CHAPTER VIIThe Joint Intelligence Architecture
"In establishing a JIC at each combatant command, we have
improved the quality of intelligence support to the
warfighter while decreasing the resources required to
produce such support."
|
CJCS Report on the Roles, Missions, and Functions of the
Armed Forces of the United States, February 1993
|
1. Introduction
This chapter describes the joint intelligence architecture
that provides a multimedia communications network with
interoperable systems that link the theater JICs, joint task
force (JTF) JISEs, deployed intelligence elements, Service
intelligence, and national intelligence organizations in a global
grid.
2. C4I For The Warrior
The Department of Defense strategy for C4I is laid out in the
Joint Staff/ J-6 developed C4I for the Warrior concept. This
concept envisions a global communications and information grid
into which all military information customers can plug
interoperable systems. The joint intelligence architecture is an
integral part of the C4I for the Warrior concept.
3. Joint Intelligence Architecture
a. Overview
- The joint intelligence architecture provides the means to
interconnect collectors, producers, and customers in an
information network. All intelligence made available to
the network from any source is stored and communicated as
data whether it is a text file, graphics, imagery, or
formatted information. The data is stored on a standards
compliant file server. The file server is the interface
with the communications network.
- In keeping with the spirit of C4I for the Warrior, the
joint intelligence architecture is a dynamic, flexible
structure providing global access to an information grid
that consists of all intelligence sources at all echelons.
The architecture facilitates the capability of the Defense
Intelligence community to focus on supporting the JFC and
subordinate joint force components and to integrate support
from non-Defense agencies and nongovernment organizations
as needed. The joint intelligence architecture is
configured to provide access to all intelligence sources
from anywhere on the globe and to provide the baseline data
that JFCs will need to support joint operations. This
architecture conceptually describes equipment capabilities,
information flow requirements, and responsibilities.
b. Principles. The Services and DOD agencies responsible for
organizing, training, and fielding intelligence systems and
personnel must provide the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, combatant commanders, and subordinate
commanders as much flexibility as possible in assembling their
intelligence support architectures. JFCs should be able to
assemble an optimum mix of intelligence capabilities (personnel,
procedures, and C4I), regardless of the source, and still receive
adequate intelligence support. Intelligence systems, concepts,
products, and language must be sufficiently interoperable for the
exchange and use of data in any form and from any source among
intelligence organizations and operating commands and forces.
Interoperability principles are shown in Figure VII-1.
Figure VII-1. Intelligence Architecture Principles
- C4I Interoperability. The J-2 should ensure command
elements' and supporting organizations' intelligence
systems and communications are compatible for exchange of
data, information, and intelligence products. If
components' intelligence systems cannot receive or exchange
intelligence data, the systems are not interoperable.
Interoperability of systems also relates to intelligence
data processing and related equipment.
- Intelligence Product Interoperability. Intelligence
organizations producing joint intelligence should ensure
that intelligence products are in a form, content, and
language usable by all components of the joint force
performing similar and related functions. For example, if
one component requires maps with Military Grid Reference
System (MGRS) (which also includes universal transverse
mercator) coordinates while another cooperating component
uses charts with geographic coordinates, location
information should be expressed with both MGRS and
geographic coordinates.
- Common Terminology and Symbols. Intelligence organizations
should understand and use concepts, language, terminology,
names, and symbols common to all joint force components.
- Standards. Factors that promote interoperability can be
expressed in standards. Standards are sets of guidelines
and criteria for continuity and similarity of data,
protocols, formats, terminology, equipment, and signals
that promote the exchange, understanding, and application
of intelligence requirements and intelligence products
among intelligence organizations and JFCs. Standards for
interoperability should be developed and incorporated into
intelligence systems, equipment, and procedures providing
intelligence for joint operations. Standards need to be
enforced in peacetime to facilitate transition to
operations other than war or war.
- Effective Training and Exercises. Intelligence
interoperability problems
reduce the ability of a joint force to attain unity of
effort. Thus, an important concept is to use realistic
training, exercises, and rehearsals of operations to
demonstrate, test, and evaluate the joint interoperability
of intelligence systems and intelligence products.
- Data Bases. Ability of all echelons of the joint force to
access archives and common data bases is key to successful
intelligence operations.
c. Requirements
"Military intelligence is not, in fact, the spectacular
service of the common imagining, but a much more prosaic
affair, dependent on an efficient machinery for collecting
and evaluating every sort of item of information--machinery
that extends from the front-line right back to Supreme
Headquarters. When the mass of information has been
collected, the art is to sift the wheat from the chaff, and
then to lay before the commander a short clear statement."
|
Field Marshal Earl Alexander,
"The Alexander Memoirs,"
1940-1945
|
- Organization. The joint architecture that provides the
infrastructure for intelligence support is not
hierarchical. Formal command and control relationships,
however, exist as shown in Figure VII-2. This relationshi
facilitates RFI management and optimizes complementary
intelligence functions by echelon without obstructing the
timely flow of critical intelligence up, down, or
laterally. The national agencies maintain systems and
organizations that respond directly, and provide
intelligence, to any echelon for time-sensitive reporting
(i.e., the TRAP broadcast). The formal flow for
intelligence RFI up and down echelons is through the NMJIC.
- Equipment
Figure VII-3. Joint Intelligence Architecture
4. Connectivity
a. General. To maximize the utility of the architecture,
systems must meet standards of connectivity using standard
communications protocols and standard encryption devices that
must be available at all echelons. The architecture has the
flexibility to accommodate, not to replace, existing I&W and
direct support systems. It is intended to overlay additional
capabilities using existing communications carriers.
b. Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System and
Joint Deployable Intelligence Support System. The joint
intelligence architecture uses JWICS and JDISS as the joint
standard and foundation for commonality among support systems.
As shown in Figure VII-4, JWICS satisfies the requirement fo
secure, high-speed, multimedia transmission services for
intelligence information. JWICS incorporates advanced networking
technologies that permit greater throughput and capacity, making
possible the use of
applications that take advantage of multimedia technologies
including video teleconferencing. Each JWICS node can create,
receive, transmit, and store video images as well as voice, text,
graphics, and data. Information can be either broadcast or
shared interactively among JWICS subscribers on a point-to-point
or multipoint basis. The JWICS circuit can be managed via
allocation of bandwidth, allowing simultaneous use of the link
for multiple applications. JWICS is an integral part of the
sensitive compartmented information portion of the Defense
Information Systems Network.
Figure VII-4. Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communication System
- As shown in Figure VII-5, JDISS provides the standar
workstation server software configuration. JDISS is the
DODIIS reference model. The basic backbone for the
dissemination of intelligence to and from deployed JDISS
nodes is via the JWICS network. Where JWICS is not
required or not available, JDISS has a versatile
communications capability that can be connected to whatever
circuit is available. The architecture optimizes
flexibility to focus intelligence efforts efficiently and
assure that support is maximized for a theater engaged in
military operations.
- All-source ntelligence dissemination in support of joint
operations at the national, theater, and subordinate joint
force levels will be via JWICS and JDISS. These systems
support the production, dissemination, and display of fused
intelligence critical to theater battle management. The
architecture provides access to data from national, theater
and tactical intelligence organizations and sources
primarily from a "push-pull" system. A "pull" concept will
result in JFCs receiving only high-quality, relevant
intelligence based on their mission and phase of the
operation. The "pull" capability is designed to prevent
communications circuit saturation. In addition,
time-sensitive intelligence will be "pushed" to JFCs and
components via dedicated broadcasts
in response to preplanned EEI. ADP interoperability with
force level systems will be accomplished by JDISS
integration. Through JWICS connectivity, intelligence
production at the national level can be shared in near real
time with the JFC. Automated processing and seamless
connectivity at all levels allow intelligence analysts at
all levels access to imagery and multiple data bases while
concurrently producing intelligence products in response to
specific mission requirements. This up, down, and across
echelon interface among strategic, operational, and
tactical intelligence organizations is the backbone for
joint intelligence dissemination.
Figure VII-5. The Joint Deployable Intelligence Support System
5. The Joint Intelligence Center/Joint Intelligence Support
Elements
Secretary of Defense memorandum, 15 March 1991, "Strengthening
Defense Intelligence," inter alia, established the JIC as the
primary intelligence organization providing support to joint
warfighting at all levels. The JIC concept fuses the main
support capabilities of all Service, Combat Support Agency, and
combat units into a one stop shopping center for intelligence
support. Although in reality, a particular JIC cannot be
expected to completely satisfy every RFI; it can coordinate
support from other intelligence organizations above and below its
echelon. A subordinate joint force is supported by a JISE, a
tailored subset of a theater JIC.
Figure VII-6. Representative Joint Intelligence Center
Figure VII-7 JIC/JISE Personnel Augmentation Sources.
a. All JICs/JISEs provide intelligence support to operational
forces and perform common functions. Figure VII-6 provides a
representative JIC organization wherein all major joint
intelligence functional areas and liaison relationships are
presented. As shown, the JIC is the principal J-2 organization
supporting joint operations.
b. The JIC/JISE is, by deign, scalable and can expand to meet
the needs of the JFC. During noncrisis periods, JIC manning is
normally retained at the minimum level required to perform
essential functions such as I&W, current intelligence, collection
management, delegated general military intelligence production,
and support to the commander. As crises develop, JICs at each
echelon bring together personnel and equipment needed to manage
intelligence support requirements. JISEs are established to
meet the particular needs of subordinate joint forces.
Collection, production, and dissemination resources are focused
on the crisis. Liaison with intelligence production agencies and
communications staffs identifies critical shortfalls, and action
to correct deficiencies is accomplished. Because the JIC is the
focal point for intelligence support to joint operations,
augmentation personnel are drawn from many sources, including
Reserves, as shown in Figure VII-7.
c. At the national level, the NMJIC is the focal point for all
defense intelligence activities in support of joint operations.
Combatant commands have JICs focused on their geographic or
functional responsibilities. A subordinate joint force, when
established, also normally forms a JISE as the focus for
intelligence in support of the joint force commander, joint
staff, and components.
d. Functions. The JIC/JISE allows for efficient access to the
entire DOD intelligence infrastructure in support of joint
operations. JICs/JISEs perform common functions although the
degree to which they engage in specific functions varies
according to command missions. The command's J-2 and JIC/JISE
are normally collocated, and it is the prerogative of command to
define JIC functions and responsibilities, particularly with
respect to the J-2 staff. In many cases, a responsibility may be
shared between the J-2 staff and JIC/JISE. For example, the J-2
staff may be responsible for setting forth collection
requirements, while the JIC may have the duties of implementing
those requirements and managing their fulfillment.
07-16-1996; 14:52:12