COMNAVRESINTCOMINST 1650.4B
02
24 October 1996
COMNAVRESINTCOM INSTRUCTION 1650.4B
Subj: AWARDS AND RECOGNITION PROGRAM
Ref: (a) SECNAVINST 1650.1F
(b) COMNAVRESFORINST 1650.1F
1. Purpose. To inform Reserve
Intelligence Area Commanders (RIACs), Naval Reserve Intelligence
Program (NRIP) unit commanding officers, and all NRIP components
of the Awards and Recognition Program, and to standardize award
and recognition procedures at COMNAVRESINTCOM and within the NRIP.
2. Cancellation. COMNAVRESINTCOMINST
1650.4A
3. Background. References (a)
and (b) provide information and regulations on awards available
to individuals and units of the Naval Service and Naval Reserve.
In addition to the above awards, COMNAVRESINTCOM has established
several awards unique to the NRIP, while some private associations
also offer awards to reservists. This instruction seeks to simplify
and clarify eligibility, selection criteria, and nomination procedures
for the various awards.
4. Method. This instruction requires
use of higher level directives as appropriate. Command guidance
is given only for clarification or for command-unique awards.
5. Action. All RIACs and unit
COs make award nominations per the guidance herein.
6. Forms. OPNAV 1650/3, "Personal
Award Recommendation," is available through the Navy Supply
System. An electronic version of this form can be found on the
main AIMS menu or downloaded from COMNAVRESINTCOM Homepage on
the Internet. COMNAVRESINTCOM 1650/3 (Rev. 8/96) "NRIP SOQ/SSOQ/BJOY
Nomination Information" is stocked at COMNAVRESINTCOM. It
can be obtained by submitting a memorandum to COMNAVRESINTCOM
(Code 21).
7. Reports. The reporting requirements for NRIP Naval Reserve Sailor of the Year (SOY), NRIP Naval Reserve Bluejacket of the Year, NAVRESINTCOM Active Duty Sailor of the Quarter (SSOQ), RIA Sailor of the Quarter, NAVRESINTCOM Shore Sailor of the Year (SSOY), NAVRESINTCOM Junior Officer of the Year (JOY),
IS1 Michael R. Wagner Award for Outstanding
Naval Reserve Intelligence Program(Active Duty) Intelligence Specialist,
CDR Joe Makoski Award for Outstanding Reserve Intelligence Program
Officer (RIPO),NAVRESINTCOM Naval Intelligence Reserve Analyst of
the Year Award, NAVRESINTCOM Civilian of the Year Award,
Captain George A. O'Connell, Jr.,Outstanding
Naval Reserve Intelligence Program Unit of the Year Award, and
Admiral Martin J. Andrews Award are exempt from reports control
by SECNAVINST 5214.2B.
B. V. MORTON
Deputy
Distribution: (refer to COMNAVRESINTCOMINST 5216.1K)
Lists I through III
LOCATOR CROSS-REFERENCE SHEET
Subj: AWARDS AND RECOGNITION PROGRAM
MANUAL
See:
(Recipient enter information as to where
this instruction is maintained)
This guide will be maintained up-to-date
by the issuance of changes or advanced changes. Changes shall
be inserted upon receipt and a record of such changes will be
made in the spaces provided.
Change Number | Date of Change | Date Entered | By Whom Entered |
REFERENCES
(a) SECNAVINST 1650.1F
Subj: NAVY AND MARINE CORPS AWARDS MANUAL
(b) COMNAVRESFORINST 1650.1F
Subj: POLICY AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING
THE NAVY DECORATIONS AND AWARDS PROGRAM WITHIN THE NAVAL
RESERVE
(c) OPNAVINST 1700.10E
Subj: SAILOR OF THE YEAR (SOY) PROGRAM
(d) COMNAVRESFORINST 1700.1D
Subj: SAILOR OF THE YEAR (SOY) PROGRAM
(e) COMNAVRESFORINST 1650.3D
Subj: RESERVE OFFICER ASSOCIATION (ROA)
"OUTSTANDING NAVAL RESERVE JUNIOR OFFICER AWARD"
(f) COMNAVRESFOR NEW ORLEANS LA MSG 181400Z
Feb 92
Subj: NAVAL RESERVE ASSOCIATION OUTSTANDING
JUNIOR OFFICER OF THE YEAR
(g) OPNAVNOTE 1650
Subj: NEW SERVICE RIBBONS
(h) OPNAVNOTE 1700
Subj: NAVAL SHORE ACTIVITIES 199X SAILOR
OF THE YEAR PROGRAM
(i) CNO WASHINGTON DC MSG 141646Z Nov
89 (NAVOP 135/89)
Subj: CHANGES TO NAVY MARINE CORPS ACHIEVEMENT
MEDAL (NAM), NAVAL RESERVE SEA SERVICE RIBBON (NRSSR), AND OVERSEAS
SERVICE RIBBON (OSR)
(h) CCPONOLAINST 12000.1A of 15 Apr 82
Subj: CIVILIAN PERSONNEL POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES MANUAL (NOTAL)
TABLE OF CONTENTSChapter 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1Section 1. Purpose 1-1Section 2. Authority 1-1Section 3. Scope 1-1Section 4. Responsibility 1-2Section 5. Administrative Processing 1-3Chapter 2. RECURRING AWARDS 2-1Section 1. RIP Naval Reserve Sailor of the Year (SOY) 2-1Section 2. NRIP Naval Reserve Bluejacket of the Year 2-3Section 3. NAVRESINTCOM Active Duty Sailor of the Quarter (SSOQ) 2-5Section 4. RIA Sailor of the Quarter 2-7Section 5. NAVRESINTCOM Shore Sailor of the Year (SSOY) 2-8Section 6. NAVRESINTCOM Junior Officer of the Year (JOY) 2-10Section 7. IS1 Michael R. Wagner Award forOutstanding Naval Reserve IntelligenceProgram (Active Duty) Intellignce Specialist 2-14Section 8. CDR Joe Makoski Award for OutstandingReserve Intelligence Program Officer(RIPO) 2-16Section 9. NAVRESINTCOM Civilian of the Year Award 2-19Section 10. Captain George A. O'Connell, Jr.,Outstanding Naval Reserve Intelligence Program Unit of the Year Award 2-21Section 11. Admiral Martin J. Andrews Award 2-23Chapter 3. INDIVIDUAL MILITARY PERSONAL DECORATIONS 3-1Section 1. General Information 3-1Section 2. Meritorious Service Medal 3-12Section 3. Navy Marine Corps Commendation Medal 3-13Section 4. Navy Marine Corps Achievement Medal 3-15Chapter 4. INDIVIDUAL SERVICE AWARDS 4-1Section 1. Naval Reserve Meritorious Service Medal 4-1Section 2. Armed Forces Reserve Medal 4-1Section 3. Navy and Marine Corps Overseas Service Ribbon 4-1Section 4. Military Outstanding Volunteer ServiceMedal 4-3Section 5. Other Awards 4-3Chapter 5. LETTERS OF COMMENDATION AND APPRECIATION 5-1Section 1. Letter of Commendation (LOC) 5-1Section 2. Letter of Appreciation (LOA) 5-2Section 3. Letter of Appreciation (LOA) to Employers and Spouses of Naval Reservists 5-3Chapter 6. AWARDS FOR EMPLOYERS 6-1Section 1. National Committee for Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve 6-1Chapter 7. PROMOTION AND ADVANCEMENT LETTERS 7-1Section 1. Promotion and Advancement Letters 7-1Chapter 8. PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION PROGRAMS 8-1Section 1. Master Training Specialist RecognitionProgram 8-1Appendix A. SAILOR OF THE YEAR SAMPLE NOMINATION FORMAT A-1Appendix B. SAILOR OF THE YEAR SAMPLE ENDORSEMENT(FOR RIAC NOMINEE ONLY) B-1Appendix C. NRIP BLUEJACKET OF THE YEAR ABBREVIATEDSAMPLE NOMINATION FORMAT . . . . . . . . . . C-1Appendix D. NRIP SOQ/SSOQ/BJOY SAILOR OF THE QUARTER NOMINATION INFORMATION COMNAVRESINTCOM 1650/3 (Rev. 8-96) D-1Appendix E. JUNIOR OFFICER OF THE YEAR SAMPLE NOMINATION FORMAT E-1Appendix F. SAMPLE OFFICER MERITORIOUS SERVICE MEDAL SUMMARY OF ACTION AND CITATION F-1Appendix G. SAMPLE ENLISTED MERITORIOUS SERVICE MEDAL SUMMARY OF ACTION AND CITATION G-1Appendix H. SAMPLE OFFICER SUMMARY OF ACTION ANDCITATION NAVY MARINE CORPS COMMENDATIONMEDAL H-1Appendix I. SAMPLE ENLISTED SUMMARY OF ACTION NAVYMARINE CORPS COMMENDATION MEDAL I-1Appendix J. SAMPLE OFFICER SUMMARY OF ACTION ANDCITATION NAVY MARINE CORPS ACHIEVEMENTMEDAL J-1Appendix K. SAMPLE ENLISTED SUMMARY OF ACTION ANDCITATION NAVY MARINE CORPS ACHIEVEMENTMEDAL K-1Appendix L. SAMPLE LETTER AWARDING MILITARY OUTSTANDING VOLUNTEER SERVICE MEDAL L-1Appendix M. SAMPLE OFFICER SUMMARY OF ACTION AND CITATION FOR A LETTER OF COMMENDATION M-1Appendix N. SAMPLE ENLISTED SUMMARY OF ACTION ANDCITATION FOR A LETTER OF COMMENDATION N-1Appendix O. SAMPLE RETIREMENT LETTER OF APPRECIATION O-1Appendix P. SAMPLE CIVILIAN LETTER OF APPRECIATION P-1Appendix Q. SAMPLE LETTER OF APPRECIATION TO SPOUSE Q-1Appendix R. SAMPLE LETTER OF APPRECIATION TO EMPLOYER R-1Appendix S. MASTER TRAINING SPECIALIST RECOGNITION PROGRAM SAMPLE NOMINATION LETTER S-1
Chapter 1. INTRODUCTIONChapter 1. INTRODUCTION
Section 1. PurposeSection 1. Purpose
It is Commander, Naval Reserve Intelligence
Command (COMNAVRESINTCOM) policy to publicly recognize deserving
personnel within NAVRESINTCOM and the Naval Reserve Intelligence
Program (NRIP). To this end, this manual institutes the COMNAVRESINTCOM
"Awards and Recognition Program". This document complements,
but does not replace, the references listed on page iii. It addresses
only the most common awards and recognition devices used within
NAVRESINTCOM and the NRIP. Each reference should be reviewed
for other awards not addressed in this manual. Further, it provides
guidance in simplifying and reducing the necessary paperwork for
Reserve Intelligence Area Commanders (RIACs) and NRIP unit commanding
officers.
Section 2. AuthoritySection 2. Authority
Military awards serve to publicly recognize
and reward extraordinary, exceptionally meritorious achievement
or service, or conspicuous acts of gallantry, or heroism. Timely
submission, evaluation and public presentation of such awards
is essential. References (a) and (b) provide Navy policy and
procedures on awards. Reference (a) delegates to COMNAVRESINTCOM,
as the "first flag officer in the Chain of Command,"
the authority to award the Navy and Marine Corps Commendation
Medal, the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal, and the Military
Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal to NAVRESINTCOM (except personal
staff) and NRIP personnel. There are no quotas which apply to
the NAVRESINTCOM awards program.
Section 3. ScopeSection 3. Scope
This Awards and Recognition Program implements
references (a) and (b) for NAVRESINTCOM and the NRIP. Additionally,
the Program provides for the nomination, selection and recognition
of certain recurring NAVRESINTCOM awards. They are: NAVRESINTCOM
Sailor of the Year, Bluejacket of the Year, Shore Sailor of the
Year, Shore Sailor of the Quarter, Reserve Intelligence Area (RIA)
Reserve Sailor of the Quarter, and Junior Officer of the Year
awards (references (c) through (h)). Further, the Program incorporates
NRIP-specific awards and individual recognition:
a. IS1 Michael R. Wagner Award for Outstanding
Naval Reserve Intelligence Specialist;
b. LCDR Joe Makoski Award for Outstanding
Junior Reserve Intelligence Program Officer (RIPO);
c. NAVRESINTCOM Civilian of the Year (COY) Award;
d. Captain George A. O'Connell, Jr.,
Outstanding Naval Reserve Intelligence Program Unit of the Year
Award;
e. Admiral Martin J. Andrews Award.
Specific instructions and guidance for
these awards are contained herein.
Section 4. ResponsibilitySection 4. Responsibility
1. NAVRESINTCOM Awards Board implements
the Awards and Recognition Program. Board members perform the
following tasks:
a. Review award recommendations received
from Reserve Intelligence Area Commanders (RIACs).
b. Preserve the character and meaning
of awards and personal decorations by judicious interpretation
of the distinction between "normal performance" and
"exceptionally meritorious performance".
c. Recommend approval of the proposed
award, approval of a lower award or disapproval of award nominations
to COMNAVRESINTCOM.
2. Deputy Chief of Staff, Administration,
is overall Awards and Recognition Program Coordinator and Sponsor:
a. Screens all award recommendations
for format and technical compliance with directives, and provides
background information to the Awards Board.
b. Maintains applicable files and processes
NAVRESINTCOM approved awards.
c. Reviews the performance of each RIAC
in carrying out this program.
3. Reserve Intelligence Area Commanders
will institute, within their Reserve Intelligence Areas (RIAs),
an Awards and Recognition Program which will:
a. Establish an "Awards Board".
b. Make awards information available
to all RIA unit commanding officers.
c. Establish intra-RIA procedures for
local recognition of outstanding performance.
d. Actively seek out and recognize eligible
and deserving RIA units and personnel for award consideration.
e. Ensure that submissions for all recurring
awards described herein are scheduled in the RIA planning calendar
and are submitted in accordance with applicable directives.
4. NRIP Unit Commanding Officers: Each
NRIP Unit Commanding Officer will:
a. Actively seek out and recommend eligible
and deserving individuals for recognition.
b. Recognize awardees and retirees at
appropriate ceremonies. A Letter of Appreciation from COMNAVRESINTCOM
shall be requested for each retiring member.
Section 5. Administrative ProcessingSection 5. Administrative Processing
1. Within the NRIP, award recommendations
for individuals should be generated by unit commanding officers.
Award recommendations for unit commanding officers should be
generated by RIACs. Unit nominations should be originated by
the gaining command and recommended by the RIAC. If the originator
of an individual recommendation is not the unit commanding officer,
the recommendation must be forwarded to the individual's commanding
officer for endorsement except when otherwise allowed by this
directive. Recommendations are forwarded via the chain of command
to the specific final awarding authority as specified in references
(a) through (g), (i), (h and this manual.
2. Letters of Commendation (LOCs), while
part of the COMNAVRESINTCOM Recognition Program, are not personal
awards as set forth in reference (a). Because LOCs are an important
means of recognizing NRIP personnel, directions for their processing
are included in this instruction. However, issuing an LOC for
specific actions during a specific time frame does not preclude
approving a future personal award based on those same actions
during that same time frame.
3. Do not nominate active duty staff
members for mid-tour personal award recommendations. While routine
end-of-tour awards are not part of the awards system, recommendations
for deserving active duty personnel should be held until near
the end of the tour so as to provide the most appropriate recognition
for the entire tour. Nominations of mid-tour letters of commendation
for active duty enlisted will be considered when appropriate to
provide mid-tour recognition.
4. Unit-generated PARs will be screened by the RIA staff member responsible for awards to evaluate the appropriate level of award and assess technical compliance with applicable directives. When RIA quality control is complete, the PAR will be assigned a RIA control number (see Chapter 3) and presented to the RIAC for signature. RIACs shall institute procedures so that all awards are processed in a timely manner, normally less than 60 days. This shall be a RIAC evaluation item.
|
Award | Eligible |
|
RIA Subm Required |
Announcement Date | Due Date to Next Echelon |
|
|
BJOY |
| 01 Feb | N | 15 Feb | N | LOC |
|
|
| ||||
SSOY | Act Duty E4 - E6 | 30 Jan | N | 15 Feb | 15 Mar | NMCAM |
NRSOY | SelRes E4 - E6 | 30 Jan | Y | 15 Mar | 1 Apr | NMCAM |
SelRes JOY | 01 - 04 W2 - W3 | 30 Sep | Y | 15 Mar |
| NMCCM |
NRIP Unit | 01 Sep | N | Mgt Conf ( Nov ) | N | N/A | |
| RIPO 01 - 04 | 01 Sep | N | Mgt Conf ( Nov ) | NONE (Incl. in End-of-Tour) | |
Wagner |
| 01 Sep | N | Mgt Conf ( Nov ) | N | NONE (Incl. in End-of-Tour) |
Master Training Specialist | NEC 9502, 9506 | N | 15 Feb | 01 Mar | ||
Award | Eligible |
|
RIA Subm Required |
Announcement Date | Due Date to Next Echelon |
|
|
Analyst | SelRes E1 - O6 | 01 Mar | Y | 1 Jun | N | NMCCM |
COY | Civilian | N | Mgt Conf (Nov) | N |
Chapter 2. RECURRING AWARDSChapter 2. RECURRING AWARDS
Section 1. NRIP Naval Reserve Sailor
of the Year (SOY)Section 1. NRIP Naval Reserve Sailor of the Year (SOY)
Schedule: 1 February - Reserve Intelligence
Area Nominations due at COMNAVRESINTCOM
1 April - COMNAVRESINTCOM Nominations
due at COMNAVRESFOR
Documents Attached: Sample Nomination Letter -- Appendix A
Sample Endorsement
-- Appendix B
1. Purpose. To establish the
NRIP Naval Reserve Sailor of the Year Award, recognizing the most
outstanding all around Selected Reservist (SelRes) sailor in the
NRIP.
2. Policy. The spirit and intent
of this program is to recognize the best all around sailor from
all eligible pay grades. The program is open to all participating
enlisted Naval Reserve personnel in the NRIP in pay grades E-4
through E-6. Personnel in pay grade E-6 selected for E-7 are
ineligible. Emphasis is on professionalism, sustained superior
performance and personal excellence. Selection of a NRIP Naval
Reserve SOY will result in the nomination of that sailor in competition
for COMNAVRESFOR Naval Reserve SOY, submission of a Personal Award
Recommendation for the Navy Marine Corps Achievement Medal by
COMNAVRESINTCOM to COMNAVRESFOR, presentation of a NAVRESINTCOM
individual plaque, and inclusion of the recipient's name on a
permanent plaque located at COMNAVRESINTCOM headquarters.
3. Criteria. When reviewing candidates
for selection, the following criteria shall apply:
a. Sustained superior performance;
b. Demonstrated superior leadership ability;
c. Demonstrated high degree of initiative,
cooperation and adaptability;
d. Exemplary military and professional
conduct; and
e. Outstanding military appearance.
f. Significance of civic involvement
or accomplishments including offices held and actively pursued.
Special consideration shall be given to those individuals who
have excelled in demanding and challenging assignments. Demonstration
of progress in furthering the individual's education and participation
in community and civic affairs shall also be considered.
4. Discussion
a. The competitive period for the NRIP
Naval Reserve SOY program is based upon the preceding calendar
year. The nomination should be dated for the current year
in which the SOY is awarded (e.g.: competitive period: 1 January
to 31 December 1992; selectee will be the 1993 Sailor of the Year).
b. Each RIA will develop its own procedures
for the selection of the NRIP SOY nominee.
c. Photos. If procuring Navy
photo service is difficult, high quality, non-professional
front and side photos of any RIA nominee are acceptable. However,
once selected as the NRIP SOY, the RIA must then provide professional
photos of the nominee as specified in the sample endorsement.
d. The Personal Award Recommendation (PAR) for the Navy Marine Corps Achievement Medal submitted with each nomination will be separately reviewed for each nominee for NRIP SOY. The NRIP SOY PAR will be forwarded for consideration by COMNAVRESFOR. Pursuant to reference (d) COMNAVRESFOR non-selectees will be awarded a Navy Marine Corps Achievement Medal from COMNAVRESFOR.
Section 2. NRIP Naval Reserve Bluejacket
of the YearSection 2. NRIP Naval Reserve Bluejacket of the Year
Schedule: 1 February - Reserve Intelligence Area
Nominations due at COMNAVRESINTCOM
Documents Attached: Sample Nomination Letter -- Appendix C
NRIP Bluejacket of the Year Nomination Sheet, COMNAVRESINTCOM 1650/3
(Rev.8-96) Appendix D
1. Purpose. To establish the
NRIP Bluejacket of the Year Award, recognizing the most outstanding
all around junior sailor in the NRIP.
2. Policy. This program is open
to all participating personnel in the NRIP in pay grades E-1 through
E-4. Personnel in pay grade E-4 selected for E-5 are ineligible.
This recognizes the best all-around sailor from all eligible
pay grades. Emphasis is on professionalism and performance.
Selection as NRIP Bluejacket of the Year will result in a recommendation
for a Letter of Commendation and presentation of a NAVRESINTCOM
individual plaque, and inclusion of the recipient's name on a
permanent plaque located at COMNAVRESINTCOM headquarters.
3. Criteria. When reviewing candidates
for selection, the following criteria shall apply:
a. Sustained superior performance;
b. Demonstrated leadership ability (if
applicable);
c. Demonstrated high degree of initiative,
cooperation, and adaptability;
d. Exemplary military professional conduct;
e. Outstanding military appearance.
Special consideration shall be given
to those individuals who have excelled in demanding and challenging
assignments. Demonstration of progress in furthering the individual's
education and participation in community and civic affairs shall
also be considered.
4. Discussion
a. The competitive period for NRIP BJOY is based upon the preceding calendar year. The nomination should be dated for the current year in which the BJOY is awarded (e.g.; performance period: 1 January to 31 December 1995; selectee will be the 1996 Bluejacket of the Year).
b. Each RIA will develop their own procedures
for the selection of the RIAs nominee for Blue Jacket of the Year.
c. The NRIP Bluejacket of the Year shall
receive a COMNAVRESINTCOM Navy and Marine Corp Achievement Medal.
All other requests for Letters of Commendation shall be submitted
and given a Letter of Commendation for selection as the RIA Bluejacket
of the Year based on the merits of summary of action.
Section 3. NAVRESINTCOM Active Duty
Sailor of the Quarter (SSOQ)Section 3. NAVRESINTCOM Active Duty Sailor of the Quarter (SSOQ)
Schedule: Reserve Intelligence Area Nominations due at COMNAVRESINTCOM quarterly as follows: 1 Feb,
1 May, 1 Aug, and 1 Nov
Documents Attached: SSOQ Review Sheet -- Appendix C
NRIP SSOQ Nomination Form 1650/3 (Rev. 8-96) Appendix D,
1. Purpose. To establish the
NRIP Active Duty Sailor of the Quarter Award, which recognizes
the most outstanding all around active duty sailor in the NRIP.
2. Policy. This program is open
to all participating active duty enlisted personnel serving in
the NRIP in pay grades E-4 through E-6. Personnel in pay grade
E-6 selected for E-7 are ineligible. The spirit and intent of
this program is to recognize the very best all around sailor from
all eligible pay grades. Emphasis shall be placed on professionalism
and performance. Selection of the NRIP Active Duty SOQ will result
in the nomination of that sailor in competition for COMNAVRESINTCOM
Sailor of the Year.
3. Criteria. When reviewing candidates
for selection, the following criteria shall apply:
a. Sustained superior performance;
b. Demonstrated superior leadership ability;
c. Demonstrated high degree of initiative,
cooperation and adaptability;
d. Exemplary military and professional
conduct; and
e. Outstanding military appearance.
Special consideration shall be given
to those individuals who have excelled in demanding and challenging
assignments. Demonstration of progress in furthering the individual's
education and participation in community and civic affairs shall
also be considered.
4. Discussion
a. The competitive period for the NAVRESINTCOM
Active Duty SOQ program is based upon performance during the preceding
fiscal quarter, and, unlike the Sailor of the Year period,
the SSOQ nomination will be numbered for that quarter (e.g.: performance
period: 1 January to 31 March 1996 and awarded in May; selectee
will be the 1996 Second Quarter Sailor of the Quarter).
This means that the fourth quarter SSOQ (1 Jul-30 Sep) will be
due to headquarters 1 Nov and will be the last SOQ eligible for
the SSOY the following February. The winner for the period 1
Oct - 31 Dec 93, for example, would only be eligible for SSOY
selected in February 97 (see table below).
FISCAL QUARTER # | FISCAL QUARTER DATES/FY |
|
| |
|
1 | 1 OCT-31 DEC/FY1 | 1 FEB/FY1 | FEB/FY1 | FEB/FY2 |
2 | 1 JAN-31 MAR/FY1 | 1 MAY/FY1 | MAY/FY1 | FEB/FY2 |
3 | 1 APR-30 JUN/FY1 | 1 AUG/FY1 | AUG/FY1 | FEB/FY2 |
4 | 1 JUL-30 SEP/FY1 | 1 NOV/FY2 | NOV/FY2 | FEB/FY2 |
5. Action
a. Nomination. Nominate a RIA
active duty Sailor of the Quarter using COMNAVRESINTCOM form 1650/3
and include a copy of the latest evaluation.
b. Selection. The COMNAVRESINTCOM
Command Master Chief will convene a quarterly board comprised
of the headquarters Chief's Mess to review nominations and recommend
a candidate to the Commander for selection.
c. Award. The active duty Sailor of the Quarter will be issued a Letter of Commendation from the commander within 30 days of selection. The RIA should present this letter to the member with appropriate formality.
Section 4. RIA Sailor of the QuarterSection 4. RIA Sailor of the Quarter
Schedule: RIA selectee forms due at COMNAVRESINTCOM quarterly as follows: 1 Feb, 1 May, 1 Aug, and
1 Nov
Documents Attached: Sample Endorsement Letter -- Appendix B
NRIP (SOQ) Nomination Form 1650/3
(Rev. 8-96) -- Appendix D
1. Purpose. To provide flag recognition
to RIA Sailors of the Quarter.
2. Policy. This is not a mandatory
award; each RIA may or may not choose to select a winner each
quarter. Eligible members include all Selected Reserve enlisted
personnel serving in the RIA in pay grades E-4 through E-6. Personnel
in pay grade E-6 selected for E-7 are ineligible. Selection as
RIA SOQ will normally result in that sailor competing for RIA
Sailor of the Year.
3. Criteria. Same as for SSOQ.
4. Discussion. The competitive
period for the RIA SOQ program is the same as for the SSOQ program.
5. Action
a. Selection. RIA's who choose
a RIA SOQ should fax/mail a completed COMNAVRESINTCOM form 1650/3
to NAVRESINTCOM by the deadlines shown above.
b. Award. For each RIA Sailor of the Quarter for whom a form is received, the Commander will issue a Letter of Commendation within 30 days of notification. The RIA should present this letter to the member with appropriate formality to recognize the achievement.
Section 5. NAVRESINTCOM Shore Sailor
of the Year (SSOY)Section 5. NAVRESINTCOM Shore Sailor of the Year (SSOY)
Schedule: 30 January - Reserve Intelligence Area
Nominations due at COMNAVRESINTCOM
15 March - COMNAVRESINTCOM Nominations
due at COMNAVRESFOR
Documents Attached: Sample Nomination
Letter -- Appendix A
1. Purpose. To establish the
NAVRESINTCOM Shore Sailor of the Year Award, recognizing the most
outstanding all around sailor in NAVRESINTCOM.
2. Policy. This program is open
to all participating active duty enlisted personnel serving in
NAVRESINTCOM, including TAR and ADSW, in pay grades E-4 through
E-6. Personnel in pay grade E-6 selected for E-7 are ineligible.
The spirit and intent of this program is to recognize the very
best all around sailor from all eligible pay grades. Emphasis
shall be placed on professionalism and performance. Selection
of a NAVRESINTCOM Shore SOY will result in the nomination of that
sailor to compete for COMNAVRESFOR Shore SOY, submission of a
Personal Award Recommendation for the Navy Marine Corps Achievement
Medal by COMNAVRESINTCOM to COMNAVRESFOR, presentation of a NAVRESINTCOM
individual plaque, and inclusion of the recipient's name on a
permanent plaque located at COMNAVRESINTCOM headquarters.
3. Criteria. When reviewing candidates
for selection, the following criteria shall apply:
a. Sustained superior performance;
b. Demonstrated superior leadership ability;
c. Demonstrated high degree of initiative,
cooperation and adaptability;
d. Exemplary military and professional
conduct; and
e. Outstanding military appearance.
Special consideration shall be given
to those individuals who have excelled in demanding and challenging
assignments. Demonstration of progress in furthering the individual's
education and participation in community and civic affairs shall
also be considered.
4. Discussion
a. The competitive period for the NAVRESINTCOM
Shore SOY program is based upon the preceding calendar
year. The nomination should be dated for the current year
in which the SOY is awarded (e.g.: performance period: 1 January
to 31 December 1996; selectee will be the 1997 Sailor of the Year).
b. The personal Award Recommendation
for the Navy Marine Corps Achievement Medal submitted with each
nomination will be acted upon separately for each nominee for
COMNAVRESINTCOM Shore SOY. The NAVRESINTCOM Shore Sailor of the
year PAR will be forwarded for consideration by COMNAVRESFOR.
COMNAVRESFOR non-selectees will be awarded a Navy Marine Corps
Achievement Medal from COMNAVRESFOR.
Section 6. NAVRESINTCOM Junior Officer of the Year (JOY)Section 6. NAVRESINTCOM Junior Officer of the Year (JOY)
Schedule: 30 September - Reserve Intelligence
Area Nominations due at COMNAVRESINTCOM
Documents Attached: Sample Endorsement -- Appendix B
Sample Nomination Format -- Appendix
E
1. Purpose. To establish the
Naval Reserve Intelligence Program (NRIP) Junior Officer of the
Year Award, in recognition of the most outstanding all around
junior officer in the NRIP.
2. Policy. This program is open to all drilling junior officer Naval Reserve personnel in the NRIP holding 1615/1635/6445/
6455/7455 designators in grades 0-1 through
0-4 and W-2 or W-3. 0-5 and W-4 selectees are ineligible as are
previous recipients of the award. This award recognizes the very
best all around junior officer from all eligible designators.
Selection of the NRIP JOY will result in COMNAVRESINTCOM recognition
as follows:
a. A NAVRESINTCOM plaque for presentation
to the recipient plus inclusion of the recipient's name on a permanent
plaque located at COMNAVRESINTCOM Headquarters.
b. Presentation of the Navy Marine Corps
Achivement Medal from COMNAVRESINTCOM.
c. Submission to the Reserve Officer
Association and the Naval Reserve Association as the COMNAVRESINTCOM
nominee for their Junior Officer of the Year awards.
3. Criteria. When reviewing candidates
for selection, the following criteria shall apply:
a. Sustained superior performance.
b. Demonstrated superior leadership ability.
c. Display of a high degree of initiative,
cooperation and adaptability.
d. Exemplary military and professional
conduct.
e. Significance of civic involvement
or accomplishments, including offices held and actively pursued.
f. Outstanding military appearance.
Special consideration shall be given
to those officers who have excelled in demanding and challenging
assignments. Demonstration of progress in furthering the officer's
education shall also be considered.
4. Discussion
a. The competitive period of the JOY
program is based upon the preceding fiscal year. The nomination
should be dated for the current fiscal year in which the
JOY is awarded (e.g., performance period: 1 October 1995 to 30
September 1996; selectee will be the 1997 Junior Officer of the
Year).
b. Each RIA shall develop its own procedures
for the selection of its NRIP JOY nominee.
c. Photos. If procuring Navy
photo service is difficult, we will accept high quality, non-professional
front and side photos of any RIA nominee. However, once selected
as the NRIP SOY, the RIA must then provide professional photos
of the nominee as specified in the sample endorsement.
d. Unit commanding officers should note
that the NRA will accept nomination packages for its award directly
from the RIA. However, we discourage such nominations because
the nominees would be in direct competition with the COMNAVRESINTCOM
nominee. Nevertheless, for any nomination sent directly to NRA,
COMNAVRESINTCOM requests a copy of the nomination cover letter.
Nomination directly to the Reserve Officers Association for its
JOY award is not permitted, since COMNAVRESFOR selects the winner.
e. In regard to submission of documentation
supporting the nominees selection, do NOT include copies
of fitness reports.
f. The personal award recommendation
submitted with each JOY nomination package will be separately
acted upon for all nominees that are not selected as the NRIP
JOY.
5. RESERVE OFFICER ASSOCIATION (ROA)
OUTSTANDING NAVAL JUNIOR OFFICER OF THE YEAR.
a. The winner of the COMNAVRESINTCOM
JOY competition will automatically be entered as the NAVRESINTCOM
nominee to the ROA JOY competition.
b. Eligibility Requirements. Same as
for NRIP JOY.
c. Special Benefits for the ROA Junior
Officer of the Year Awardee. The candidate will:
(1) Be invited to attend the ROA Midwinter
Conference in Washington, DC.
(2) Be issued AT orders with pay and
allowances for a period not to exceed four days, including travel.
The ROA will sponsor conference registration fees, meals, and
hotel accommodations for the selectee and his/her spouse.
(3) Be recognized with a plaque to be
presented at the Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard Service Selection
Luncheon and at the Midwinter Conference Banquet.
d. Submission Schedule: None for RIA's;
15 November is the deadline for COMNAVRESINTCOM submission to
COMNAVRESFOR.
e. Two additional photos are required
prior to submission to COMNAVRESFOR: black and white, 3"
X 5", one a portrait and the other an action-type photo.
6. NAVAL RESERVE ASSOCIATION (NRA)
OUTSTANDING JUNIOR OFFICER OF THE YEAR.
a. The Naval Reserve Association presents
two awards each year: one to a naval reserve officer drilling
with a component of the Naval Reserve and one to an active duty
TAR officer.
b. The winner in the COMNAVRESINTCOM
JOY competition will be automatically entered as the NAVRESINTCOM
nominee to the NRA JOY competition.
(1) The winner of the Joe Makoski Award
competition shall automatically be entered as the NAVRESINTCOM
nominee for the NRA TAR competition.
c. Eligibility Requirements. Same as
for NRIP JOY.
d. Special Benefits for the NRA Outstanding
Junior Officer of the Year Awardee.
(1) The NRA selectee(s) will be invited
to attend the formal presentation at the annual NRA National Conference.
The NRA will sponsor conference registration fees, meals, and
hotel accommodations for the selectee.
(2) The NAVRESINTCOM candidate will receive
a Navy Marine Corps Commendation Medal with COMNAVRESINTCOM as
awarding authority.
e. Submission Schedule. None for RIA's;
deadline for COMNAVRESINTCOM submission to NRA Headquarters as
promulgated by NRA/COMNAVRESFOR.
Section 7. IS1 Michael R. Wagner Award
for Outstanding Naval Reserve Intelligence Program (Active
Duty) Intelli gence SpecialistSection 7. IS1 Michael R. Wagner Award for Outstanding Naval Reserve Intelligence Program (Active Duty) Intelli gence Specialist
Reference: None - See Eligibility Requirements and
Selection Criteria
below
Schedule: 1 September - Reserve Intelligence
Area Nominations due at COMNAVRESINTCOM
1. Purpose. To establish the
IS1 Michael R. Wagner Award to be awarded annually to recognize
outstanding performance by a NRIP active duty Intelligence Specialist
(IS).
2. Background. IS1 Michael R.
Wagner, USN, served as the RIA Area Six active duty Intelligence
Specialist from May 1981 until September 1983. Following that
tour, he was transferred to attache duty in Beirut, Lebanon, where
he was killed in action on 20 September 1984. His selfless dedication
to duty and the United States Navy provides an inspiration to
all who follow in his path. This award is established to honor
IS1 Michael Wagner and to recognize outstanding performance by
a NRIP active duty Intelligence Specialist.
3. Policy. The IS1 Michael R.
Wagner Award is awarded by COMNAVRESINTCOM to an active duty Intelligence
Specialist (E-4 through E-9) who has served at least six months
in an NRIP position (including COMNAVAIRESFOR Code N2, ONI-14
and NAVRESINTCOM staff) during the past fiscal year. Repeat awards
are not authorized.
4. Nomination Process
a. On or before 1 September of each year
RIACs/RIPOs should provide their nomination to COMNAVRESINTCOM.
b. The nomination package will consist
of:
(1) Bulletized resume of nominee.
(2) Copy of performance evaluations covering
previous 12 months.
(3) Justification for selection.
5. Selection Criteria. Nominations
will be based on overall performance. Points to be considered
are:
a. Attitude, enthusiasm and eagerness to serve the Reserve Intelligence Program and its personnel;
b. Coordination of the Basic Reserve
Intelligence Training for enlisted personnel;
c. Leadership ability;
d. Adaptability; and
e. Promotion of good command relationships.
6. Selection Process. Final selection
will be made by COMNAVRESINTCOM who will seek the confidential
advice of RIACs, senior TAR Intelligence Officers, Host Air Activity
commanding officers, and NAVRESINTCOM staff as necessary to select
the most deserving nominee.
7. Recognition of Recipient
a. The IS1 Michael R. Wagner Award will
consist of a plaque for presentation to the recipient, plus installation
of the recipient's name on a permanent plaque located at NAVRESINTCOM
headquarters. Recipient shall also receive a specific achievement
Navy and Marine Corp Achievement Medal.
b. The award will normally be presented
at the annual NAVRESINTCOM Management Conference in November.
c. Identification of the receipt of this
award should be highlighted in any "end of tour" award
recommendation.
Section 8. CDR Joe Makoski Award for
Outstanding Reserve Intelligence Program Officer (RIPO)Section 8. CDR Joe Makoski Award for Outstanding Reserve Intelligence Program Officer (RIPO)
Reference: None - See Eligibility Requirements
and Selection Criteria below
Schedule: 1 August - Deputy Commander,
NAVRESINTCOM solicits officers listed in paragraph 5 for nominees
1 September - Officers listed in paragraph
5 submit prioritized list of nominees to NAVRESINTCOM
Document Attached: LCDR Makoski Nomination
Checklist -- Appendix F
1. Purpose. To establish the
LCDR Joe Makoski Award to recognize outstanding performance by
a RIPO in the grade of O4 or below.
2. Background
a. The RIPO is the cornerstone of the
Naval Reserve Intelligence Program, acting as a daily point of
contact, coordinator, counselor and administrator to the hundreds
of NRIP reservists in his/her Area. Appropriate recognition of
outstanding RIPO performance is therefore most important.
b. LCDR Joseph V. Makoski, USNR, served
with skill, distinction and dedication as RIPO Area EIGHTEEN,
from February 1981 to January 1984, and as RIPO Area SIXTEEN,
from February to July 1984. At that time, a sudden and untimely
physical disability caused his retirement from the Navy and the
loss of his talents to the NRIP. LCDR Makoski's courage in coping
with a crippling disability has provided an inspiring example
to all who know him.
c. This award was established on 28 September
1986, to honor LCDR Makoski and to recognize outstanding performance
by a similar junior officer serving as a RIPO.
3. Eligibility Requirements.
Officers who are LCDR or below (including CDR selectees) and who
have served at least six months as a RIPO during the past fiscal
year are eligible. Repeat awards are not authorized.
4. Selection Criteria. Nominations
may be based on overall performance, exceptional specific achievements,
or both. Points to be considered are:
a. Attitude, enthusiasm and eagerness
to serve the Reserve Intelligence Area and its personnel;
b. Administrative efficiency;
c. Management of training, ADT and readiness;
d. Facilities and budget management;
e. Promotion of good command relationships,
and
f. Contributions to the NRIP nationally.
5. Nomination Process
a. On or before 1 September of each year,
the holders of the following billets should separately submit
to COMNAVRESINTCOM a prioritized list of the nominees, with a
brief summary of reasons for each:
(1) RIACs
(2) RIPOs
(3) Deputy Commander, NAVRESINTCOM
(4) CNO (N2R)
(5) Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI-14)
(6) COMNAVAIRESFOR (N2)
6. Selection Process. Final selection
will be made by COMNAVRESINTCOM, who will also seek the confidential
advice of RIACs, Host Air Activity Commanding Officers, and NAVRESINTCOM
staff as necessary to select the most deserving nominee.
7. Recognition of Recipient
a. The LCDR Joe Makoski Award will consist
of an individual plaque presented to the recipient, plus installation
of the recipient's name on a permanent plaque located at NAVRESINTCOM
headquarters or at another suitable location. Recipient will also
receive a specific achievement Navy and Marine Corp Achievement
Medal.
b. The award will normally be presented
during the annual NAVRESINTCOM Management Conference in November.
c. The recipient will be the COMNAVRESINTCOM
nominee for the Naval Reserve Association active duty Junior Officer
of the Year award. Within 60 days after selection, the winner's
RIAC will forward to COMNAVRESINTCOM a smooth nomination package
for this
award. Use the same format as for the
NRIP JOY. Include a full-length black and white photo in uniform.
d. Identification of the receipt of this
award should be highlighted in any "end of tour" award
recommendation.
Section 9. NAVRESINTCOM Civilian of
the Year AwardSection 9. NAVRESINTCOM Civilian of the Year Award
Reference: CCPONOLAINST 12000.1A (NOTAL)
Schedule: 1 September - Reserve Intelligence Area
Nominations
due at COMNAVRESINTCOM
Document Attached: Civilian of the Year Nomination Checklist
Appendix G
1. Purpose. To establish the
NAVRESINTCOM Civilian of the Year Award to recognize outstanding
performance of COMNAVRESINTCOM civilian support staff members.
2. Background. As an Echelon
IV command, COMNAVRESINTCOM is authorized to recognize the civilian
employees within its 14 Reserve Intelligence Areas. This recognition
can take the form of a cash awards, per the guidance of the reference,
and/or the awarding of a civil service medal.
3. Eligibility Requirements.
Civil servants who have served at least six months, either on
the NAVRESINTCOM or a RIAC staff, are eligible. Repeat awards
may be given only under unusual circumstances. Only those with
most recent performance ratings of "outstanding" are
eligible.
4. Nomination Process
a. On or before 1 September of each fiscal
year, RIACs/RIPOs and the COMNAVRESINTCOM Chief Staff Officer
should provide his nominations to the Deputy Commander, NAVRESINTCOM.
b. The nomination package will consist
of:
The nominee's most recent performance
appraisal, per Chapter 11 of the reference;
(1) Bulletized resume of nominee;
(2) Justification for selection;
(3) RIAC recommendation.
5. Selection Process. Final selection
will be made by the Commander, who will also seek the confidential
advice of RIACs, Host Air Activity Commanding Officers, and the
NAVRESINTCOM staff as necessary to select the most deserving nominee
and runner-up.
6. Recognition of the Recipient
a. The award will normally be announced
at the annual NAVRESINTCOM Management Conference in November and
a plaque presented as soon as possible thereafter at a suitable
public occasion.
b. The Civilian of the Year will normally
receive a higher cash performance award than other civilians for
the performance award cycle ending 31 October.
Section 10. Captain George A. O'Connell,
Jr., Outstanding Naval Reserve Intelligence Program Unit
of the Year AwardSection 10. Captain George A. O'Connell, Jr., Outstanding Naval Reserve Intelligence Program Unit of the Year Award
Reference: None - See Eligibility Requirements and Selection
Criteria below
Schedule: 1 September - Reserve Intelligence Area
Nominations
due at COMNAVRESINTCOM
Document Attached: CAPT George A. O'Connell,
Jr. Nomination Checklist -- Appendix H
1. Purpose. To establish the
Captain George A. O'Connell, Jr. Outstanding Unit of the Year
Award to recognize the outstanding NRIP unit.
2. Background. Captain George
A. O'Connell, Jr., USNR (Ret) was a dedicated member of the Naval
Reserve Intelligence Program and past president of the Naval Reserve
Association. He served with distinction on active duty in World
War II as a communications officer and air intelligence officer
in the South Pacific, and on the CNO's staff in Washington. Upon
release from active duty, he immediately affiliated with the U.S.
Naval Reserve, was recalled during the Korean War to serve at
the Photographic Intelligence Center in Washington, D.C. and remained
active in the reserve intelligence program serving as a member
and commanding officer of several reserve intelligence units until
his retirement in 1974. This award has been established in conjunction
with the Naval Reserve Association to honor Captain O'Connell's
dedicated service and superb leadership and management by recognizing
the outstanding Naval Reserve Intelligence Program unit each year.
3. Eligibility Criteria. Any
pay unit in the NRIP. Must not have been a previous recipient
of this award within the last five years.
4. Selection Criteria. Annual
selection will be based on unit performance during the 12 month
period ending 30 September.
a. Primary factors. Winning units
will be selected based on outstanding performance and unique achievements,
primarily in the following two areas:
(1) Mobilization readiness (unit must
be at R1 or R2 readiness level).
(2) Support to the gaining command and
other active forces.
b. Secondary factors. If a winner
cannot be determined based on the primary factors, then the following
areas may be looked at as tie-breakers:
(1) Security and security awareness.
(2) Training programs and training efficiency.
(3) Recruiting and retention.
(4) Administrative efficiency, including
automation.
5. Nomination Process. By 1 September
of each year, nominations will be submitted to COMNAVRESINTCOM
by RIACs. Each nomination must address the primary factors listed
in paragraph 4 above. Secondary factors may or may not be addressed.
Be as specific as possible in identifying achievements and results.
RIAs should use any internal processes that may already exist
to select and nominate units for this award. RIA selection processes
should be streamlined to minimize paperwork. More than one unit
from a RIA may be nominated, but they must be ranked by the RIAC.
6. Selection Process. Final selection
will be made by COMNAV-RESINTCOM after evaluation of nominations
and recommendations from the NAVRESINTCOM Awards Board. The Awards
Board may seek the confidential advice of RIACs, Gaining Command
representatives and others deemed appropriate to select the most
deserving unit.
7. Recognition for Recipient Unit.
The Captain George A. O'Connell, Jr. Award will consist of an
individual plaque presented to the recipient unit. The unit's
name will be engraved on a permanent plaque located at COMNAVRESINTCOM
headquarters. The award will normally be presented to the RIAC
of the selected unit during the annual NAVRESINTCOM Management
Conference. The RIAC will then present the award to the selected
unit at an appropriate recognition ceremony in the RIA.
Section 11.
Admiral Martin J. Andrews Award
References: -- None
Schedule: -- None
Documents Attached: -- None
1. Purpose. To establish the
Naval Reserve Intelligence Program Hall of Honor, recognizing
the few outstanding individuals who have given of themselves to
such a degree that a personal award cannot recognize them sufficiently.
2. Policy. This program is open
to all members of the Naval Reserve Intelligence Program in the
rank of Captain. Nominations for this Award are not open. COMNAVRESINTCOM
shall determine the membership of the Hall of Honor. This award
shall be periodic in nature.
3. Criteria. COMNAVRESINTCOM shall
select those officers who have willingly and tirelessly given
of their time and talents to further the goals and mission of
NAVRESINTCOM without thought of personal gain.
Chapter 3. INDIVIDUAL MILITARY PERSONAL
DECORATIONSChapter 3. INDIVIDUAL MILITARY PERSONAL DECORATIONS
Section 1. General InformationSection 1. General Information
1. General. Personal decorations
are important symbols of recognition, and a means of publicly
recognizing and rewarding extraordinary, exceptionally meritorious,
or conspicuously outstanding acts of heroism and other acts or
services which are above and beyond that normally expected and
which distinguish the individual among those performing similar
acts or services.
2. Submission requirements. Submission
of personal award recommendations (PARs) must include at a minimum:
a. The original PAR form (OPNAV 1650/3)
(both sides), signed by both the originator (normally the unit
CO) and the first endorser (normally the RIAC). Original signatures
of the unit commanding officer and the RIAC are required. Signing
"by direction" is not authorized. Originators are required
to submit a soft copy of each PAR (3.5" IBM-compatible diskette).
An electronic version of the OPNAV 1650/3 form can be obtained
in AIMS or from the COMNAVRESINTCOM Homepage on the Internet.
3. Required PAR identification numbering
system. Each PAR will have a unique sequential identification
number assigned by the RIA at the time it is logged out of the
RIA for submission to COMNAVRESINTCOM. This seven-digit number
will be neatly lettered or typed in the upper right hand corner
on the front side of the PAR form. The composition of the I.D.
number shall be as follows:
a. Digits 1 and 2 - RIA originating the
PAR;
b. Digits 3 and 4 - fiscal year in which
the PAR is submitted;
c. Digits 5, 6, and 7 - Sequential number
of the PAR during the current fiscal year.
Do not use dashes, hyphens, or spaces
between the characters.
d. Example: RIA 17 has submitted 23
PARS since 1 October 1993 and is about to submit its 24th. Its
PAR identification number will be: 1794024.
4. Details for Preparing a Personal
Award Recommendation (PAR) (FORM OPNAV 1650/3 (Rev. 1-94)).
Nominations for personal decorations are made using the PAR form.
Detailed guidance for completing this form follows:
Documents Attached: Sample Personal Award
Recommendation (OPNAV 1650/3) - Blank
"FROM" Block:
Enter originator (usually the NRIP unit and unit Commanding Officer).
Do not name the commanding officer, simply insert "Commanding
Officer," followed by the command title in long form. Do
not use abbreviations. See Appendix B to Chapter 2 of SECNAVINST
1650.1F.
"TO" Block:
Enter awarding authority as follows:
Award
Awarding Authority
Meritorious Service Medal CHIEF OF NAVAL
OPERATIONS
Navy Marine Corp COMNAVRESINTCOM
Commendation Medal
Navy Marine Corp COMNAVRESINTCOM
Achievement Medal
Letter COMNAVRESINTCOM
of Commendation
Block 1:
Social Security Number
Block 2:
Designator/NEC/MOS. Enter officer designator or Navy Enlisted
Classification Code (e.g. "1635", "2526").
If there is no NEC, simply insert "0000". MOS is the
USMC Military Occupational Standard.
Block 3:
List full name: Last (ALL CAPS), first and middle
DOE, John Robert
DOE, John NMN
DOE, John Robert Jr.
Use the above examples for full name,
name with appropriate initial in quotations if there is an initial
only, and "NMN" for no middle name. Indicate "Jr.",
"Sr.", "II", "III", as appropriate.
Block 4:
Component. Choose from USNR-R, (for all SELRES or IVTU members),
USNR, (TAR) or USN.
Block 5:
Grade/Rate. Enter proper abbreviation for present rank/rate,
i.e., AFCM, YN1(SS), CAPT, etc. (Do not use pay grade E3, E4,
O4, O6 etc.)
Block 6:
Warfare Designator. If earned, identify only one designator,
(SW/AW/SS).
Block 7:
UIC/RUIC. Enter unit five digit identification code (e.g. "00072")
that corresponds to the unit identified in block 17.
Block 8:
Recommended award. Award name must be abbreviated in this block,
(e.g. NAVY MARINE CORPS ACHIEVEMENT MEDAL -- NA, NAVY MARINE CORPS
COMMENDATION MEDAL -- NC, MERITORIOUS SERVICE MEDAL -- MM, MILITARY
OUTSTANDING VOLUNTEER SERVICE MEDAL -- MOVSM).
Block 9:
Specific Achievement. Check either YES or NO indicating whether
the award is a specific achievement award. A specific achievement
means a single, discrete accomplishment, normally occurring over
a short period of time as opposed to outstanding performance for
many things done during a multi-year tour of duty. (e.g., the
PAR form for the Junior Officer of the Year, Sailor of the Year
and Shore Sailor of the Year should be specific achievement awards.)
Block 10:
Check appropriate box. The majority of peacetime awards will
be "meritorious".
Block 11:
Number of award of this medal. Enter as "First", "Second",
and so forth, the number of the recommended award which
the member will have, assuming that the recommended award is approved.
The number in this block and block 19 should agree (i.e., if
the member has been awarded the same personal decoration once
previously, that particular award should be listed once in block
19, and block 11 should state "Second").
Block 12:
Action Date/Meritorious Period. Enter date or dates for which
the award is recommended (e.g., "15 Jun 1991 to 29 Jul 1993").
These must be the same dates that are listed on the citation.
Block 13:
Area of Action/Service. Specify geographic area of action/service
(e.g. CONUS, WESTPAC, EUROPE, MED). Typically, the entry will
be CONUS.
Block 14:
Expiration of Active Duty. For active duty enlisted, enter EAOS;
for active duty officer, enter "INDEFINITE" unless the
date has been established for transfer to Fleet Reserve or Retired
List; for participating Naval Reserve officers and enlisted members,
enter "N/A." For TAR officers enter "Indefinite".
Block 15:
Estimated Detachment Date. If known, indicate (e.g. "15
Oct 1989"). This date is of particular importance when the
award is to be presented prior to the date that the member will
be retiring or detaching. If unknown
or not detaching, indicate "N/A".
Block 16:
New Duty Station. Type in SNDL authorized short title of the
new duty station with the complete mailing address (e.g., "NAS
Dallas, TX 75211-9541"). If being separated, enter home
address, including ZIP code.
Block 17:
Unit and unit location at Time of Action/Service. Enter official
abbreviated title of the command where individual was assigned
during the period of action or service.
Block 18:
Duty Assignment. Enter standard title of billet/ assigned duty
(e.g., Training Officer).
Block 19:
Previous Personal Decorations and periods for which recognized.
Enter only previous personal decorations and periods for
which awarded (e.g., "Navy Marine Corp Achievement Medal,
Sep 1985 - Oct 1989"). Personal awards/decorations are listed
in SECNAVINST 1650.1F, Chapter 2. Good Conduct Medals are not
considered personal decorations. DO NOT enter campaign,
service or unit awards. If none, so indicate.
Block 20:
Personal awards for which recommended but not yet approved.
If none, so indicate, by entering "NONE". (Normally,
"NONE", as this is usually used for combat situations.)
Block 21:
Other personnel being recommended for same action. Enter
other names of personnel being recommended for same action.
If none, so indicate (usually this is "NONE").
Block 22:
List first name or initial, middle initial, last name, rank,
title of originator (spelled out). Signature block should only
contain the signature. Remember to check the appropriate certification
block.
Block 23:
Forwarding endorsement by via addressee(s). Spell out entire
title of command (no abbreviations). Do not include mailing address.
NRIP activities will submit award recommendations on participating
reservists using the following chain of command:
a. Naval Reserve Unit;
b. Reserve Intelligence Area Commander;
c. Commander, Naval Reserve Intelligence
Command (if not the awarding authority);
d. Commander, Naval Air Reserve Force
(if not awarding authority);
e. Commander, Naval Reserve Force (if
not awarding authority);
f. Chief of Naval Operations.
Note:
SECNAVINST 1650.1F Section 2 paragraph 220.3, permits the use
of standard size paper (appended to OPNAV 1650/3) when additional
space is required. The NRIP unit commanding officer must comment
or endorse a PAR involving a member of the unit at the time of
action if he is not the originator. Thus, PARS originated by
the RIAC must be commented upon or endorsed by the member's unit
commanding officer. Exceptions to this rule are those unit members
who have been assigned (and approved in writing) to the RIAC Staff.
Block 24:
To be completed by the awarding authority. Combat "V".
For combat use only. Check box "Yes" or "No".
Block 25: Summary of action. This part of the PAR, to be included on the reverse side of OPNAV Form 1650/3, is required in all cases and is the most important element since each PAR is evaluated on the merits of this justification. Generalities, excess use of superlatives and the "job description approach" are to be avoided. Use specific, action-oriented statements and qualitative and quantitative descriptions and comparisons. Brevity is encouraged. An outline or bullet format limited to one page is sufficient for the majority of cases for Navy Marine Corps Achievement Medal PARs, it is required to be a maximum of one page. The emphasis should be on performance of responsibilities and specific accomplishments that set the member apart from his/her peers. This objective summary will give specific examples of the performance and the manner it was accomplished along with the results and benefits derived. The amount of detail and supporting documentation required will depend upon the circumstances, nature and requirements of the
award being recommended. Weak, incomplete,
or otherwise insufficient write-ups will result in the PAR being
disapproved, downgraded, or returned to the originator for rework
or reconsideration. If the originator desires that the award
be processed for presentation prior to the transfer/separation
of the member, a statement to this effect should be made following
the summary. In the event the PAR origination date is more
than 90 days beyond the ending date of the period of action (Block
12), include an explanation for the delay in submission.
5. Citation. The originator will
prepare a proposed (double-spaced) citation. The approving authority
will prepare the smooth citation on command letterhead. Citations
must be factual and contain no classified material. They are
formal statements of the facts delineated in the SOA. Non-combat
personal award citations are limited to 7 typewritten lines with
90 characters per line. Citations for LOCs shall be no more than
22 typewritten lines with 65 characters per line. In no case
should citations exceed one typewritten page. The citation must
agree with the PAR in terms of dates (block 12), unit
at time of action (block 17), and duty assignment of the
individual (block 18). Include identification of the RIA (spelled
out, with RIA number in upper case) and the geographical location
on the citation. Do not use acronyms unless they have been previously
defined and will be used more than once in the text. The citation
is made up of the three parts as set forth by SECNAVINST 1650.1F,
paragraph 220.3, which outlines very specific requirements for
the contents. Examples are as follows:
a. Opening Sentence. The opening
sentence of the body of the citation consists of a standard
phrase describing the degree of meritorious or heroic service
as specified for each award; the duty assignment of the individual;
the unit name (spelled out); RIA (spelled out, with RIA number
in upper case); the geographic location; and the inclusive dates
of service upon which the PAR is based. Opening standard phrases
for specific decorations include:
(1) Meritorious Service Medal.
"For outstanding meritorious achievement/or service ..."
(2) Navy Marine Corps Commendation
Medal. "For heroic achievement (or meritorious achievement)
(or heroic service) (or meritorious service) while serving as
..."
(3) Navy Marine Corps Achievement
Medal. "For leadership (or professional) achievement
in the superior performance of duties while serving as ..."
(4) Letter of Commendation. "For
leadership (or professional) achievement in the performance of
duties while serving as..."
b. Statement of Heroic/Meritorious
Achievement or Service. The second part of the citation identifies
the recipient by name, describes his/her specific duty assignments,
his/her accomplishment, and the impact or benefits derived from
the actions. The description of the recipient's achievements
must show clearly that they were sufficient to justify the award
recommended. No classified information may be included in the
proposed citation.
(1) Identify officers by rank and last
name, and enlisted personnel as "Chief Petty Officer",
"Petty Officer", "Seaman", followed by last
name;
(2) If duty was performed in actual combat,
the citation should so state.
c. Commendatory Remarks. The
third part of each citation states that the outstanding attributes,
mentioned or implied in the second part, "reflected great
credit upon himself (herself) and were in keeping with the highest
traditions of the United States Naval Service." Typically,
Navy Marine Corps Achievement Medal citations close as follows:
"Petty Officer Doe's exceptional professional ability, initiative and loyal dedication to duty throughout reflected great credit upon himself and were in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service."
Most Common Errors on Form 1650/3
d. Insufficient lead time for processing.
Average lead time after receipt by COMNAVRESINTCOM is 45 - 60
days for Navy Marine Corps Commendation or Achievement Medals,
and 90 to 120 days for Meritorious Service Medals which have Chief
of Naval Operations awarding authority.
e. "To" Line: Awarding
Authority incorrect for respective medal. The Awarding Authority
for the Navy Marine Corps Commendation and Achievement Medal is
COMMANDER, NAVAL RESERVE INTELLIGENCE COMMAND. For all others,
see page 3-14. COMNAVRESINTCOM UIC is 68899 and shall be included
in the "To" Line.
f. Block 4: USNR-R is the appropriate
component for SelRes members.
g. Block 5: Do not use pay grade,
E7, E5, O3 etc.
h. Block 7: UIC/RUIC omitted
or incorrect; this should reflect the UIC/RUIC of Block 17.
i. Block 13: Improper area listed.
This refers to a geographic area, such as CONUS, WESTPAC,
etc. - not a specific location.
j. Block 16: Incomplete mailing
address - include zip code if member is transferred to new duty
station or is being separated.
k. Block 17: Geographical location
of unit at time of action must be included. Unit must be the same
as UIC/RUIC shown in Block 7.
l. Block 18: Duty assignment
inconsistent with proposed citation.
m. Block 19: Improper awards
listed or incorrectly stated. Only list prior receipt of personal
decorations. Refer to SECNAVINST 1650.1F, Appendix B to Chapter
2. The period covered by each such decoration must be stated
(e.g. NA 01 Oct 1990 - 30 Sep 1991). Do Not list "service"
awards (i.e. Sea Service Deployment Ribbon) or "Unit"
awards (i.e. Navy Unit Commendation Award).
n. Block 23: Incorrect chain
of command. The proper chain of command is found in Section 4
of this chapter. SECNAVINST 1650.1F, Section 2 Paragraph 220.3,
permits the use of standard size paper (appended to OPNAV
1650/3) when additional space is required.
o. Block 23: The "Command"
portion is for the title of the endorsing command, not
the name of the commanding officer of the endorsing command.
The "Signature" portion must include the rank of the
signee. Otherwise, leave Block 23 blank.
p. Block 24: Incomplete. (If
award is locally approved, this block should be completed and
signed by the awarding authority). For all awards submitted to
or via COMNAVRESINTCOM, leave Block 24 blank.
q. Block 25: Poorly written Summary
of Action which does not adequately provide justification to merit
the proposed award. Too often, the SOA is too general or describes
the nominee's character as is done in a Fitness Report or Evaluation.
Rather, it must focus on specific achievements and be action-oriented.
It should describe the individual's level of responsibility and
the impact or benefits derived from his/her actions.
r. Citations are not factual,
too wordy, or exceed maximum length and width. The citation must
be submitted in double-spaced format, must be a condensation of
the Summary of Action and must open and close with language as
specifically prescribed for each award.
s. As a general rule, only one award
will be made for the same act, achievement, or period of meritorious
service. LOC's are not considered awards and are not covered
by this rule.
t. Timeliness. PARS are not submitted
in a timely manner. Late PARS are allowed if accompanied by written
justification.
6. Tips on Writing Personal Award
Recommendations and Citations
a. For unit commanding officers, department
heads and Command Chiefs, observe your personnel closely to determine
whether their performance approaches an extraordinary level on
a day-to-day, month-to-month basis. If so, keep track of specific
aspects of performance, i.e., build a fact file. Look to see
if the performance is beyond the scope of duties. A COMNAVRESINTCOM
LOC need not be outside the scope of normally performed duties,
but a personal decoration is recognition for performance exceeding
that which can be recognized by fitness report or performance
evaluation.
b. Objectively evaluate the individual's
level of responsibility and the extent of impact the actions have
on the unit, RIA, NRIP, or Naval Reserve program. Keep perspective;
the responsibility level combined with superb performance of a
unit Commanding Officer or a RIA Command Chief are typically necessary
to merit a Navy Marine Corps Commendation Medal (NMCCM). Personnel
with outstanding performance, but lesser responsibility, should
normally be nominated for a Navy Marine Corps Achievement Medal
(NAM) or Letter of Commendation (LOC). Remember, however, a NAM
is awarded only to Lieutenant Commanders and below, not to senior
officers.
c. Apply the facts of performance
against the requirements of the award. The elements making up
the requirements for an award viewed in comparison to the facts
of performance will enable a determination of worthiness for the
award. This comparison will form the basis for the summary of
action if there is a sufficient finding for meeting the required
award elements.
d. Take your time. Writing a
good PAR involves thought. The PAR is going to be read by strangers.
Ask yourself whether you are easily communicating the justification
in the summary of action so as to compel the readers to conclude
the individual has clearly earned the award. A well written PAR
"leaps out" at the reader with positive statements about
the actions of the recommended individual.
e. Make sure all blocks on the
PAR are complete and correct. Have the PAR reviewed
by at least one knowledgeable individual for correctness and justification.
f. Be timely. Dedicate the time
to completing the PAR within a short time after expiration of
the action period.
g. Follow up with higher authority
to make sure the PAR has been received and is "in line"
for review, but follow the chain of command at all times.
h. Citations. The first sentence
of each citation must begin as specified for each respective award
and then be completed as specified in this manual under "Details
for Preparing a Personal Award Recommendation." The second
sentence should be a general statement which states summarily
the individual's achievements. The next several statements should
draw specific detail of the achievements from the Summary of Action.
The closing, commendatory remark should also be as specified.
Read your draft aloud; imagine yourself reading it front of a
formation at quarters. The body of the citation should flow easily,
with simple, concise sentences.
7. NRIP Chain of Command for Personal
Award Recommendations
R
- AWARDING AUTHORITY
8. Replacement of Awards
Reference: SECNAVINST 1650.1F
a. Large medals (U. S. awards only) may
be replaced without charge if the medal has been lost, destroyed
or rendered unfit for use without the fault or neglect
on the part of the person to whom awarded. Large medals may be
replaced at the expense of the individual if not entitled to replacement
without charge. Send replacement requests in writing to RIPO's.
RIPO's verify eligibility, consolidate requests, and forward
to COMNAVRESINTCOM Headquarters (Code 02B) on a quarterly basis.
b. Procedure for Replacement at Own
Expense
1. Contact: BUPERS (PERS 312)
2. Address:
Bureau of Personnel (BUPERS - 312)
Washington, DC 20370
3. Telephone: DSN 224-3296; Commercial
(202)694-3296
4. Send memo request together with copy
of citation or other evidence of award and money order, if being
charged. Costs range from $1.00 to about $20.00 depending on
the award.
c. Foreign Awards: Large medals
of foreign awards are available for purchase at the Navy Exchange
and other commercial outlets.
Section 2. Meritorious Service MedalSection 2. Meritorious Service Medal
Reference: SECNAVINST 1650.1F, Chapter
2, Section 3, Article 230.10
Documents Attached: Sample Summary of Action and
Citation --
Appendix J and K
1. Eligibility Requirements:
Awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States
who distinguishes himself/herself by outstanding meritorious achievement
or service to the United States. To justify this decoration,
the acts or services rendered by an individual, regardless of
grade or rate, must have been comparable to that required for
the Legion of Merit but in a duty of lesser responsibility. The
Meritorious Service Medal is the counterpart of the Bronze Star
Medal for the recognition of meritorious non-combat service.
When the degree of meritorious achievement or service rendered
is not sufficient to warrant the award of the Meritorious Service
Medal, the Navy Marine Corps Commendation Medal, when appropriate,
should be considered.
2. Specific Language Required on Citation
a. The phraseology used for the opening
sentence is as follows:
"For outstanding meritorious achievement/service..."
b. The commendatory closing remarks for
the Meritorious Service Medal will end with the words:
"... were in keeping with highest
traditions of the United States Naval Service."
Section 3. Navy Marine Corps Commendation
MedalSection 3. Navy Marine Corps Commendation Medal
Reference: SECNAVINST 1650.1F, Chapter
2, Section 3, Article 230.12
Documents Attached: Sample Summary of Action and
Citation --
Appendix L and M
1. Eligibility Requirements:
Awarded to a person who, while serving in any capacity with the
Navy or Marine Corps (including foreign military personnel and
members of U. S. Reserve components on active or inactive duty),
distinguishes himself after 06 December 1941, by heroic or meritorious
achievement or service. To merit this award, the acts or services
must be accomplished or performed in a manner above that normally
to be expected and sufficient to distinguish the individual above
those performing similar services, as set forth in the following:
a. For Acts of Heroism: Worthy
of special recognition, but not to the degree required for the
Bronze Star Medal when combat is involved or the Navy and Marine
Corps Medal when combat is not involved.
b. For Meritorious Achievement:
Outstanding and worthy of special recognition, but not to the
degree required for the Bronze Star Medal or Air Medal when combat
is involved or the Meritorious Service Medal or Air Medal when
combat is not involved. The achievement should be such as to
constitute a definite contribution to the Naval service, such
as an invention, or improvement in design, procedure or organization.
c. For Meritorious Service: Outstanding
and worthy of special recognition, but not to the degree required
for the Bronze Star Medal or Air Medal when combat is involved
or the Meritorious Service Medal or Air Medal when combat is not
involved. The award may cover an extended period of time during
which a higher award may have been recommended or received for
specific act(s). The criteria, however, should not be the period
of service involved, but rather the circumstances and conditions
under which the service was performed. The performance should
be well above that usually expected of an individual commensurate
with his/her grade or rate, and above the degree of excellence
which can be appropriately reflected in the individual's fitness
report or performance evaluation report.
2. Specific Language Required On Citation
a. The phraseology used for the opening
sentence is as follows:
"For heroic achievement (or meritorious
achievement) (or heroic service) (or meritorious service) while
serving as..."
b. The commendatory closing remarks for
the Navy Marine Corps Commendation Medal will end with the words:
"... were in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service."
Section 4. Navy Marine Corps Achievement
MedalSection 4. Navy Marine Corps Achievement Medal
Reference: SECNAVINST 1650.1F, Chapter
2, Section 3, Article 230.13
Documents Attached: Sample Summary of Action and Sample
Citation --
Appendix N and O
1. Eligibility Requirements:
Awarded to enlisted or commissioned members of the Navy and Marine
Corps, including members of Reserve components on active or inactive
duty, of the grade of Lieutenant Commander/Major and junior
thereto, for service performed on or after 1 May 1961. It
may also be awarded to members of other branches of the Armed
Forces of comparable grade or rate, when attached to, or serving
with, units of the Department of the Navy. The award shall be
given for meritorious service or achievement in a combat or non-combat
situation based on sustained performance or specific achievement
of a superlative nature, and shall be of such merit as to warrant
more tangible recognition than is possible by a fitness report
or evaluation sheet, but which does not warrant a Navy Marine
Corps Commendation Medal or higher.
2. Professional achievement which merits
the award must:
a. Clearly exceed that which is normally
required or expected, considering the individual's grade or rate,
training and experience; and
b. Be an important contribution which
is of benefit to the United States and the Naval service.
3. Leadership achievement which merits
the award must:
a. Be noteworthy;
b. Be sustained so as to demonstrate
a high state of development or, if for a specific achievement,
be of such merit as to earn singular recognition for the act(s);
and
c. Reflect most creditably on the efforts
of the individual toward the accomplishment of the unit mission.
4. Specific Language Required On Citation
a. The phraseology used for the opening
sentence is as follows:
"For leadership (or professional)
achievement in the superior performance of his (or her) duties
while serving as ..."
b. The commendatory closing remarks for
the Navy Marine Corps Achievement Medal will end with the words:
"Rank/Rate, Last Name's" exceptional professional ability, initiative and loyal dedication to duty throughout reflected great credit upon himself/herself and were in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service."
Chapter 4. INDIVIDUAL SERVICE AWARDSChapter 4. INDIVIDUAL SERVICE AWARDS
Section 1. Naval Reserve Meritorious
Service MedalSection 1. Naval Reserve Meritorious Service Medal
Reference: SECNAVINST 1650.1F, Chapter
4, Section 3, Article 430.3
1. Required Service: Four years
of enlisted service with no evaluation mark less than 3.0. This
medal is equivalent to the active duty Navy Good Conduct Medal.
2. Eligibility certification:
(Section 128) Unit Commanding Officer certifies eligibility.
3. Original Procurement: Standard
MILSTRIP Requisition submitted direct to DPSC Philadelphia, PA.
Letter requests are not acceptable. S/N 8455-00-926-6783.
Section 2. Armed Forces Reserve MedalSection 2. Armed Forces Reserve Medal
Reference: SECNAVINST 1650.1F, Chapter
4, Section 3, Article 430.21
1. Required Service: Ten years
of honorable satisfactory service in any 12-year period (see SECNAVINST
1650.1F, Chapter 4, Article 430.21, page 4-48). Repeat medals
are awarded for each follow-on period of ten years of honorable
service in any 12 year period.
2. Eligibility Certification:
Section 128
a. Officer: Apply by letter to Bureau
of Naval Personnel Command (Pers-9).
b. Enlisted: Unit Commanding Officer
certifies eligibility.
3. Original Procurement: Standard
MILSTRIP Requisition submitted direct to DPSC Philadelphia, PA.
Letter requests are not acceptable. S/N 8455-00-753-2908.
Section 3. Navy and Marine Corps Overseas
Service RibbonSection 3. Navy and Marine Corps Overseas Service Ribbon
Reference: SECNAVINST 1650.1F Chapter
4, Section 3, Article 430.19
1. Eligible Personnel: Officer
and enlisted personnel of the United States Navy, United States
Naval Reserve, United States Marine Corps, and United States Marine
Corps Reserve.
2. Eligibility Requirements
a. Active Duty Personnel: 12 months
consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas duty station.
b. Inactive Reservists: 30 consecutive
days or 45 cumulative days of Annual Training (AT), Active Duty
Training (ADT) or Active Duty Special Work (ADSW).
An individual cannot be awarded the Sea
Service Deployment Ribbon and Overseas Service Ribbon for the
same period. "Overseas" is defined as duty outside the
United States (Alaska and Hawaii are not eligible duty
stations, except for service at Adak, Alaska).
3. Beginning Date of Eligibility:
15 August 1974
4. Initial Award: Qualifying
service performed between 15 August 1974 and 1 January 1979 will
be credited only toward the initial award of the ribbon. Subsequent
to 1 January 1979, one award for each qualifying period (Subsequent
award is 3/16-inch Bronze Star).
5. Waiver of Requirements: For active duty personnel no more than 14 days may be waived. For inactive reservists - no waiver.
For posthumous awards the time requirements
may be waived by the Chief of Naval Operations/Commandant of the
Marine Corps in posthumous cases on a case be case basis.
6. Awarding Authority: Commanding
Officers. Navy Commanding Officers shall:
a. Determine eligibility from service
records, affidavits, or upon completion of eligibility requirements
at current command.
b. Make service record entries for enlisted
members and issue letter of eligibility for officer personnel.
Section 4. Military Outstanding Volunteer
Service MedalSection 4. Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal
Reference: SECNAV NOTICE 1650, 12 April
1994
Documents Attached: Sample COMNAVRESINTCOM
Authorization Letter -- Appendix P
1. Eligible Personnel: Officer
and enlisted personnel of the United States Navy, United States
Naval Reserve, United States Marine Corps, and United States Marine
Corps Reserve.
2. Eligibility Requirements: The
Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal (MOVSM) may be awarded
to members who, subsequent to December 31, 1992, perform outstanding
volunteer community service of a sustained, direct and consequential
nature. To be eligible, an individual's service must:
a. be to the civilian community, including
the military family community;
b. be significant in nature and produce
tangible results;
c. reflect favorably on the Military
Service and the Department of the Navy; and
d. be of a sustained and direct nature,
normally, three or more years.
Section 5. Other Awards
Reference: SECNAVINST 1650.1F Chapter
4, Section 3, Article 430.19
1. Refer to the previous reference for details concerning the Naval Reserve Sea Service Ribbon and Navy Arctic Service Ribbon.
Chapter 5. LETTERS OF COMMENDATION
AND APPRECIATIONChapter 5. LETTERS OF COMMENDATION AND APPRECIATION
Section 1. Letter of Commendation
(LOC)Section 1. Letter of Commendation (LOC)
Document Attached: Sample Summary of
Action and Letters of Commendation Citation -- Appendix
Q and R
1. Background: The purpose of
a COMNAVRESINTCOM LOC is to recognize outstanding or exemplary
performance of duty. When appropriate, an LOC may be requested
in lieu of a recommendation for personal decoration. Performance
earning a COMNAVRESINTCOM LOC need not be outside the scope of
normally assigned duties, but should reflect such a degree of
dedication, contribution and sheer competence that there is no
question that the individual deserves special public recognition.
2. Procedure: COMNAVRESINTCOM
LOCs are submitted on the Personal Award Recommendation Form,
OPNAV 1650/3. They are not, however, personal awards, and issuance
of an LOC does not preclude the period of action or achievements
described in it from being used as a basis for nomination for
a personal decoration. The block 25 Summary of Action must detail
the acts for which the LOC is recommended and not exceed the available
space. The proposed citation must not exceed 22 lines
with 65 spaces per line.
Section 2. Letter of Appreciation
(LOA)Section 2. Letter of Appreciation (LOA)
Document Attached: Sample Letters of
Appreciation Citations - Appendix S and T
1. Background: The Letter of
Appreciation (LOA) is for two purposes only:
a. To acknowledge and honor retiring
members of the NRIP for career service regardless of particular
achievements.
b. To recognize gaining command and other
non-NRIP personnel for exemplary support to the NRIP.
2. Procedure: Request LOAs by
letter/fax/e-mail.
a. Retirement LOA. A standardized
retirement LOA citation is included herein (see sample #1 LOA)
and will be used for all retirements unless otherwise requested.
b. LOA for non-NRIP personnel.
All other LOA's will be in standard Navy letter format, military
or civilian, as appropriate. When requesting an LOA, be sure
to include a draft of what you want it to say.
Section 3. Letter of Appreciation
(LOA) to Employers and Spouses of Naval ReservistsSection 3. Letter of Appreciation (LOA) to Employers and Spouses of Naval Reservists
Documents Attached: Sample Letter of Appreciation to Spouse
Appendix U
Sample Letter
of Appreciation to Employer Appendix V
1. Background: Employer and spouse support of Naval Reserve Intelligence personnel is vital to the success of the Naval Reserve Intelligence Program (NRIP). Without such support and encouragement, active participation through monthly drills and AT would be difficult, if not impossible. Employers must often rearrange work schedules or postpone programs to accommodate a reservist's drill or AT schedule. Families often postpone or even cancel vacation plans or outings. Leaders of the NRIP should recognize the inconveniences caused by participation in the program and demonstrate their appreciation to those individuals who have accepted these inconveniences. The RIAC is encouraged to send Letters of Appreciation to employers and spouses of those reservists who desire to participate in this recognition program. COMNAVRESINTCOM will send Letters of Appreciation on flag stationary to RIAC spouses and employers upon written request.
Chapter 6. AWARDS FOR EMPLOYERSChapter 6. AWARDS FOR EMPLOYERS
Section 1. National Committee for
Employer Support of the Guard and ReserveSection 1. National Committee for Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve
Reference: None - See "National
Committee for Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve"
pamphlet and nomination form.
Schedule: Nominations may be submitted
anytime. The program is a continuing effort.
Documents Attached: National Committee for Employer Support
of the Guard and Reserve Fact Sheet "My
Boss is a Pro"
Awards Nomination Form
1. National Committee for Employer Support of the Guard and
reserve, on behalf of the Department
of Defense, conduct a program designed to honor employers who
support a strong Guard and Reserve force. Nomination will result
in the employer receiving one of three, suitable for mounting,
awards: "PRO PATRIA", "STATE CHAIRMAN'S AWARD",
or "EMPLOYER SUPPORT CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION".
At a minimum, each employer will receive a certificate of appreciation.
Participating reservists are encouraged to take this opportunity
to express their "thanks" to deserving employers.
2. Additional forms can be obtained by
telephoning (800) 336-4590 or DSN 226-1400.
Chapter 7. PROMOTION AND ADVANCEMENT
LETTERSChapter 7. PROMOTION AND ADVANCEMENT LETTERS
Section 1. Promotion and Advancement
LettersSection 1. Promotion and Advancement Letters
1. Purpose: To recognize the
performance of NRIP members who have been selected for promotion
or advancement and to challenge each to successfully meet the
increased leadership responsibility which accompanies the new
rank or rate.
2. Procedure: COMNAVRESINTCOM will send a personal congratulatory letter to each of the following selectees: O-5, O-6, E-7, E-8, E-9, LDO, and CWO. As soon as results are published for each of these boards, RIAC's will provide the following information on each selectee: rank selected for, full name, and current mailing address. For all other RIA promotions and advancements, RIACs are encouraged to send their own personal letters of congratulations.
Chapter 8. PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION
PROGRAMSChapter 8. PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION PROGRAMS
Section 1. Master Training Specialist Recognition ProgramSection 1. Master Training Specialist Recognition Program
(CNRIC 16 to 11)
Reference: COMNAVAIRESFORINST 1500.4
Schedule: 1 February - RIAC nominations due at
COMNAVRESINTCOM
1 March - COMNAVRESINTCOM nominations
due at COMNAVAIRESFOR (Code 553)
Document Attached: Sample Nomination
Letter -- Appendix W
1. Purpose. To establish a program
to recognize outstanding enlisted instructor personnel within
COMNAVRESINTCOM and NMITC/ FITCPAC units as Master Training Specialists
(MTSs).
2. Discussion. This recognition
program provides RIACs with a means of recognizing outstanding
individual effort and fostering excellence in training and education.
The main objective is to recognize outstanding individuals in
instructor-related and/or curriculum development billets
(i.e., enlisted personnel assigned to instructor billets in NR
NMITC 0186, NR FITCPAC 0194 and RIPO ISs in all
RIAs). Recognition as an MTS should not preclude other appropriate
awards for the same service, nor should it be used as an end-of-tour
award. A secondary objective is to create a cadre of MTSs whose
proficiency will enable them to certify incoming instructors and
participate in instructor evaluation and in-service training.
Designation as an MTS is a permanent recognition of training
excellence and, as such, remains in effect for personnel subsequently
assigned to non-instructor- related duties.
3. Nomination Process. RIACs
shall establish a local review board to nominate personnel for
designation as MTSs. Local review boards may be convened anytime
during the year, however, all nominations must be submitted to
COMNAVRESINTCOM no later than 1 February each year. Local review
boards should be comprised of individuals knowledgeable in current
instructional techniques, requirements, and instructions.
a. Nominations for MTS shall be forwarded
to COMNAVRESINTCOM for review per COMNAVAIRESFORINST 1500.4 and
the attached sample letter. A copy of the nominee's latest enlisted
performance evaluation and instructor evaluation shall be included.
b. COMNAVRESINTCOM will forward final nominees to COMNAVAIRESFOR for approval and issuance of a certificate of achievement.
c. The designation of MTS should be publicized
through local station newspapers, hometown news releases, and
other appropriate PAO media. Presentations should be made at
a formal ceremony to signify command support and interest.
Appendix A. SAILOR OF THE YEAR SAMPLE
NOMINATION FORMATAppendix A. SAILOR OF THE YEAR SAMPLE NOMINATION FORMAT
From: Commanding Officer, (NRIP Unit)
To: Reserve Intelligence Area Commander,
Area
Subj: 19 NAVAL
RESERVE INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (SHORE) SAILOR OF THE YEAR NOMINATION
IN THE CASE OF (RATE/NAME/USNR-R/SSN)
Ref: (a) COMNAVRESINTCOMINST 1650.4B
Encl: (1) Information considered pertinent to support the nomination (e.g., certified to be true copies of letters of commendation/appreciation, news releases, etc.)
(2) Narrative biography, starting with date and place of birth, schooling, military service, current assignment, awards, medals, family, etc. (limited to two typewritten, double-spaced pages).
(3) Personal Award Recommendation (OPNAV 1650/3 (Rev 1/94)) for the Navy Marine Corps Achievement Medal with proposed citation listing COMNAVRESINTCOM as awarding authority and the individual's unit commanding officer as originator and the RIAC as the first endorser. PAR must indicate "Sailor of the Year Program" at the top of form.
(4) Certified to be true copies of periodic
evaluations for the last three years.
1. Per reference (a), Petty Officer
is nominated for the 19
Naval Reserve Intelligence Program Sailor of the Year.
2. The following information is provided:
a. Name:
b. SSN:
c. Date of Birth:
d. Date enlisted in Navy/Naval Reserve:
e. Advancement History (give dates):
(1) E-4
(2) E-5
(3) E-6
f. Currently selected for advancement? (If yes, provide date to be advanced).
g. Dependents (list names, dates of
birth) (optional):
h. If previously selected as Sailor
of the Month/Quarter/ Year, give date(s) and command(s):
i. Brief synopsis of significant professional
achievements which warrant selection:
j. Awards (personal, service, campaign):
k. Off-duty community involvement:
l. Educational background:
(1) Years of formal schooling completed
and degree(s) attained:
(2) Significant Navy schools completed:
(3) Other self-study educational achievements
attained while affiliated with the Naval Reserve. Include correspondence
courses, USAFI extension courses, Navy-sponsored courses, etc.
Exclude rate courses required for advancement.
m. Accomplishments in civilian employment:
(if SELRES)
n. Any other information to distinguish
nominee from contemporaries (limited to one single spaced
typewritten page):
CO's Signature
Typed Name
Appendix B.
SAILOR OF THE YEAR SAMPLE ENDORSEMENT (FOR RIAC NOMINEE
ONLY)
FIRST ENDORSEMENT on Unit ltr 1650 Ser
of 10 Feb 19
From: Reserve Intelligence Area Commander, Area
To: Commander, Naval Reserve Intelligence
Command
Subj: NAVAL RESERVE INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM
_____________ OF THE YEAR (SOY/SSOY/BJOY) NOMINATION
Encl: (1) Two 5X7 black and white
glossy photographs, full length front view and side view
with plain background, in service dress blue uniform, uncovered.
1. Readdressed and forwarded as the
Reserve Intelligence Area nominee for
NRIP (Shore) Sailor of the Year.
2. RIAC comments (limited to one
single spaced typewritten page):
RIAC's Signature
Typed Name
Appendix C.
NRIP BLUEJACKET OF THE YEAR ABBREVIATED SAMPLE NOMINATION
FORMAT
From: Commanding Officer, (NRIP Unit)
To: Reserve Intelligence Area Commander,
Area ____
Subj: 19__ NRIP BLUEJACKET OF THE YEAR
NOMINATION IN THE CASE OF (RATE/NAME/USNR/SSN)
Ref: (a) COMNAVRESINTCOMINST 1650.4B
Encl: (1) Personal Award Recommendation (OPNAV 1650/3 (Rev 1/94)) for a Letter of Commendation with proposed citation listing COMNAVRESINTCOM as awarding authority.
(2) Copies of last two evaluations (certified
to be a true copy).
1. In accordance with reference (a),
_________________ is nominated for the 19__ Naval Reserve Intelligence
Program Bluejacket of the Year.
CO's Signature
Typed Name
Appendix D.
NRIP SOQ/SSOQ/BJOY SAILOR OF THE QUARTER NOMINATION INFORMATION COMNAVRESINTCOMINST 1650.4B
|
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT: The authority to request this information is contained in 5 USC 301 departmental regulations. The information requested is not mandatory; however, failure to provide the required information may result in the selection board being unable to consider the nominee for Sailor of the Quarter. |
1. Name, Rate, and SSN of Nominee: | 2. Current Status: (Circle one) USNR-R USNR(TAR) USN |
3. Reserve Intelligence Area Assigned: | 4. Reserve Unit Assigned: | 5. Currently Selected for Advancement:
(Circle one) YES NO |
6. Previously Selected as Sailor of the Month/Quarter/Year: (Give date(s) and command(s))
|
7. Primary Duties:
|
8. Collateral Duties:
|
9. Description of selection eligibility which distinguished nominee from other peers in the RIA during the quarter:
|
10. Command Master Chief (Signature & Date) | 11. Reserve Intelligence Program
Officer (Signature & Date) | 12. Reserve Intelligence Area
Commander (Signature & Date) |
COMNAVRESINTCOM 1650/3 (Rev. 8-96) Appendix D. NRIP SOQ/SSOQ/BJOY SAILOR OF THE QUARTER NOMINATION INFORMATION COMNAVRESINTCOMINST 1650.4BPRIVACY ACT STATEMENT The authority to request this information is contained in 5 USC 301 departmental regulations. The information requested is not mandatory; however, failure to provide the required information may result in the selection board being unable to consider the nominee for Sailor of the Quarter.1. Name, Rate, and SSN of Nominee2. Current Status (Circle one) USNR-R USNR(TAR) USN3. Reserve Intelligence Area Assigned4. Reserve Unit Assigned5. Currently Selected for Advancement (Circle one) YES NO6. Previously Selected as Sailor of the Month/Quarter/Year (Give date(s) and command(s))COMNAVRESINTCOM 1650/3 (Rev. 8-96)
Appendix E.
JUNIOR OFFICER OF THE YEAR SAMPLE NOMINATION FORMAT
From: Commanding Officer, (Member's Unit)
To: Reserve Intelligence Area Commander,
Area
Subj: 19 NAVAL RESERVE INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM JUNIOR OFFICER OF THE YEAR NOMINATION IN THE CASE OF RANK/NAME/USNR/
SSN/DESIGNATOR)
Ref: (a) COMNAVRESINTCOMINST 1650.4B
Encl: (1) Personal Award Recommendation (OPNAV 1650/3) for the Navy Marine Corps Commendation Medal with proposed citation listing COMNAVRESINTCOM as the awarding authority with the individual's unit commanding officer as the originator and the RIAC as the first endorser.
(2) OQQ/NRQQ
(3) Any other documentation desired to
support nomination such as awards received, news releases, etc.)
1. In accordance with reference (a), (rank
and name) is nominated for the 19
Naval Reserve Intelligence Program Junior Officer of the Year.
2. (Free format letter of recommendation
which might include: synopsis of professional and personal achievements
and traits which warrant selection; awards received; community
involvement; any educational achievements not on OQQ; any accomplishments
in civilian employment; and CO comments on performance. Also
include basic family information. Do not duplicate OQQ.)
CO's Signature
Typed Name
Appendix F. SAMPLE OFFICER MERITORIOUS
SERVICE MEDAL SUMMARY OF ACTION AND CITATIONAppendix F. SAMPLE OFFICER MERITORIOUS SERVICE MEDAL SUMMARY OF ACTION AND CITATION
SUMMARY OF ACTION
- CAPTAIN SMITH 001-00-0002
From 01 October 1994 to 30 September
1996, Captain Smith distinguished himself by exceptionally meritorious
service to the United States Navy as Reserve Intelligence Area
Commander, Area TWENTY. During this period, Captain Smith provided
outstanding guidance and direction to nine (9) Naval Reserve Intelligence
Units located in Alaska and Florida, comprised of more than 300
officers and enlisted personnel.
Through Captain Smith's exceptional performance
of duty a comprehensive series of programs was established that
significantly enhanced area mobilization readiness, training,
retention, recruitment, and greatly strengthened the area's overall
pride and professionalism.
The following accomplishments reflect
the breadth of Captain Smith's exceptional leadership and management
activities:
* Gaining Commands - Improved
relationships with gaining commands has been accomplished through
personal visits and communications with Unit Commanding Officers,
RIA TWENTY personnel, the host air facility and gaining commands.
Captain Smith visited each of his units' gaining commands and
led the effort for expanded support, which culminated in the establishment
of an additional CINCSOUTH Unit and a major expansion in DIA and
Seventh Fleet billets. He also orchestrated U.S. CINCSOUTH, J-2
and RLO visits and received visitors from DIA and JICPAC.
* Mobilization Readiness - Under
his leadership and guidance, all units have improved mobilization
readiness - 8 units stand at R-1 and 1 unit at R-2. This has
been accomplished even with a significant increase in billets
and is a result of his aggressive recruiting program, an effective
BRIT school, specific targeting of AT for all members, improved
retention, and tenacious attention to the assignment of personnel
to specific billets. Area TWENTY has provided personnel for exercises
and short lead time augmentation support. Examples include exercise
support (25 persons for additional ADT) for joint forces in U.
S., Korea, Japan and the Philippines.
* Manning Levels - Especially
noteworthy, over the last 18 months, intelligence billets have
increased 55%, from 150 to 232 with current manning averaging
100% overall and 75% reduction in controllable losses. He has
made recruiting an all-hands evolution by establishing a recruiting
team comprised of members from all units and managed by the DRIAC
for Manpower Management. The recruiting program has been highly
energized and has brought 42 additional personnel on board so
far, with 70 formal interviews currently under way. Targeted
efforts have been directed to area employers resulting in the
affiliation of five APGs and 13 direct commissions in process.
Retention has been
greatly enhanced by the current management
philosophy which embodies communication and improved resource
management.
* Advancement - Through Captain
Smith's personal communication with Unit Commanding Officers,
a high degree of emphasis has been placed on preparing enlisted
members to take advancement exams. Most recently, 50 time-in-rate
eligible enlisted personnel took the exam and 48 passed. In the
"IS" rate, 95.7% passed the exam and 93.3% of all rates
taking the exam passed.
* Basic Reserve Intelligence Training
(BRIT) Graduates - Captain Smith has aggressively organized
and placed into operation intensified programs pertaining to enlisted
readiness training with special emphasis given to Advance Pay
Grade (APG) personnel. Under his leadership a curriculum emphasizing
military discipline and training was incorporated into the BRIT
school, which has produced 25 graduates. The results have been
improved morale, retention and mobilization readiness of APG personnel.
* Project Support - Emphasis continues
on increasing man-hours spent on production and decreasing administrative
time. The production time has improved from 40% for all six units
to 44% in FY 1995/1996, while administrative overhead was reduced
from 32% to 25%. The RIAC Staff has also been instrumental in
assuming additional administrative responsibilities, thereby freeing
up drill pay personnel for production. While not reflected in
the percentage figures, there is an organized and integrated program
involving "sister services". Through Captain Smith's
innovative leadership, 20 Air Force and 4 Marine officers and
enlisted personnel, working directly with the RIA TWENTY Units,
contributed over 2,000 man-hours to the Area's production support
of the active Navy.
Captain Smith has consistently demonstrated superior competence in directing the many faceted administrative requirements of Area TWENTY. He regularly contributes a minimum of eight extra drills per month to his duties as RIAC, a significant investment of personal time and cost to himself. Captain Smith's extensive accomplishments reflect great credit upon himself, positively distinguish him from others and earn for him the special recognition afforded by this award.
SAMPLE OFFICER CITATION
MERITORIOUS SERVICE MEDAL
The President of the United States takes
pleasure in presenting the MERITORIOUS SERVICE MEDAL to
CAPTAIN
WILLIAM PATRICK SMITH
UNITED STATES NAVAL RESERVE
For service as set forth in the following
CITATION:
"For outstanding meritorious service
as Reserve Intelligence Area Commander, Area TWENTY, Commander,
Naval Reserve Intelligence Command, at Naval Air Station San Diego,
California from 1 October 1994 to 30 September 1996. Due to Captain
Smith's tireless efforts and superlative performance, the mobilization
readiness and productivity of the nine area units were significantly
increased. An additional unit was established in support of U.
S. Southern Command and other units were enlarged, resulting in
a 55% increase in Area billets. In spite of this rapid expansion,
Captain Smith achieved an overall manning average of 100% and
a 75% decrease in controllable losses. In leading his area to
these achievements, Captain Smith gave of himself to a degree
clearly beyond that which could reasonably be expected. His performance,
professionalism and loyal dedication to duty reflected great credit
upon himself and were in keeping with highest traditions of the
United States Naval Service."
For the President
Appendix G. SAMPLE ENLISTED MERITORIOUS SERVICE MEDAL
SUMMARY OF ACTION AND CITATIONAppendix G.
SUMMARY OF ACTION
--ISCS SMITH 001-01-0001
Command Senior Chief Smith's outstanding
meritorious service was instrumental in the command's achievement
of numerous objectives, particularly relating to the welfare of
more than 2,000 enlisted members of the Naval Reserve Intelligence
Program (NRIP) situated in 18 geographic areas throughout the
nation. His untiring committment and devotion to duty, at great
sacrifice of tiem, energy and expense, made lasting and significant
contributions to the command. He has clearly earned the special
recognition afforded by the award of the Meritorious Service Medal.
Command Senior Chief Smith, recognizing
a need to improve communicaitons with the command's enlisted personnel,
gained approval of his idea to increase direct interaction with
NRIP enlisted personnel by increasing the number of visits to
Reserve Intelligence Areas (RIAs). By volunteering to accompany
the Commander on Intelligence Oversight Inspections, he doubled
the opportunities to interact with RIA enlsited personnel on a
personal, face-to-face basis, thereby significantly improving
communications, morale, and espirit de corps throughout. In all,
he visited each RIA at least twice, and he arranged in several
cases, to visit a RIA even more frequently to help solve local
problems.
Another of his initivies, implemented
to improve communications, was to bring RIA Command Chiefs to
command headquarters as part of the RIA leadeship team visits.
Performing drills with the headquarter's staff one weekend provided
each Command Chief exposure to staff personnel and procedures
and clearly demonstrated the Commander's commitment to ensuring
that the RIA Command Chiefs are an integral part of the NRIP manamgement
structure.
Noting a lack of effective communicaitons
and cohesiveness of the headquarters enlisted personnel, including
Chief Petty Officers (CPOs), he initiated and implemented a CPO
Mess tailored specifically to the command's needs. With success
noted almost immediately, he then undescored and reinforced the
CPO Mess concept during visits to RIAs. The benefits noted to
date are that (1) more enlisted issues and problems are discussed
and resolved at the local level, and (2) the mess concept provides
the platform for RIA CPOs to be visible and to function as the
Navy's middle managers as they are intended to be.
Command Senior Chief Smith enthusiastically
presented countless briefs on enlisted leadership to NRIP-sponsored
senior career development courses for command chiefs, CO/XOs and
Reserve Intelligence Area Commanders. He used these opportunities
to discuss enlisted matters in general and to specifically address
the value that qualified Chief Petty Officers can be to a RIA
when permitted to function as enlisted leaders and managers.
Critiques have documented that his briefings were always well
received and many of his ideas are being implemented throughout
the NRIP.
Recognizing the value of the Senior Enlisted
Leadership Symposium (MG-8) as a forum for expanding the knowledge
of the NRIP's future enlisted leaders, he sought and received
authorization to expand course quotas by 40% over a two year period.
This increase in quotas will provide a significantly larger pool
of more qualified enlisted leaders to fill existing leadership
voids.
Additionally, while attending his first
Training Advisory Board (TAB), he noted a paucity of enlisted
representation on this Board. He presented and gained approval
from the Commander to increase enlisted membership on the TAB.
The expanded representation has fostered a better understanding
of enlisted training needs and promoted meaningful dialogue between
all individuals attending the TAB.
Command Senior Chief Smith scheduled
periodic visits and conducted telephone liaison with Command Master
Chiefs at NRIP Gaining Commands in order to assure an awareness
of and support for the NRIP. This initiative has resulted in
an increased appreciation for NRIP enlisted personnel and their
professionalism and abilities, while also establishing another
forum for connectivity between the NRIP and its Gaining Commands.
Command Senior Chief Smith upgraded the
quality review process and streamlined various enlisted awards
boards to assure a full impartial review of all award nominees.
He presented well researched recommendations to the Commander
and maintained a flawless record of each selection process for
future recommendations.
Command Senior Chief Smith has taken the COMNAVRESINTCOM Command Senior Chief position to a new, most positive level of professionalism. He established a solid working relationship with the Force Master Chief Petty Officer (FMCOP) in New Orleans, vastly expanding the FMCPO's knowledge of the NRIP and its enlisted leadership structure. He has raised the position to a much higher level of involvement in Command issues then enjoyed by his predecessors. By these actions, he has had a most significant positive impact on the overall effectiveness and morale of NRIP enlisted members and established a sound future for the command's enlisted personnel and is most definitely deserving of recognition afforded by the award of the Navy Meritorious Service Medal.
SAMPLE ENLISTED CITATION
MERITORIOUS SERVICE MEDAL
The President of the United States takes
pleasure in presenting the MERITORIOUS SERVICE MEDAL to
INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST SENIOR CHIEF
CHARLES S. SMITH
UNITED STATES NAVAL RESERVE
For service as set forth in the following:
CITATION:
"For outstanding meritorious service
as Command Senior Chief Petty Officer, Commander, Naval Reserve
Intelligence Command, Dallas, Texas, from 1 October 1994 to 30
September 1996. Demonstrating exemplary leadership and management,
Senior Chief Petty Officer Smith's performance contributed significantly
to mission accomplishment. By tireless effort and superlative
devotion to duty, he markedly improved the welfare of the more
than 2,000 enlisted members of the Naval Reserve Intelligence
Program. Instituting numerous initiatives, he guided the Command
and Program's senior enlisted leadership to excel in upgrading
enlisted professional development, thereby raising readiness and
intelligence contributory support to the active forces. Senior
Chief Petty Officer Smith gave of himself to a degree clearly
beyond that which could be reasonablely expected. His performance,
professionalism, and loyal dedication to duty reflected great
credit upon himself and were in keeping with the highest traditions
of the United States Naval Service."
For the President,
Appendix H. SAMPLE OFFICER SUMMARY OF ACTION AND CITATION
NAVY MARINE CORPS COMMENDATION MEDALAppendix H. SAMPLE OFFICER SUMMARY OF ACTION AND CITATION NAVY MARINE CORPS COMMENDATION MEDAL
SUMMARY OF ACTION
-- COMMANDER WOOD 002-02-0002
Commander Wood distinguished himself
through meritorious service as the Commanding Officer of NR SACLANT
INTEL ZERO ZERO ZERO ONE from 01 October 1994 to 30 September
1996. Through expert leadership and management, he ensured the
unit exceeded both the reserve intelligence program administrative
requirements and the gaining command's support needs. The following
highlights his achievements:
- Made support to the gaining command
a top priority; through his astute planning the ten unit personnel
accomplished over 100 percent of the gaining command's requirements,
totaling six months of active duty.
- Reorganized unit manning to successfully
meet the new priorities of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
and the Supreme Allied Commander Atlantic.
- Expanded unit responsibilities to include
the writing of NATO intelligence documents.
- Established and supervised the training
of intelligence watch teams in the SACLANT Strategic Direction
Center (SDC), due to the rapid increase in NATO exercise activity.
Through his initiative nine unit personnel, both officer and
enlisted, qualified as watch officers and flawlessly augmented
the SACLANT SDC.
- Supervised the Intelligence Cell watch
teams for two high-intensity exercises. Under his direction,
unit members prepared daily intelligence summaries, maintained
orders of battle, and conducted operational intelligence briefings
to multi-national flag officers. As a result of his guidance
and training, the intelligence cell was recognized as the SDC's
most effective and professional watch team.
- His close monitoring and direction
ensured the unit achieved and maintained an R1 readiness level,
despite a turnover in excess of 40 percent of unit manning.
- His constant attention to the professional
development of unit members resulted in 100 percent retention
and timely promotions for 88 percent of eligible personnel.
Commander Wood's outstanding performance over this two-year period has surpassed that which is considered outstanding as both Commanding Officer and Intelligence Officer, and warrants the recognition afforded by the Navy Commendation Medal.
SAMPLE OFFICER CITATION
NAVY MARINE CORPS COMMENDATION MEDAL
The Secretary of the Navy takes pleasure in presenting the NAVY COMMENDATION MEDAL to
COMMANDER
GLENN RAY WOOD
UNITED STATES NAVAL RESERVE
for service as set forth in the following
CITATION:
"For meritorious service as Commanding
Officer, Naval Reserve Supreme Allied Commander Atlantic Intelligence
Unit ZERO ZERO ZERO ONE, Reserve Intelligence Area TWENTY, Naval
Air Station Fort Smith, Arkansas, from 1 October 1994 through
30 September 1996. Through his exceptional managerial acumen,
Commander Wood was instrumental in the unit's attainment of an
R-1 readiness level despite significant personnel turnover. Commander
Woods' personal and distinctive contributions, absolute dedication
and intense devotion to duty reflected great credit upon himself
and were in keeping with the highest traditions of the Naval Service."
For the Secretary,
Appendix I.
SAMPLE ENLISTED SUMMARY OF ACTION NAVY MARINE CORPS COMMENDATION
MEDAL
SUMMARY OF ACTION
-- ISC JONES 003-03-0003
Chief Petty Officer Jones distinguished
herself through superior performance and exceptional personal
achievement as an Operations Department Intelligence Specialist,
Acting Leading Chief Petty Officer, Training Chief Petty Officer,
and Command Chief for NR Office of Naval Intelligence 0001 from
01 October 1994 to 30 November 1996. She is a most impressive
chief petty officer who possesses a pride of performance and ambition
seldom encountered amongst her peers. She continues to impress
all members of the intelligence community with his consistent
over achievement. She has markedly contributed to the readiness
of the unit, from R4 to R2 and training readiness from T4 to T1,
through her tireless dedication to duty and sharing her wealth
of knowledge with the unit. During the past year, Chief Petty
Officer Jones spent countless hours outside of the normally scheduled
drills in accomplishing the following, well in excess of her pears:
- When the units Chief was suddenly absent
from the unit for almost a year, on his own initiative and in
addition to her other duties, she assumed the role and responsibilities
of Command Chief and performed without equal.
- With the unit scheduled for an ADMAT
inspection, CPO Jones assumed responsibility as the Training Chief
Petty Officer, where she planned, organized and documented all
unit training activities. She developed and maintained the Short
and Medium Range Training Plans and other unit training forms
and created a database for recording unit training. The result
was increased training department efficiency through the consistent,
accurate and timely submission of these forms. CPO Jones also
conducted an extensive review of all enlisted training jackets
and generated a computer based tracking system to facilitate continuous
assessments and overview of enlisted training jacket status.
- CPO Jones takes a keen interest in
the professional development of all enlisted personnel in the
unit. She established a solid foundation for enhanced and meaningful
training for enlisted personnel to ensure that billet and advancement
requirements are achieved.
- Assuming the job of Unit Chief, she
organized the "IS" Advancement Exam Review for ALL enlisted
IS personnel in Reserve Intelligence Area TWENTY (RIA-20) during
FY96. At her own expense, she compiled a bound copy of an Advancement
Exam Review Guide which has been submitted to COMNAVRESINTCOM
for consideration of dissemination throughout the intelligence
community. In addition to teaching many of the classes, ISC Jones
continues to be a key leader during IS rate training, scheduling
and assigning instructors and ensuring Instructor Guide content
quality, rewriting lessons whenever warranted. As
a direct result of her efforts, OPINTEL
0001's enlisted members have achieved a 90% pass rate on the advancement
exam.
- In addition to the Professional Military
Training, she regularly trains unit members on computer programs
and assists briefers in the creation of overheads, charts, other
briefing items, and coaches them on professional briefing techniques.
- Utilizing her expertise with a personal
computer, ISC Jones developed a significant catalog of training
items for use by the Intelligence Mutual Support Department.
Specifically, she built a comprehensive computer library of surface,
air, submarine and land platform line drawings and silhouettes,
created overheads and charts and compiled a library of training
material for future use by the unit during briefings and war gaming
scenarios. Her efforts have markedly improved the unit's ability
to efficiently and quickly adapt and revise scenarios to mirror
real world occurrences.
Chief Petty Officer Jones's consistent superb performance, and her untiring efforts and commitment to the Intelligence program have resulted in significant personal accomplishments throughout her naval reserve career. Her personal example of OUTSTANDING dedication, devotion, special efforts, close coordination and successful achievement of such a wide variety of tasks is a tribute to herself and an example for others to follow. She can always be relied upon to make effective decisions, accept additional responsibilities without question, and present a professional appearance and demeanor. Her unsurpassed service ranks her among the finest examples of chief petty officers serving in the Naval Reserve. She has contributed materially to the success of the Unit and of Area TWENTY. Her efforts were in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service and Warrant for him the special recognition of the Navy Commendation Medal.
SAMPLE ENLISTED CITATION
NAVY MARINE CORPS COMMENDATION
MEDAL
The Secretary of the Navy takes pleasure
in presenting the NAVY COMMENDATION MEDAL to
CHIEF INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST
MICHELLE MARY JONES
UNITED STATES NAVAL RESERVE
for service as set forth in the following
CITATION:
"For professional achievement in
the superior performance of her duties while serving as an Operation
Department Chief Petty Officer, Training Department Chief Petty
Officer, and Acting Command Chief, Naval Reserve Office of Naval
Intelligence Unit ZERO ZERO ZERO ONE, Reserve Intelligence Area
TWENTY, Naval Air Station Fort Smith, Arkansas from 01 October
1994 to 30 November 1996. Chief Petty Officer Jones coordinated
all unit training activities and generated a computer-based tracking
system to facilitate continuous assessments and overview of all
enlisted training jackets. Chief Petty Officer Jones' personal
and distinctive contributions, absolute dedication and intense
devotion to duty reflected great credit upon himself and were
in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval
Service."
For the Secretary,
Appendix J. SAMPLE OFFICER SUMMARY OF ACTION AND CITATION
NAVY MARINE CORPS ACHIEVEMENT MEDALAppendix J. SAMPLE OFFICER SUMMARY OF ACTION AND CITATION NAVY MARINE CORPS ACHIEVEMENT MEDAL
SUMMARY OF ACTION
- LCDR JONES 002-00-0001
LCDR Jones distinguished himself by meritorious
service/pro-fessional achievement while serving as the Training
and Readiness Department Head and Recruiting Officer for a large
(32 officers/28 enlisted) unit. Specifically, LCDR Jones' meritorious
service/professional achievement is highlighted by the following
noteworthy items:
* As the unit's recruiting officer, his
400+ individual recruiting contacts more than doubled the number
of contacts made by any other RIA TWENTY member. Of these contacts,
20 individuals are currently processing through the Direct Commission
(Intelligence) program and three have affiliated. Closely coordinating
with active duty recruiting programs at NAS Jacksonville, he made
significant contributions to overall recruiting, not just for
the Naval Reserve Intelligence Program, but also for the Navy.
* As the Training and Readiness Department
Head, he planned and implemented the unit's compliance with rate
and billet training requirements, junior officer professional
development training and exercised superb professional management
of the documentation of such training. Making maximum use of
available computer assets, he ensured each of the 60 unit members
received complete quality training, thereby advancing not only
readiness, but recruiting and retention objectives as well. His
sustained outstanding performance contributed most significantly
toward accomplishment of his unit's mission and consistent R-1/R-2
(usually R-1) readiness level.
* He devoted numerous extra hours to
provide training counseling for Basic Reserve Intelligence Training
(BRIT) course students from this and other units. By so doing,
the newly-affiliated students received professional guidance at
a critical, early stage of their career, thereby fostering the
retention goal.
* He assertively guided unit members
in planning and scheduling annual training, thereby materially
contributing to his unit having the highest active duty for training
augmentation rate among the 14 reserve intelligence units supporting
the gaining command for both 1995 and 1996.
* Unmatched dedication in accomplishing the above (often working numerous non-duty, non-pay hours) resulted in his selection as the Reserve Intelligence Area TWENTY Junior Officer of the Year for 1996.
SAMPLE OFFICER CITATION
NAVY MARINE CORPS ACHIEVEMENT
MEDAL
The Secretary of the Navy takes pleasure
in presenting the NAVY MARINE CORPS ACHIEVEMENT MEDAL to
LIEUTENANT COMMANDER
ROBERT BRIAN JONES
UNITED STATES NAVAL RESERVE
for service as set forth in the following
CITATION:
Professional achievement in the superior
performance of his duties while serving as Recruiting Officer,
Joint Intelligence Center Pacific Unit ZERO ZERO ZERO ONE, Reserve
Intelligence Area TWENTY, Naval Air Station, Miami, Florida, from
1 October 1994 to 30 September 1996. His multiple officer applications
and affiliations significantly upgraded readiness in the Area.
Lieutenant Commander Jones' exceptional professional ability,
initiative and loyal dedication to duty throughout reflected great
credit upon himself and were in keeping with the highest traditions
of the United States Naval Service.
For the Secretary,
Appendix K. SAMPLE ENLISTED SUMMARY OF ACTION AND CITATION
NAVY MARINE CORPS ACHIEVEMENT MEDALAppendix K.
SUMMARY OF ACTION
--IS1 CARTER 004-04-0004
ISl Carter distinguished himself by meritorious service while
assigned as Leading Petty Officer, Training Petty Officer and
Merchant Ship Reporting Division member of NR ONI 0001
Specifically, ISl Carter's meritorious service is highlighted by
the following noteworthy items:
He consistently displayed Total Quality Leadership through his
leadershipbyexample style and complete focus on the needs of
unit enlisted personnel. His counseling efforts led to the
submission of 3 change of rating applications by unit members.
ISl Carter guided a unit APG in completion of required course
work and successful participation in the first exam cycle. He
was instrumental in the development of "Goals for Enlisted
Personnel FY95", a TQL approach for the training and
professionalism of RIA20 enlisted personnel. His proactive
stance as leading petty officer brought longterm enlisted career
planning to an unprecedented level.
* While assigned to the Training Department, he initiated a
comprehensive review and update of unit training records. He
meticulously expended over 30 offduty hours in researching unit
training jackets, preparing a discrepancy list and compiling all
necessary documentation to ensure readiness for a triennial
inspection. His efforts proved significant in the training
department's inspection success with
no discrepancies noted.
* As the leader of a 5member Photographic team in the Merchant
Ship Reporting Division, ISl Carter's performance has been
superlative. Motivated by ISl Carter, his photographic team
continuously meets and exceeds all prior month production goals
in both quantity and quality. He dedicated many offduty hours
to provide liaison between unit and law enforcement to access
otherwise controlled areas in videotape/Photographic collection.
His efforts have proven instrumental in this unit achieving
status as one of the topproducing
ONI collection units.
* ISl Carter contributed to unit readiness through successfully
recruiting an interrogator~translator for the unit, and 2 in
process, language qualified candidates.
* Outstanding dedication in accomplishing the above resulted NR ONI 0001 Sailor of the Year for 1995 and 1996.
SAMPLE ENLISTED CITATION
NAVY MARINE CORPS ACHIEVEMENT
MEDAL
The Secretary of the Navy takes pleasure
in presenting the NAVY ACHIEVEMENT MEDAL to
INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST FIRST CLASS
JOHN FREDERICK CARTER, JR.
UNITED STATES NAVAL RESERVE
for service as set forth in the following
CITATION
"For leadership in the superior
performance of his duties while serving as Leading Petty Officer
and Training Petty Officer, NR Office of Naval Intelligence ZERO
ZERO ZERO ONE, Reserve Intelligence Area TWENTY, Miami, Florida
from 01 May 1993 to 31 March 1996. Exemplifying total quality
leadership, he brought enlisted career planning and development
to an unprecedented level. Petty Officer Carter's exceptional
professional ability, initiative and loyal dedication to duty
throughout reflected great credit upon himself and were in keeping
with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Reserve."
For the Secretary,
Appendix L.
SAMPLE LETTER AWARDING MILITARY OUTSTANDING VOLUNTEER
SERVICE MEDAL
From: Commander, Naval Reserve Intelligence Command
To: Seaman J.P. Smith
Via: Reserve Intelligence Area Commander, Area TWENTY
Commanding Officer, Naval Reserve Office
of Naval Intelligence ZERO ZERO ZERO ONE
Subj: AWARD OF MILITARY OUTSTANDING VOLUNTEER
SERVICE MEDAL
Ref: (a) SECNAVNOTE 1650 of 12 April
1994
1. In accordance with reference (a),
you are authorized to wear the Military Outstanding Volunteer
Service Medal (Gold Star/Silver Star in lieu of ___ award) for
outstanding public service with ORGANIZATION for the period
from _________ to __________.
L. L. POE
Copy to:
BUPERS (PERS 313C)
Appendix M. SAMPLE OFFICER SUMMARY OF ACTION AND CITATION
FOR A LETTER OF COMMENDATIONAppendix M.
SUMMARY OF ACTION -- LCDR WARE 100-10-1000
LCDR Ware distinguished himself by meritorious
service based upon sustained outstanding performance of a clearly
superlative nature and of such distinction as to warrant the more
tangible recognition of a Letter of Commendation than is possible
by fitness report.
Specifically, LCDR Ware's meritorious
service achievement is highlighted by the following accomplishments:
a. As the unit's Training and Readiness
Officer for the period 01 October 1994 through 30 September 1996
he organized and implemented the unit's training program. He
materially contributed to maintaining the unit's training readiness
level at a consistent T1 rating. This included compliance with
rate and billet training requirements, junior officer professional
development, and specific training related documentation requirements.
b. During its Triennial Inspection of
RIA-20, the COMNAVRESINTCOM staff specifically singled out his
unit as possessing "...by far the best unit training and
readiness department of any RIA in the nation".
c. As a result of his superb professional
management of the program, the 68 member unit maintained a 100%
completion rate for each of the six month reporting periods. Training
tracks, RSTARS inputs, and individual member training plans were
completed in a timely accurate fashion.
In terms of professional ability, initiative
and loyal dedication (numerous non-duty, non-pay hours) LCDR Ware
has exceeded normal expectations of a junior officer.
SAMPLE OFFICER LETTER OF COMMENDATION
CITATION
COMMANDER, NAVAL RESERVE INTELLIGENCE
COMMAND takes pleasure in presenting a LETTER OF COMMENDATION
to
LIEUTENANT COMMANDER
JAMES L. WARE
UNITED STATES NAVAL RESERVE
for service as set forth in the following
Citation:
"For professional achievement in
the performance of his duties while serving as Training Officer,
Atlantic Intelligence Command Reserve Unit ZERO ZERO ZERO ONE,
Reserve Intelligence Area TWENTY, Naval Air Reserve, Norfolk,
Virginia from 1 October 1994 to 30 September 1996. Displaying
superb leadership and management, Lieutenant Commander Ware's
performance contributed importantly to mission accomplishment.
By dynamic resourcefulness and untiring commitment, he excelled
in providing complete training programs for officer and enlisted
professional development, thereby markedly facilitating readiness
and intelligence contributory support to the active forces, particularly
the gaining command, Atlantic Intelligence Command and the foregoing
achievement was widely recognized during the command's inspection.
Lieutenant Commander Ware's exceptional professional ability,
initiative, and loyal dedication to duty throughout reflected
great credit upon himself were in keeping with the highest traditions
of the United States Naval Service."
L. L. POE
Note: COMNAVRESFOR AND COMNAVAIRESFOR Letters of Commendation are also available. Refer to COMNAVRESFORINST 1650.1F for details.
Appendix N. SAMPLE ENLISTED SUMMARY OF ACTION AND CITATION
FOR A LETTER OF COMMENDATIONAppendix N. SAMPLE ENLISTED SUMMARY OF ACTION AND CITATION FOR A LETTER OF COMMENDATION
SUMMARY OF ACTION SK3 Brandon
111-11-1111
SK3 Brandon distinguished himself by
meritorious service while serving as an Intelligence Mutual Support
Department member, Command security Petty Officer and Physical
Fitness Coordinator of NR ONI 0001. Specifically, SK3 Brandon's
meritorious service is highlighted by the following noteworthy
items:
* Affiliating in February 1994 as an APG, he immediately
I distinguished himself from his peers
by his outstanding level of motivation and performance. He set
the standard for quality of photographic work in the Merchant
Ship Reporting Division. Consistently displaying creativity and
efficiency, his production output was unmatched for a 9month
period. His initiative while on vacation in photographing European
merchant vessels to support the gaining command typifies SK3 Brandon's
dedication to duty.
* The aggressive role which he assumed in Interrogation of
Prisoners of War (IPW) training through curriculum development
Yielded significant, visible results
in unit readiness.
* He clearly exceeded expectations of his rank, rate, training
and experience in the area of overt collections. immediately
exhibiting savvy and maturity in overt collection, his
contributions in source contact, assessment and brief writeup
have exceeded those of more senior personnel. Through his own
initiative, he learned the techniques
of knowledgeability brief writing to support the unit mission
and gaining command tasking.
* SK3 Brandon exceeded the expectations of his rank and rate
during the twomonth absence of
the Command Security Manager and Physical Fitness coordinator.
He acted, unassisted, as Command Security Petty Officer and Physical
Fitness coordinator, and performed his duties in a flawless manner.
* Due to his consistently superior performance,
normally expected of more senior personnel, he was routinely approached
by department heads for adhoc tasking.
* Unmatched dedication in accomplishing the above resulted in his selection as the Reserve Intelligence Area TWENTY Bluejacket of the Year for 1996.
SAMPLE ENLISTED LETTER OF COMMENDATION
CITATION
COMMANDER, NAVAL RESERVE INTELLIGENCE
COMMAND takes pleasure in presenting a LETTER OF COMMENDATION
to
STOREKEEPER THIRD CLASS
JOSE BRANDON
UNITED STATES NAVAL RESERVE
for service as set forth in the following
CITATION:
"For professional achievement in the performance of his duties while serving as an Intelligence Mutual Support
Department member, Command Security Petty Officer and Physical
Fitness Coordinator, Office of Naval
Intelligence ZERO ZERO ZERO ONE, Reserve Intelligence Area TWENTY,
from 1 February 1994 to 31 March 1995. Storekeeper Third Class
Brandon consistently distinguished himself from his peers by setting
the production standard for quality and output of photographic
work in the Merchant Ship Reporting Division. Assuming an aggressive
role in interrogation of prisoners of war training through tailored
curriculum development, Storekeeper Third Class Brandon made significant
contributions to unit mobilization readiness. Performing well
beyond that expected of his rank and rate, he made significant
contributions to his unit's overt collections tasking. Storekeeper
Third Class Brandon's exceptional professional ability, initiative
and loyal dedication to duty throughout reflected great credit
upon himself and were in keeping with the highest traditions of
the United States Naval Service."
L. L. POE
Appendix O.
SAMPLE RETIREMENT LETTER OF APPRECIATION
RANK/RATE
NAME
UNITED STATES NAVAL RESERVE
"Upon the occasion of your retirement
from the United States Naval Reserve, I congratulate you on your
successful career and wish you every success in your future endeavors.
It is my pleasure and privilege to express the grateful appreciation
of our country, the Navy, and the Naval Reserve Intelligence Command
for your self-sacrificing and sustained contributions during your
__ years of service. Your dedication, loyalty, accomplishments,
and love for the United States Navy have been clearly manifest
throughout your career. Your distinguished performance [in (several)
key (leadership) positions of the Naval Reserve Intelligence Program]
[as an (intelligence specialist/(chief) petty officer/naval officer)]
has strengthened the program and advanced the mission. I further
express my appreciation to your family for their support of your
Naval career. I know personally that these careers are very demanding
of our families, and families are a significant factor in keeping
our Navy strong. With my sincere appreciation for your superb
service to the United States Navy, I send my best wishes."
Sincerely,
L. L. POE
Rear Admiral, U.S. Naval Reserve
AppendixAppendix
P. SAMPLE CIVILIAN LETTER OF APPRECIATION
MS. MARIE SMITH
2608 Lakeview Trail
Dallas, TX 75075
Dear Miss Smith:
I wish to express my gratitude for your
service as the Security Manager at Naval Air Reserve San Diego
from December 1992 to May 1996. You distinguished yourself through
your positive attitude and initiative.
The efficiency of your service reduced
processing time for security clearances of Reserve Intelligence
personnel which subsequently increased the readiness of reserve
units.
You demonstrated traits which are expected
of the best in the Navy. Pride and professionalism are the benchmarks
by which you conducted your work. These traits reflect great
pride in yourself and are in keeping with the highest traditions
of the United States Naval Service. Thank you for your service.
Sincerely,
L. L. POE
Rear Admiral
U.S. Naval Reserve
Appendix Q.
SAMPLE LETTER OF APPRECIATION TO SPOUSE
Dear Mr./Mrs. :
I want to take this opportunity to tell
you how appreciative I am for the support you regularly and consistently
provide (first name) and, indirectly, to me and the Navy in connection
with his/her activities as a member of the Naval Reserve.
As one who has spent many years in the
Reserve program, attending drills one weekend per month and performing
two weeks of active duty annually away from home, I understand
what these separations mean to you both. I am therefore all the
more grateful to you for your understanding because I recognize
that if a Reservist does not have the support of his/her spouse,
a very difficult and often unhappy situation for everyone can
develop.
Further, I want you to know that (first
name) contributes materially and significantly to his unit and
the Naval Reserve Intelligence Program as a whole. It is easy
to feel unimportant in an organization as large as the United
States Navy, but every single unit and every single unit member
is important to us here at (Host activity), and we feel fortunate
to be able to include him/her as a most valued member of this
command.
Again, let me say that I realize the
importance of your special contribution to the Naval Reserve Program.
Thank you very much for your continued understanding and support.
We appreciate it!
Sincerely,
L.L. POE
Rear Admiral
U.S. Naval Reserve
Appendix R. SAMPLE LETTER OF APPRECIATION
TO EMPLOYERAppendix R. SAMPLE LETTER OF APPRECIATION TO EMPLOYER
Dear Mr./Mrs. :
As you may be aware, (Reservist's name),
one of your employees, is an active member of the Naval Reserve
Intelligence Program. I supervise (Reservist's name) as the program
commander for this area.
(Reservist's name) is a most valuable
asset to the Naval Reserve Intelligence Program. I am confident
that he/she is also as valuable to your organization.
(Reservist's name) with his/her intelligence
expertise is an important member of a strong Naval Reserve. He/she
is not only qualified and ready to assume an intelligence assignment
in time of war, but also provide timely and valuable support to
active Naval forces during his/her drill weekend each month.
His/her work on the drill weekend or while on annual training
duty is not by any stretch of the imagination "busy work,"
but represents a very significant savings of time and money for
the Navy and the taxpayer.
Although federal law mandates that members
of the Naval Reserve be given latitude by civilian employers for
their military duty without jeopardizing their jobs, it is important
that employers understand the true value of Reserve participation
to the Navy and the nation.
I sincerely believe that the contributions
being made by (Reservist's name) are essential to our nation's
strength and security. Your role as an employer who understands
and appreciates these responsibilities is important to the success
of our mission -- to provide trained intelligence personnel to
the active forces in event of mobilization or national emergency.
Sincerely,
L. L. POE
Rear Admiral
U.S. Naval Reserve
Appendix S. MASTER TRAINING SPECIALIST RECOGNITION PROGRAM
SAMPLE NOMINATION LETTERAppendix S.
From: Reserve Intelligence Area Commander, Area
To: Commander, Naval Reserve Intelligence
Command
Subj: NOMINATION FOR MASTER TRAINING
SPECIALIST
Ref: (a) COMNAVAIRESFORINST 1500.5C
(b) COMNAVRESINTCOMINST 1700.2
Encl: (1) Enlisted Performance Evaluation Report (NAVPERS
1616/24)
(2) Instructor Evaluation Report
1. (Rate/Name/SSN)
is recommended for designation as a Master Training Specialist.
(Rate/Name)
has fulfilled all the eligibility requirements for the designation
and has been certified by the RIA review board as deserving of
this recognition.
2. Per references (a) and (b), the following
information is provided:
a. Date Assigned to Instructor Billet:
b. BSC/AUIC:
c. Date 9502/9506 NEC Awarded:
d. Total Instructor Hours During Previous
12 Months:
e. List of Courses Instructed:
f. Additional Amplifying Remarks:
RIAC's Signature Typed Name
Copy to:
CO, (Member's unit)