[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 61 (Monday, April 16, 2018)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2138-S2139]
NOMINATION OBJECTION
Mr. WYDEN. Madam President, I am putting a hold on the nomination of
Mr. Jason Klitenic to be General Counsel of the Office of Director of
National Intelligence. I intend to maintain the hold until there is a
satisfactory response to the March 6, 2018, letter Senator Grassley and
I sent the Director of National Intelligence regarding the Intelligence
Community Office of Inspector General, OIG, and the termination of its
Executive Director of Intelligence Community Whistleblowing and Source
Protection. To date, we have received no response to the letter, nor
have we been provided the documents related to the Executive Director's
termination requested in the letter.
My hold is not connected to the qualifications of Mr. Klitenic to
serve in the position to which he has been nominated, and it is my
intention to release the hold once my concerns related to the OIG are
resolved.
I ask unanimous consent to have the March 6, 2018, letter printed in
the Record.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
March 6, 2018.
Hon. Daniel Coats,
Director of National Intelligence,
Washington, DC.
Dear Director Coats: We write to express deep concern about
the Office of the Intelligence Community Inspector General
(OIG) and to urge that you stay actions taken by the OIG
pending confirmation of the new Inspector General. We are
writing to you because the current acting leadership of the
OIG is the subject of our concerns as well as the subject of
allegations in connection with the specific personnel matter
in question.
Late last week, the OIG's Executive Director of
Intelligence Community Whistleblowing and Source Protection
(the ``Executive Director'') was terminated in a process
marked by procedural irregularities and serious conflicts of
interest. Further, the termination of the Executive Director
came after an extended period during which the acting
leadership of the OIG demonstrated a lack of support for the
critical whistleblower protection mission of the office.
The timing of these actions, which occurred during the
confirmation process for Mr. Michael Atkinson to be the new
Inspector General, is especially troubling. We are concerned
that the termination of the Executive Director may constitute
an effort to preempt the nominee's authority to make his own
decisions upon confirmation. Moreover, during the nominee's
hearing, multiple U.S. Senators expressed the expectation
that the nominee would, if confirmed, address their concerns
regarding the current acting leadership of the OIG and its
approach to whistleblowers. We are concerned that any
preemptive steps taken by the acting leadership risk
undercutting the constitutional authority of the U.S. Senate
to provide advice and consent through the confirmation
process.
We therefore write with several urgent requests. First, on
November 29, 2017, Senator Grassley sent you and the Acting
Inspector General letters urging the preservation of all
records relating to the Executive Director's then-proposed
termination, as well as all the contents of the Executive
Director's office.
[[Page S2139]]
Senator Grassley has not received responses to those letters.
We request that you respond and that you ensure that the
Acting Inspector General responds as well. We further request
that the preservation described in the letters be
implemented, and that it be applied as well to all subsequent
records related to the Executive Director's termination and
all matters then pending involving his Office.
Second, Senator Grassley's letters requested documents
related to the personnel action against the Executive
Director and related matters. We request your support in
ensuring that Congress receives the documents described in
the letters as well as subsequent documents related to the
process by which the Executive Director was terminated.
Finally, we urge that all personnel decisions made by the
OIG since the nomination of Mr. Atkinson, including the
termination of the Executive Director, be stayed pending his
confirmation. (Mr. Atkinson's nomination has been favorably
reported by both the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs and the Select Committee on Intelligence
and is awaiting final Senate action on the Calendar.) Upon
his confirmation, the new Inspector General should have the
unfettered authority to consider both personnel and policy
matters de novo without being hindered by preemptive actions
taken by the current acting leadership.
Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.
Sincerely,
Charles Grassley,
U.S. Senator.
Ron Wyden,
U.S. Senator.
____________________