[Congressional Record: August 2, 2011 (Senate)]
[Page S5230]
TRIBUTE TO EDWARD LEVINE
Mr. KERRY. Mr. President, it is my pleasure but also a sad moment for
members of the Foreign Relations Committee to take this time to
celebrate the service of and also to salute the retirement of one of
the Senate's great staffers: Ed Levine.
Ed is retiring this week after a remarkable 35 years of service to
the Senate--a lot longer than most Senators get to serve and that most
staff up here have the courage to hang in there and serve.
In his decades of service, Ed has provided wise and perceptive
counsel to two committees, to many Members, and most recently to the
Foreign Relations Committee. His deep knowledge of foreign policy and
his remarkable sense of this institution are truly going to be missed
and I mean missed enormously.
He grew up and he went to school here in Washington, DC, before he
headed off to Berkeley and then later to Yale. When he was a young man
here in this community, he used to ride the streetcar down to Georgia
Avenue, where he would watch the Senators play at Griffith Stadium. For
those who are too young to remember, there actually was a baseball team
called the Senators once upon a time. He did not watch folks here
playing at Griffith Stadium. But when the Washington Senators left for
good to become the Texas Rangers, I have to reckon that Ed just decided
that the U.S. Senators were the only game left in town, and he has been
here ever since.
He first came to the Senate in 1976. He joined the Select Committee
on Intelligence back then--literally right after it was established. It
was a historic moment. Those who remember their history of the 1970s
remember that was a time of great consternation about the covert
activities of the CIA. The activities and the oversight of the CIA
became a major national issue and concern. So it was a historic moment
when the Senate was reasserting its constitutional responsibility to
provide oversight.
Ed spent the next 20 years overseeing some of the Nation's most
sensitive programs and some of its most closely guarded secrets. He was
trusted with some of the most secret information of our country because
he never had anything but the interests of our country and the security
of the Nation foremost in his mind.
I think that is also borne out in the fact that through the course of
his career, he worked for Members of both sides of the aisle while he
was on the Intelligence Committee. He served on that committee as the
personal representative of Republican Senator Clifford Case and then
Republican Senator David Durenberger, and then later for Democratic
Senators Howard Metzenbaum and Chuck Robb. His work for the
Intelligence Committee exemplified a standard of public service that
puts the fulfillment of the Senate's constitutional duties above any
other partisan concerns.
For him, there never was a party issue, Republican or Democrat, or an
ideological issue, liberal or conservative. It was: What are the best
interests of the United States of America and how do we protect its
security? He has applied that very same approach to his work on the
Foreign Relations Committee, where I have had the privilege of watching
him work over the course of the 26 years I have been here.
He worked mostly previously for now-Vice President Biden. A few days
ago, we held a business meeting at the Foreign Relations Committee, and
it was characteristic of Ed's diligence in representing the interests
of country above party that Senator Lugar, the ranking member of the
committee, and who has served with him for a long time, took time to
acknowledge his service and to note how constructively he had worked
with the Republican counterparts on the committee over these many
years.
We saw that in large measure last year when we considered the New
START treaty, in which Ed played an integral role. You know, I might
mention to colleagues, when Vice President Biden was Senator Biden and
chairman of the committee, he coined a nickname for Ed. He called him
``Fast Eddie.'' And the irony of that for all of us who know him is
that Ed does not do ``fast.'' He is one of the most careful and
deliberate thinkers on our staff, and that is one of the things people
valued in him the most. It was never a hip shot. It was always based on
thinking, research, experience, and knowledge.
His knowledge of arms control, I may say, is encyclopedic. During the
New START debate, we had a war room set up one floor below this in the
Foreign Relations Committee room, with dozens of experts from the
various departments of our government, and stacks of briefing books,
and instant computer linkage to the State Department, to the Defense
Department, Intelligence, and so forth, but often when we had a
question, all we had to do was turn to Ed and he would know the answer
from right up here in his head, from his experience.
That is not surprising, given how many treaties Ed has helped this
body to consider during his career. He worked on the INF Treaty, on the
START I treaty, on the START II treaty, on the Chemical Weapons
Convention, on the Convention on Conventional Weapons.
I went up to him a moment ago. I saw he was wearing a tie with a
sword being beaten into plowshares, and he reminded me that came from
the mutual and balanced force reduction treaty, which he said was the
only thing they could agree on, but he is proudly wearing it today.
What all of this adds up to is that Ed spent a great chunk of his
life doing his best to help the Senate protect our Nation from the most
dangerous weapons that ever existed. He did it with such
professionalism, even, I might add, when faced with personal loss, as
when his father died last year right during the consideration of the
treaty, but it did not stop Ed from doing his duty.
All of his Senate service is a real testament to his character. That
he earned the respect from the Members he served and the staff he
worked with is a testament to his great skill and knowledge. And that
he has done so for so many years is a testament to his sense of public
citizenship and his love of country.
So, Ed, we thank you, all the Members of the Senate, for your
service. We will miss you in the Senate. I wish you personally the best
in all of your future endeavors.
Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. SESSIONS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________