National Security Analysis Issue Area Plan--Fiscal Years 1996-98
(Letter
Report, 05/01/96, GAO/IAP-96-4)
GAO provided information on its national security analysis issue area
plan, focusing on the: (1) military services' roles and functions and
how they can best be accomplished; (2) effectiveness and affordability
of the Department of Defense's (DOD) planned force structure; (3) extent
to which planned defense budgets are affordable and consistent with
national security priorities; and (4) extent to which the intelligence
community is adequately addressing the change in threat and new
requirements.
GAO plans to: (1) evaluate the changing DOD role in carrying out new
missions, the sizes of the active and reserve forces, the affordability
of proposed DOD programs, and the accuracy of intelligence estimates
used to support force structure and weapons acquisitions; (2) assess the
DOD system for identifying needed changes in service roles and
functions, DOD requirements for nuclear forces, alternative force
structure options, whether the DOD financial plan and budget match its
priorities, and the role of intelligence agencies in supporting new
missions; (3) identify opportunities for greater specialization or
consolidation of key combat functions; (4) determine whether military
forces are properly shaped to support warfighting requirements, whether
DOD budgets are based on accurate data and realistic assumptions, and
whether unnecessary duplication exists between intelligence
organizations and programs; and (5) analyze the options for meeting
requirements for forward presence.
--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------
REPORTNUM: IAP-96-4
TITLE: National Security Analysis Issue Area Plan--Fiscal Years
1996-98
DATE: 05/01/96
SUBJECT: Defense cost control
Strategic forces
Strategic planning
Defense budgets
Defense capabilities
Military intelligence operations
Defense contingency planning
National defense operations
Military forces
Combat readiness
IDENTIFIER: DOD Future Years Defense Program
******************************************************************
** This file contains an ASCII representation of the text of a **
** GAO report. Delineations within the text indicating chapter **
** titles, headings, and bullets are preserved. Major **
** divisions and subdivisions of the text, such as Chapters, **
** Sections, and Appendixes, are identified by double and **
** single lines. The numbers on the right end of these lines **
** indicate the position of each of the subsections in the **
** document outline. These numbers do NOT correspond with the **
** page numbers of the printed product. **
** **
** No attempt has been made to display graphic images, although **
** figure captions are reproduced. Tables are included, but **
** may not resemble those in the printed version. **
** **
** Please see the PDF (Portable Document Format) file, when **
** available, for a complete electronic file of the printed **
** document's contents. **
** **
** A printed copy of this report may be obtained from the GAO **
** Document Distribution Center. For further details, please **
** send an e-mail message to: **
** **
** <info@www.gao.gov> **
** **
** with the message 'info' in the body. **
******************************************************************
Cover
================================================================ COVER
National Security and International Affairs Division
May 1996
NATIONAL SECURITY ANALYSIS ISSUE
AREA PLAN - FISCAL YEARS 1996-98
GAO/IAP-96-4
Abbreviations
=============================================================== ABBREV
FOREWORD
============================================================ Chapter 0
As the investigative arm of Congress and the nation's auditor, the
General Accounting Office is charged with following the federal
dollar wherever it goes. Reflecting stringent standards of
objectivity and independence, GAO's audits, evaluations, and
investigations promote a more efficient and cost-effective
government; expose waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement in federal
programs; help Congress target budget reductions; assess financial
information management; and alert Congress to developing trends that
may have significant fiscal or budgetary consequences. In fulfilling
its responsibilities, GAO performs original research and uses
hundreds of databases or creates its own when information is
unavailable elsewhere.
To ensure that GAO's resources are directed toward the most important
issues facing Congress, each of GAO's 35 issue areas develops a
strategic plan that describes the significance of the issues it
addresses, its objectives, and the focus of its work. Each issue
area relies heavily on input from congressional committees, agency
officials, and subject-matter experts in developing its strategic
plan.
The National Security Analysis issue area covers programs of the
Department of Defense (DOD), the individual military services, and
other supporting defense agencies. GAO's work in the National
Security Analysis issue area focuses on roles and functions of the
military services, force structure, budget and affordability, and the
activities of the intelligence community. The principal issues we
cover are the following:
-- the military services' roles and functions and how they can best
be accomplished,
-- the effectiveness and affordability of DOD's planned force
structure,
-- the extent to which planned defense budgets are affordable and
consistent with national security priorities, and
-- the extent to which the intelligence community is adequately
addressing the changed threat and new requirements.
Our planned work will emphasize the issues of force structure and
budget and affordability. In the pages that follow, we describe our
key planned work.
Because events may significantly affect even the best of plans, our
process allows for updating the plan and provides the flexibility to
respond quickly to emerging issues. If you have any questions or
suggestions about this plan, please call me at (202) 512-3504.
Richard Davis
Director
National Security Analysis
CONTENTS
============================================================ Chapter 1
FOREWORD
---------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 1:1
1
TABLE I: KEY ISSUES
---------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 1:2
4
TABLE II: PLANNED MAJOR WORK
---------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 1:3
6
TABLE III: GAO CONTACTS
---------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 1:4
7
TABLE I: KEY ISSUES
=========================================================== Appendix 2
Issue Significance
---------------------------- --------------------------------------------------
Roles and functions: What During the Cold War, the services spent billions
roles and functions should of dollars developing costly, overlapping
U.S. military forces fulfill capabilities. Efforts to reduce or eliminate
and how can they best be overlapping capabilities are becoming more
accomplished? important as DOD seeks to identify funds that can
be shifted to support force modernization.
Force structure: Are DOD's The Congress continues to be concerned about the
restructuring plans likely adequacy of DOD's planned force structure. There
to produce an affordable and is likely to be a major reassessment of the
effective force? nation's national security strategy and military
needs in 1997.
Budget and affordability: There is a widespread concern in the Congress that
Are budgets for national planned defense budgets are inadequate to support
security programs affordable the planned military force and that defense
and consistent with security budgets may be insufficient to fund planned
priorities? modernization.
Intelligence: Is the U.S. The United States spends tens of billions of
intelligence community dollars each year on intelligence programs, most
adequately addressing the of which were developed during the Cold War years.
changed threat and new The intelligence community is undergoing major
requirements? changes under its new director.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Objectives Focus of work
---------------------------- --------------------------------------------------
Evaluate the changing role Opportunities to better adapt air power to the
of U.S. forces in carrying changing national security environment within
out new missions. reduced defense budgets
Assess DOD's process for Implementation of the recommendations on roles
identifying needed changes and functions made by the Commission on Roles and
in service roles and Missions and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
functions.
Identify opportunities for
greater specialization or
consolidation of key combat
functions.
Assess whether the force Composition of active forces
structure is properly shaped
to support warfighting Size and role of reserve forces
requirements.
DOD's forward presence requirements
Assess the active/reserve
force mix. Future U.S. nuclear posture
Evaluate options for
meeting changing
requirements for forward
presence.
Assess DOD's requirements
for nuclear forces and
evaluate alternative force
structure options.
Evaluate affordability of Affordability of defense programs within planned
DOD's proposed programs. defense budgets
Assess whether DOD's Budgetary analysis of infrastructure,
budgets are based on personnel, and operation and maintenance accounts
accurate data and realistic
assumptions. Comparison of spending plans, military
deficiencies, and stated defense priorities
Assess whether DOD's
financial plan and budget
execution match its
priorities.
Determine whether Consistency of force structure and weapons needs
unnecessary duplication with threat estimates
exists between intelligence
organizations and programs. Intelligence support for peace operations
Evaluate the accuracy of
intelligence estimates used
to support force structure
and weapon acquisitions.
Assess the role of
intelligence agencies in
supporting new missions.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE II: PLANNED MAJOR WORK
=========================================================== Appendix 3
Issue Planned major job starts
------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
Roles and functions Capping report encompassing the results of our six
comprehensive cross-service reviews of combat air
power to offer opportunities for improved matching of
assets to requirements
Evaluations of selected DOD reviews stemming from
the Commission on Roles and Missions report
Force structure Review of alternatives for providing overseas
presence\a
Individual reviews of Air Force, Army, and Navy
planned distribution of personnel among combat,
support, and other activities\a
Assessment of the savings in force structure that
might be achieved by introducing selected
technological innovations
Evaluation of how DOD uses computer modeling in
assessing the adequacy of force structure
Adequacy of current force structure to support the
deployment of forces to implement the Bosnia peace
accord
Evaluation of an anticipated reevaluation of the
National Security and Military Strategies
Budget and Analysis of infrastructure costs in the Future
affordability Years Defense Program\a
Compilation and costing of GAO options for reducing
DOD's infrastructure\a
Comparison of fiscal years 1996 and 1997 Future
Years Defense Programs
Continuing analysis of costs and funding to conduct
peace operations\a
Analysis of selected appropriations accounts
(operation and maintenance, military personnel,
research and development)
Intelligence Reviews of selected intelligence programs as
congressional interests dictate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a Ongoing jobs
TABLE III: GAO CONTACTS
============================================================ Chapter 4
DIRECTOR
-------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 4:0.1
Richard Davis (202) 512-3504
ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR
-------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 4:0.2
Carol R. Schuster (202) 512-3966
ASSISTANT DIRECTORS
-------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 4:0.3
Marvin E. Casterline
Fred Dziadek
Richard J. Herley
Robert Pelletier
Sharon L. Pickup
Steven H. Sternlieb
Janet A. St. Laurent
Gary K. Weeter
*** End of document. ***