
The White House Briefing Room
September 21, 1998
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT TO THE OPENING SESSION OF THE 53RD UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
(New York, New York)
____________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release September 21, 1998
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
TO THE OPENING SESSION
OF THE 53RD UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY
United Nations
New York, New York
11:13 A.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. Mr. President, Mr.
Secretary General, the delegates of this 53rd session of the General Assembly,
let me begin by thanking you for your very kind and generous welcome and by
noting that at the opening of this General Assembly the world has much to
celebrate.
Peace has come to Northern Ireland after 29 long years.
Bosnia has just held its freest elections ever. The United Nations is
actively mediating crises before they explode into war all around the world.
And today more people determine their own destiny than at any previous moment
in history.
We celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights, with those rights more widely embraced than ever before. On
every continent people are leading lives of integrity and self-respect, and a
great deal of credit for that belongs to the United Nations.
Still, as every person in this room knows, the promise of our
time is attended by perils. Global economic turmoil today threatens to
undermine confidence in free markets and democracy. Those of us who benefit
particularly from this economy have a special responsibility to do more to
minimize the turmoil and extend the benefits of global markets to all
citizens. And the United States is determined to do that.
We still are bedeviled by ethnic, racial, religious and tribal
hatreds; by the spread of weapons of mass destruction; by the almost frantic
effort of too many states to acquire such weapons; and, despite all efforts to
contain it, terrorism is not fading away with the end of the 20th century. It
is a continuing defiance of Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, which says, "Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of
person."
Here at the U.N., at international summits around the world,
and on many occasions in the United States, I have had the opportunity to
address this subject in detail, to describe what we have done, what we are
doing, and what we must yet do to combat terror. Today, I would like to talk
to you about why all nations must put the fight against terrorism at the top
of our agenda.
Obviously this is a matter of profound concern to us. In the
last 15 years our citizens have been targeted over and over again -- in
Beirut, over Lockerbie, in Saudi Arabia, at home in Oklahoma City by one of
our own citizens, and even here in New York in one of our most public
buildings, and most recently on August 7th in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam, where
Americans who devoted their lives to building bridges between
nations, people very much like all of you, died in a campaign of
hatred against the United States.
Because we are blessed to be a wealthy nation with a
powerful military and a worldwide presence active in promoting
peace and security, we are often a target. We love our country
for its dedication to political and religious freedom, to
economic opportunity, to respect for the rights of the
individual. But we know many people see us as a symbol of a
system and values they reject, and often they find it expedient
to blame us for problems with deep roots elsewhere.
But we are no threat to any peaceful nation, and we
believe the best way to disprove these claims is to continue our
work for peace and prosperity around the world. For us to pull
back from the world's trouble spots, to turn our backs on those
taking risks for peace, to weaken our own opposition to
terrorism, would hand the enemies of peace a victory they must
never have.
Still, it is a grave misconception to see terrorism
as only, or even mostly, an American problem. Indeed, it is a
clear and present danger to tolerant and open societies and
innocent people everywhere. No one in this room, nor the people
you represent, are immune.
Certainly not the people of Nairobi and Dar es
Salaam. For every American killed there, roughly 20 Africans
were murdered and 500 more injured -- innocent people going about
their business on a busy morning. Not the people of Omagh in
Northern Ireland, where the wounded and killed were Catholics and
Protestants alike, mostly children and women, and two of them
pregnant, people out shopping together, when their future was
snuffed out by a fringe group clinging to the past.
Not the people of Japan who were poisoned by sarin
gas in the Tokyo subway. Not the people of Argentina who died
when a car bomb decimated a Jewish community center in Buenos
Aires. Not the people of Kashmir and Sri Lanka killed by ancient
animosities that cry out for resolution. Not the Palestinians
and Israelis who still die year after year for all the progress
toward peace. Not the people of Algeria enduring the nightmare
of unfathomable terror with still no end in sight. Not the
people of Egypt, who nearly lost a second President to
assassination. Not the people of Turkey, Colombia, Albania,
Russia, Iran, Indonesia, and countless other nations where
innocent people have been victimized by terror.
Now, none of these victims are American, but every
one was a son or a daughter, a husband or wife, a father or
mother, a human life extinguished by someone else's hatred,
leaving a circle of people whose lives will never be the same.
Terror has become the world's problem. Some argue, of course,
that the problem is overblown, saying that the number of deaths
from terrorism is comparatively small, sometimes less than the
number of people killed by lightning in a single year. I believe
that misses the point in several ways.
First, terrorism has a new face in the 1990s. Today
terrorists take advantage of greater openness and the explosion
of information and weapons technology. The new technologies of
terror and their increasing availability, along with the
increasing mobility of terrorists, raise chilling prospects of
vulnerability to chemical, biological, and other kinds of
attacks, bringing each of us into the category of possible
victim. This is a threat to all humankind.
Beyond the physical damage of each attack, there is
an even greater residue of psychological damage -- hard to
measure, but slow to heal. Every bomb, every bomb threat has an
insidious effect on free and open institutions, the kinds of
institutions all of you in this body are working so hard to
build.
Each time an innocent man or woman or child is
killed, it makes the future more hazardous for the rest of us.
For each violent act saps the confidence that is so crucial to
peace and prosperity. In every corner of the world, with the
active support of U.N. agencies, people are struggling to build
better futures, based on bonds of trust connecting them to their
fellow citizens and with partners and investors from around the
world.
The glimpse of growing prosperity in Northern
Ireland was a crucial factor in the Good Friday Agreement. But
that took confidence -- confidence that cannot be bought in times
of violence. We can measure each attack and the grisly
statistics of dead and wounded, but what are the wounds we cannot
measure?
In the Middle East, in Asia, in South America, how
many agreements have been thwarted after bombs blew up? How many
businesses will never be created in places crying out for
investments of time and money? How many talented young people in
countries represented here have turned their backs on public
service?
The question is not only how many lives have been
lost in each attack, but how many futures were lost in their
aftermath. There is no justification for killing innocents.
Ideology, religion, and politics, even deprivation and righteous
grievance do not justify it. We must seek to understand the
roiled waters in which terror occurs; of course we must.
Often, in my own experience, I have seen where peace
is making progress, terror is a desperate act to turn back the
tide of history. The Omagh bombing came as peace was succeeding
in Northern Ireland. In the Middle East, whenever we get close
to another step toward peace, its enemies respond with terror.
We must not let this stall our momentum.
The bridging of ancient hatreds is, after all, a
leap of faith, a break with the past, and thus a frightening
threat to those who cannot let go of their own hatred. Because
they fear the future, in these cases terrorists seek to blow the
peacemakers back into the past.
We must also acknowledge that there are economic
sources of this rage as well. Poverty, inequality, masses of
disenfranchised young people are fertile fields for the siren
call of the terrorists and their claims of advancing social
justice. But depravation cannot justify destruction, nor can
inequity ever atone for murder. The killing of innocents is not
a social program.
Nevertheless, our resolute opposition to terrorism
does not mean we can ever be indifferent to the conditions that
foster it. The most recent U.N. human development report
suggests the gulf is widening between the world's haves and
have-nots. We must work harder to treat the sources of despair
before they turn into the poison of hatred. Dr. Martin Luther
King once wrote that the only revolutionary is a man who has
nothing to lose. We must show people they have everything to
gain by embracing cooperation and renouncing violence. This is
not simply an American or a Western responsibility; it is the
world's responsibility.
Developing nations have an obligation to spread new
wealth fairly, to create new opportunities, to build new open
economies. Developed nations have an obligation to help
developing nations stay on the path of prosperity and -- and --to
spur global economic growth. A week ago I outlined ways we can
build a stronger international economy to benefit not only all
nations, but all citizens within them.
Some people believe that terrorism's principal fault
line centers on what they see as an inevitable clash of
civilizations. It is an issue that deserves a lot of debate in
this great hall. Specifically, many believe there is an
inevitable clash between Western civilization and Western values,
and Islamic civilizations and values. I believe this view is
terribly wrong. False prophets may use and abuse any religion to
justify whatever political objectives they have -- even
cold-blooded murder. Some may have the world believe that
almighty God himself, the merciful, grants a license to kill.
But that is not our understanding of Islam.
A quarter of the world's population is Muslim --
from Africa to Middle East to Asia and to the United States,
where Islam is one of our fastest growing faiths. There are over
1,200 mosques and Islamic centers in the United States, and the
number is rapidly increasing. The 6 million Americans who
worship there will tell you there is no inherent clash between
Islam and America. Americans respect and honor Islam.
As I talked to Muslim leaders in my country and
around the world, I see again that we share the same hopes and
aspirations: to live in peace and security, to provide for our
children, to follow the faith of our choosing, to build a better
life than our parents knew and pass on brighter possibilities to
our own children. Of course, we are not identical. There are
important differences that cross race and culture and religion
which demand understanding and deserve respect.
But every river has a crossing place. Even as we
struggle here in America, like the United Nations, to reconcile
all Americans to each other and to find greater unity in our
increasing diversity, we will remain on a course of friendship
and respect for the Muslim world. We will continue to look for
common values, common interests, and common endeavors. I agree
very much with the spirit expressed by these words of Mohammed:
rewards for prayers by people assembled together are twice those
said at home.
When it comes to terrorism there should be no
dividing line between Muslims and Jews, Protestants and
Catholics, Serbs and Albanians, developed societies and emerging
countries. The only dividing line is between those who practice,
support, or tolerate terror, and those who understand that it is
murder, plain and simple.
If terrorism is at the top of the American agenda --
and should be at the top of the world's agenda -- what, then, are
the concrete steps we can take together to protect our common
destiny. What are our common obligations? At least, I believe
they are these: to give terrorists no support, no sanctuary, no
financial assistance; to bring pressure on states that do; to act
together to step up extradition and prosecution; to sign the
Global Anti-Terror Conventions; to strengthen the Biological
Weapons and Chemical Convention; to enforce the Chemical Weapons
Convention; to promote stronger domestic laws and control the
manufacture and export of explosives; to raise international
standards for airport security; to combat the conditions that
spread violence and despair.
We are working to do our part. Our intelligence and
law enforcement communities are tracking terrorist networks in
cooperation with other governments. Some of those we believe
responsible for the recent bombing of our embassies have been
brought to justice. Early this week I will ask our Congress to
provide emergency funding to repair our embassies, to improve
security, to expand the worldwide fight against terrorism, to
help our friends in Kenya and Tanzania with the wounds they have
suffered.
But no matter how much each of us does alone, our
progress will be limited without our common efforts. We also
will do our part to address the sources of despair and alienation
through the Agency for International Development in Africa, in
Asia, in Latin America, in Eastern Europe, in Haiti and
elsewhere. We will continue our strong support for the U.N.
Development Program, the U.N. High Commissioners for Human Rights
and Refugees, UNICEF, the World Bank, the World Food Program.
We also recognize the critical role these agencies
play and the importance of all countries, including the United
States, in paying their fair share.
In closing, let me urge all of us to think in new
terms on terrorism, to see it not as a clash of cultures or
political action by other means, or a divine calling, but a clash
between the forces of the past and the forces of the future,
between those who tear down and those who build up, between hope
and fear, chaos and community.
The fight will not be easy. But every nation will
be strengthened in joining it, in working to give real meaning to
the words of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights we signed
50 years ago. It is very, very important that we do this
together.
Eleanor Roosevelt was one of the authors of the
Universal Declaration. She said in one of her many speeches in
support of the United Nations, when it was just beginning, "All
agreements and all peace are built on confidence. You cannot
have peace and you cannot get on with other people in the world
unless you have confidence in them."
It is not necessary that we solve all the world's
problems to have confidence in one another. It is not necessary
that we agree on all the world's issues to have confidence in one
another. It is not even necessary that we understand every
single difference among us to have confidence in one another.
But it is necessary that we affirm our belief in the primacy of
the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, and, therefore, that
together we say terror is not a way to tomorrow, it is only a
throwback to yesterday. And together -- together -- we can meet
it and overcome its threats, its injuries, and its fears with
confidence.
Thank you very much. (Applause.)
END 11:37 A.M. EDT