Index

PDF Version

96-224

108TH CONGRESS

Rept. 108-724

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

2d Session

Part 4

--9/11 RECOMMENDATIONS IMPLEMENTATION ACT

OCTOBER 5, 2004- Ordered to be printed

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, from the Committee on Government Reform, submitted the following

R E P O R T

together with

MINORITY VIEWS

[To accompany H.R. 10]

[Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]

The Committee on Government Reform, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 10) to provide for reform of the intelligence community, terrorism prevention and prosecution, border security, and international cooperation and coordination, and for other purposes, having considered the same, report favorably thereon with an amendment and recommend that the bill as amended do pass.

CONTENTS Page
Committee Statement and Views 149
Section-by-Section 156
Explanation of Amendments 164
Committee Consideration 164
Roll Call Votes 165
Application of Law to the Legislative Branch 173
Statement of Oversight Findings and Recommendations of the Committee 173
Statement of General Performance Goals and Objectives 173
Constitutional Authority Statement 173
Unfunded Mandate Statement 173
Committee Estimate 173
Budget Authority and Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate 173
Minority Views 191

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS.

Sec. 1. Short title.
Sec. 2. Table of contents.
TITLE I--REFORM OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY
Sec. 1001. Short title.
Subtitle A--Establishment of National Intelligence Director
Sec. 1011. Reorganization and improvement of management of intelligence community.
Sec. 1012. Revised definition of national intelligence.
Sec. 1013. Joint procedures for operational coordination between Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agency.
Sec. 1014. Role of National Intelligence Director in appointment of certain officials responsible for intelligence-related activities.
Sec. 1015. Initial appointment of the National Intelligence Director.
Sec. 1016. Executive schedule matters.
Subtitle B--National Counterterrorism Center and Civil Liberties Protections
Sec. 1021. National Counterterrorism Center.
Sec. 1022. Civil Liberties Protection Officer.
Subtitle C--Joint Intelligence Community Council
Sec. 1031. Joint Intelligence Community Council.
Subtitle D--Improvement of Human Intelligence (HUMINT)
Sec. 1041. Human intelligence as an increasingly critical component of the intelligence community.
Sec. 1042. Improvement of human intelligence capacity.
Subtitle E--Improvement of Education for the Intelligence Community
Sec. 1051. Modification of obligated service requirements under National Security Education Program.
Sec. 1052. Improvements to the National Flagship Language Initiative.
Sec. 1053. Establishment of scholarship program for English language studies for heritage community citizens of the United States within the National Security Education Program.
Sec. 1054. Sense of Congress with respect to language and education for the intelligence community; reports.
Sec. 1055. Advancement of foreign languages critical to the intelligence community.
Sec. 1056. Pilot project for Civilian Linguist Reserve Corps.
Sec. 1057. Codification of establishment of the National Virtual Translation Center.
Sec. 1058. Report on recruitment and retention of qualified instructors of the Defense Language Institute.
Subtitle F--Additional Improvements of Intelligence Activities
Sec. 1061. Permanent extension of Central Intelligence Agency Voluntary Separation Incentive Program.
Sec. 1062. National Security Agency Emerging Technologies Panel.
Subtitle G--Conforming and Other Amendments
Sec. 1071. Conforming amendments relating to roles of National Intelligence Director and Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Sec. 1072. Other conforming amendments
Sec. 1073. Elements of intelligence community under National Security Act of 1947.
Sec. 1074. Redesignation of National Foreign Intelligence Program as National Intelligence Program.
Sec. 1075. Repeal of superseded authorities.
Sec. 1076. Clerical amendments to National Security Act of 1947.
Sec. 1077. Conforming amendments relating to prohibiting dual service of the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Sec. 1078. Access to Inspector General protections.
Sec. 1079. General references.
Sec. 1080. Application of other laws.
Subtitle H--Transfer, Termination, Transition and Other Provisions
Sec. 1091. Transfer of community management staff.
Sec. 1092. Transfer of terrorist threat integration center.
Sec. 1093. Termination of positions of Assistant Directors of Central Intelligence.
Sec. 1094. Implementation plan.
Sec. 1095. Transitional authorities.
Sec. 1096. Effective dates.
TITLE II--TERRORISM PREVENTION AND PROSECUTION
Subtitle A--Individual Terrorists as Agents of Foreign Powers
Sec. 2001. Individual terrorists as agents of foreign powers.
Subtitle B--Stop Terrorist and Military Hoaxes Act of 2004
Sec. 2021. Short title.
Sec. 2022. Hoaxes and recovery costs.
Sec. 2023. Obstruction of justice and false statements in terrorism cases.
Sec. 2024. Clarification of definition.
Subtitle C--Material Support to Terrorism Prohibition Enhancement Act of 2004
Sec. 2041. Short title.
Sec. 2042. Receiving military-type training from a foreign terrorist organization.
Sec. 2043. Providing material support to terrorism.
Sec. 2044. Financing of terrorism.
Subtitle D--Weapons of Mass Destruction Prohibition Improvement Act of 2004
Sec. 2051. Short title.
Sec. 2052. Weapons of mass destruction.
Sec. 2053. Participation in nuclear and weapons of mass destruction threats to the United States.
Subtitle E--Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing
Chapter 1--Funding to Combat Financial Crimes Including Terrorist Financing
Sec. 2101. Additional authorization for FinCEN.
Sec. 2102. Money laundering and financial crimes strategy reauthorization.
Chapter 2--Enforcement Tools to Combat Financial Crimes Including Terrorist Financing
Subchapter A--Money laundering abatement and financial antiterrorism technical corrections
Sec. 2111. Short title.
Sec. 2112. Technical corrections to Public Law 107-56.
Sec. 2113. Technical corrections to other provisions of law.
Sec. 2114. Repeal of review.
Sec. 2115. Effective date.
Subchapter B--Additional enforcement tools
Sec. 2121. Bureau of Engraving and Printing security printing.
Sec. 2122. Conduct in aid of counterfeiting.
Subtitle F--Criminal History Background Checks
Sec. 2141. Short title.
Sec. 2142. Criminal history information checks.
Subtitle G--Protection of United States Aviation System from Terrorist Attacks
Sec. 2171. Provision for the use of biometric or other technology.
Sec. 2172. Transportation security strategic planning.
Sec. 2173. Next generation airline passenger prescreening.
Sec. 2174. Deployment and use of explosive detection equipment at airport screening checkpoints.
Sec. 2175. Pilot program to evaluate use of blast-resistant cargo and baggage containers.
Sec. 2176. Air cargo screening technology.
Sec. 2177. Airport checkpoint screening explosive detection.
Sec. 2178. Next generation security checkpoint.
Sec. 2179. Penalty for failure to secure cockpit door.
Sec. 2180. Federal air marshal anonymity.
Sec. 2181. Federal law enforcement in-flight counterterrorism training.
Sec. 2182. Federal flight deck officer weapon carriage pilot program.
Sec. 2183. Registered traveler program.
Sec. 2184. Wireless communication.
Sec. 2185. Secondary flight deck barriers.
Sec. 2186. Extension.
Sec. 2187. Perimeter Security.
Sec. 2188. Definitions.
Subtitle H--Other Matters
Sec. 2191. Grand jury information sharing.
Sec. 2192. Interoperable law enforcement and intelligence data system.
Sec. 2193. Improvement of intelligence capabilities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
TITLE III--BORDER SECURITY AND TERRORIST TRAVEL
Subtitle A--Immigration Reform in the National Interest
Chapter 1--General Provisions
Sec. 3001. Eliminating the `Western Hemisphere' exception for citizens.
Sec. 3002. Modification of waiver authority with respect to documentation requirements for nationals of foreign contiguous territories and adjacent islands.
Sec. 3003. Increase in full-time border patrol agents.
Sec. 3004. Increase in full-time immigration and customs enforcement investigators.
Sec. 3005. Alien identification standards.
Sec. 3006. Expedited removal.
Sec. 3007. Preventing terrorists from obtaining asylum.
Sec. 3008. Revocation of visas and other travel documentation.
Sec. 3009. Judicial review of orders of removal.
Chapter 2--Deportation of Terrorists and Supporters of Terrorism
Sec. 3031. Expanded inapplicability of restriction on removal.
Sec. 3032. Exception to restriction on removal for terrorists and criminals.
Sec. 3033. Additional removal authorities.
Subtitle B--Identity Management Security
Chapter 1--Improved Security for Drivers' Licenses and Personal Identification Cards
Sec. 3051. Definitions.
Sec. 3052. Minimum document requirements and issuance standards for Federal recognition.
Sec. 3053. Linking of databases.
Sec. 3054. Trafficking in authentication features for use in false identification documents.
Sec. 3055. Grants to States.
Sec. 3056. Authority.
Chapter 2--Improved Security for Birth Certificates
Sec. 3061. Definitions.
Sec. 3062. Applicability of minimum standards to local governments.
Sec. 3063. Minimum standards for Federal recognition.
Sec. 3064. Establishment of electronic birth and death registration systems.
Sec. 3065. Electronic verification of vital events.
Sec. 3066. Grants to States.
Sec. 3067. Authority.
Chapter 3--Measures To Enhance Privacy and Integrity of Social Security Account Numbers
Sec. 3071. Prohibition of the display of social security account numbers on driver's licenses or motor vehicle registrations.
Sec. 3072. Independent verification of birth records provided in support of applications for social security account numbers.
Sec. 3073. Enumeration at birth.
Sec. 3074. Study relating to use of photographic identification in connection with applications for benefits, social security account numbers, and social security cards.
Sec. 3075. Restrictions on issuance of multiple replacement social security cards.
Sec. 3076. Study relating to modification of the social security account numbering system to show work authorization status.
Subtitle C--Targeting Terrorist Travel
Sec. 3081. Studies on machine-readable passports and travel history database.
Sec. 3082. Expanded preinspection at foreign airports.
Sec. 3083. Immigration security initiative.
Sec. 3084. Responsibilities and functions of consular officers.
Sec. 3085. Increase in penalties for fraud and related activity.
Sec. 3086. Criminal penalty for false claim to citizenship.
Sec. 3087. Antiterrorism assistance training of the Department of State.
Sec. 3088. International agreements to track and curtail terrorist travel through the use of fraudulently obtained documents.
Sec. 3089. International standards for translation of names into the Roman alphabet for international travel documents and name-based watchlist systems.
Sec. 3090. Biometric entry and exit data system.
Sec. 3091. Enhanced responsibilities of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism.
Sec. 3092. Establishment of Office of Visa and Passport Security in the Department of State.
Subtitle D--Terrorist Travel
Sec. 3101. Information sharing and coordination.
Sec. 3102. Terrorist travel program.
Sec. 3103. Training program.
Sec. 3104. Technology acquisition and dissemination plan.
Subtitle E--Maritime Security Requirements
Sec. 3111. Deadlines for implementation of maritime security requirements.
TITLE IV--INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND COORDINATION
Subtitle A--Attack Terrorists and Their Organizations
Chapter 1--Provisions Relating to Terrorist Sanctuaries
Sec. 4001. United States policy on terrorist sanctuaries.
Sec. 4002. Reports on terrorist sanctuaries.
Sec. 4003. Amendments to existing law to include terrorist sanctuaries.
Chapter 2--Other Provisions
Sec. 4011. Appointments to fill vacancies in Arms Control and Nonproliferation Advisory Board.
Sec. 4012. Review of United States policy on proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and control of strategic weapons.
Sec. 4013. International agreements to interdict acts of international terrorism.
Sec. 4014. Effective Coalition approach toward detention and humane treatment of captured terrorists.
Sec. 4015. Sense of Congress and report regarding counter-drug efforts in Afghanistan.
Subtitle B--Prevent the Continued Growth of Terrorism
Chapter 1--United States Public Diplomacy
Sec. 4021. Annual review and assessment of public diplomacy strategy.
Sec. 4022. Public diplomacy training.
Sec. 4023. Promoting direct exchanges with Muslim countries.
Sec. 4024. Public diplomacy required for promotion in Foreign Service.
Chapter 2--United States Multilateral Diplomacy
Sec. 4031. Purpose.
Sec. 4032. Support and expansion of democracy caucus.
Sec. 4033. Leadership and membership of international organizations.
Sec. 4034. Increased training in multilateral diplomacy.
Sec. 4035. Implementation and establishment of Office on Multilateral Negotiations.
Chapter 3--Other Provisions
Sec. 4041. Pilot program to provide grants to American-sponsored schools in predominantly Muslim countries to provide scholarships.
Sec. 4042. Enhancing free and independent media.
Sec. 4043. Combating biased or false foreign media coverage of the United States.
Sec. 4044. Report on broadcast outreach strategy.
Sec. 4045. Office relocation.
Sec. 4046. Strengthening the Community of Democracies for Muslim countries.
Subtitle C--Reform of Designation of Foreign Terrorist Organizations
Sec. 4051. Designation of foreign terrorist organizations.
Sec. 4052. Inclusion in annual Department of State country reports on terrorism of information on terrorist groups that seek weapons of mass destruction and groups that have been designated as foreign terrorist organizations.
Subtitle D--Afghanistan Freedom Support Act Amendments of 2004
Sec. 4061. Short title.
Sec. 4062. Coordination of assistance for Afghanistan.
Sec. 4063. General provisions relating to the Afghanistan Freedom Support Act of 2002.
Sec. 4064. Rule of law and related issues.
Sec. 4065. Monitoring of assistance.
Sec. 4066. United States policy to support disarmament of private militias and to support expansion of international peacekeeping and security operations in Afghanistan.
Sec. 4067. Efforts to expand international peacekeeping and security operations in Afghanistan.
Sec. 4068. Provisions relating to counternarcotics efforts in Afghanistan.
Sec. 4069. Additional amendments to the Afghanistan Freedom Support Act of 2002.
Sec. 4070. Repeal.
Subtitle E--Provisions Relating to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan
Sec. 4081. New United States strategy for relationship with Saudi Arabia.
Sec. 4082. United States commitment to the future of Pakistan.
Sec. 4083. Extension of Pakistan waivers.
Subtitle F--Oversight Provisions
Sec. 4091. Case-Zablocki Act requirements.
Subtitle G--Additional Protections of United States Aviation System from Terrorist Attacks
Sec. 4101. International agreements to allow maximum deployment of Federal flight deck officers.
Sec. 4102. Federal air marshal training.
Sec. 4103. Man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS).
Subtitle H--Improving International Standards and Cooperation to Fight Terrorist Financing
Sec. 4111. Sense of the Congress regarding success in multilateral organizations.
Sec. 4112. Expanded reporting requirement for the Secretary of the Treasury.
Sec. 4113. International Terrorist Finance Coordinating Council.
Sec. 4114. Definitions.
TITLE V--GOVERNMENT RESTRUCTURING
Subtitle A--Faster and Smarter Funding for First Responders
Sec. 5001. Short title.
Sec. 5002. Findings.
Sec. 5003. Faster and smarter funding for first responders.
Sec. 5004. Modification of homeland security advisory system.
Sec. 5005. Coordination of industry efforts.
Sec. 5006. Superseded provision.
Sec. 5007. Sense of Congress regarding interoperable communications.
Sec. 5008. Sense of Congress regarding citizen corps councils.
Sec. 5009. Study regarding nationwide emergency notification system.
Sec. 5010. Required coordination.
Subtitle B--Government Reorganization Authority
Sec. 5021. Authorization of intelligence community reorganization plans.
Subtitle C--Restructuring Relating to the Department of Homeland Security and Congressional Oversight
Sec. 5025. Responsibilities of Counternarcotics Office.
Sec. 5026. Use of counternarcotics enforcement activities in certain employee performance appraisals.
Sec. 5027. Sense of the House of Representatives on addressing homeland security for the American people.
Subtitle D--Improvements to Information Security
Sec. 5031. Amendments to Clinger-Cohen provisions to enhance agency planning for information security needs.
Subtitle E--Personnel Management Improvements
Chapter 1--Appointments Process Reform
Sec. 5041. Appointments to national security positions.
Sec. 5042. Presidential inaugural transitions.
Sec. 5043. Public financial disclosure for the intelligence community.
Sec. 5044. Reduction of positions requiring appointment with Senate confirmation.
Sec. 5045. Effective dates.
Chapter 2--Federal Bureau of Investigation Revitalization
Sec. 5051. Mandatory separation age.
Sec. 5052. Retention and relocation bonuses.
Sec. 5053. Federal Bureau of Investigation Reserve Service.
Sec. 5054. Critical positions in the Federal Bureau of Investigation intelligence directorate.
Chapter 3--Reporting Requirement
Sec. 5061. Reporting requirement.
Subtitle F--Security Clearance Modernization
Sec. 5071. Definitions.
Sec. 5072. Security clearance and investigative programs oversight and administration.
Sec. 5073. Reciprocity of security clearance and access determinations.
Sec. 5074. Establishment of national database .
Sec. 5075. Use of available technology in clearance investigations.
Sec. 5076. Reduction in length of personnel security clearance process.
Sec. 5077. Security clearances for presidential transition.
Sec. 5078. Reports.
Subtitle G--Emergency Financial Preparedness
Sec. 5081. Delegation authority of the Secretary of the Treasury.
Sec. 5082. Extension of emergency order authority of the securities and exchange commission.
Sec. 5083. Parallel authority of the Secretary of the Treasury with respect to government securities.
Subtitle H--Other Matters
Chapter 1--Privacy Matters
Sec. 5091. Requirement that agency rulemaking take into consideration impacts on individual privacy.
Sec. 5092. Chief privacy officers for agencies with law enforcement or anti-terrorism functions.
Chapter 2--Mutual Aid and Litigation Management
Sec. 5101. Short title.
Sec. 5102. Mutual aid authorized.
Sec. 5103. Litigation management agreements.
Sec. 5104. Additional provisions.
Sec. 5105. Definitions.
Chapter 3--Miscellaneous Matters
Sec. 5131. Enhancement of public safety communications interoperability.
Sec. 5132. Sense of Congress regarding the incident command system.
Sec. 5133. Sense of Congress regarding United States Northern Command plans and strategies.
Sec. 5134. Information sharing.

TITLE I--REFORM OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY

SEC. 1001. SHORT TITLE.

Subtitle A--Establishment of National Intelligence Director

SEC. 1011. REORGANIZATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF MANAGEMENT OF INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.

`NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE DIRECTOR

`RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES OF THE NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE DIRECTOR

`OFFICE OF THE NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE DIRECTOR

`CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

`DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

SEC. 1012. REVISED DEFINITION OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE.

SEC. 1013. JOINT PROCEDURES FOR OPERATIONAL COORDINATION BETWEEN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY.

SEC. 1014. ROLE OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE DIRECTOR IN APPOINTMENT OF CERTAIN OFFICIALS RESPONSIBLE FOR INTELLIGENCE-RELATED ACTIVITIES.

SEC. 1015. INITIAL APPOINTMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE DIRECTOR.

SEC. 1016. EXECUTIVE SCHEDULE MATTERS.

Subtitle B--National Counterterrorism Center and Civil Liberties Protections

SEC. 1021. NATIONAL COUNTERTERRORISM CENTER.

`NATIONAL COUNTERTERRORISM CENTER

`Sec. 119. National Counterterrorism Center.'.

SEC. 1022. CIVIL LIBERTIES PROTECTION OFFICER.

Subtitle C--Joint Intelligence Community Council

SEC. 1031. JOINT INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY COUNCIL.

Subtitle D--Improvement of Human Intelligence (HUMINT)

SEC. 1041. HUMAN INTELLIGENCE AS AN INCREASINGLY CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.

SEC. 1042. IMPROVEMENT OF HUMAN INTELLIGENCE CAPACITY.

Subtitle E--Improvement of Education for the Intelligence Community

SEC. 1051. MODIFICATION OF OBLIGATED SERVICE REQUIREMENTS UNDER NATIONAL SECURITY EDUCATION PROGRAM.

SEC. 1052. IMPROVEMENTS TO THE NATIONAL FLAGSHIP LANGUAGE INITIATIVE.

SEC. 1053. ESTABLISHMENT OF SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES FOR HERITAGE COMMUNITY CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES WITHIN THE NATIONAL SECURITY EDUCATION PROGRAM.

`SEC. 812. FUNDING FOR SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN HERITAGE COMMUNITY RESIDENTS.

SEC. 1054. SENSE OF CONGRESS WITH RESPECT TO LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION FOR THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY; REPORTS.

SEC. 1055. ADVANCEMENT OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES CRITICAL TO THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.

`Subtitle A--Science and Technology';

`Subtitle B--Foreign Languages Program

`PROGRAM ON ADVANCEMENT OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES CRITICAL TO THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY

`EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS

`VOLUNTARY SERVICES

`REGULATIONS

`DEFINITIONS

`Subtitle C--Additional Education Provisions

`ASSIGNMENT OF INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY PERSONNEL AS LANGUAGE STUDENTS

`Subtitle A--Science and Technology
`Sec. 1001. Scholarships and work-study for pursuit of graduate degrees in science and technology.
`Subtitle B--Foreign Languages Program
`Sec. 1011. Program on advancement of foreign languages critical to the intelligence community.
`Sec. 1012. Education partnerships.
`Sec. 1013. Voluntary services.
`Sec. 1014. Regulations.
`Sec. 1015. Definitions.
`Subtitle C--Additional Education Provisions
`Sec. 1021. Assignment of intelligence community personnel as language students.'.

SEC. 1056. PILOT PROJECT FOR CIVILIAN LINGUIST RESERVE CORPS.

SEC. 1057. CODIFICATION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NATIONAL VIRTUAL TRANSLATION CENTER.

`NATIONAL VIRTUAL TRANSLATION CENTER

`Sec. 120. National Virtual Translation Center.'.

SEC. 1058. REPORT ON RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF QUALIFIED INSTRUCTORS OF THE DEFENSE LANGUAGE INSTITUTE.

Subtitle F--Additional Improvements of Intelligence Activities

SEC. 1061. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY VOLUNTARY SEPARATION INCENTIVE PROGRAM.

SEC. 1062. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES PANEL.

Subtitle G--Conforming and Other Amendments

SEC. 1071. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS RELATING TO ROLES OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE DIRECTOR AND DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY.

`ADDITIONAL ANNUAL REPORTS FROM THE NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE DIRECTOR'.

SEC. 1072. OTHER CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

SEC. 1073. ELEMENTS OF INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY UNDER NATIONAL SECURITY ACT OF 1947.

SEC. 1074. REDESIGNATION OF NATIONAL FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM AS NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM.

SEC. 1075. REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITIES.

SEC. 1076. CLERICAL AMENDMENTS TO NATIONAL SECURITY ACT OF 1947.

`Sec. 102. National Intelligence Director.
`Sec. 102A. Responsibilities and authorities of National Intelligence Director.
`Sec. 103. Office of the National Intelligence Director.
`Sec. 104. Central Intelligence Agency.
`Sec. 104A. Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.'; and

`Sec. 114. Additional annual reports from the National Intelligence Director.';

`Sec. 506. Specificity of National Intelligence Program budget amounts for counterterrorism, counterproliferation, counternarcotics, and counterintelligence'.

SEC. 1077. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS RELATING TO PROHIBITING DUAL SERVICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY.

SEC. 1078. ACCESS TO INSPECTOR GENERAL PROTECTIONS.

SEC. 1079. GENERAL REFERENCES.

SEC. 1080. APPLICATION OF OTHER LAWS.

Subtitle H--Transfer, Termination, Transition and Other Provisions

SEC. 1091. TRANSFER OF COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT STAFF.

SEC. 1092. TRANSFER OF TERRORIST THREAT INTEGRATION CENTER.

SEC. 1093. TERMINATION OF POSITIONS OF ASSISTANT DIRECTORS OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE.

SEC. 1094. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.

SEC. 1095. TRANSITIONAL AUTHORITIES.

SEC. 1096. EFFECTIVE DATES.

TITLE II--TERRORISM PREVENTION AND PROSECUTION

Subtitle A--Individual Terrorists as Agents of Foreign Powers

SECTION 2001. INDIVIDUAL TERRORISTS AS AGENTS OF FOREIGN POWERS.

Subtitle B--Stop Terrorist and Military Hoaxes Act of 2004

SEC. 2021. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2022. HOAXES AND RECOVERY COSTS.

`Sec. 1038. False information and hoaxes

`1038. False information and hoaxes.'.

SEC. 2023. OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND FALSE STATEMENTS IN TERRORISM CASES.

SEC. 2024. CLARIFICATION OF DEFINITION.

Subtitle C--Material Support to Terrorism Prohibition Enhancement Act of 2004

SEC. 2041. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2042. RECEIVING MILITARY-TYPE TRAINING FROM A FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION.

`Sec. 2339D. Receiving military-type training from a foreign terrorist organization

SEC. 2043. PROVIDING MATERIAL SUPPORT TO TERRORISM.

SEC. 2044. FINANCING OF TERRORISM.

Subtitle D--Weapons of Mass Destruction Prohibition Improvement Act of 2004

SEC. 2051. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2052. WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.

SEC. 2053. PARTICIPATION IN NUCLEAR AND WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION THREATS TO THE UNITED STATES.

`832. Participation in nuclear and weapons of mass destruction threats to the United States.';

`Sec. 832. Participation in nuclear and weapons of mass destruction threats to the United States

Subtitle E--Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing

CHAPTER 1--FUNDING TO COMBAT FINANCIAL CRIMES INCLUDING TERRORIST FINANCING

SEC. 2101. ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATION FOR FINCEN.

SEC. 2102. MONEY LAUNDERING AND FINANCIAL CRIMES STRATEGY REAUTHORIZATION.

`Fiscal year 2004
$15,000,000
Fiscal year 2005
$15,000,000'.

CHAPTER 2--ENFORCEMENT TOOLS TO COMBAT FINANCIAL CRIMES INCLUDING TERRORIST FINANCING

SUBCHAPTER A--MONEY LAUNDERING ABATEMENT AND FINANCIAL ANTITERRORISM TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS

SEC. 2111. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2112. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO PUBLIC LAW 107-56.

`TITLE III--INTERNATIONAL MONEY LAUNDERING ABATEMENT AND FINANCIAL ANTITERRORISM ACT OF 2001'.

`TITLE III--INTERNATIONAL MONEY LAUNDERING ABATEMENT AND FINANCIAL ANTITERRORISM ACT OF 2001'.

SEC. 2113. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO OTHER PROVISIONS OF LAW.

`Sec. 5318A Special measures for jurisdictions, financial institutions, international transactions, or types of accounts of primary money laundering concern'.

`5318A. Special measures for jurisdictions, financial institutions, international transactions, or types of accounts of primary money laundering concern.'.

SEC. 2114. REPEAL OF REVIEW.

SEC. 2115. EFFECTIVE DATE.

SUBCHAPTER B--ADDITIONAL ENFORCEMENT TOOLS

SEC. 2121. BUREAU OF ENGRAVING AND PRINTING SECURITY PRINTING.

SEC. 2122. CONDUCT IN AID OF COUNTERFEITING.

Subtitle F--Criminal History Background Checks

SEC. 2141. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2142. CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION CHECKS.

Subtitle G--Protection of United States Aviation System From Terrorist Attacks

SEC. 2171. PROVISION FOR THE USE OF BIOMETRIC OR OTHER TECHNOLOGY.

SEC. 2172. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY STRATEGIC PLANNING.

SEC. 2173. NEXT GENERATION AIRLINE PASSENGER PRESCREENING.

SEC. 2174. DEPLOYMENT AND USE OF EXPLOSIVE DETECTION EQUIPMENT AT AIRPORT SCREENING CHECKPOINTS.

SEC. 2175. PILOT PROGRAM TO EVALUATE USE OF BLAST-RESISTANT CARGO AND BAGGAGE CONTAINERS.

SEC. 2176. AIR CARGO SCREENING TECHNOLOGY.

SEC. 2177. AIRPORT CHECKPOINT SCREENING EXPLOSIVE DETECTION.

SEC. 2178. NEXT GENERATION SECURITY CHECKPOINT.

SEC. 2179. PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO SECURE COCKPIT DOOR.

SEC. 2180. FEDERAL AIR MARSHAL ANONYMITY.

SEC. 2181. FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT IN-FLIGHT COUNTERTERRORISM TRAINING.

SEC. 2182. FEDERAL FLIGHT DECK OFFICER WEAPON CARRIAGE PILOT PROGRAM.

SEC. 2183. REGISTERED TRAVELER PROGRAM.

SEC. 2184. WIRELESS COMMUNICATION.

SEC. 2185. SECONDARY FLIGHT DECK BARRIERS.

SEC. 2186. EXTENSION.

SEC. 2187. PERIMETER SECURITY.

SEC. 2188. DEFINITIONS.

Subtitle H--Other Matters

SEC. 2191. GRAND JURY INFORMATION SHARING.

SEC. 2192. INTEROPERABLE LAW ENFORCEMENT AND INTELLIGENCE DATA SYSTEM.

SEC. 2193. IMPROVEMENT OF INTELLIGENCE CAPABILITIES OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION.

TITLE III--BORDER SECURITY AND TERRORIST TRAVEL

Subtitle A--Immigration Reform in the National Interest

CHAPTER 1--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 3001. ELIMINATING THE `WESTERN HEMISPHERE' EXCEPTION FOR CITIZENS.

SEC. 3002. MODIFICATION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS FOR NATIONALS OF FOREIGN CONTIGUOUS TERRITORIES AND ADJACENT ISLANDS.

SEC. 3003. INCREASE IN FULL-TIME BORDER PATROL AGENTS.

SEC. 3004. INCREASE IN FULL-TIME IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATORS.

SEC. 3005. ALIEN IDENTIFICATION STANDARDS.

SEC. 3006. EXPEDITED REMOVAL.

SEC. 3007. PREVENTING TERRORISTS FROM OBTAINING ASYLUM.

SEC. 3008. REVOCATION OF VISAS AND OTHER TRAVEL DOCUMENTATION.

SEC. 3009. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ORDERS OF REMOVAL.

CHAPTER 2--DEPORTATION OF TERRORISTS AND SUPPORTERS OF TERRORISM

SEC. 3031. EXPANDED INAPPLICABILITY OF RESTRICTION ON REMOVAL.

SEC. 3032. EXCEPTION TO RESTRICTION ON REMOVAL FOR TERRORISTS AND CRIMINALS.

SEC. 3033. ADDITIONAL REMOVAL AUTHORITIES.

Subtitle B--Identity Management Security

CHAPTER 1--IMPROVED SECURITY FOR DRIVERS' LICENSES AND PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION CARDS

SEC. 3051. DEFINITIONS.

SEC. 3052. MINIMUM DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS AND ISSUANCE STANDARDS FOR FEDERAL RECOGNITION.

SEC. 3053. LINKING OF DATABASES.

SEC. 3054. TRAFFICKING IN AUTHENTICATION FEATURES FOR USE IN FALSE IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENTS.

SEC. 3055. GRANTS TO STATES.

SEC. 3056. AUTHORITY.

CHAPTER 2--IMPROVED SECURITY FOR BIRTH CERTIFICATES

SEC. 3061. DEFINITIONS.

SEC. 3062. APPLICABILITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.

SEC. 3063. MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR FEDERAL RECOGNITION.

SEC. 3064. ESTABLISHMENT OF ELECTRONIC BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRATION SYSTEMS.

SEC. 3065. ELECTRONIC VERIFICATION OF VITAL EVENTS.

SEC. 3066. GRANTS TO STATES.

SEC. 3067. AUTHORITY.

CHAPTER 3--MEASURES TO ENHANCE PRIVACY AND INTEGRITY OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS

SEC. 3071. PROHIBITION OF THE DISPLAY OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS ON DRIVER'S LICENSES OR MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS.

SEC. 3072. INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF BIRTH RECORDS PROVIDED IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS.

SEC. 3073. ENUMERATION AT BIRTH.

SEC. 3074. STUDY RELATING TO USE OF PHOTOGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION IN CONNECTION WITH APPLICATIONS FOR BENEFITS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS, AND SOCIAL SECURITY CARDS.

SEC. 3075. RESTRICTIONS ON ISSUANCE OF MULTIPLE REPLACEMENT SOCIAL SECURITY CARDS.

SEC. 3076. STUDY RELATING TO MODIFICATION OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERING SYSTEM TO SHOW WORK AUTHORIZATION STATUS.

Subtitle C--Targeting Terrorist Travel

SEC. 3081. STUDIES ON MACHINE-READABLE PASSPORTS AND TRAVEL HISTORY DATABASE.

SEC. 3082. EXPANDED PREINSPECTION AT FOREIGN AIRPORTS.

SEC. 3083. IMMIGRATION SECURITY INITIATIVE.

SEC. 3084. RESPONSIBILITIES AND FUNCTIONS OF CONSULAR OFFICERS.

SEC. 3085. INCREASE IN PENALTIES FOR FRAUD AND RELATED ACTIVITY.

SEC. 3086. CRIMINAL PENALTY FOR FALSE CLAIM TO CITIZENSHIP.

SEC. 3087. ANTITERRORISM ASSISTANCE TRAINING OF THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.

SEC. 3088. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS TO TRACK AND CURTAIL TERRORIST TRAVEL THROUGH THE USE OF FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED DOCUMENTS.

SEC. 3089. INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR TRANSLATION OF NAMES INTO THE ROMAN ALPHABET FOR INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL DOCUMENTS AND NAME-BASED WATCHLIST SYSTEMS.

SEC. 3090. BIOMETRIC ENTRY AND EXIT DATA SYSTEM.

SEC. 3091. ENHANCED RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COORDINATOR FOR COUNTERTERRORISM.

SEC. 3092. ESTABLISHMENT OF OFFICE OF VISA AND PASSPORT SECURITY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.

Subtitle D--Terrorist Travel

SEC. 3101. INFORMATION SHARING AND COORDINATION.

SEC. 3102. TERRORIST TRAVEL PROGRAM.

SEC. 3103. TRAINING PROGRAM.

SEC. 3104. TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION AND DISSEMINATION PLAN.

Subtitle E--Maritime Security Requirements

SEC. 3111. DEADLINES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF MARITIME SECURITY REQUIREMENTS.

TITLE IV--INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND COORDINATION

Subtitle A--Attack Terrorists and Their Organizations

CHAPTER 1--PROVISIONS RELATING TO TERRORIST SANCTUARIES

SEC. 4001. UNITED STATES POLICY ON TERRORIST SANCTUARIES.

SEC. 4002. REPORTS ON TERRORIST SANCTUARIES.

SEC. 4003. AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING LAW TO INCLUDE TERRORIST SANCTUARIES.

CHAPTER 2--OTHER PROVISIONS

SEC. 4011. APPOINTMENTS TO FILL VACANCIES IN ARMS CONTROL AND NONPROLIFERATION ADVISORY BOARD.

SEC. 4012. REVIEW OF UNITED STATES POLICY ON PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND CONTROL OF STRATEGIC WEAPONS.

SEC. 4013. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS TO INTERDICT ACTS OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM.

`(aa) should be in full compliance with United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373 (September 28, 2001), other appropriate international agreements relating to antiterrorism measures, and such other appropriate criteria relating to antiterrorism measures;

`(bb) should sign and adhere to a `Counterterrorism Pledge' and a list of `Interdiction Principles', to be determined by the parties to the agreement;

`(cc) should identify assets and agree to multilateral efforts that maximizes the country's strengths and resources to address and interdict acts of international terrorism or the financing of such acts;

`(dd) should agree to joint training exercises among the other parties to the agreement; and

`(ee) should agree to the negotiation and implementation of other relevant international agreements and consensus-based international standards; and

`(aa) to identify regions throughout the world that are emerging terrorist threats;

`(bb) to establish terrorism interdiction centers in such regions and other regions, as appropriate;

`(cc) to deploy terrorism prevention teams to such regions, including United States-led teams; and

`(dd) to integrate intelligence, military, and law enforcement personnel from countries that are parties to the agreement in order to work directly with the regional centers described in item (bb) and regional teams described in item (cc).'.

SEC. 4014. EFFECTIVE COALITION APPROACH TOWARD DETENTION AND HUMANE TREATMENT OF CAPTURED TERRORISTS.

SEC. 4015. SENSE OF CONGRESS AND REPORT REGARDING COUNTER-DRUG EFFORTS IN AFGHANISTAN.

Subtitle B--Prevent the Continued Growth of Terrorism

CHAPTER 1--UNITED STATES PUBLIC DIPLOMACY

SEC. 4021. ANNUAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC DIPLOMACY STRATEGY.

SEC. 4022. PUBLIC DIPLOMACY TRAINING.

SEC. 4023. PROMOTING DIRECT EXCHANGES WITH MUSLIM COUNTRIES.

SEC. 4024. PUBLIC DIPLOMACY REQUIRED FOR PROMOTION IN FOREIGN SERVICE.

CHAPTER 2--UNITED STATES MULTILATERAL DIPLOMACY

SEC. 4031. PURPOSE.

SEC. 4032. SUPPORT AND EXPANSION OF DEMOCRACY CAUCUS.

SEC. 4033. LEADERSHIP AND MEMBERSHIP OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.

SEC. 4034. INCREASED TRAINING IN MULTILATERAL DIPLOMACY.

SEC. 4035. IMPLEMENTATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF OFFICE ON MULTILATERAL NEGOTIATIONS.

CHAPTER 3--OTHER PROVISIONS

SEC. 4041. PILOT PROGRAM TO PROVIDE GRANTS TO AMERICAN-SPONSORED SCHOOLS IN PREDOMINANTLY MUSLIM COUNTRIES TO PROVIDE SCHOLARSHIPS.

SEC. 4042. ENHANCING FREE AND INDEPENDENT MEDIA.

SEC. 4043. COMBATING BIASED OR FALSE FOREIGN MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE UNITED STATES.

SEC. 4044. REPORT ON BROADCAST OUTREACH STRATEGY.

SEC. 4045. OFFICE RELOCATION.

SEC. 4046. STRENGTHENING THE COMMUNITY OF DEMOCRACIES FOR MUSLIM COUNTRIES.

Subtitle C--Reform of Designation of Foreign Terrorist Organizations

SEC. 4051. DESIGNATION OF FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS.

SEC. 4052. INCLUSION IN ANNUAL DEPARTMENT OF STATE COUNTRY REPORTS ON TERRORISM OF INFORMATION ON TERRORIST GROUPS THAT SEEK WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND GROUPS THAT HAVE BEEN DESIGNATED AS FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS.

Subtitle D--Afghanistan Freedom Support Act Amendments of 2004

SEC. 4061. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 4062. COORDINATION OF ASSISTANCE FOR AFGHANISTAN.

SEC. 4063. GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE AFGHANISTAN FREEDOM SUPPORT ACT OF 2002.

`SEC. 304 FORMULATION OF LONG-TERM STRATEGY FOR AFGHANISTAN.

`Sec. 304. Formulation of long-term strategy for Afghanistan.'.

SEC. 4064. RULE OF LAW AND RELATED ISSUES.

SEC. 4065. MONITORING OF ASSISTANCE.

SEC. 4066. UNITED STATES POLICY TO SUPPORT DISARMAMENT OF PRIVATE MILITIAS AND TO SUPPORT EXPANSION OF INTERNATIONAL PEACEKEEPING AND SECURITY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN.

SEC. 4067. EFFORTS TO EXPAND INTERNATIONAL PEACEKEEPING AND SECURITY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN.

SEC. 4068. PROVISIONS RELATING TO COUNTERNARCOTICS EFFORTS IN AFGHANISTAN.

`TITLE III--PROVISIONS RELATING TO COUNTERNARCOTICS EFFORTS IN AFGHANISTAN

`SEC. 301. ASSISTANCE FOR COUNTERNARCOTICS EFFORTS.

`TITLE III--PROVISIONS RELATING TO COUNTERNARCOTICS EFFORTS IN AFGHANISTAN
`Sec. 301. Assistance for counternarcotics efforts.'.

SEC. 4069. ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS TO THE AFGHANISTAN FREEDOM SUPPORT ACT OF 2002.

SEC. 4070. REPEAL.

Subtitle E--Provisions Relating to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan

SEC. 4081. NEW UNITED STATES STRATEGY FOR RELATIONSHIP WITH SAUDI ARABIA.

SEC. 4082. UNITED STATES COMMITMENT TO THE FUTURE OF PAKISTAN.

SEC. 4083. EXTENSION OF PAKISTAN WAIVERS.

Subtitle F--Oversight Provisions

SEC. 4091. CASE-ZABLOCKI ACT REQUIREMENTS.

Subtitle G--Additional Protections of United States Aviation System from Terrorist Attacks

SEC. 4101. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS TO ALLOW MAXIMUM DEPLOYMENT OF FEDERAL FLIGHT DECK OFFICERS.

SEC. 4102. FEDERAL AIR MARSHAL TRAINING.

SEC. 4103. MAN-PORTABLE AIR DEFENSE SYSTEMS (MANPADS).

Subtitle H--Improving International Standards and Cooperation to Fight Terrorist Financing

SEC. 4111. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING SUCCESS IN MULTILATERAL ORGANIZATIONS.

SEC. 4112. EXPANDED REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY.

SEC. 4113. INTERNATIONAL TERRORIST FINANCE COORDINATING COUNCIL.

SEC. 4114. DEFINITIONS.

TITLE V--GOVERNMENT RESTRUCTURING

Subtitle A--Faster and Smarter Funding for First Responders

SEC. 5001. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 5002. FINDINGS.

SEC. 5003. FASTER AND SMARTER FUNDING FOR FIRST RESPONDERS.

`TITLE XVIII--FUNDING FOR FIRST RESPONDERS
`Sec. 1801. Definitions.
`Sec. 1802. Faster and smarter funding for first responders.
`Sec. 1803. Essential capabilities for first responders.
`Sec. 1804. Task Force on Essential Capabilities for First Responders.
`Sec. 1805. Covered grant eligibility and criteria.
`Sec. 1806. Use of funds and accountability requirements.
`Sec. 1807. National standards for first responder equipment and training.'; and

`TITLE XVIII--FUNDING FOR FIRST RESPONDERS

`SEC. 1801. DEFINITIONS.

`SEC. 1802. FASTER AND SMARTER FUNDING FOR FIRST RESPONDERS.

`SEC. 1803. ESSENTIAL CAPABILITIES FOR FIRST RESPONDERS.

`SEC. 1804. TASK FORCE ON ESSENTIAL CAPABILITIES FOR FIRST RESPONDERS.

`SEC. 1805. COVERED GRANT ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA.

`SEC. 1806. USE OF FUNDS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REQUIREMENTS.

`SEC. 1807. NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR FIRST RESPONDER EQUIPMENT AND TRAINING.

SEC. 5004. MODIFICATION OF HOMELAND SECURITY ADVISORY SYSTEM.

`SEC. 203. HOMELAND SECURITY ADVISORY SYSTEM.

`203. Homeland Security Advisory System.'.

SEC. 5005. COORDINATION OF INDUSTRY EFFORTS.

SEC. 5006. SUPERSEDED PROVISION.

SEC. 5007. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS.

SEC. 5008. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING CITIZEN CORPS COUNCILS.

SEC. 5009. STUDY REGARDING NATIONWIDE EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION SYSTEM.

SEC. 5010. REQUIRED COORDINATION.

Subtitle B--Government Reorganization Authority

SEC. 5021. AUTHORIZATION OF INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY REORGANIZATION PLANS.

`Sec. 905. Limitation on authority.

`Sec. 913. Application of chapter

`913. Application of chapter.'.

Subtitle C--Restructuring Relating to the Department of Homeland Security and Congressional Oversight

SEC. 5025. RESPONSIBILITIES OF COUNTERNARCOTICS OFFICE.

`SEC. 878. OFFICE OF COUNTERNARCOTICS ENFORCEMENT.

SEC. 5026. USE OF COUNTERNARCOTICS ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES IN CERTAIN EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS.

`SEC. 843. USE OF COUNTERNARCOTICS ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES IN CERTAIN EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS.

`Sec. 843. Use of counternarcotics enforcement activities in certain employee performance appraisals.'.

SEC. 5027. SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON ADDRESSING HOMELAND SECURITY FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Subtitle D--Improvements to Information Securityn Security

SEC. 5031. AMENDMENTS TO CLINGER-COHEN PROVISIONS TO ENHANCE AGENCY PLANNING FOR INFORMATION SECURITY NEEDS.

Subtitle E--Personnel Management Improvements

CHAPTER 1--APPOINTMENTS PROCESS REFORM

SEC. 5041. APPOINTMENTS TO NATIONAL SECURITY POSITIONS.

SEC. 5042. PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURAL TRANSITIONS.

SEC. 5043. PUBLIC FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE FOR THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.

`TITLE III--INTELLIGENCE PERSONNEL FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

`SEC. 301. PERSONS REQUIRED TO FILE.

`SEC. 302. CONTENTS OF REPORTS.

`SEC. 303. FILING OF REPORTS.

`SEC. 304. FAILURE TO FILE OR FILING FALSE REPORTS.

`SEC. 305. CUSTODY OF AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO REPORTS.

`SEC. 306. REVIEW OF REPORTS.

`SEC. 307. CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS AND OTHER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.

`SEC. 308. AUTHORITY OF COMPTROLLER GENERAL.

`SEC. 309. DEFINITIONS.

`SEC. 310. NOTICE OF ACTIONS TAKEN TO COMPLY WITH ETHICS AGREEMENTS.

`SEC. 311. ADMINISTRATION OF PROVISIONS.

SEC. 5044. REDUCTION OF POSITIONS REQUIRING APPOINTMENT WITH SENATE CONFIRMATION.

SEC. 5045. EFFECTIVE DATES.

CHAPTER 2--FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION REVITALIZATION

SEC. 5051. MANDATORY SEPARATION AGE.

SEC. 5052. RETENTION AND RELOCATION BONUSES.

`Sec. 5759. Retention and relocation bonuses for the Federal Bureau of Investigation

`5759. Retention and relocation bonuses for the Federal Bureau of Investigation.'.

SEC. 5053. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION RESERVE SERVICE.

`SUBCHAPTER VII--RETENTION OF RETIRED SPECIALIZED EMPLOYEES AT THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

`Sec. 3598. Federal Bureau of Investigation Reserve Service

`SUBCHAPTER VII--RETENTION OF RETIRED SPECIALIZED EMPLOYEES AT THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
`3598. Federal Bureau of Investigation Reserve Service.'.

SEC. 5054. CRITICAL POSITIONS IN THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION INTELLIGENCE DIRECTORATE.

CHAPTER 3--REPORTING REQUIREMENT

SEC. 5061. REPORTING REQUIREMENT.

Subtitle F--Security Clearance Modernization

SEC. 5071. DEFINITIONS.

SEC. 5072. SECURITY CLEARANCE AND INVESTIGATIVE PROGRAMS OVERSIGHT AND ADMINISTRATION.

SEC. 5073. RECIPROCITY OF SECURITY CLEARANCE AND ACCESS DETERMINATIONS.

SEC. 5074. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL DATABASE .

SEC. 5075. USE OF AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY IN CLEARANCE INVESTIGATIONS.

SEC. 5076. REDUCTION IN LENGTH OF PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE PROCESS.

SEC. 5077. SECURITY CLEARANCES FOR PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION.

SEC. 5078. REPORTS.

Subtitle G--Emergency Financial Preparedness

SEC. 5081. DELEGATION AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY.

SEC. 5082. EXTENSION OF EMERGENCY ORDER AUTHORITY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

SEC. 5083. PARALLEL AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY WITH RESPECT TO GOVERNMENT SECURITIES.

Subtitle H--Other Matters

CHAPTER 1--PRIVACY MATTERS

SEC. 5091. REQUIREMENT THAT AGENCY RULEMAKING TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION IMPACTS ON INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY.

`Sec. 553a. Privacy impact assessment in rulemaking

553a. Privacy impact assessment in rulemaking.'.

SEC. 5092. CHIEF PRIVACY OFFICERS FOR AGENCIES WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT OR ANTI-TERRORISM FUNCTIONS.

CHAPTER 2--MUTUAL AID AND LITIGATION MANAGEMENT

SEC. 5101. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 5102. MUTUAL AID AUTHORIZED.

SEC. 5103. LITIGATION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS.

SEC. 5104. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS.

SEC. 5105. DEFINITIONS.

CHAPTER 3--MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS

SEC. 5131. ENHANCEMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS INTEROPERABILITY.

SEC. 5132. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEM.

SEC. 5133. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING UNITED STATES NORTHERN COMMAND PLANS AND STRATEGIES.

SEC. 5134. INFORMATION SHARING.

COMMITTEE STATEMENT AND VIEWS

Purpose and summary

H.R. 10, the 9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act, as reported by the House Committee on Government Reform, addresses the problems and weaknesses identified by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States by authorizing improvements to the operations of the Federal government relating to intelligence and security. The legislation reported by the Committee included provisions within the jurisdiction of the Government Reform Committee that (1) re-authorize reorganization authority within the intelligence community; (2) improve agency planning regarding information security; (3) streamline the appointments process for intelligence community personnel; (4) revitalizes the Federal Bureau of Investigation workforce; (5) streamline security clearances and processes; (6) modernizes driver's licenses and improves ID security; and (7) improves information security.

Background and need for legislation

H.R. 10 was introduced on September 24, 2004, by House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, to address the problems and weaknesses identified by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States by authorizing improvements to the operations of the Federal government relating to intelligence and security. The legislation, the culmination of the bipartisan 9/11 Commission report and Congress's own recent oversight work, creates a new National Intelligence Director, a National Counterterrorism Center, a Joint Intelligence Community Council and makes other comprehensive reforms to the organization of the Intelligence Community. The following paragraphs elaborate on the importance of some of the provisions in H.R. 10 that are within the jurisdiction of the Government Reform Committee.

Reorganization Authority. This legislation includes a section reauthorizing executive reorganization authority for the intelligence community. The rationale for this language is straightforward: even if Congress succeeds in creating a National Intelligence Director and a National Counter Terrorism Center, future modifications to our intelligence community's organization are inevitable. The NID and NCTC, while critically important steps, are not a panacea--and Congress, unfortunately, is likely only to act again in the event of another crisis.

The Government Reform Committee has been looking extensively at government organization challenges. Part and parcel of moving from a system of `need to know' to `need to share' is the need to restructure the Executive Branch to match 21st Century needs and requirements. The 9/11 Commission rightly recognized that we need a government better organized than the one that exists today, with its national security institutions designed half a century ago to win the Cold War.

The Commission's report makes the need for reauthorization of Executive Reorganization Authority all the more urgent. The obsolete and redundant nature of the federal bureaucracy is the single greatest impediment to moving from a system of `need to know' to `need to share.'

No discussion of impediments to effective information sharing can be complete without discussing the need to reorganize the Executive Branch.

This Committee has held several hearings on the need to reauthorize the Executive Reorganization Authority, which expired in 1984. The authority existed off an on for a period of fifty years, giving Presidents the ability to submit Executive Branch reorganization proposals to the Congress for a guaranteed, up or down vote. In doing so, Executive Branch reorganizations could come before Congress without getting buried in the congressional committee jurisdictional turf battles that have spelled the demise of many governmental reorganization proposals in recent history.

We need look no further than the deliberations that led to the creation of the Homeland Security Department for evidence that Congress is not terribly well-equipped to tackle organizational challenges: too much turf, too many egos, too much time. As hearings held by this Committee over the past two years have shown, this same problem of poor organization exists in federal food safety oversight, federal child welfare programs, and multiple homeland security functions. Reauthorization of executive reorganization authority is the surest, most effective manner of proactively responding to organizational challenges.

As the Commission's report says, `We recommend significant changes in the organization of the government. We know that the quality of the people is more important than the quality of the wiring diagrams. * * * Good people can overcome bad structures. They should not have to.' (page 399)

Information Security and Information Sharing. As a nation, we must be able to identify terrorist threats and defeat them. Our success depends on collecting, analyzing, and appropriately sharing information found in databases, transactions, and other sources. The 9/11 Commission report made clear what the Government Reform Committee already knew; there is a lack of information sharing and analysis among the relevant public and private sector parties. In the period preceding September 11th, there were instances of potentially helpful information that was available but that no person knew to ask for; information that was distributed only in compartmented channels, and information that was requested but could not be shared. H.R. 10 requires the President to establish a trusted information network and secure information-sharing environment (the `Network') to promote the sharing of intelligence and homeland security information in a manner consistent with national security and the protection of privacy and civil liberties. It is absolutely critical to our national security that the federal government maintains secure information systems. The legislation requires agencies to include information security as a requirement for systems planning and acquisition by agencies. H.R. 10 would also provide OMB greater authority in guiding agencies on information security issues.

Streamlining the Appointments Process. This legislation seeks to improve the Presidential appointment process--without violating the spirit or letter of the conflict of interest laws--and allow a newly elected President to submit nominations to the Senate for Presidential appointments to National Security-related positions as expeditiously as possible. The Presidential appointments process is unnecessarily long, burdensome and complex. When it comes to national security appointments, the need to accelerate the process is even more pressing.

This legislation streamlines the financial disclosure requirements for national security appointments, in keeping with a 9/11 Commission recommendation. `Since a catastrophic event could occur with little or no notice, we should minimize as much as possible the disruption of national security policymaking during the change of administrations by accelerating the process for national security appointments.' (page 422)

The current appointments process is riddled with duplicative and unnecessary paperwork, resulting in reporting requirements that are onerous enough to discourage many potential appointees, and sufficiently burdensome to keep appointees busy for weeks trying to come into compliance.

Addressing this issue through a Sense of Congress--which some are attempting to do--is not enough; Congress is the problem. This legislation authorizes real reforms to expedite the appointments process for individuals appointed to national security positions (rather than a blanket statement that the process is in need of repair).

High-level executive branch employees have been required since 1978 to file financial disclosure reports in connection with their entrance into government, and thereafter on an annual basis. This is an important element of an accountable, transparent government, free of conflicts of interest. But in recent years, various aspects of the appointment process have been criticized as unnecessarily difficult and slow--and, especially in the national security realm, slow is not an option.

Nearly a dozen major studies since the mid-1980s have made the case that the wide range of paperwork required by the different offices involved in vetting the President's executive branch nominees needs to be condensed into standardized forms. In addition, many of these studies have concluded that the financial disclosure requirements for these positions should be streamlined. A survey conducted by the Presidential Appointee Initiative of senior level appointees from the Reagan, George H. W. Bush and Clinton Administrations showed that in each successive administration, appointees found the existing financial disclosure requirements increasingly burdensome and difficult to meet.

Others agreed that the current requirements seek more information than necessary to determine whether conflicts exist for executive branch employees. In testimony before the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, Scott Harshbarger of Common Cause stated, `The disclosure form needs to contain all the information necessary to identify potential conflicts. It does not need to be a net worth statement.'

Toward that end, H.R. 10 simplifies financial disclosure reporting for national security appointees by substantially reducing the amount of detail these appointees must provide regarding their sources of income, assets and liabilities--while requiring more than enough information to make sure that potential conflicts of interest can be identified. To reiterate, the changes--which include raising the minimum thresholds for reporting, lowering the top valuation categories and reducing the number of categories overall--return the focus to using the forms for conflict of interest determinations rather than as statements of net worth.

Revitalizing the Federal Bureau of Investigation Workforce. The 9/11 Commission recommends `a specialized and integrated national security workforce should be established at the FBI consisting of agents, analysts, linguists and surveillance specialists who are recruited, trained, rewarded and retained to ensure the development of an institutional culture imbued with a deep expertise in intelligence and national security.' (page 425)

While the FBI has already begun making reforms to bolster its intelligence gathering and analysis capabilities, H.R. 10 includes language that provides the personnel flexibilities and benefits needed to recruit, retain and reward the best and brightest FBI agents, including intelligence analysts.

The growing problem of recruiting, hiring and keeping talented individuals within the FBI has been a concern of the Committee for some time. This situation will only grow worse if nothing is done to improve the FBI's personnel problems while simultaneously asking the Bureau to re-organize itself and do more to protect national security. This legislation offers a solution that meets both the goals of the Commission and the challenges identified by the Committee's previous work in this matter.

Specifically, the legislation allows the agency to offer bonuses to hire and keep key employees; increase salaries for personnel in critical intelligence positions; delay mandatory retirements; and create a Reserve Service so the agency could activate retired employees with specialized skills. The latter provision would allow the FBI to bring back as many as 500 retirees in times of crisis and allow the retirees to collect a salary while continuing to receive their pensions.

Identification Security. The Commission's report urges the federal government to set standards for the issuance of birth certificates and other forms of identification, such as driver's licenses, and to task the Department of Homeland Security with improving identification security. In recommending that the United States establish a secure identification system, the 9/11 Commission noted: `All but one of the 9/11 hijackers acquired some form of U.S. identification document, some by fraud. Acquisition of these forms of identification would have assisted them in boarding commercial flights, renting cars, and other necessary activities.' (page 390) Better identification security, including minimum data and standards will ensure that a person who presents a form of identification is the person identified on that document.

`Fraud in identification of documents is no longer just a problem of theft. At many entry points to vulnerable facilities, including gates for boarding aircraft, sources of identification are the last opportunity to ensure that people are who they say they are and to check whether they are terrorists.' (Commission recommendation, page 390)

A secure system of identification will have two effects on terrorist activities. First, it will make it more difficult for a terrorist to obtain an identity document by fraud. Thus, a terrorist will not be able to conceal his true identity to board commercial aircraft, enter federal facilities, transfer funds to a U.S. bank account, or other activities that may require identification. Second, terrorists will be forced to use (like many of the 9/11 hijackers did anyway) their real identities. As a result, law enforcement and intelligence officials are far more likely to be able to detect their activity before an attack.

Most Americans use their state driver's license as their primary form of identification. H.R. 10 would establish a more secure system for issuing driver's licenses and other forms of state identification documents for use in connection with federal benefits and activities. Under the legislation, a state driver's license or identification card that does not meet specified standards for data, source documents, and security, will not be accepted for federal purposes. For a state driver's license or identification card to be acceptable for federal purposes, an issuing state must obtain and verify proof of identity, lawful presence in the United States, residence, and possession of only one license.

States must also maintain databases of driver identification information, retain documents used to establish identity, and share data with other states. The legislation would also require the establishment of security features for birth and death records and the sharing of those records.

Streamlining Security Clearances and Processes. Among the 9/11 Commission's recommendations is specific guidance regarding the granting and maintenance of the security clearances the Government relies upon to control access to sensitive information. The Government Reform Committee has held hearings on, and previously drafted legislation, to address security clearance backlog and reciprocity issues. Now, the Committee has drafted Subtitle F of Title V in the `9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act' to address the serious problems facing the U.S. Federal security clearance system.

In the wake of 9/11, the demand for security clearances for both government and industry personnel has dramatically increased. Unfortunately, the government mechanisms that investigate and adjudicate clearances have not kept pace with the necessity to process clearance requests quickly and effectively. Both government and industry personnel face additional challenges once they have a security clearance from one agency but then need to work on a project on behalf of a different agency; often, agencies do not recognize clearances granted by a sister agency, requiring personnel to go through the process yet again.

This is an obstacle to coordination and information sharing among national security agencies. As a result, the Government does not utilize its human capital resources in the most effective manner and many defense contractor companies are unable to hire otherwise qualified employees because the security clearance process is requiring, on average, over a year to complete. All signs point to even longer delays if action is not taken. Defense contractor companies often rely on hiring, almost always at a premium, already cleared employees from other firms, thereby increasing costs, which are then passed on to the taxpayer. Ultimately, these backlogs threaten national security by limiting the availability of quality personnel able to work in the national security arena.

The 9/11 Report calls for a single federal agency to be, `responsible for providing and maintaining security clearances, insuring uniform standards--including uniform security questionnaires and financial report requirements, and maintaining a single database.' (page 422) It goes on to stipulate that the National Intelligence Director (NID) be able to `set personnel policies to establish standards for education and training and facilitate assignments at the national intelligence centers and across agency lines'. (page 414) It also directs the NID to `set information sharing and information technology policies to maximize data sharing, as well as policies to protect the security of information'. (page 414) Finally, the 9/11 Report calls for Presidential transition procedures that `work more effectively and allow new officials to assume their new responsibilities as quickly as possible.' (page 422)

It is worth noting that, while the 9/11 Report addresses security clearance issues only within the context of its recommendation on improving Presidential transitions, it is most appropriate to address this important national security issue in its own right. To that end, H.R. 10 assigns the Deputy National Intelligence Director for Community Management and Resources responsibility for daily oversight of security clearance policy, the establishment of uniform investigative and adjudicative standards, and the enforcement of reciprocity. This will ensure that security clearance issues receive the attention they are due by placing them firmly within the chain of command established by Title I of the `9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act'. It will also lodge responsibility for enforcing reciprocity, not within a pre-existing intelligence community agency with its own interests and prejudices, but within the office of the NID where it belongs. The problem of enforcing reciprocity is one of mediating between agencies with different corporate cultures. Therefore, simply assigning one of these agencies to enforce reciprocity will only serve to exacerbate the problem.

Furthermore, the `9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act' will address the specific concerns of the 9/11 Report enumerated above in a number of ways. First, it ensures consistency of procedures and standards (Sec. 5072), including uniform questionnaires, financial reporting requirements and polygraph procedures for all security clearance applicants. Second, it mandates reciprocity (Sec. 5073) and, through the creation of a single database to track granted clearances and other pertinent information, enhances information sharing and a `need-to-share' mindset while effectively incentivizing reciprocity (Sec. 5074). H.R. 10 is also consistent with the recommendations of the 9/11 Report in that it mandates the use of available technology to enhance clearance investigations and secure national secrets (Sec. 5075), while facilitating the most effective use of human capital across agency lines. It establishes specific performance goals for the reduction of the time required to conduct security clearance investigations and adjudicate access to classified material (Sec. 5076). Finally, H.R. 10 addresses the Presidential transition concerns of the 9/11 Report by requiring the President-elect to submit the names of candidates for high-level national security positions to the NID after the general election so that the NID may expedite their clearance procedures, thereby ensuring they are able to assume their new responsibilities as quickly as possible (Sec. 5077).

In these ways, the `9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act' will streamline the Federal security clearance investigative and adjudicative process, clearing up the bottleneck that has become increasingly dangerous in the post-9/11 world.

Legislative history

H.R. 10, the 9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act, was introduced on September 24, 2004, by House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, along with 16 consponsors: Reps. Roy Blunt (R-MO); John Boehner (R-OH); Chris Cox (R-CA); Tom Davis (R-VA); Tom DeLay (R-TX); David Dreier (R-CA); Peter Hoekstra (R-MI); Duncan Hunter (R-CA); Henry Hyde (R-IL); Jim Nussle (R-IA); Michael Oxley (R-OH); Deborah Pryce (R-OH); James Sensenbrenner (R-WI); Chris Smith (R-NJ); William Thomas (R-CA); and Bill Young (R-FL). The bill was referred to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), and in addition to the Committees on Armed

Services, Education and the Workforce, Energy and Commerce, Financial Services, Government Reform, International Relations, the Judiciary, Rules, Science, Transportation and Infrastructure, Ways and Means, and Homeland Security (Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. On September 29, 2004, the bill was agreed to by voice vote and ordered to be reported favorably, with amendments, by the House Government Reform Committee.

SECTION-BY-SECTION

The only sections described in this section are those sections (or in some cases subsections of sections) of H.R. 10 that fall within the jurisdiction of the House Committee on Government Reform.

Sec. 1011. Reorganization and improvement of management of intelligence community

Subsection (a) of this section would add a new section 102A to the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 402 et seq.) that would, among other things, authorize the National Intelligence Director to issue regulations to provide incentives to the personnel of the elements of the intelligence community to serve on the staff of the National Intelligence Director, the national intelligence centers, and the National Counterterrorism Center, and to facilitate the rotation of personnel through the various elements of the intelligence community.

Sec. 1016. Executive schedule matters

This section would add the National Intelligence Director to the list of Executive Schedule I positions, and the Deputy National Intelligence Director and the Director of the National Counterterrorism Center to the list of Executive Schedule II positions. This section would also strike the references to the Assistance Directors of Central Intelligence from the list of Executive Schedule IV positions.

Sec. 1052. Improvements to the National Flagship Language Initiative

Subsection (b) of this section would amend section 802(i) of the David L. Boren National Security Education Act of 1991 (50 U.S.C. 1902(i)) to add a requirement that employees must enter into service agreements in order to take part in training program authorized by the Act.

Sec. 1056. Pilot project for Civilian Linguist Reserve Corps

This section would authorize a three year pilot project to establish a Civilian Linguist Reserve Corps comprised of United States citizens with advanced levels of proficiency in foreign languages who would be available upon a call of the President to perform such service or duties with respect to such foreign languages in the Federal Government as the President may specify.

Sec. 1061. Permanent extension of Central Intelligence Agency voluntary separation incentive program

This section would permanently extend the Central Intelligence Agency voluntary separation incentive program.

Sec. 1062. National Security Agency Emerging Technologies Panel

This section would provide an exemption from the Federal Advisory Committee Act for the National Security Agency Emerging Technologies Panel.

Sec. 1080. Application of other laws

This section would add employees of the Office of the National Intelligence Director to the list of employees that are prohibited from participating in political activities. It would also authorize the NID to not disclose to the Secretary of State gifts received from foreign entities if disclosure would adversely affect U.S. intelligence sources. Finally, this section would add the Office of the National Intelligence Director to the list of offices and agencies covered by section 105(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government Act.

Sec. 2121. Bureau of Engraving and Printing security printing

This section would authorize procurement guidelines for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.

Sec. 3051. Definitions

This section would provide definitions for the terms `driver's license,' `identification card,' `Secretary,' and `State,' for the purposes of sections 3051 through 3056.

Sec. 3052. Minimum document requirements and issuance standards for Federal recognition

This section would require that, for a state driver's license or identification card to be acceptable for federal purposes, States must certify to the Secretary of Homeland Security, within 3 years, that they have met specified standards for data elements, source documents, and security. This section would also prohibit States from providing a driver's license to an applicant holding a driver's license issued by another State without confirmation from the other State that the individual is terminating or has terminated the driver's license. Finally, this section would require an applicant require proof of legal presence in order to obtain a driver's license or identification card.

Sec. 3053. Linking of databases

This section would require that all States participate in the Driver License Agreement interstate compact to ensure States have access to the information contained in the motor vehicle databases of all other States. This section would also set forth minimum requirements for the information contained in such databases.

Sec. 3054. Trafficking in authentication features for use in false identification documents

This section would amend Title 18 to make it a federal crime to traffic in or use security features designed to prevent tampering, counterfeiting, or duplication of identity documents.

Sec. 3055. Grants to States

This section would authorize, for Fiscal Years 2005 through 2009, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security to issue grants to States to fulfill the minimum requirements set forth in this subtitle.

Sec. 3056. Authority

This provision would require the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish minimum standards required to permit federal employees to accept state drivers' licenses and personal identification cards.

Sec. 3061. Definitions

This section would provide definitions for the terms `birth certificate,' `registrant,' and `State,' for the purposes of sections 3061 through 3067.

Sec. 3062. Applicability of minimum standards to local governments

This section would clarify that all minimum standards set forth in Subtitle II apply to the issuance of birth certificates by the State and local government entities within that State.

Sec. 3063. Minimum standards for Federal recognition

This section would require that, for a birth certificate to be acceptable for federal purposes, States must certify to the Secretary of Homeland Security, within 3 years, that they have met specified standards for information and security.

Sec. 3064. Establishment of electronic birth and death registration systems

This section would direct the Secretary, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Commissioner of Social Security, to work with the States to establish standards for electronic birth and death registration systems in the States.

Sec. 3065. Electronic verification of vital events

This section would establish the Secretary as the lead in the implementation of electronic verification of vital events. The Secretary is given authority to issue regulations in the establishment and implementation of the system.

Sec. 3066. Grants to States

This section would authorize, for Fiscal Years 2005 through 2009, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security to issue grants to States to fulfill the minimum requirements set forth in this subtitle.

Sec. 3067. Authority

This section would authorize the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Health and Human Services and in consultation with the States, to issue regulations, certify standards, issue grants and provide an extension to the deadlines set forth in this subtitle.

Sec. 5003. Faster and smarter funding for first responders

Subsection (a)(2) of this section would add a new title to Public Law 107-296 that would, among other things, establish a Task Force on Essential Capabilities for First Responders that would be subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

Sec. 5021. Authorization of intelligence community reorganization plans

This section would reauthorize the President's authority to submit executive branch reorganization plans to Congress for a guaranteed, up or down vote, but limits such plans to cover only the elements of the intelligence community rather than authorizing the authority government-wide.

Sec. 5025. Responsibilities of Counternarcotics Office

This section would amend 6 U.S.C. 458 to, among other things, authorize the Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy to appoint the Director of the Office of Counternarcotics Enforcement as the United States Interdiction Coordinator.

Sec. 5026. Use of counternarcotics enforcement activities in certain employee performance appraisals

This section would add a new section to subtitle E of title VII of Public Law 107-296 that would require certain subdivisions of the Department of Homeland Security to include counternarcotics enforcement activities in employee performance appraisals.

Sec. 5031. Amendments to Clinger-Cohen provisions to enhance agency planning for information security needs

This section would require agencies to include cyber security as a requirement for systems planning and acquisition by agencies.

Sec. 5041. Appointments to national security positions

This section would authorize the President to appoint individuals to executive schedule IV and V national security positions regardless of whether or not the positions require Senate confirmation in statute. This section would also authorize the President to appoint individuals to executive schedule II and III national security positions that require Senate confirmation if the Senate fails to act on the nomination within thirty legislative days after submission of the nomination to the Senate.

Sec. 5042. Presidential inaugural transitions

This section would the statute governing presidential transitions.

Sec. 5043. Public financial disclosure for the intelligence community

This section would expedite and streamline the public financial disclosure requirements for intelligence personnel while maintaining sufficient reporting to ensure that the existence of conflicts of interest can be determined. This section reduces the amount of detail a covered employee must report regarding financial interests, while authorizing the Office of Government Ethics or the employing department to require the individual to provide additional information needed to complete the form or perform a conflict of interest analysis.

Sec. 5044. Reduction of positions requiring appointment with Senate confirmation

This section would require all agency heads to report to the President and the Congress the number of positions within that agency that require Senate confirmation.

Sec. 5045. Effective dates

This section would explain that section 5043 will take effect on January 1 of the year following date of enactment of the Act, or July 1 of the following year if the legislation gets enacted after July 1 of the previous year.

Sec. 5051. Mandatory separation age

This section would amend title 5, United States Code, to allow the Director of the FBI to, on a limited basis, delay the mandatory retirement age of individual FBI agents until the agent reaches 65 years of age. This authority would expire on December 31, 2009.

Sec. 5052. Retention and relocation bonuses

This section would amend Chapter 57 of Title 5, United States Code, to authorize the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, after consultation with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management and the completion of a service agreement signed by the employee, to pay an employee a bonus, which cannot exceed 50 percent of the annual rate of basic pay of the employee as of the beginning of the period of service multiplied by the number of years in the required period of service of the employee involved, but shall in no event exceed 100 percent of the annual rate of basic pay of the employee as of the beginning of the service period. This section would also prohibit retention and relocation bonuses from being paid to political appointees.

Sec. 5053. Federal Bureau of Investigation Reserve Service

This section would authorize the Director to establish an FBI Reserve Service that would facilitate streamlined, temporary re-hire from a pre-certified cadre of retired FBI employees who possess specialized skills required to deal with the demands of crisis and other special situations without adversely impacting their retirement pay.

Sec. 5054. Critical positions in the Federal Bureau of Investigation intelligence directorate

This section would amend Title 5 to include positions in the new FBI Intelligence Directorate--if they are determined to be of an extremely high level in a scientific, technical, professional, or administrative field, and critical to the FBI's successful accomplishment of an important mission--as critical positions. This authority would allow the FBI, in conjunction with the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Personnel Management, to fix pay for that position up to Executive Schedule I.

Sec. 5061. Reporting requirement

This section would require the President to submit a report to Congress within six months after the date of enactment of this Act, on the following: the hiring policies of the federal government with respect to its foreign language needs and the war on terrorism; the current workforce capabilities of the relevant federal agencies regarding foreign language needs and the war on terrorism; shortfalls in workforce capabilities with respect to the war on terrorism; and any specific plans to eliminate the aforementioned shortfalls.

Sec. 5071. Definitions

This section would define `Director' as the National Intelligence Director. However, it is assumed throughout the legislation that the Deputy National Intelligence Director for Community Management and Resources will be acting for the NID in most cases regarding security clearance issues.

Sec. 5072. Security clearance and investigative programs oversight and administration

This section would detail the responsibilities and authority of the Deputy NID for Community Management and Resources vis-a.AE2-vis security clearance policy. The responsibilities and authorities would include: daily oversight of these issues government-wide; the establishment of uniform investigative and adjudicative procedures, application questionnaires and requirements; the power to designate authorized investigative and adjudicative agencies; enforcing reciprocity; and developing new resources and methods.

Sec. 5073. Reciprocity of security clearance and access determinations

This section would establish in statute, for the first time, the unequivocal mandate of reciprocal recognition of security clearances government-wide. It would also explicitly prohibit the establishment of additional requirements or the use of duplicative investigations by agencies that try to inhibit access to classified information by personnel with the appropriate level of clearance.

Sec. 5074. Establishment of national database

First, this section would facilitate information sharing and reduce backlog by consolidating all information about cleared personnel government-wide into a single database accessible to all national security agencies. Second, agency participation in contributing information to this database would serve as the means by which the NID could threaten to de-certify authorized investigative and adjudicative agencies, thereby enforcing the reciprocity requirement.

Sec. 5075. Use of available technology in clearance investigations

This section would make provision for the use of the latest technology in investigating, adjudicating, and maintaining security clearances. This would include the development of a system that would provide continuous monitoring of cleared personnel in order to spot developing trends that may compromise the security of government information before they become a problem.

Sec. 5076. Reduction in length of personnel security clearance process

This section would establish a performance goal of 60 days for granting a security clearance (40 days for an investigation and 20 days for adjudication) over a phase-in period of 5 years. It would also establish an interim benchmark of 120 days from application to adjudication to be reached within 2 years of enactment.

Sec. 5077. Security clearances for presidential transition

This section would address the specific recommendation of the 9/11 Report that security clearances be expedited for Presidential transition teams. It would mandate an adjudication decision for personnel whose names are submitted by the President-elect by the date of the general election.

Sec. 5078. Reports

This section would require the NID to submit annually a report to the appropriate committees of Congress on agency progress toward meeting the performance goals laid out in Section 5076. The report would also provide recommendations for improvement.

Sec. 5092. Chief privacy officers for agencies with law enforcement or anti-terrorism functions

This section would establish within each federal agency with law enforcement or antiterrorism functions a chief privacy officer, designated by the head of the agency, with primary responsibility over privacy policy within that agency.

Sec. 5134. Information sharing

This section would direct the President to establish a trusted information network and secure information-sharing environment (the `Network') to promote the sharing of intelligence and homeland security information in a manner consistent with national security and the protection

of privacy and civil liberties. The section would outline the required attributes of the Network, including that it would be decentralized and would allow information sharing horizontally across agencies, vertically between levels of government and, as appropriate, with the private sector; build on existing systems capabilities; incorporate protections for privacy and civil liberties; and, to enhance accountability and facilitate oversight, employ authentication, access controls, audit capabilities and other mechanisms. This section would require that within 90 days, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), in consultation with the Executive Council established below, would have to: submit to the President and Congress a description of the technological, legal, and policy issues presented by creation of the Network and how these will be addressed; establish electronic directory services to assist in locating relevant people and information; and conduct a baseline review of current federal agency information sharing capabilities. Within 180 days, this section would direct the President to: issue guidelines for acquiring, accessing, sharing, and using terrorism information; issue guidelines to protect privacy and civil liberties in the development and use of the Network; require federal agencies to promote a culture of information sharing through greater incentives and reduced disincentives for information sharing. This section would require that within 270 days, the Director of OMB, in consultation with the Executive Council, would have to prepare and submit to the President and Congress an Enterprise Architecture and Implementation plan. The plan would include: a description of the functions, capabilities and resources of the proposed Network; a delineation of the roles of the federal agencies that are to participate in the development of the Network; a description of the system design that will meet the technological requirements to link and enhance existing networks; an enterprise architecture; a description of how privacy and civil liberties will be protected in the design and implementation of the Network; a plan and time line for the development and implementation of the Network; budgetary requirements; and proposals for any legislation that the Director of OMB believes to be necessary to implement the Network. This section would give the Director of OMB the responsibility, in consultation with the Executive Council, for implementing and managing the Network; developing policies and guidelines to foster the development and proper operation of the Network; and assisting, monitoring and assessing the implementation of the Network by individual departments and agencies. The Director of OMB, within 30 days, would have to appoint an official, with the equivalent of Deputy Director rank, whose primary responsibility will be to carry out the day-to-day duties of the OMB Director with respect to information sharing. This section would also establish an Executive Council on Information Sharing, chaired by the Director of OMB and made up of key federal officials (including officials from the NID, DHS, DoD, DOJ, the State Department) and state, local, and tribal officials, and individuals from private or nonprofit entities that own or operate critical infrastructure, appointed by the President. The Council would: assist the Director of OMB in his responsibilities with respect to the Network; ensure that there is coordination among Network participants; review ongoing policy, legal and technology issues; and establish a dispute resolution process to resolve disagreements among agencies about whether particular information is to be shared and in what manner. This section would also establish an Advisory Board on Information Sharing, made up of no more than 15 members with significant experience or expertise in policy, technical and operational matters, appointed by the President from outside the federal government. The Board would advise the President and the Executive Council on policy, technical, and management issues related to the design and implementation of the Network. This section would direct the President, through the Director of OMB, to report semiannually to Congress on the state of the Network. The report would include a general progress report on implementation of the Network, as well as information on how the Network is performing with respect to a variety of specific considerations. The head of each agency participating in the Network would have to ensure: full agency compliance with Network guidelines and procedures; the provision of activities resources to support operation of and participation in the Network; and full agency cooperation in the development of the Network and in the management and acquisition of information technology consistent with applicable law. This section would require each agency participating in the Network to submit to OMB within one year, reports that include the agency's strategic plan, objective performance measures, and budgetary requirements for implementing the Network within the agency and increasing information sharing. Annual agency reports would be required thereafter assessing the agency's progress in complying with the Network's requirements and outlining the agency's future plans for Network implementation. This section would require that, within one year after enactment of the Act and periodically thereafter, the Comptroller General review and evaluate the implementation of the Network to determine the extent of compliance with the Network's requirements and to assess the effectiveness of the Network both in improving information sharing and in protecting civil liberties; the Comptroller General is to report to Congress on his findings. This section would also direct the Inspectors General of relevant federal agencies to, at their discretion, conduct audits or investigations to assess their agencies' effectiveness in improving information sharing and complying with the Network's requirements. Finally, this section would authorize $50 million to the Director of OMB for FY2005; and then such sums as are necessary thereafter, to be allocated in accordance with the system design and implementation plan required by the Act.

EXPLANATION OF AMENDMENTS

The amendment in the nature of a substitute, as amended, is explained in the descriptive portions of this report.

COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

On September 29, 2004, the House Committee on Government Reform met in open session, and by voice vote, ordered reported favorably the bill, H.R. 10, as amended.

Insert offset folio 169 here HR724.001

Insert offset folio 170 here HR724.002

Insert offset folio 171 here HR724.003

Insert offset folio 172 here HR724.004

Insert offset folio 173 here HR724.005

Insert offset folio 174 here HR724.006

Insert offset folio 175 here HR724.007

Insert offset folio 176 here HR724.008

APPLICATION OF LAW TO THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

Section 102(b)(3) of Public Law 104-1 requires a description of the application of this bill to the legislative branch where the bill relates to the terms and conditions of employment or access to public services and accommodations. Legislative branch employees and their families, to the extent that they are otherwise eligible for the benefits provided by this legislation, have equal access to its benefits.

STATEMENT OF OVERSIGHT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE

In compliance with clause 3(c)(1) of rule XIII and clause (2)(b)(1) of rule X of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee's oversight findings and recommendations are reflected in the descriptive portions of this report.

STATEMENT OF GENERAL PERFORMANCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

In accordance with clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee's performance goals and objectives are reflected in the descriptive portions of this report.

CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT

Under clause 3(d)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee must include a statement citing the specific powers granted to Congress to enact the law proposed by H.R. 10. Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution of the United States grants the Congress the power to enact this law.

UNFUNDED MANDATE STATEMENT

Section 423 of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act (as amended by Section 101(a)(2) of the Unfunded Mandate Reform Act, P.L. 104-4) requires a statement whether the provisions of the reported include unfunded mandates. A statement from the Congressional Budget Office regarding unfunded mandates was not available at the time this report was filed.

COMMITTEE ESTIMATE

Clause 3(d)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives requires an estimate and a comparison by the Committee of the costs that would be incurred in carrying out H.R. 10. However, clause 3(d)(3)(B) of that rule provides that this requirement does not apply when the Committee has included in its report a timely submitted cost estimate of the bill prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office under section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act.

BUDGET AUTHORITY AND CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE

With respect to the requirements of clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 308(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and with respect to requirements of clause (3)(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee has received the following cost estimate for H.R. 10 from the Director of Congressional Budget Office:

October 5, 2004.

Hon. TOM DAVIS,
Chairman, Committee on Government Reform,
House of Representatives, Washington, DC.

DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: The Congressional Budget Office has prepared the enclosed cost estimate for H.R. 10, the 9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act.

If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Matthew Pickford.

Sincerely,

Douglas Holtz-Eakin,

Director.

Enclosure.

H.R. 10--9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act

Summary: H.R. 10 would affect the intelligence community, terrorism prevention and prosecution, and border security, as well as international cooperation and coordination. Title I would establish an Office of the National Intelligence Director (NID) to manage and oversee intelligence activities of the U.S. government, including foreign intelligence and counterintelligence activities. The legislation would transfer some existing intelligence organizations to that office and would establish a National Counterterrorism Center and one or more national intelligence centers within the Office of the NID. Title II would authorize funding for law enforcement, counterterrorism activities, and programs related to aviation safety. Title III would increase the number of agents performing border security and immigration functions, improve the security of identity documents such as driver's licenses, and increase the number of consular officers within the Department of State. Title IV would authorize funds for a number of international cooperation programs. Finally, title V would reauthorize and restructure several homeland security programs.

CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 10 would cost about $560 million in 2005 and almost $14.7 billion over the 2005-2009 period, assuming appropriation of the specified and estimated amounts. That total does not include possible additional costs associated with implementing provisions dealing with the creation of an interoperable data system for exchanging law enforcement and intelligence data or the establishment of a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reserve service because CBO does not have sufficient information to estimate those costs at this time. With regard to the FBI reserve service, CBO cannot predict when a national emergency would occur, but expects that costs for the proposed reserve service would likely be insignificant in most years.

The bill also contains provisions that would decrease direct spending. In particular, it would establish a fund within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to enhance efforts to detect explosives at security checkpoints in airports; authorize the collection and spending of $30 million a year of fees from airline passengers in 2005 and 2006 for that purpose; allow the Director of the FBI to waive the mandatory retirement requirement for agents until age 65; and extend indefinitely the authority of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to offer incentive payments to employees who voluntarily retire or resign. CBO estimates that enacting those provisions would decrease direct spending by about $25 million in 2005, $4 million over the 2005-2009 period, and $2 million over the 2005-2014 period. The estimate of direct spending does not include the effects of extending the authority of the CIA to offer incentive payments to employees who voluntarily retire or resign because the data needed to prepare such an estimate are classified. Enacting H.R. 10 would not affect receipts.

H.R. 10 contains several intergovernmental mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA). CBO estimates that those mandates, in aggregate, would impose costs on state, local, and tribal governments totaling more than $600 million over fiscal years 2005 through 2009. CBO estimates that the costs in at least one of those years would exceed the threshold established in UMRA ($60 million in 2004, adjusted annually for inflation). The bill would authorize appropriations for grants to states to cover such costs.

CBO has not completed an analysis of the bill's impact on the private sector. That analysis will be provided later in a separate report.

Estimated cost to the Federal Government: The estimated budgetary impact of H.R. 10 is summarized in Table 1. The costs of this legislation fall within budget functions 050 (national defense), 400 (transportation), 450 (community and regional development), 550 (health), 750 (administration of justice), and 800 (general government).

Basis of estimate: Most of H.R. 10's effects on the federal budget would be subject to appropriation of amounts necessary to implement the bill. For this estimate, CBO assumes that the bill will be enacted by the end of the calendar year, that all such amounts will be appropriated near the start of each fiscal year, and that outlays will follow historical patterns for similar activities.

TABLE 1- BUDGETARY IMPACT OF H.R. 10, THE 9/11 RECOMMENDATIONS IMPLEMENTATION ACT, AS ORDERED REPORTED BY THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                By fiscal year, in millions of dollars--                         
                                                                                    2005  2006  2007  2008  2009 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGES IN SPENDING SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION 1                                                                   
Estimated Authorization Level                                                      1,184 5,076 1,393 4,750 5,315 
Estimated Outlays                                                                    558 4,339 2,145 3,319 4,317 
CHANGES IN DIRECT SPENDING 2                                                                                     
Estimated Budget Authority                                                             *     *     *     *     * 
Estimated Outlays                                                                    -25   -12    19    10     5 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Spending subject to appropriation

H.R. 10 contains provisions that would affect the intelligence community, terrorist prevention and prosecution, and border security, as well as international cooperation and coordination. Table 2 presents CBO's estimates of the cost of those provisions. In total, we estimate that implementing H.R. 10 would cost almost $14.7 billion over the 2005-2009 period, assuming appropriation of the specified and estimated amounts. That total does not include the possible additional costs associated with implementing provisions dealing with the creation of an interoperable data system for exchanging law enforcement and intelligence data or the establishment of an FBI reserve service because CBO does not have sufficient information to estimate those costs at this time. With regard to the FBI reserve service, CBO cannot predict when a national emergency would occur, but expects that costs for the proposed reserve service would likely be insignificant in most years.

TABLE 2- ESTIMATED CHANGES IN SPENDING SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION UNDER H.R. 10 AS ORDERED REPORTED BY THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             By fiscal year, in millions of dollars                         
                                                                                               2005  2006  2007  2008  2009 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reform the Intelligence Community:                                                                                          
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                    40   235    75    90    70 
Estimated Outlays                                                                                30    60   110   145   140 
Combating Financial Crimes:                                                                                                 
Authorization Level                                                                              51     0     0     0     0 
Estimated Outlays                                                                                36    15     0     0     0 
Aviation Security:                                                                                                          
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                   528 4,343   330     0     0 
Estimated Outlays                                                                               238 3,666   957   340     0 
Improve Intelligence Capabilities of the FBI:                                                                               
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                     4     5     6     7     8 
Estimated Outlays                                                                                 3     5     6     8     8 
Increase the Number of Border Patrol and Immigration Agents:                                                                
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                     0   174   526   981 1,451 
Estimated Outlays                                                                                 0   165   509   958 1,427 
Grants to Improve Security of Driver's Licenses:                                                                            
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                    80    30    30    10    10 
Estimated Outlays                                                                                80    30    30    10    10 
New Standards for Issuance of Birth and Death Certificates:                                                                 
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                   330    20    30    40    50 
Estimated Outlays                                                                                70   150   160    35    45 
Expand Immigration Services at Foreign Airports:                                                                            
Authorization Level                                                                              49    88   137     0     0 
Estimated Outlays                                                                                39    80   127    28     0 
Increase the Number of Consular Officers:                                                                                   
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                     0    33    62    93   125 
Estimated Outlays                                                                                 0    27    54    84   115 
Reform International Cooperation and Coordination:                                                                          
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                    17    17    17     7     7 
Estimated Outlays                                                                                 7    15    17    15     9 
First-Responder Grants:                                                                                                     
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                     0     0     0 3,314 3,381 
Estimated Outlays                                                                                 0     0     0 1,491 2,350 
Counternarcotics Office:                                                                                                    
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                     6     6     6     6     6 
Estimated Outlays                                                                                 4     6     6     6     6 
Security Clearance Modernization:                                                                                           
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                    23    68   116   143   147 
Estimated Outlays                                                                                21    64   111   140   147 
Public Safety Communications Interoperability:                                                                              
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                     6     6     6     6     6 
Estimated Outlays                                                                                 5     6     6     6     6 
Information-Sharing Network:                                                                                                
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                    50    51    52    53    54 
Estimated Outlays                                                                                25    50    52    53    54 
Total Changes: 1                                                                                                            
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                 1,184 5,076 1,393 4,750 5,315 
Estimated Outlays                                                                               558 4,339 2,145 3,319 4,317 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reform the Intelligence Community. Title I would reform the intelligence community by establishing the position of National Intelligence Director and an Office of the National Intelligence Director to manage and oversee intelligence activities of the U.S. government, including foreign intelligence and counterintelligence activities. The legislation also would transfer some existing organizations, specifically the Office of the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence for Community Management and the Terrorist Threat Integration Center (TTIC),

to that office and would establish a National Counterterrorism Center and one or more national intelligence centers within the Office of the NID. The bill would expand language training within the intelligence community and authorize additional scholarships for new recruits. Finally, the legislation would establish a civilian linguist reserve corps. CBO estimates that implementing title I and other provisions relating to the intelligence community would cost about $490 million over the 2005-2009 period (see Table 3). These costs are in addition to those that would be incurred under current law by the Office of the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence for Community Management and the Terrorist Threat Integration Center. The estimated costs include expenses to establish, house, and administer the new Office of the National Intelligence Director and implement other specified programs, such as improving training programs and establishing a scholarship program.

TABLE 3- ESTIMATED CHANGES IN SPENDING SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION FOR REFORMING THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY UNDER H.R. 10 AS ORDERED REPORTED BY THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         By fiscal year, in millions of dollars--                     
                                                                                             2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create the Office of the National Intelligence Director:                                                              
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                  15  210   50   80   60 
Estimated Outlays                                                                              10   35   80  135  130 
Other Program Authorizations:                                                                                         
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                  25   25   25   10   10 
Estimated Outlays                                                                              20   25   25   10   10 
Total Changes:                                                                                                        
Estimated Authorization Level                                                                  40  235   75   90   70 
Estimated Outlays                                                                              30   60  110  145  140 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Create the Office of the National Intelligence Director, CBO estimates that establishing, housing, and administering the Office of the NID would cost about $390 million over the 2005-2009 period.

The bill would transfer the Office of the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence for Community Management (identified as the Intelligence Community Management Account within the budget) and the TTIC to the Office of the NID.

The Intelligence Community Management Account (ICMA) was established by Congressional direction to provide resources that directly support the Director of the Central intelligence Agency and the intelligence community as a whole in coordinating cross-program activities. Because part of its budget is classified, CBO does not know the overall size of this organization. Unclassified budgets for the ICMA indicate that the office has a staff of about 300 people who develop the National Foreign Intelligence Program budget, oversee research and development activities, and develop intelligence plans and requirements, but the Congress also authorizes and appropriates funds for additional staff in the classified portion of the intelligence budget.

Similarly, CBO has no budget information on the TTIC, but public information released by the White House indicates that the center opened in May 2003 with a staff of about 60 people working alongside the counterterrorism offices of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the CIA. That same information indicates that the Administration expects to eventually staff the TTIC with between 200 and 300 people to serve as the hub for all intelligence regarding terrorist threats.

CBO expects that the NID would require staff to perform its authorized functions in addition to the staff transferred from the ICMA and the planned staff for the TTIC. Because much of the detailed information regarding the organization, staffing levels, and budgets of the intelligence community are classified at a level above clearances held by CBO employees, CBO has used information about staff requirements from similar organizations within the Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of Homeland Security, and other federal agencies to attempt to estimate the number of additional staff that might be needed by the NIC. Based on that analysis, CBO estimates that the NID might need to hire around 300 new staff, including appointees such as principal and deputy directors, key managers such as a general counsel, a civil liberties protection officer, personnel to perform administrative functions such as policy development and budget and finance activities, and personnel for the National Counterterrorism Center and one or more national intelligence centers. CBO expects that many of these new hires would be staff transferred from other organizations within the intelligence community but that those other organizations would eventually fill many of the vacated positions within their organizations over about a four year period following enactment of this legislation.

Based on information about the staffing levels and costs for the administrative offices of the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, and other agencies, CBO estimates that the personnel and related expenses to provide centralized leadership, coordination, and support and analytical services for the Office of the National Intelligence Director would eventually cost around $45 million annually, but that costs would be much

lower in the first few years as positions are filled. CBO estimates that such costs would be minimal in the first year and total about $130 million over the 2005-2009 period.

Section 1094 would express the sense of the Congress that the permanent location of the NID headquarters be at a location other than the George Bush Center for Intelligence in Langley, Virginia. For this estimate, CBO assumes that the Director's office and associated staff would occupy the space currently used by the Intelligence Community Management staff until fiscal year 2007. Starting in 2007, CBO assumes that the office would move to new office space in a building owned by the General Services Administration (GSA) until a new building can be built for its use. CBO estimates that initially GSA would need to renovate and furnish office space for the NID staff. (After 2009, CBO expects that these positions would be relocated to the new permanent NID headquarters.) CBO estimates that the GSA rental payments would reach about $20 million a year and total about $40 million over the 2007-2009 period. Additional costs to purchase computers, network equipment, and supplies in the first few years following the relocation into the GSA-owned building also would be significant. CBO estimates that those costs would total $30 million over the 2007-2009 period.

CBO assumes that GSA would construct a new building on land already owned by the federal government to serve as the headquarters for the Office of the NID. Based on information provided by GSA about recent federal office building projects, CBO estimates that planning and design of the new headquarters would cost $15 million over the 2005-2006 period, and that constructing the facility to house NID employees would cost about $175 million over the 2006-2009 period. (An additional $20 million in spending would occur in 2010 to complete construction of the new building.) CBO assumes that the headquarters would be located on property already owned by the federal government in the Washington, D.C. area. If GSA had to buy land for the building site, costs would be higher. CBO assumes that construction of the new facility would not start until sometime in late 2006 and would be completed after 2009. Therefore, CBO estimates that no costs associated with furnishing, equipping, and maintaining the new space would be incurred during the 2005-2009 period nor would there be costs to relocate NID staff from the interim offices to the new headquarters over that period.

Other Program Authorizations. Title I also would authorize the President and the NID to initiate or enhance several programs within the intelligence community. Based on information from the Administration and on the costs of other similar efforts, CBO estimates that those efforts would cost about $20 million in 2005 and total around $90 million over the 2005-2009 period, subject to appropriation of the specified and estimated amounts.

Section 1052 would authorize the appropriation of an additional $2 million a year to carry out the grant program for the National Flagship Language Initiative, which was established to improve higher education in foreign languages that the Secretary of Defense has identified as critical to the interests of the national security of the United States. CBO estimates that implementing this section would cost $10 million over the 2005-2009 period, assuming appropriation of the specified amounts.

Section 1053 would establish a new scholarship program within the National Security Education Trust Fund. The scholarships would be available to students who are U.S. citizens and are native speakers of a foreign language that is identified as critical to the national security interests of the United States. The scholarships would enable those students to pursue English language studies at an institution of higher education in the United States to attain proficiency in those skills. The bill would authorize the appropriation of $4 million a year starting in 2005 for these scholarships. CBO estimates that the costs for the scholarship program would total about $20 million over the 2005-2009 period, assuming appropriation of the specified amounts.

Section 1055 would establish a program operated jointly by the NID and the Department of Defense to advance foreign language skills in languages that are critical to the capability of the intelligence community to carry out national security activities. Under this provision, personnel from the intelligence community could be reimbursed for the total cost of tuition and training in foreign language studies undertaken at educational institutions that have entered into educational partnerships with the U.S. government. In addition, federal agencies would be allowed to provide financial assistance to those educational institutions, including the loan of equipment and instructional materials. CBO has no specific information about how this joint NID/DoD program would be implemented. Assuming that participation levels would be similar to those for another foreign language program offered within the National Security Education Trust Fund, CBO estimates that the new program would cost about $1 million a year.

Section 1056 would allow the NID to establish a civilian linguist reserve corps consisting of U.S. citizens with advanced levels of proficiency in foreign languages. CBO assumes that members of the reserve corps would receive pay, transportation, and per diem when performing work for the federal government as requested by the President. The pilot project would be conducted for a three-year period, starting in 2005. Based on information provided by the staff of the National Security Education Program, CBO expects that the reserve corps would consist of about 150 people at any given time and cost about $50 million over the 2005-2007 period.

Section 1062 would establish an Emerging Technologies Panel within the National Security Agency to advise the NID on the research, development, and application of existing and emerging science and technology advances, advances in encryption, and other topics. Based on the budgets of other advisory panels, CBO estimates that the costs to operate this panel would be about $1 million in 2005 and would total $10 million over the 2005-2009 period.

Combating Financial Crimes. Section 2101 and 2102 would authorize the appropriation of $51 million for fiscal year 2005 for the Financial Crimes Enforcement Center to improve its computer systems and to assist states and localities in combating financial crimes. CBO estimates that this provision would result in outlays of $36 million in 2005 and $15 million in 2006, assuming appropriation of the specified amount.

Aviation Security. Title II would authorize the appropriation of the funds necessary to continue aviation security programs in 2006 and to deploy explosive-detection equipment at airport check points. Based on information from DHS and current funding levels, CBO estimates that title II would authorize the appropriation of about $5.2 billion over the 2005-2007 period for aviation security programs administered by DHS. We estimate that most of that amount--roughly $4 billion--would be authorized to be appropriated in fiscal year 2006 for ongoing programs administered by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and for the federal air marshals. (That estimate is net of almost $2 billion in offsetting collections from passenger and air-carrier fees that we assume will continue to be collected by TSA in 2006 to partly offset the cost of aviation security programs in that year.) This estimate also includes almost $1 billion over the 2005-2007 period for installing explosive-detection equipment at airport screening checkpoints and $70 million in 2005 for programs to better control access to airports, improve passenger screening, and train federal law enforcement officials in certain counterterrorism measures. In addition, title II would specifically authorize the appropriation of $95 million in 2005 for security projects at airports and $2 million for a pilot program to test technology to reduce the threat of explosions of baggage and cargo on commercial flights. Assuming appropriation of the specified and estimated amounts, CBO estimates that implementing all of these provisions would cost $238 million in 2005 and $5.2 billion over the 2005-2009 period.

Improve the Intelligence Capabilities of the FBI. Section 2193 would direct the FBI to continue to improve the intelligence capabilities of the bureau and to develop and maintain a national intelligence workforce within the FBI. Today, the FBI spends about $30 million on counterterrorism training. Since 2002, more than 1,500 agents have been added to the bureau's staff to meet its counterterrorism mission, an increase of about 20 percent. In addition, since the events of September 11, 2001, the FBI has partnered with other intelligence agencies to provide training in counterterrorism and counterintelligence to its staff, and it plans to increase that training in the future. CBO assumes that implementation of this bill would require the agency to conduct more extensive training than is currently planned. Based on information from the bureau, we estimate that this additional training would cost $3 million in 2005 and almost $30 million over the 2005-2009 period, assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts.

Interoperable Law Enforcement and Intelligence Data System. Under the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-173), the Administration is required to integrate all law enforcement data into an interoperable electronic data system known as the Chimera system. However, the act did not establish a firm date by which the Administration must deploy a fully operational Chimera system. Section 2192 would transfer the responsibility for this activity to the NID. The provision would direct the NID to design a state-of-the-art Chimera system with both biometric identification and linguistic capabilities satisfying the best technology standards, and to deliver a fully operational system by September 11, 2007, for use by the intelligence community, federal law enforcement agencies, and counterterrorism personnel to collect and share information. Although CBO believes that establishing a firm deadline for the operational system would likely result in increased discretionary spending in the near term, CBO does not have sufficient information to estimate that increase at this time. Absent information as to whether this transfer would result in changes to the system, CBO also cannot estimate whether any long-term costs would result from this transfer.

Increase the Number of Border Patrol and Immigration Agents. Sections 3003 and 3004 would direct DHS to increase the number of border patrol agents by 2,000 per year and the number of investigators of immigration violations by 800 each year over the 2006-2010 period. Implementing this provision would increase the number of federal agents by 14,000 by 2010. Assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts, CBO estimates that this provision would cost $165 million in fiscal year 2006 and $3.1 billion over the 2006-2009 period.

Grants To Improve the Security of Driver's Licenses. Section 3055 would authorize the appropriation of such sums as necessary for fiscal years 2005 through 2009 for DHS to make grants to states to cover the costs of improving the security of driver's licenses as required by the bill. Based on information from states and from the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA), CBO estimates that implementing this provision would cost $80 million in 2005 and $160 million over the 2005-2009 period, assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts.

New Standards for Issuance of Birth and Death Certificates. Sections 3062 and 3063 would require new federal standards governing the issuance and management of birth

certificates recognized by the federal government. Section 3064 would require the establishment of a uniform electronic birth and death registration system, and section 3065 would extend that system to allow electronic verification of vital records.

Maintaining birth and death records has long been a function of state governments. The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), currently works with states to compile birth and death data for epidemiological studies. H.R. 10 would authorize the Secretary to expand that cooperation to the formal linking of birth and death records for purposes of preventing fraud and other government uses. The bill also would authorize the appropriation of such sums as may be necessary for these activities, including grants to states to comply with these new requirements.

Based on information from the CDC and the National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems, CBO estimates that implementing the new security standards and building the electronic system of vital records would cost $460 million over the 2005-2009 period, assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts. That cost would be for grants to states to meet the new federal requirements. Of these amounts, $70 million in 2005 and $330 million over the 2005-2009 period would cover start-up costs, including digitalizing old birth and death certificates, building electronic systems for reporting deaths in some states, upgrading security arrangements, and acquiring computer infrastructure. CBO estimates that operating the new system for vital records over the 2006-2009 period would cost $130 million. We expect that the system would be fully operational in 2009, at which point annual operating costs would total $50 million.

Expand Immigration Services at Foreign Airports. Sections 3082 and 3083 would authorize the appropriation of $49 million for 2005, $88 million for 2006, and $137 million for 2007 for DHS to expand perinspection services and immigration security at foreign airports. CBO estimates that implementing this provision would cost $274 million over the 2005-2009 period, assuming appropriation of the specified amounts.

Increase the Number of Consular Officers. Section 3084 would authorize the Secretary of State to increase the number of consular officers by 150 each year over the number allotted in the previous year during the 2006-2009 period. It also would authorize the Secretary to provide additional training to consular officers in the detection of fraudulent documents presented by applicants for admission into the United States. Based on the average cost of training and stationing consular officers overseas, CBO estimates that implementing the provision would cost $27 million in 2006 and $280 million over the 2006-2009 period.

Reform International Cooperation and Coordination. Title IV would require the President to produce numerous reports, express the sense of the Congress on many issues, and urge the President to seek agreements with other countries to improve cooperation in the global fight against terrorist organizations. The title also would authorize some additional spending. Subtitle D, the Afghanistan Freedom Support Act Amendments of 2004, would authorize additional rule-of-law, disarmament, and counternarcotics activities ion Afghanistan by the U.S. Department of State, but would not increase the overall authorization of appropriations above the $425 million authorized for each of fiscal years 2005 and 2006 in current law.

Title IV contains three indefinite authorizations of appropriations and other provisions that CBO estimates would cost $7 million in 2005 and $63 million over the 2005-2009 period, assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts. In the cases where the same provision has been included in other bills at specified authorization levels, CBO used that authorization level for this estimate. CBO assumes that spending for these programs will follow the historical pattern of similar programs.

Section 4041 would authorize the appropriation of such sums as may be necessary in 2005, 2006, and 2007 to provide grants to American-sponsored schools in predominately Muslim countries to provide scholarships to students from lower- and middle-income families of those countries. H.R. 4303, the American Education Promotion Act, as ordered reported by the House Committee on International Relations on June 24, 2004, would authorize the appropriation of $5 million each year for such grants. That amount is included in this estimate.

Section 4042 would authorize the appropriation of such sums as may be necessary in 2005, 2006, and 2007 for grants by the National Endowment for Democracy to enhance free and independent media worldwide. H.R. 1950, the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2004 and 2005, as reported by the House Committee on International Relations on May 16, 2003, would have authorized $15 million for such grants. CBO assumes the amount would be provided in three equal installments over the three-year period.

Section 4103 would authorize the appropriation of such sums as may be necessary for programs to reduce the number of shoulder-fired missiles. For the purpose of the estimate, CBO assumed the appropriation of $5 million each year, an amount similar to the cost of other programs for reducing the availability of small arms.

Section 4035 would establish within the Department of State an Office on Multilateral Negotiations. In our estimate for H.R. 4053, the United States International

Leadership Act of 2004, as ordered reported by the House Committee on International Relations on March 31, 2004, CBO estimated that establishing and operating an Office on Multilateral Negotiations would cost $2 million a year.

Sections 4011 and 4012 would require the Secretary of State to fill vacancies on the Arms Control and Nonproliferation Advisory Board and to provide resources to procure the services of experts and consultants. Based on the cost of other advisory boards, CBO estimates that implementing these sections would cost less than $200,000,000 a year.

First-Responder Grants. Subtitle A of title V would authorize funding for grants to state and local governments for staff and equipment to respond to acts of terrorism and natural disaster. It would authorize the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security to change the criteria used to distribute funding for four existing first-responder grant programs--the State Homeland Security, the Urban Area Security Initiative, the Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention, and the Citizen Corps grant programs. Assuming appropriation of the necessary funds, CBO estimates that implementing this subtitle would cost $3.8 billion over the 2008-2009 period.

Almost $10 billion has been appropriated for first responder grants since fiscal year 2003, including about $3 billion in fiscal year 2004. The Office of Domestic Preparedness (within DHS (derives its primary authority to distribute grants to state and localities to prepare and respond to terrorism from the USA Patriot Act (Public Law 107-56). That law authorized the appropriations of such sums as necessary for first-responder grants in the Patriot Act and continue the authorization to appropriate such sums as necessary after 2007.

For this estimate, CBO assumes that the amount in CBO's baseline--$3.3 billion--would be appropriated for first-responders grants in 2008 and that 2009 funding levels for first-responder grants would continue that level, adjusted for anticipated inflation.

Counternarcotics Office. Section 5025 would authorize the appropriation of $6 million in fiscal year 2005 to strengthen the authority of the Counternarcotics Officer at DHS. Under the bill, the Office of Counternarcotics Enforcement would be responsible for coordinating policies and federal operations aimed at preventing the entry of illegal drugs into the United States. DHS currently has a Counternarcotics Officer within the Chief of Staff's office. According to that office, the Counternarcotics Office is working with limited authority to coordinate the agency's anti-drug effort. Assuming the appropriation of the necessary amounts to continue this effort over the next five years. CBO estimates that implementing this provision would cost $28 million over the 2005-2009 period.

FBI Reserve Service. Section 5053 would allow the FBI to establish a reserve service consisting of former employees of the FBI who would be eligible for temporary reemployment during a period of national emergency. Under the bill, the total number of personnel in this reserve service would receive reimbursement for transportation and per diem expenses when participating in any training, and members who are retired federal employees would be allowed to collect both pay and retirement benefits during their period of reemployment. CBO cannot predict when a national emergency might occur, so no costs are included in this estimate for activating the proposed FBI Reserve Service. In most years CBO expects that the cost associated with the reserve service would being significant--mostly covering limited training time, per diem, and transportation expenses. In an emergency, if all members of the reserve corps were reemployed for six months, the costs would total about $25 million.

Security Clearance Modernization. Beginning five years after enactment of this bill, section 5076 would require the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to achieve a 60-day turnaround period for all security clearances requested by federal agencies. Currently, OPM anticipates that by the fall of 2005 the typical turnaround period for security clearances will be approximately 120 days. Based on information from OPM, CBO expects that approximately 1,700 new investigators would have to be hired over the next three years to meet the 60-day standard. With an average annual cost of about $80,000 per investigator, and assuming the appropriation of the necessary amounts, CBO estimates that this provision would cost $483 million over the 2005-2009 period.

Interoperability of Public Safety Communications. Section 5131 would establish a program within DHS to provide assistance and training to enhance the interoperability of public safety communication among federal, state, and local governments in high-risk jurisdictions. DHS currently conducts activities to enhance communications; however, according to that office, it is working with limited funds and legal authority. Based on information from DHS, CBO estimates that implementing this section would cost $29 million over the 2005-2009 period.

Information-Sharing Network. Section 5134 would direct the President to establish a `trusted information network' to promote sharing of intelligence and homeland security information among all relevant federal departments, state and local authorities, and relevant private-sector entities. That section also would create an executive council chaired by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to implement and manage the network and create an advisory board to advise the President and the executive council on policy, technical, and management issues related to the design and operation of the network. Finally, the section would authorize the appropriation of $50 million in fiscal year 2005 and such sums as may be necessary for each subsequent year for this effort. For this estimate, absent an understanding of the information networks in place today within the intelligence community, the requirements for establishing such an information-sharing network, and the timelines needed to do so, CBO has projected the $50 million authorized for 2005 over the 2006-2009 period with annual adjustments for anticipated inflation. Thus, CBO estimates that implementing this section would cost about $235 million over the 2005-2009 period. (The Department of Defense recently completed the purchase of equipment for upgrading its intelligence network to improve the sharing of national security intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, and command and control information sharing at a cost of nearly $1 billion.)

Direct spending

The bill contains provisions that would decrease direct spending (see Table 4). CBO estimates that enacting those provisions would decrease direct spending by about $25 million in 2005, $4 million over the 2005-2009 period, and $2 million over the 2005-2014 period. The estimate of direct spending of direct spending does not include spending associated with extending the authority of the CIA to offer incentive payments to employees who voluntarily retire or resign because the data needed to prepare such an estimate are classified.

TABLE 4- CHANGES IN DIRECT SPENDING UNDER H.R. 10 AS ORDERED REPORTED BY THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM 1 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           By fiscal year, in millions of dollars--                                              
                                                               2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Budget Authority                                        *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    * 
Estimated Outlays                                               -25  -12   19   10    5    3    *    *    *    * 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority to Offer Incentive Payments to Employees of the CIA Who Voluntarily Resign or Retire. Section 1061 would extend indefinitely the authority of the CIA to offer incentive payments to employees who voluntarily retire or resign. Under current law, this authority would expire on September 30, 2005. This section also would eliminate the requirement that the CIA make a deposit to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund equal to 15 percent of final pay for each employee who accepts an incentive payment. Extending authority to offer incentive payments to these employees could increase outlays from the Civil Service Retirement System in the near term, although those amounts would be offset by reduced retirement payments in later years. CBO cannot provide an estimate of the direct spending effects because the data needed for such an estimate are classified.

Aviation Security. Section 2177 would establish a fund within DHS to enhance efforts to detect explosives at security checkpoints in airports. The bill would authorize the collection and spending of $30 million a year of fees from airline passengers in 2005 and 2006.

The cost of the new program would be offset by fee collections authorized under the bill. TSA already collects a $2.50 fee from airline passengers each time they board an aircraft (with a maximum of $5.00 per one-way trip). Under current law, such fees may be collected only to the extent provided for in advance in appropriations acts, and income from those fees is recorded as an offset to appropriated spending. H.R. 10 would require TSA to collect up to $30 million a year from passengers without appropriation action. Under H.R. 10, we estimate that the agency would collect that amount each year. Because H.R. 10 would cause such fees to be used to finance the activities related to explosives detection at airport checkpoints, such fees would not be available to reduce the costs of other TSA spending. In other words, the collections under H.R. 10 would lead to a reduction in the amount of fees recorded as offsets to appropriated spending--essentially changing some discretionary offsetting collections into mandatory offsetting receipts.

Based on historical spending patterns for similar activities, CBO estimates that fees collected under this provision would exceed the amounts actually spent for explosives detection for the next few years. Hence, we estimate that enacting section 2177 would reduce net direct

spending by $37 million in 2005 and 2006, but would increase net direct spending in later years and have no impact on the budget over the 2005-2014 period.

Increased Fines for New Federal Crimes. Several sections in title II would establish new federal crimes for offenses relating to the commission of terrorist acts. Because those prosecuted and convicted under the bill could be subject to fines, the federal government might collect additional fines if the legislation is enacted. Criminal fines are deposited as receipts in the Crime Victims Fund and later spent. CBO expects any additional revenues and direct spending under the bill would be negligible because of the small number of cases involved.

Authority to Waive Separation Age Requirement for FBI Agents. Section 5051 would provide the FBI with the ability to allow agents to remain at the agency beyond the age of 60. Under current law, FBI agents are required to retire at age 57, although the agency's director may waive that requirement until the agent turns 60. This section would allow the director to waive the mandatory retirement requirement until age 65. This authority would last through the end of 2009, at which time the waiver authority would revert to current law. Information provided by the FBI indicates that the agency issues waivers to between 25 and 75 employees annually. By expanding the current waiver authority, CBO expects the bill would cause some FBI employees to retire later than they otherwise would have. We anticipate this would cause retirement annuities to fall in the near term, and to increase after the expanded waiver authority expires in 2009. CBO estimates this section would reduce direct spending for retirement benefits by less than $500,000 in 2005 and by a total of $2 million over the 2005-2014 period.

Estimated impact on state, local, and tribal governments: H.R. 10 contains several intergovernmental mandates as defined in UMRA. The major mandates would require state, local, and tribal governments to significantly change the way they process and issue driver's licenses, identification cards, and birth and death certificates. The costs to state, local, and tribal governments would depend on federal regulations that are yet to be developed. However, based on information from state agencies, CBO estimates that, in aggregate, the intergovernmental mandates in the bill would impose costs on state, local, and tribal governments totaling more than $600 million over fiscal years 2005 through 2009. CBO estimates that the costs in at least one of those years would exceed the threshold established in UMRA ($60 million in 2004, adjusted annually for inflation). The bill would authorize appropriations for grants to states to cover such costs.

Intergovernmental mandates with significant costs

Driver's Licenses. H.R. 10 would effectively require state agencies that issue driver's licenses to comply with new standards for producing, verifying, and ensuring the security of driver's licenses and identification cards. Those provisions would be effective three years after the bill's enactment. CBO considers these standards to be mandates because any driver's licenses issued after that time would be invalid for federal identification purposes unless they met those requirements.

Based on information from AAMVA and other groups representing state and local governments, CBO expects that states would face significant additional costs to administer the new system. Specifically, state licensing agencies would be required to verify, with the issuing agency, each document presented as proof of identification, residency, and citizenship status. Agencies such as the Social Security Administration currently charge a fee for each verification, and assuming that other agencies would charge similar fees, states would incur ongoing costs as well as one-time costs to upgrade computer systems to meet those requirements. States also would face significant costs to upgrade computer systems to digitize and store electronic copies of all source documents and to create and maintain the Driver's License Agreement, an interstate database to share driver information. Finally, certain states that do not currently require background checks for certain employees would face additional costs to complete those checks.

CBO assumes that states would begin to establish procedures for complying with these standards in 2005, the year following the bill's enactment; we estimate that they would incur additional costs totaling $80 million during that first year and another $80 million over fiscal years 2006 through 2009.

Issuance and Verification of Vital Statistics Information. H.R. 10 also would impose several intergovernmental mandates with significant costs on state, local, and tribal agencies that issue birth and death certificates. Those agencies would effectively be required to print birth certificates on safety paper, to establish a central database of vital information, and to ensure that certain employees have security clearances. Those provisions also would be effective three years after the bill's enactment. Certificates issued after that date would be invalid for certain purposes unless they met those requirements. We estimate that state, local, and tribal governments would face additional costs to comply with those requirements totaling more than $70 million in 2005, and almost $400 million over fiscal years 2006 through 2009. Most of those costs would be for upgrading computer software and hardware, and for staff time to convert existing paper records into electronic records. These are mostly one-time costs that would be incurred over the five-year period.

Mandates with no significant costs

The bill also contains several other inter-governmental mandates, but CBO expects that they would probably not impose significant additional costs on state, local, or tribal governments. Specifically, the bill would:

Require state licensing agencies to include minimum features on all driver's license and identification cards, including full legal name, date of birth, gender, driver's license or identification number, photo, legal address, physical security features, and machine-readable technology. According to AAMVA, all states currently include these minimum features on licenses.

Require state agencies to meet minimum standards before issuing driver's licenses, including documenting the individual's name, date of birth, address, and proof of Social Security number (SSNs). While states currently set their own standards for such information, all states currently require at least this minimum documentation.

Require states to maintain a database of driver information; require states to implement training classes for employees to identify fraudulent documents; and require documents and supplies to be securely stored. According to state officials, all states currently comply with those requirements.

Require offices that maintain vital information to comply with requirements for securing their buildings. Based on information from representatives of state offices of vital statistics, CBO believes that most offices already would be in compliance, assuming that the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security would establish minimum security requirements in any event.

Require that state and local governments limit access to birth and death certificates. Fourteen states currently allow public access to those records, but CBO estimates that they would incur no additional costs to limit access.

Prohibit states from accepting any foreign document, other than an official passport, for identification purposes for the issuance of driver's licenses. Currently, at least 10 states accept identification cards issued by foreign governments, such as the `matricula consular' issued by Mexico. This prohibition would preempt state authority.

Require states to resolve any discrepancies that arise from verifying Social Security numbers, though the language is unclear as to what specific actions would be required. Currently, at least two states prohibit their employees from enforcing immigration laws, and many of those discrepancies may be related to immigration. This requirement might preempt those state laws.

Prohibit states from displaying Social Security numbers on driver's licenses or from including Social Security numbers in bar codes, magnetic strips, or similar devices. CBO has found new instances where states used SSNs as identifiers on licenses or coded SSNs in some other manner on the license.

Require all law enforcement officers who are armed, including state and local personnel, to have a standardized credential when traveling on aircraft. CBO assumes TSA would establish and issue each credentials.

Estimated impact on the private sector: CBO has not completed an analysis of the bill's impact on the private sector. That analysis will be provided later in a separate report.

Previous CBO estimates: On October 4, 2004, CBO transmitted cost estimates for H.R. 10, as ordered reported by the House Committee on Armed Services and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. On October 5, 2004, CBO transmitted a cost estimate for H.R. 10 as reported by the House Committee on Financial Services. The versions of the legislation approved by those three committees are similar, and the cost estimates are identical. The House Government Reform version contains an authorization of appropriations for an information-sharing network that was not addressed by the other versions of the bill.

On September 24, 2004, CBO transmitted a cost estimate for S. 2840, the National Intelligence Reform Act of 2004, as reported by the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs. Both bills would create a new Office of the National Intelligence Director and reform certain aspects of the intelligence community. In addition, H.R. 10 would reform terrorism prevention and prosecution, border security, and international cooperation and coordination activities--areas not addressed by S. 2840. Differences in the estimated costs reflect differences between the two bills.

Estimate prepared by: Federal Costs: Intelligence Programs: Raymond J. Hall; Homeland Security: Megan Carroll and Julie Middleton; Justice: Mark Grabowicz; Vital Records; J. Timothy Gronniger; International Programs: Joseph C. Whitehall; General Government: Matthew Pickford. Impact on State, Local, and Tribal Governments: Melissa Merrell.

Estimate approved by: Robert A. Sunshine, Assistant Director for Budget Analysis.

MINORITY VIEWS

On July 22, 2004, the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (the Commission) issued its final report with unanimous recommendations. As the report states:

Ten Commissioners--five Republicans and five Democrats chosen by elected leaders from our nation's capital at a time of great partisan division--have come together to present this report without dissent. We have come together with a unity of purpose because our nation demands it.

On August 3, 2004, the Government Reform Committee held a hearing with two Commissioners, former Navy Secretary John Lehman, a Republican, and former Senator Bob Kerrey, a Democrat. They urged members to follow the Commission's example and work together to implement all of the Commission's unanimous recommendations.

The legislative effort in the Senate has been bipartisan. Senator Lieberman has worked, and continues to work, with both Senator Collins and Senator McCain to produce bipartisan legislation embodying the recommendations of the Commission. This legislation has passed out of committee and is being considered by the full Senate as these views are being written.

On the House side, some members are clearly trying to cross the aisle to forge a bipartisan consensus about how to combat terrorism and make our nation safer. In particular, Reps. Maloney and Shays have introduced legislation that follows the carefully crafted Senate approach. We believe the Committee, and indeed the House, should have used this legislation as its starting point.

Instead, we considered H.R. 10, legislation drafted by the Republican leadership.

As introduced, H.R. 10 is deeply flawed. Rep. Jim Turner, the ranking member of the Select Committee on Homeland Security, released a `Report Card on H.R. 10,' which compares H.R. 10 to the Commission's recommendations and the Senate legislation. There are 41 `bold faced' recommendations in the Commission's report. Rep. Turner's analysis finds that H.R. 10 fully implements only 11 of these recommendations. In contrast, 16 recommendations are not addressed at all, and 14 are only partially implemented. Rep. Turner's comparison is attached to these minority views.

At the same time, H.R. 10 includes controversial `poison pills,' like the new provisions that expand the Patriot Act. It also includes provisions allowing foreign nationals to be shipped to countries known to engage in torture, contrary to the nation's commitments under international law and the painful lessons of Abu Ghraib. In total, there are more than 40 provisions in H.R. 10 that go beyond the Commission's recommendations.

The missing components are not minor oversights. H.R. 10 does not give the National Intelligence Director the full authority recommended by the Commission. It does not take the actions recommended by the Commission to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons. It falls short on border security, aviation security, and emergency response.

At the Committee's hearing in August, former Navy Secretary John Lehman stated:

It's time for an entirely new system of providing our nation's leaders, and the congressional leaders with the intelligence they need to make wise policy and decisions. Our recommendations are not a Chinese menu. They are a whole system. If all of the important elements are not adopted, it makes it very difficult for the others to succeed.

The Commission's recommendations are a cohesive package. Picking and choosing among them effectively destroys the fabric that binds them together. Yet that is exactly what H.R. 10 does.

At the Committee's markup, several Democratic members attempted to correct some of these omissions by offering amendments to implement key Commission recommendations, such as: (1) choosing a single federal agency to conduct security clearance investigations; (2) establishing a civil liberties protection board; and (3) enhancing congressional oversight through the appointment of an Inspector General, a Chief Financial Officer, and similar officials, within the office of the National Intelligence Director.

All of these proposed amendments were drawn from the Commission's report. They were drafted utilizing language contained in the bipartisan Senate legislation, and they mirrored language in the bipartisan House bills. Yet all of these amendments failed on virtually party-line votes.

Democratic members of the Committee also attempted to improve the bill by stripping provisions that were extraneous to the Commission's recommendations. For example, language in the bill greatly diminishes congressional oversight by granting the executive branch wide authority to reorganize components of the intelligence community. Other language in the bill undermines long-standing financial disclosure requirements by exempting intelligence appointees from disclosing whether they have assets worth over $50 million, $25 million, or even $5 million.

None of these provisions was based on recommendations of the Commission. In addition, there is no similar language in the bipartisan Senate or House bills. Including such controversial and extraneous provisions not only endangers final passage of a House bill, but will needlessly complicate efforts by the House and Senate to come to final agreement in the conference committee. For these reasons, Democratic members offered amendments to strike these extraneous and unsupported provisions. These amendments failed on party-line votes.

There were a few areas where the Committee was able to improve the bill on a bipartisan basis. For example, in negotiations prior to the mark-up, the Committee removed one extraneous provision that would have stripped collective bargaining rights from employees in the name of

`homeland security.' At the mark-up, the majority agreed to a Democratic amendment to establish a more efficient information sharing network to correct past failures to `connect the dots' among federal agencies. Unfortunately, this agreement was adopted only after the majority insisted on removing language that would have established a civil liberties board to monitor the use of this new information sharing network, as the Commission recommended.

As this bill moves to the House floor, Democratic members are committed to working in a bipartisan manner to ensure that all of the Commission's recommendations are fully implemented, and that all extraneous provisions added by the House Republican leadership are removed. This goal is expressly endorsed by the Commission and is necessary to protect the nation and to make the legislation worthy of the sacrifices of the families and victims of the tragic events of September 11.
HENRY A. WAXMAN.
MAJOR R. OWENS.
PAUL E. KANJORSKI.
ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS.
DANNY K. DAVIS.
WM. LACY CLAY.
STEPHEN F. LYNCH.
C.A. DUTCH RUPPERSBERGER.
TOM LANTOS.
EDOLPHUS TOWNS.
CAROLYN B. MALONEY.
DENNIS J. KUCINICH.
JOHN F. TIERNEY.
DIANE E. WATSON.
LINDA T. SANCHEZ.
ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON.
JIM COOPER.
BERNARD SANDERS.
BETTY MCCOLLUM.
CHRIS VAN HOLLEN.