Corrected copy of ESC REGULATION 67-4

AIAI23-203

AIR INTELLIGENCE AGENCY INSTRUCTION 23-203

11 JULY 1980

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HQ AIR INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

Supply

ESC COMMAND EQUIPMENT REVIEW AND AUTHORIZATION ACTIVITY

This regulation prescribes procedures for the HQ ESC Equipment Review and Authorization Activity as required by AFM 67-1, Volume IV, Part One.This regulation applies to HQ ESC major staff offices only.

Corrected copy of ESC REGULATION 67-4.

This revision corrects the distribution list and updates the checklist for evaluating equipment allowance and authorization requests from ESC organizations.

Supersedes USAFSSR 67-4, 28 November 1975.

HQ ESC/LGS

MSgt J. A Campbell

HQ ESC/LG

Jack W. Conaway

M; X: AUL/SE (1); IG, Norton (1)

1. Responsibilities.When requested, HQ ESC major staff offices will provide technical assistance for evaluating ESC organization equipment allowance or authorization requests.

2. Procedures:

2.1. The ESC Command Equipment Management Office (CEMO) will review each table of allowance change request and special allowance request received from ESC organizations for applicability of allowance source codes and adequacy of justification.If required, CEMO will forward the request to the appropriate major staff office for evaluation of the requirement.

2.2. Major staff offices having primary interest for the requested item will:

2.2.1. Thoroughly evaluate each allowance or authorization request received using (as a minimum) the checklist in attachment 1.

2.2.2. Complete evaluation of each change request in 7 calendar days.If an evaluation cannot be completed in this time, send the CEMO (LGSE) an interim reply.

2.2.3. Upon completing each evaluation, forward recommendations and comments to the CEMO for validation of the requirements.

WILLIAM R. CARROLL

Lt Col, USAF

Director of Administration

CHECKLIST FOR EVALUATING EQUIPMENT ALLOWANCE AND AUTHORIZATION REQUESTS FROM ESC ORGANIZATIONS

A1.1. Consider the following items in evaluating each equipment allowance or authorization request and add as appropriate:

A1.1.1. Effect on personnel required to use and maintain the requested equipment (new training, calibration requirements, ancillary equipments requirements, expendables; such as tape and paper or unique storage or safety features).

A1.1.2. Impact on mission programming (master program).

A1.1.3. Impact on organization manpower and functional alinement.

A1.1.4. Whether the item requested can be used in similar organizations.

A1.1.5. Degree of suitability of a similar item contained in current documents or joint use with another shop oroffice.

A1.1.6. Why the item is required.Explain its use and the specific reason it is needed.In requests for test equipment, identify the end item to be supported by model, nomenclature, national stock number (NSN), etcetera.

A1.1.7. Who will use it? Provide the section title, functional code, and AFSCs.

A1.1.8. Why the total number requested including present assets.

A1.1.9. What the workload volume is and the frequency of use.

A1.1.10. What is currently being used to perform the functions for which the equipment change is requested.

A1.1.11. References to related AF publications, technical orders, provisioning lists, and tasking directives. Give specific paragraphs, title, and date of the document.

A1.1.12. Whether there will be any savings in manpower, time, money, or materials.

A1.1.13. A new or recommended basis of issue if other than that stated on the request.

A1.1.14. Any other information useful to CEMO in validating the request.

A1.2. Make evaluations unclassified whenever possible.If classification cannot be avoided, do not make it higher than Secret.