ACCESSION NUMBER:00000 FILE ID:96050902.tgi DATE:05/09/96 TITLE:09-05-96 PARTISAN SPARRING AT CONGRESSIONAL HEARING ON NARCOTICS TEXT: (Administration priorities opposed by Republicans) (720) By Jerry Stilkind USIA Staff Writer Washington -- President Clinton has proposed a record-high $15,000 million budget to fight the spread of illegal drugs but his congressional opponents are challenging the strategy and priorities he has planned for the battle. In this presidential and congressional election year, few government programs escape the careful scrutiny of President Clinton and his Democratic party and the leadership of the Republican party, which controls both parts of Congress. Both sides agree that fighting drugs is one of the most important issues facing the country. They do not agree on how to do it and whether the problem is dramatically worsening. The budget proposed by President Clinton for the fiscal year beginning October 1 is 9.3 percent higher than the current one. The largest item in the proposed budget, as it was in this year's, is $2,900 million for treatment programs that help addicts break their dependence on drugs. Representative Bill Zeliff, chairman of the Subcommittee on National Security, Committee on Government Reform and Oversight in the House of Representatives, took aim at this priority when General (Retired) Barry McCaffrey, director of the White House drug office, appeared before the subcommittee May 8. "The sad truth is that this president still seems to think that treating the wounded is the way to win this war...," Zeliff said at the opening of the hearing into the administration's 1996 drug control strategy plan. He called for shifting priorities to several other programs in the proposed budget -- U.S. and international efforts to reduce illegal drug crops in Latin America and Asia; tightening controls at U.S. borders to stop drugs from entering the country; and education and other measures that would help prevent youngsters from starting to use narcotics. "We have a major policy failure," Zeliff charged. McCaffrey replied that the crop destruction and interdiction programs could use some more money but pointed out that the proposed budget was a "dramatic" increase over current spending. Nevertheless, it is a "lean budget" that meets today's realities, he said. He defended the emphasis on treating drug offenders by saying that almost 1.5 million are arrested a year for narcotics violations by local, state and federal officers at a cost of thousands of millions dollars to taxpayers. He estimated that the social costs of drug use -- imprisonment, policing, robberies, hospital treatment, related health problems such as AIDS -- has been $67,000 million a year since 1990. The number of drug users has dropped to 12 million from a high of 24 million in 1979, which led McCaffrey to argue that treating the addiction of this declining population would, if successful, dramatically decrease the societal costs of illegal narcotics. Some treatment programs have a good success rate, he said. McCaffrey said one of his priorities in the coming year was to study which treatment programs do work and promised the subcommittee he would report back to it with that information. But, he conceded that drug use among teenagers, particularly marijuana, has risen the past few years. Almost 1.5 million high school seniors (17-year-olds) will abuse drugs monthly by the year 2000 if the current rate of increase continues among youngsters. More will de done to educate and prevent youngsters about the hazards of drug use, he told the subcommittee. That is the number one goal of the president's budget, he said. Zeliff argued that the rise in abuse by youngsters shows that the narcotics problem is getting worse in the United States and that the administration's strategy needs to be drastically revised. As for reemphasizing the use of military planes and ships to stop the smuggling of narcotics, McCaffrey said that strategy would not work as well now as it did just a few years ago because the drug lords are using different tactics. About 70 percent of the cocaine from South America now is being carried over the Mexican border into the United States, he said. "They're not flying drugs from Colombia to South Florida. That ain't the game. So the easy pickings are over.... The payoff in interdiction in the future is more likely to be smart intelligence than it is ships on station and flying hours," he said. NNNN