USFK J-2 Philosophy
I want to share my philosophy about intelligence organizations
and the people who make up those organizations. I share my philosophy
because you need to know the moral and intellectual foundations
for how I make decisions, where I'm coming from, and what I hook
into during good times and tough times. The words that follow
aren't perfunctory -- they have meaning for me, and they will
have meaning for you. As such, I want each of you to read this
philosophy and think about it. Moreover, I hope each of you will
take the time to think about your own philosophy, to articulate
and live it.
1. THREAT: TREAT WITH CIRCUMSPECTION AND RESPECT. We
must always keep an eye to the north. At all costs, we must avoid
allowing the nKs to catch us off guard.
- When the nKs come, they will come with duplicity, surprise,
and great violence. We must never be complacent, regardless of
what the nK propaganda machine cranks and spins.
- We must respect nK capabilities -- infantry, special operations
forces (SOF), artillery, chemical weapons, surface-to-surface
missiles.
- We must also respect nK capabilities to know and understand
the hubs of power most important to us. They will surely attack
those centers; which means we must anticipate and deny.
- Typically, the nKs don't want to die; therefore, they will
use good COMSEC, along with the night, terrain, and weather to
create false patterns and mask movements. nK's attack will come
with sound and fury. The nKs will struggle for dominance of the
peninsula and for survival of the regime in the North; the South
will struggle for its way of life to survive.
- We have to keep in mind that our time-honored scenarios might
not describe the events that could come with dramatic changes
in nK. These changes could happen on a moment's notice; they
could be social, economic, political, military, or a combination
of changes in these functional areas. We have to be able to think
inside and outside of the traditional box of scenarios to anticipate
information requirements, understand the environment, and advise
our leaders on the best courses of action to take regardless of
complexity, vagueness, or ambiguity of the nK situation or intentions.
- While respecting nK's capabilities, we shouldn't make them
into something larger than life, with superhuman capabilities.
We must always look for vulnerabilities. We must figure out
where to attack them with our own brand of sound and fury.
2. IDEAL ENVIRONMENT: INDIVIDUAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL
LEARNING. I want us to have an ideal environment in which
people can work, learn, change, and develop.
- In an ideal environment, people can make mistakes and survive,
debate issues, and exchange information and ideas.
- An ideal environment enables human beings to grow in competence.
- An ideal work environment changes because of feedback. In
such an organization, people are confident and often ask: Should
we be doing this? Is there a better way? Why do we do things
the way we do?
- People in a learning organization learn best from doing, then
sharing their experiences and ideas with others; they develop
networks and always seek and gain access to information; they
strive to develop their intellectual capabilities.
- Leaders in a learning organization help subordinates learn.
All leaders take an active interest in and direct roles for the
intellectual development of their subordinates, regardless of
circumstance.
3. WHAT WE'RE ALL ABOUT: THINKING. Analysts are inquisitive.
Analysts always have mysteries or pursue unanswered questions.
Analysts are thinkers. But good thinking isn't confined to analysts.
I expect all people to think effectively and improve their ability
to think in all kinds of situations.
- It's a rare person who's born with superb analysis and synthesis
capabilities. Thus, analysts must continuously work to improve
their thinking capabilities.
- Analysts must learn to SYNTHESIZE so they can use the
results of analysis, develop relationships, and evolve to a higher
level of meaning in their thought processes. In the intelligence
business, analysts must learn to synthesize apparently related
as well as disparate bits and pieces of information because a
capable enemy will present only isolated bits and pieces of information.
When synthesizing, analysts continuously ask: What do these
pieces of information mean? How do these pieces of information
relate? What are the implications from my analysis and synthesis?
What piece of information do I need to establish a relationship?
- Analysts must think holistically, seeing how combinations
work and how things relate even when seemingly disparate. Patterns
and aggregations of things and events become common in such an
approach. At our level of operation, we must be able to see the
whole of South Korea and of North Korea, the surrounding seas,
surrounding countries, relationships with the United States and
other world powers, combined operations, U.S. joint service operations,
and so forth.
- Through good thinking, we can predict enemy behavior, intentions,
capabilities, and vulnerabilities. We can develop good thoughts
on rationale for enemy intentions, and we can use our thinking
capabilities to go through wargaming mental exercises to help
avoid surprise. We can never become complacent in our thinking
- thinking we know truth, when often truth changes frequently.
4. ORGANIZATIONAL VECTOR: OPEN, CREATIVE, ADAPTIVE. As
an organization standing on the threshold of the 21st century,
we can't afford to bind ourselves to a bureaucracy totally accentuating
and upholding the status quo.
- We need to exchange ideas among ourselves. If people think
they have a better way of doing things, they need to bring forth
the idea. Virtually nobody can say for certain to know the truth.
We need to be receptive to the ideas of all people. I want all
of us to exchange ideas openly, freely, without fear.
- We can't afford to allow existence of the notion that rank
equals brains - intellect is rank-independent. Some of our brightest
and most creative people are junior in rank. Their brightness
and ideas are as valuable as any others. They simply haven't
had the time to expand and temper their ideas with understanding
gained through experience.
- We must have an environment where we can disagree with each
other, discuss issues, and respect others' viewpoints.
- Bad news doesn't get better with time. Thus, we need to address
bad news, inevitable in any organization, openly and promptly.
- We must be creative in our approaches to problem solving --
we need new ideas to enable us to become better and adapt to the
blowing wind of change that affects our work, and our lives.
5. COMMUNICATIONS: LIFE-BLOOD OF INTELLIGENCE. Our analysis
and synthesis is for naught if we can't move it to warfighters
in time to be relevant. Communications and intelligence closely
relate -- communications provide PATHS TO MOVE INFORMATION
and intelligence provides MEANING THAT TRAVELS OVER THOSE PATHS.
Many forms of communications exist; we must know and exercise
all to overcome the adversity of a failed primary or alternate
route. We must aim for having a primary route plus at least three
alternate routes. We must develop very close relations with those
who control communications, and we must exercise ALL ways
of moving information frequently.
6. AUTOMATION: A TOOL TO HELP US THINK. Automation is
a work aid -- nothing more, nothing less. In its simplest state,
automation helps human beings think. The world of automation
has software applications and hardware intertwined in a complex
process that helps us manage, manipulate, exploit, and track information
resident in data.
- Automation isn't the end-state of our efforts in the intelligence
business. Yes, I want people proficient in calling-up applications,
wiring machines together, and developing the kind of graphics
we need for presenting our ideas and information most effectively.
But I want all of us to recognize automation for what it is --
simply a tool to help us think. With automation, we can manipulate
and sort large amounts of data, correlate it, and produce graphics
of stunning complexity and magnitude.
- We all must train to gain proficiency with the machines and
we'll do so. But on a parallel path, we must work hard to develop
our intellects and our thinking capabilities; the machines will
help us in this quest. Because automation involves very complex
psychomotor skills, we must devote time for our people to become
proficient. Our turnover compounds the challenge; thus, we must
be able to take in new people and help them learn rapidly. We
must have an effective system to do so.
- We'll increasingly push intelligence products in graphic form
and, correspondingly, we'll have to work very hard to ensure we
have substance brought about through good thinking to back up
the picture.
7. BASICS: FUNDAMENTALS OF OUR PROFESSION. We must never
forget the absolute requirement to know basics of our profession.
- We need to know and understand what collection systems can
and can't do.
- We need to know fundamentals of intelligence preparation of
the battlefield (IPB) and how IPB relates to designing and executing
intelligence synchronization, creating combat power effects, and
coupling killing systems with information.
- We need to know the basics of threat in great detail -- order
of battle, doctrine, tactics, weapon systems, communications systems.
We must know the context in which we'll fight -- terrain, weather,
history, national ethos.
- We must know the fundamentals of U.S. communications and automation.
We also must know and understand fundamentals of friendly doctrine,
organization, and equipment so we can relate them to our adversaries.
8. SYNERGY: AVAILABLE TO THOSE WHO SEEK IT. Synergy
enables enormous power of all kinds to spring forth. Synergy
is, by definition, a condition where the whole is greater than
the sum of its parts. We must create synergy through using combinations
of people, things, and thoughts.
- A collection manager creates synergy when working guardrail
common sensor (GRCS) with the U-2 ASARS. Taken alone, each system
is very capable. When working together in a tipping and cueing
role, their combined capabilities greatly increase and enhance
their power. Very quickly, the collection whole is indeed greater
than its parts.
- People working together in work groups create a type of synergy.
Each person is a wonderful, complex, mysterious human being.
When we combine people in a matrix work group to solve a thorny
problem, an intellectual synergy develops and becomes awesome.
- Thinking presents yet another example of synergy we'll engage
in. When analysts study problems and put their thoughts in a
paper, we'll murder board the thoughts and provide insights from
several minds. We'll turn analysis into synthesis in which we
discern relationships and determine a higher level of meaning
than what mere analysis would yield. Then, instead of just written
words, we'll build a package with words, graphics, and photos
to take a synergistic approach to presenting information to our
consumers.
9. OUR REASON FOR EXISTENCE: PROVIDE MEANINGFUL INFORMATION
TO OUR CONSUMERS. We must work hard to satisfy the needs
of those who use our information. We must strive to interact
with recipients of our information and intelligence and adjust
content or presentation to satisfy consumers.
- We must strive to answer warfighter priority intelligence
requirements (PIR). We must suggest to our commanders PIR in
the absence of their guidance. We must work to solve combined
and joint warfighter's PIR. We must work to answer warfighter
PIR on- and off-peninsula.
- We must use all our intellectual and physical energy to provide
warfighters the right kind of information, with the precision
and timeliness they require, in the form they want.
- We can't ever ignore information requirements of one level
of war at the expense of another level of war - levels of war
relate and we can't view them in isolation.
- We must always tie everything we do to information requirements
of warfighters.
- TEAMWORK: IMPERATIVE FOR SUCCESS IN ANY ENDEAVOR.
We can't do things effectively in isolation or without being
concerned for the welfare of others. Specifically, we lose an
immense source of power if we don't learn to operate as a team.
Moreover, we can't hope to achieve synergy if we operate in isolation,
not trying to conduct our activities and energies with a well-defined
and purposefully constructed sense of harmony.
As individuals or as members of organizations, we'll always operate
with others and within a multitude of contexts. In our case,
we'll operate with our ROK counterparts in combined operations
and within a U.S. military joint context. The object in these
relationships is working in harmony, accentuating strengths, and
minimizing weaknesses. We have to learn about differences among
us, bypass or get over those differences, overcome obstacles to
teamwork, and develop an effective team. We must have close relationships
that cut across cultural biases and service ethos lines in armistice
because we'll be stronger for it in crisis and conflict. Every
day I hope each of us does something to improve relationships
with ROK or U.S. joint counterparts.
11. HUMAN BEINGS: OUR GREATEST STRENGTH. We will work
very hard to accomplish our mission with the highest standards
of excellence. Regardless of the relentless pace of our lives
and the hard work we perform, we can't ever lose sight of caring
for people. We need to ensure, absolutely, that our people learn,
get their promotions, get recognition for doing well, and get
a sense of accomplishment and satisfaction from their work. We
must help each other grow intellectually, and help each other
during the difficult times that will come to each of us; we must
treat each other with dignity and respect; we must watch out for
each other on and off duty. We must ensure that our subordinates
have a good place to live, work, eat, and play. We must have
an environment of integrity and caring - we always tell the truth;
we don't equivocate. We must be proud of who we are and of what
we're doing.
12. INFORMATION REVOLUTION: ONE OF THE MOST MOMENTOUS
CHANGES IN HISTORY. We can't fear change. Arguably, change
makes most of us uncomfortable. We like the status quo because
we get accustomed to accomplishing our tasks in certain ways,
and we like our environments to be without perturbation. Regardless
of our likes, change is upon us and we must act. We can take
two paths. The first is the path of status quo - resisting change,
arguing for the way we've always done it, being leery of and resistant
to new ideas.
The second path is the more difficult and certainly least taken.
That is the path of accepting change and using its presence and
energy to shape the future like we desire. This approach is active,
aggressive, and more risky than the first but it is certainly
the approach we have to be on to provide the best possible support
to our informational consumers. We must be bold, competent, and
innovative to hope to excel as we move toward the 21st
century and as we move even farther on the path of the information
revolution.