[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 172 (Tuesday, January 1, 2013)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2027]
INTELLIGENCE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013
______
speech of
HON. RUSH D. HOLT
of new jersey
in the house of representatives
Monday, December 31, 2012
Mr. HOLT. Madam Speaker, I regret that this bill, like so many of its
predecessors over the past several years, does nothing to address some
the urgent need for real reform in our intelligence community.
I am particularly troubled by the failure of this bill to address the
deepening militarization of the Central Intelligence Agency, a process
that began long ago but that has accelerated dramatically in the post-
9/11 era.
Throughout most of its history, the CIA has--at the direction of
successive presidents--veered between two organizational paths. The
first, and the proper one, is for the CIA to do what President Truman
intended when he created it: to collect information about the world
around us, synthesize and analyze that data, and provide it to the
executive and the legislature for their information and action, as
appropriate. The other path--the one that has caused the CIA and our
Nation so much grief--is the path of militarized covert, and not-so-
covert, action.
Today, it is manifested in a quasi-publicly acknowledged CIA
assassination-by-drone campaign on which the Administration has refused
to provide information, despite my own request and the request of many
other House and Senate members for the information. In the previous
decade, we saw what happened when lines of responsibility and
accountability for secret programs were fuzzy or not observed. The
result was a detainee and interrogation program that was a national
embarrassment morally, and an albatross politically with our allies
around the world. The not-so-covert ``drone wars'' are on a similar
glide path, and this bill does nothing to provide a much-needed course
correction for the policy.
This state of affairs is all the more regrettable because there are
many dedicated professionals working in the CIA and elsewhere in our
intelligence community who are forced to implement these questionable
programs and policies. Some would agree with me that the entire
enterprise is out of control and would benefit from much more focused
and effective Congressional oversight. If this bill contained
whistleblower protections for intelligence community employees, some of
those individuals might well step forward to report what they know, and
what they believe needs to be changed. But this bill contains no such
protections, ensuring that the chilling threat of job retaliation
remains in place. We will not restore true accountability and oversight
over the intelligence community until such reforms are enacted, and
which are absent from this bill. Accordingly, I cannot support it.
____________________