Index

PDF Version

108TH CONGRESS

REPT. 108-724

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

2d Session

Part 3
9/11 RECOMMENDATIONS IMPLEMENTATION ACT

OCTOBER 4, 2004- Ordered to be printed
Mr. OXLEY, from the Committee on Financial Services, submitted the following
R E P O R T
together with
DISSENTING VIEWS
[To accompany H.R. 10]

The Committee on Financial Services, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 10) to provide for reform of the intelligence community, terrorism prevention and prosecution, border security, and international cooperation and coordination, and for other purposes, having considered the same, report favorably thereon with an amendment and recommend that the bill as amended do pass.

CONTENTS Page
Amendment 1
Purpose and Summary 49
Background and Need for Legislation 50
Hearings 52
Committee Consideration 52
Committee Votes 52
Committee Oversight Findings 56
Performance Goals and Objectives 56
New Budget Authority, Entitlement Authority, and Tax Expenditures 56
Committee and Congressional Budget Act Cost Estimates 56
Federal Mandates Statement 56
Advisory Committee Statement 57
Constitutional Authority Statement 57
Applicability to Legislative Branch 57
Section-by-Section Analysis of the Legislation 57
Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported 87
Dissenting Views 89

AMENDMENT

The amendment is as follows:

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the following:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS.

TITLE I--REFORM OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY
Sec. 1001. Short title.
Subtitle A--Establishment of National Intelligence Director
Sec. 1011. Reorganization and improvement of management of intelligence community.
Sec. 1012. Revised definition of national intelligence.
Sec. 1013. Joint procedures for operational coordination between Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agency.
Sec. 1014. Role of National Intelligence Director in appointment of certain officials responsible for intelligence-related activities.
Sec. 1015. Initial appointment of the National Intelligence Director.
Sec. 1016. Executive schedule matters.
Subtitle B--National Counterterrorism Center and Civil Liberties Protections
Sec. 1021. National Counterterrorism Center.
Sec. 1022. Civil Liberties Protection Officer.
Subtitle C--Joint Intelligence Community Council
Sec. 1031. Joint Intelligence Community Council.
Subtitle D--Improvement of Human Intelligence (HUMINT)
Sec. 1041. Human intelligence as an increasingly critical component of the intelligence community.
Sec. 1042. Improvement of human intelligence capacity.
Subtitle E--Improvement of Education for the Intelligence Community
Sec. 1051. Modification of obligated service requirements under National Security Education Program.
Sec. 1052. Improvements to the National Flagship Language Initiative.
Sec. 1053. Establishment of scholarship program for English language studies for heritage community citizens of the United States within the National Security Education Program.
Sec. 1054. Sense of Congress with respect to language and education for the intelligence community; reports.
Sec. 1055. Advancement of foreign languages critical to the intelligence community.
Sec. 1056. Pilot project for Civilian Linguist Reserve Corps.
Sec. 1057. Codification of establishment of the National Virtual Translation Center.
Sec. 1058. Report on recruitment and retention of qualified instructors of the Defense Language Institute.
Subtitle F--Additional Improvements of Intelligence Activities
Sec. 1061. Permanent extension of Central Intelligence Agency Voluntary Separation Incentive Program.
Sec. 1062. National Security Agency Emerging Technologies Panel.
Subtitle G--Conforming and Other Amendments
Sec. 1071. Conforming amendments relating to roles of National Intelligence Director and Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Sec. 1072. Other conforming amendments
Sec. 1073. Elements of intelligence community under National Security Act of 1947.
Sec. 1074. Redesignation of National Foreign Intelligence Program as National Intelligence Program.
Sec. 1075. Repeal of superseded authorities.
Sec. 1076. Clerical amendments to National Security Act of 1947.
Sec. 1077. Conforming amendments relating to prohibiting dual service of the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Sec. 1078. Access to Inspector General protections.
Sec. 1079. General references.
Sec. 1080. Application of other laws.
Subtitle H--Transfer, Termination, Transition and Other Provisions
Sec. 1091. Transfer of community management staff.
Sec. 1092. Transfer of terrorist threat integration center.
Sec. 1093. Termination of positions of Assistant Directors of Central Intelligence.
Sec. 1094. Implementation plan.
Sec. 1095. Transitional authorities.
Sec. 1096. Effective dates.
Subtitle I--Grand Jury Information Sharing
Sec. 1101. Grand jury information sharing.
Subtitle J--Other Matters
Sec. 1111. Interoperable law enforcement and intelligence data system.
Sec. 1112. Improvement of intelligence capabilities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
TITLE II--TERRORISM PREVENTION AND PROSECUTION
Subtitle A--Individual Terrorists as Agents of Foreign Powers
Sec. 2001. Individual terrorists as agents of foreign powers.
Subtitle B--Stop Terrorist and Military Hoaxes Act of 2004
Sec. 2021. Short title.
Sec. 2022. Hoaxes and recovery costs.
Sec. 2023. Obstruction of justice and false statements in terrorism cases.
Sec. 2024. Clarification of definition.
Subtitle C--Material Support to Terrorism Prohibition Enhancement Act of 2004
Sec. 2041. Short title.
Sec. 2042. Receiving military-type training from a foreign terrorist organization.
Sec. 2043. Providing material support to terrorism.
Sec. 2044. Financing of terrorism.
Subtitle D--Weapons of Mass Destruction Prohibition Improvement Act of 2004
Sec. 2051. Short title.
Sec. 2052. Weapons of mass destruction.
Sec. 2053. Participation in nuclear and weapons of mass destruction threats to the United States.
Subtitle E--Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing
Chapter 1--Funding to Combat Financial Crimes Including Terrorist Financing
Sec. 2101. Additional authorization for FinCEN.
Sec. 2102. Money laundering and financial crimes strategy reauthorization.
Chapter 2--Enforcement Tools to Combat Financial Crimes Including Terrorist Financing
Subchapter A--Money laundering abatement and financial antiterrorism technical corrections
Sec. 2111. Short title.
Sec. 2112. Technical corrections to Public Law 107-56.
Sec. 2113. Technical corrections to other provisions of law.
Sec. 2114. Repeal of review.
Sec. 2115. Effective date.
Subchapter B--Additional enforcement tools
Sec. 2121. Bureau of Engraving and Printing security printing.
Sec. 2122. Conduct in aid of counterfeiting.
Sec. 2123. Reporting of cross-border transmittal of funds.
Sec. 2124. Enhanced effectiveness of examinations, including anti-money laundering programs.
Subchapter C--Unlawful Internet Gambling Funding Prohibition
Sec. 2131. Short title.
Sec. 2132. Findings.
Sec. 2133. Policies and procedures required to prevent payments for unlawful internet gambling.
Sec. 2134. Definitions.
Sec. 2135. Common sense rule of construction.
Subtitle F--Criminal History Background Checks
Sec. 2141. Short title.
Sec. 2142. Criminal history information checks.
Subtitle G--Protection of United States Aviation System from Terrorist Attacks
Sec. 2171. Provision for the use of biometric or other technology.
Sec. 2172. Transportation security strategic planning.
Sec. 2173. Next generation airline passenger prescreening.
Sec. 2174. Deployment and use of explosive detection equipment at airport screening checkpoints.
Sec. 2175. Pilot program to evaluate use of blast-resistant cargo and baggage containers.
Sec. 2176. Air cargo screening technology.
Sec. 2177. Airport checkpoint screening explosive detection.
Sec. 2178. Next generation security checkpoint.
Sec. 2179. Penalty for failure to secure cockpit door.
Sec. 2180. Federal air marshal anonymity.
Sec. 2181. Federal law enforcement in-flight counterterrorism training.
Sec. 2182. Federal flight deck officer weapon carriage pilot program.
Sec. 2183. Registered traveler program.
Sec. 2184. Wireless communication.
Sec. 2185. Secondary flight deck barriers.
Sec. 2186. Extension.
Sec. 2187. Perimeter Security.
Sec. 2188. Definitions.
Subtitle H--Other Matters
Sec. 2191. Grand jury information sharing.
Sec. 2192. Interoperable law enforcement and intelligence data system.
Sec. 2193. Improvement of intelligence capabilities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
TITLE III--BORDER SECURITY AND TERRORIST TRAVEL
Subtitle A--Immigration Reform in the National Interest
Chapter 1--General Provisions
Sec. 3001. Eliminating the `Western Hemisphere' exception for citizens.
Sec. 3002. Modification of waiver authority with respect to documentation requirements for nationals of foreign contiguous territories and adjacent islands.
Sec. 3003. Increase in full-time border patrol agents.
Sec. 3004. Increase in full-time immigration and customs enforcement investigators.
Sec. 3005. Alien identification standards.
Sec. 3006. Expedited removal.
Sec. 3007. Preventing terrorists from obtaining asylum.
Sec. 3008. Revocation of visas and other travel documentation.
Sec. 3009. Judicial review of orders of removal.
Chapter 2--Deportation of Terrorists and Supporters of Terrorism
Sec. 3031. Expanded inapplicability of restriction on removal.
Sec. 3032. Exception to restriction on removal for terrorists and criminals.
Sec. 3033. Additional removal authorities.
Subtitle B--Identity Management Security
Chapter 1--Improved Security for Drivers' Licenses and Personal Identification Cards
Sec. 3051. Definitions.
Sec. 3052. Minimum document requirements and issuance standards for Federal recognition.
Sec. 3053. Linking of databases.
Sec. 3054. Trafficking in authentication features for use in false identification documents.
Sec. 3055. Grants to States.
Sec. 3056. Authority.
Chapter 2--Improved Security for Birth Certificates
Sec. 3061. Definitions.
Sec. 3062. Applicability of minimum standards to local governments.
Sec. 3063. Minimum standards for Federal recognition.
Sec. 3064. Establishment of electronic birth and death registration systems.
Sec. 3065. Electronic verification of vital events.
Sec. 3066. Grants to States.
Sec. 3067. Authority.
Chapter 3--Measures To Enhance Privacy and Integrity of Social Security Account Numbers
Sec. 3071. Prohibition of the display of social security account numbers on driver's licenses or motor vehicle registrations.
Sec. 3072. Independent verification of birth records provided in support of applications for social security account numbers.
Sec. 3073. Enumeration at birth.
Sec. 3074. Study relating to use of photographic identification in connection with applications for benefits, social security account numbers, and social security cards.
Sec. 3075. Restrictions on issuance of multiple replacement social security cards.
Sec. 3076. Study relating to modification of the social security account numbering system to show work authorization status.
Subtitle C--Targeting Terrorist Travel
Sec. 3081. Studies on machine-readable passports and travel history database.
Sec. 3082. Expanded preinspection at foreign airports.
Sec. 3083. Immigration security initiative.
Sec. 3084. Responsibilities and functions of consular officers.
Sec. 3085. Increase in penalties for fraud and related activity.
Sec. 3086. Criminal penalty for false claim to citizenship.
Sec. 3087. Antiterrorism assistance training of the Department of State.
Sec. 3088. International agreements to track and curtail terrorist travel through the use of fraudulently obtained documents.
Sec. 3089. International standards for translation of names into the Roman alphabet for international travel documents and name-based watchlist systems.
Sec. 3090. Biometric entry and exit data system.
Sec. 3091. Enhanced responsibilities of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism.
Sec. 3092. Establishment of Office of Visa and Passport Security in the Department of State.
Subtitle D--Terrorist Travel
Sec. 3101. Information sharing and coordination.
Sec. 3102. Terrorist travel program.
Sec. 3103. Training program.
Sec. 3104. Technology acquisition and dissemination plan.
Subtitle E--Maritime Security Requirements
Sec. 3111. Deadlines for implementation of maritime security requirements.
TITLE IV--INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND COORDINATION
Subtitle A--Attack Terrorists and Their Organizations
Chapter 1--Provisions Relating to Terrorist Sanctuaries
Sec. 4001. United States policy on terrorist sanctuaries.
Sec. 4002. Reports on terrorist sanctuaries.
Sec. 4003. Amendments to existing law to include terrorist sanctuaries.
Chapter 2--Other Provisions
Sec. 4011. Appointments to fill vacancies in Arms Control and Nonproliferation Advisory Board.
Sec. 4012. Review of United States policy on proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and control of strategic weapons.
Sec. 4013. International agreements to interdict acts of international terrorism.
Sec. 4014. Effective Coalition approach toward detention and humane treatment of captured terrorists.
Sec. 4015. Sense of Congress and report regarding counter-drug efforts in Afghanistan.
Subtitle B--Prevent the Continued Growth of Terrorism
Chapter 1--United States Public Diplomacy
Sec. 4021. Annual review and assessment of public diplomacy strategy.
Sec. 4022. Public diplomacy training.
Sec. 4023. Promoting direct exchanges with Muslim countries.
Sec. 4024. Public diplomacy required for promotion in Foreign Service.
Chapter 2--United States Multilateral Diplomacy
Sec. 4031. Purpose.
Sec. 4032. Support and expansion of democracy caucus.
Sec. 4033. Leadership and membership of international organizations.
Sec. 4034. Increased training in multilateral diplomacy.
Sec. 4035. Implementation and establishment of Office on Multilateral Negotiations.
Chapter 3--Other Provisions
Sec. 4041. Pilot program to provide grants to American-sponsored schools in predominantly Muslim countries to provide scholarships.
Sec. 4042. Enhancing free and independent media.
Sec. 4043. Combating biased or false foreign media coverage of the United States.
Sec. 4044. Report on broadcast outreach strategy.
Sec. 4045. Office relocation.
Sec. 4046. Strengthening the Community of Democracies for Muslim countries.
Subtitle C--Reform of Designation of Foreign Terrorist Organizations
Sec. 4051. Designation of foreign terrorist organizations.
Sec. 4052. Inclusion in annual Department of State country reports on terrorism of information on terrorist groups that seek weapons of mass destruction and groups that have been designated as foreign terrorist organizations.
Subtitle D--Afghanistan Freedom Support Act Amendments of 2004
Sec. 4061. Short title.
Sec. 4062. Coordination of assistance for Afghanistan.
Sec. 4063. General provisions relating to the Afghanistan Freedom Support Act of 2002.
Sec. 4064. Rule of law and related issues.
Sec. 4065. Monitoring of assistance.
Sec. 4066. United States policy to support disarmament of private militias and to support expansion of international peacekeeping and security operations in Afghanistan.
Sec. 4067. Efforts to expand international peacekeeping and security operations in Afghanistan.
Sec. 4068. Provisions relating to counternarcotics efforts in Afghanistan.
Sec. 4069. Additional amendments to the Afghanistan Freedom Support Act of 2002.
Sec. 4070. Repeal.
Subtitle E--Provisions Relating to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan
Sec. 4081. New United States strategy for relationship with Saudi Arabia.
Sec. 4082. United States commitment to the future of Pakistan.
Sec. 4083. Extension of Pakistan waivers.
Subtitle F--Oversight Provisions
Sec. 4091. Case-Zablocki Act requirements.
Subtitle G--Additional Protections of United States Aviation System from Terrorist Attacks
Sec. 4101. International agreements to allow maximum deployment of Federal flight deck officers.
Sec. 4102. Federal air marshal training.
Sec. 4103. Man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS).
Subtitle H--Improving International Standards and Cooperation to Fight Terrorist Financing
Sec. 4111. Sense of the Congress regarding success in multilateral organizations.
Sec. 4112. Expanded reporting and testimony requirements for the Secretary of the Treasury.
Sec. 4113. Coordination of United States Government efforts.
Sec. 4114. Definitions.
TITLE V--GOVERNMENT RESTRUCTURING
Subtitle A--Faster and Smarter Funding for First Responders
Sec. 5001. Short title.
Sec. 5002. Findings.
Sec. 5003. Faster and smarter funding for first responders.
Sec. 5004. Modification of homeland security advisory system.
Sec. 5005. Coordination of industry efforts.
Sec. 5006. Superseded provision.
Sec. 5007. Sense of Congress regarding interoperable communications.
Sec. 5008. Sense of Congress regarding citizen corps councils.
Sec. 5009. Study regarding nationwide emergency notification system.
Sec. 5010. Required coordination.
Subtitle B--Government Reorganization Authority
Sec. 5021. Authorization of intelligence community reorganization plans.
Subtitle C--Restructuring Relating to the Department of Homeland Security and Congressional Oversight
Sec. 5025. Responsibilities of Counternarcotics Office.
Sec. 5026. Use of counternarcotics enforcement activities in certain employee performance appraisals.
Sec. 5027. Sense of the House of Representatives on addressing homeland security for the American people.
Subtitle D--Improvements to Information Security
Sec. 5031. Amendments to Clinger-Cohen provisions to enhance agency planning for information security needs.
Subtitle E--Personnel Management Improvements
Chapter 1--Appointments Process Reform
Sec. 5041. Appointments to national security positions.
Sec. 5042. Presidential inaugural transitions.
Sec. 5043. Public financial disclosure for the intelligence community.
Sec. 5044. Reduction of positions requiring appointment with Senate confirmation.
Sec. 5045. Effective dates.
Chapter 2--Federal Bureau of Investigation Revitalization
Sec. 5051. Mandatory separation age.
Sec. 5052. Retention and relocation bonuses.
Sec. 5053. Federal Bureau of Investigation Reserve Service.
Sec. 5054. Critical positions in the Federal Bureau of Investigation intelligence directorate.
Chapter 3--Management Authority
Sec. 5061. Management authority.
Subtitle F--Security Clearance Modernization
Sec. 5071. Definitions.
Sec. 5072. Security clearance and investigative programs oversight and administration.
Sec. 5073. Reciprocity of security clearance and access determinations.
Sec. 5074. Establishment of national database .
Sec. 5075. Use of available technology in clearance investigations.
Sec. 5076. Reduction in length of personnel security clearance process.
Sec. 5077. Security clearances for presidential transition.
Sec. 5078. Reports.
Subtitle G--Emergency Financial Preparedness
Chapter 1--Emergency Preparedness for Fiscal Authorities
Sec. 5081. Delegation authority of the Secretary of the Treasury.
Sec. 5081A. Treasury support for financial services industry preparedness and response.
Chapter 2--Market Preparedness
Subchapter A--Netting of Financial Contracts
Sec. 5082. Short title.
Sec. 5082A. Treatment of certain agreements by conservators or receivers of insured depository institutions.
Sec. 5082B. Authority of the FDIC and NCUAB with respect to failed and failing institutions.
Sec. 5082C. Amendments relating to transfers of qualified financial contracts.
Sec. 5082D. Amendments relating to disaffirmance or repudiation of qualified financial contracts.
Sec. 5082E. Clarifying amendment relating to master agreements.
Sec. 5082F. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991.
Sec. 5082G. Bankruptcy code amendments.
Sec. 5082H. Recordkeeping requirements.
Sec. 5082I. Exemptions from contemporaneous execution requirement.
Sec. 5082J. Damage measure.
Sec. 5082K. SIPC stay.
Sec. 5082L. Applicability of other sections to chapter 9.
Sec. 5082M. Effective date; application of amendments.
Sec. 5082N. Savings clause.
Subchapter B--Emergency Securities Response
Sec. 5086. Short title.
Sec. 5087. Extension of emergency order authority of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Sec. 5088. Parallel authority of the Secretary of the Treasury with respect to government securities.
Sec. 5089. Joint report on implementation of financial system resilience recommendations.
Sec. 5089A. Private sector preparedness.
Sec. 5089B. Report on public/private partnerships.
Subtitle H--Other Matters
Chapter 1--Privacy Matters
Sec. 5091. Requirement that agency rulemaking take into consideration impacts on individual privacy.
Sec. 5092. Chief privacy officers for agencies with law enforcement or anti-terrorism functions.
Chapter 2--Mutual Aid and Litigation Management
Sec. 5101. Short title.
Sec. 5102. Mutual aid authorized.
Sec. 5103. Litigation management agreements.
Sec. 5104. Additional provisions.
Sec. 5105. Definitions.
Chapter 3--Miscellaneous Matters
Sec. 5131. Enhancement of public safety communications interoperability.
Sec. 5132. Sense of Congress regarding the incident command system.
Sec. 5133. Sense of Congress regarding United States Northern Command plans and strategies.

TITLE I--REFORM OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY

TITLE II--TERRORISM PREVENTION AND PROSECUTION

Subtitle E--Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing

CHAPTER 1--FUNDING TO COMBAT FINANCIAL CRIMES INCLUDING TERRORIST FINANCING

SEC. 2101. ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATION FOR FINCEN.

SEC. 2102. MONEY LAUNDERING AND FINANCIAL CRIMES STRATEGY REAUTHORIZATION.

`2004
$15,000,000.
`2005
$15,000,000.'.

CHAPTER 2--ENFORCEMENT TOOLS TO COMBAT FINANCIAL CRIMES INCLUDING TERRORIST FINANCING

SUBCHAPTER A--MONEY LAUNDERING ABATEMENT AND FINANCIAL ANTITERRORISM TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS

SEC. 2111. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2112. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO PUBLIC LAW 107-56.

`TITLE III--INTERNATIONAL MONEY LAUNDERING ABATEMENT AND FINANCIAL ANTITERRORISM ACT OF 2001'.

`TITLE III--INTERNATIONAL MONEY LAUNDERING ABATEMENT AND FINANCIAL ANTITERRORISM ACT OF 2001'.

SEC. 2113. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO OTHER PROVISIONS OF LAW.

`Sec. 5318A. Special measures for jurisdictions, financial institutions, international transactions, or types of accounts of primary money laundering concern'.

`5318A. Special measures for jurisdictions, financial institutions, international transactions, or types of accounts of primary money laundering concern.'.

SEC. 2114. REPEAL OF REVIEW.

SEC. 2115. EFFECTIVE DATE.

SUBCHAPTER B--ADDITIONAL ENFORCEMENT TOOLS

SEC. 2121. BUREAU OF ENGRAVING AND PRINTING SECURITY PRINTING.

SEC. 2122. CONDUCT IN AID OF COUNTERFEITING.

SEC. 2123. REPORTING OF CROSS-BORDER TRANSMITTAL OF FUNDS.

SEC. 2124. ENHANCED EFFECTIVENESS OF EXAMINATIONS, INCLUDING ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROGRAMS.

SUBCHAPTER C--UNLAWFUL INTERNET GAMBLING FUNDING PROHIBITION

SEC. 2131. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2132. FINDINGS.

SEC. 2133. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES REQUIRED TO PREVENT PAYMENTS FOR UNLAWFUL INTERNET GAMBLING.

SEC. 2134. DEFINITIONS.

SEC. 2135. COMMON SENSE RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

Subtitle F--Criminal History Background Checks

TITLE III--BORDER SECURITY AND TERRORIST TRAVEL

TITLE IV--INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND COORDINATION

Subtitle B--Prevent the Continued Growth of Terrorism

CHAPTER 1--UNITED STATES PUBLIC DIPLOMACY

CHAPTER 2--UNITED STATES MULTILATERAL DIPLOMACY

SEC. 4033. LEADERSHIP AND MEMBERSHIP OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.

SEC. 4034. INCREASED TRAINING IN MULTILATERAL DIPLOMACY.

SEC. 4035. IMPLEMENTATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF OFFICE ON MULTILATERAL NEGOTIATIONS.

CHAPTER 3--OTHER PROVISIONS

Subtitle C--Reform of Designation of Foreign Terrorist Organizations

Subtitle D--Afghanistan Freedom Support Act Amendments of 2004

SEC. 4061. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 4062. COORDINATION OF ASSISTANCE FOR AFGHANISTAN.

SEC. 4063. GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE AFGHANISTAN FREEDOM SUPPORT ACT OF 2002.

Subtitle E--Provisions Relating to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan

Subtitle H--Improving International Standards and Cooperation to Fight Terrorist Financing

SEC. 4111. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING SUCCESS IN MULTILATERAL ORGANIZATIONS.

SEC. 4112. EXPANDED REPORTING AND TESTIMONY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY.

SEC. 4113. COORDINATION OF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT EFFORTS.

SEC. 4114. DEFINITIONS.

TITLE V--GOVERNMENT RESTRUCTURING

Subtitle G--Emergency Financial Preparedness

CHAPTER 1--EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FOR FISCAL AUTHORITIES

SEC. 5081. DELEGATION AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY.

SEC. 5081A. TREASURY SUPPORT FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE.

CHAPTER 2--MARKET PREPAREDNESS

SUBCHAPTER A--NETTING OF FINANCIAL CONTRACTS

SEC. 5082. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 5082A. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN AGREEMENTS BY CONSERVATORS OR RECEIVERS OF INSURED DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS.

SEC. 5082B. AUTHORITY OF THE FDIC AND NCUAB WITH RESPECT TO FAILED AND FAILING INSTITUTIONS.

SEC. 5082C. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO TRANSFERS OF QUALIFIED FINANCIAL CONTRACTS.

SEC. 5082D. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO DISAFFIRMANCE OR REPUDIATION OF QUALIFIED FINANCIAL CONTRACTS.

SEC. 5082E. CLARIFYING AMENDMENT RELATING TO MASTER AGREEMENTS.

SEC. 5082F. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1991.

`SEC. 407. TREATMENT OF CONTRACTS WITH UNINSURED NATIONAL BANKS, UNINSURED FEDERAL BRANCHES AND AGENCIES, CERTAIN UNINSURED STATE MEMBER BANKS, AND EDGE ACT CORPORATIONS.

SEC. 5082G. BANKRUPTCY CODE AMENDMENTS.

`Sec. 555. Contractual right to liquidate, terminate, or accelerate a securities contract';

`Sec. 556. Contractual right to liquidate, terminate, or accelerate a commodities contract or forward contract';

`Sec. 559. Contractual right to liquidate, terminate, or accelerate a repurchase agreement';

`Sec. 560. Contractual right to liquidate, terminate, or accelerate a swap agreement';

`Sec. 561. Contractual right to terminate, liquidate, accelerate, or offset under a master netting agreement and across contracts; proceedings under Section 304

`561. Contractual right to terminate, liquidate, accelerate, or offset under a master netting agreement and across contracts; proceedings under section 304.'.

`Sec. 767. Commodity broker liquidation and forward contract merchants, commodity brokers, stockbrokers, financial institutions, financial participants, securities clearing agencies, swap participants, repo participants, and master netting agreement participants

`Sec. 753. Stockbroker liquidation and forward contract merchants, commodity brokers, stockbrokers, financial institutions, financial participants, securities clearing agencies, swap participants, repo participants, and master netting agreement participants

`555. Contractual right to liquidate, terminate, or accelerate a securities contract.
`556. Contractual right to liquidate, terminate, or accelerate a commodities contract or forward contract.';

`559. Contractual right to liquidate, terminate, or accelerate a repurchase agreement.
`560. Contractual right to liquidate, terminate, or accelerate a swap agreement.';

`767. Commodity broker liquidation and forward contract merchants, commodity brokers, stockbrokers, financial institutions, financial participants, securities clearing agencies, swap participants, repo participants, and master netting agreement participants.';

`753. Stockbroker liquidation and forward contract merchants, commodity brokers, stockbrokers, financial institutions, financial participants, securities clearing agencies, swap participants, repo participants, and master netting agreement participants.'.

SEC. 5082H. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS.

SEC. 5082I. EXEMPTIONS FROM CONTEMPORANEOUS EXECUTION REQUIREMENT.

SEC. 5082J. DAMAGE MEASURE.

`Sec. 562. Timing of damage measurement in connection with swap agreements, securities contracts, forward contracts, commodity contracts, repurchase agreements, and master netting agreements

`562. Timing of damage measure in connection with swap agreements, securities contracts, forward contracts, commodity contracts, repurchase agreements, or master netting agreements.'.

SEC. 5082K. SIPC STAY.

SEC. 5082L. APPLICABILITY OF OTHER SECTIONS TO CHAPTER 9.

SEC. 5082M. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

SEC. 5082N. SAVINGS CLAUSE.

SUBCHAPTER B--EMERGENCY SECURITIES RESPONSE

SEC. 5086. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 5087. EXTENSION OF EMERGENCY ORDER AUTHORITY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

SEC. 5088. PARALLEL AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY WITH RESPECT TO GOVERNMENT SECURITIES.

SEC. 5089. JOINT REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF FINANCIAL SYSTEM RESILIENCE RECOMMENDATIONS.

SEC. 5089A. PRIVATE SECTOR PREPAREDNESS.

SEC. 5089B. REPORT ON PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS.

Subtitle H--Other Matters

PURPOSE AND SUMMARY

The portions of H.R. 10 within the jurisdiction of the Financial Services Committee will authorize new funding for the fight against the financing of terror, give the government new tools to fight the funding of terrorism, take steps both to help prevent an attack on the financial system and to make the system and markets more resilient in case of another attack, and establish tools to improve international cooperation in the fight against terror funding. Among the major elements of the legislation are: additional authorizations for the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), to reduce the Bank Secrecy Act compliance burden on financial institutions while significantly increasing the usefulness of FinCEN's data to law enforcement; a series of purely technical corrections to the anti-terror finance title of the USA PATRIOT Act; language to tighten laws governing the counterfeiting of U.S. currency; authority for the Treasury Department to help countries strengthen their own currencies against counterfeiting; tools to close the Internet gambling loophole which provides a dangerous opportunity for the financing of terror; legislation to provide for the orderly unwinding of certain financial contracts where one party becomes insolvent, thus minimizing the risk of market disruption in the case of attack; and language aimed at improving international cooperation to combat the financing of terror, including a requirement for the Treasury Secretary to report annually on anti-terrorist financing initiatives and language supporting codification of interagency cooperation before international sessions held to set standards for anti-terrorist financing.

BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR LEGISLATION

On November 27, 2002, President Bush signed legislation creating the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (9/11 Commission) (Public Law 107-306), which was directed to investigate the `facts and circumstances relating to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,' including those relating to intelligence agencies, law enforcement agencies, diplomacy, immigration issues and border control, the flow of assets to terrorist organizations, and the role of congressional oversight and resource allocation. To fulfill its mandate, the 9/11 Commission reviewed over 2.5 million pages of documents, conducted interviews of some 1,200 individuals in ten countries, and held 19 days of public hearings featuring testimony from 160 witnesses. On July 22, 2004, the 9/11 Commission issued a 567-page report on its investigation.

On August 23, 2004, the Committee held a hearing on those findings and recommendations of the 9/11 Commission that relate to terrorist financing and other matters within the Committee's purview. The Committee received testimony from 9/11 Commission Vice-Chairman Lee Hamilton, as well as representatives of the Treasury Department, the Department of Justice, and the Department of Homeland Security.

The bulk of the 9/11 Commission's final report centers on reorganizing and strengthening the Nation's intelligence capabilities to prevent another large-scale terrorist attack. While the 9/11 Commission made no specific legislative recommendations on terrorist financing issues, both its final report and Vice-Chairman Hamilton's August 23, 2004, testimony contained findings that are of legislative interest to the Committee, including the following:

Vigorous efforts to track terrorist financing must remain front and center in U.S. counterterrorism efforts.

Since 9/11, the U.S. financial services sector and some of its international counterparts have provided law enforcement agencies with `extraordinary cooperation' to support quickly developing counter-terrorism investigations. Because financial institutions are in the best position to understand and identify problematic transactions or accounts, continued enforcement of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) rules for financial institutions, particularly in the area of Suspicious Activity Reporting, is necessary.

Investigators need the right tools to identify customers and trace financial transactions in fast-moving counterterrorism investigations.

While the financial provisions enacted after 9/11, particularly those contained in title III of the USA PATRIOT Act and subsequent regulations, have succeeded in addressing obvious vulnerabilities in the domestic financial system, the U.S. has been less successful in persuading other countries to adopt financial regulations that would permit the tracing of financial transactions.

Enacted shortly after the September 11, 2001, attacks, title III of the USA PATRIOT Act (Public Law 107-56) represents easily the most far-reaching anti-money laundering legislation since the original Bank Secrecy Act was enacted in 1970. It gives U.S. law enforcement agencies new tools with which to attack the financial infrastructure of terrorism, and new authority, to share information and better coordinate their efforts with the intelligence community and the financial services industry. The law enlists a broad range of commercial entities beyond traditional depository institutions in the financial war against terrorism, through provisions requiring across-the-board implementation of anti-money laundering programs and enhanced regulatory and law enforcement scrutiny of informal or underground financial networks, such as the hawala system used by al Qaeda and other terrorist groups. Title III includes strong measures for tracking and interrupting the flow of criminal funds through off-shore secrecy havens, countries characterized by a lack of financial transparency and minimal cooperation with U.S. law enforcement efforts. The USA PATRIOT Act also imposes significant new identification requirements on individuals seeking to open accounts at financial institutions, designed to make it more difficult for terrorists to gain entry to the U.S. financial system.

The Committee has performed rigorous oversight of the implementation of title III and other aspects of the Government's efforts to combat terrorist financing, holding 14 full Committee and subcommittee hearings on those issues since 9/11. While the 9/11 Commission made no legislative recommendations on issues that fall within the Committee's jurisdiction, the Commission found that `vigorous efforts to track terrorist financing must remain front and center in U.S. counterterrorism efforts,' and that new ways of fostering inter-agency and international cooperation are essential to the fight against terrorist financing. The Commission also found that `terrorists have shown considerable creativity in their methods for moving money.' Expanding upon this point in his August 23, 2004 testimony, 9/11 Commission Vice-Chairman Hamilton stated:

While we have spent significant resources examining the ways al Qaeda raised and moved money, we are under no illusions that the next attack will use similar methods. As the government has moved to close financial vulnerabilities and loopholes, al Qaeda adapts. We must continually examine our system for loopholes that al Qaeda can exploit, and close them as they are uncovered. This will require constant efforts on the part of this Committee, working with the financial industry, their regulators and the law enforcement and intelligence community.

The Committee believes that it is important to note the rationale for two provisions which are included in its recommended amendment which were not included in the introduced version of the bill. The first, a provision prohibiting the use of the payments system to conduct unlawful Internet gambling, is the text of H.R. 2143 as it passed the House. This provision responds to the 9/11 Commission's call for a continuous examination of the financial system for loopholes which terrorists such as al Qaeda can exploit. Enactment of this provision will close a specific loophole that the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice have both identified in testimony before the Committee as being vulnerable to use in terrorist financing schemes, largely because of the speed and anonymity with which Internet gambling can be conducted.

The second provision which deserves special mention is the inclusion of provisions addressing the `netting' of financial contracts. While these complicated but non-controversial provisions were originally imagined as an important tool in resolving the insolvency of financial firms, they have taken on greater importance in the period since the events of September 11, 2001 and the specific targeting of several large financial institutions by terrorists in recent months. The effects on the Nation's economy of a successful attack on any sizable financial firm could be catastrophic. With a single, well-placed attack, literally tens of billions of dollars could disappear from the Nation's economy. As Chairman of the Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan wrote in a recent letter to the Chairman of the Committee, `Should a terrorist attack result in the insolvency of one or more market participants, such uncertainty would unnecessarily place the financial system at greater risk in what unquestionably would be an especially dangerous period.' Without the tools contained in these provisions, originally reported by the Committee as H.R. 2120, recovery from such an attack could be far from certain.

The Committee's amendment to H.R. 10 constitutes its response to the 9/11 Commission's call for constant vigilance, and builds on landmark

provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act that the Commission concluded have significantly advanced efforts to combat the financing of terrorism.

HEARINGS

The Committee on Financial Services held a hearing on September 22, 2004 entitled `Legislative Proposals to Implement the Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission.' Those proposals formed the basis of the Committee's legislative contributions to the legislation introduced as H.R. 10, the 9/11 Recommendations mplementation Act. The following witnesses testified: The Honorable Stuart A. Levey, Under Secretary for the Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, Department of the Treasury and The Honorable Brian C. Roseboro, Under Secretary for Domestic Finance, Department of the Treasury.

COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

The Committee on Financial Services met in open session on September 29, 2004, and ordered H.R. 10, the 9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act, favorably reported to the House, with an amendment, by a voice vote.

COMMITTEE VOTES

Clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives requires the Committee to list the record votes on the motion to report legislation and amendments thereto. The following amendments were considered by record vote. The names of members voting for and against follow.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Paul, no. 1b, changing the standards under which a financial institution must file a suspicious activity report, was not agreed to by a record vote of 10 yeas and 58 nays (Record vote no. FC-22).

RECORD VOTE NO. FC-22
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Representative             Aye Nay Present     Representative Aye Nay Present 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Oxley                        X             Mr. Frank (MA)       X         
Mr. Leach                                       Mr. Kanjorski       X         
Mr. Baker                        X                 Ms. Waters   X             
Mr. Bachus                       X                Mr. Sanders   X             
Mr. Castle                       X               Mrs. Maloney       X         
Mr. King                         X              Mr. Gutierrez       X         
Mr. Royce                        X              Ms. Velazquez       X         
Mr. Lucas (OK)                                       Mr. Watt   X             
Mr. Ney                          X               Mr. Ackerman       X         
Mrs. Kelly                       X            Ms. Hooley (OR)       X         
Mr. Paul                   X                  Ms. Carson (IN)       X         
Mr. Gillmor                X                      Mr. Sherman       X         
Mr. Ryun (KS)                    X             Mr. Meeks (NY)       X         
Mr. LaTourette                   X                    Ms. Lee   X             
Mr. Manzullo               X                       Mr. Inslee       X         
Mr. Jones (NC)             X                        Mr. Moore       X         
Mr. Ose                          X                Mr. Capuano       X         
Mrs. Biggert                     X                   Mr. Ford       X         
Mr. Green (WI)                   X               Mr. Hinojosa       X         
Mr. Toomey                 X                   Mr. Lucas (KY)       X         
Mr. Shays                        X                Mr. Crowley       X         
Mr. Shadegg                      X                   Mr. Clay       X         
Mr. Fossella                     X                 Mr. Israel       X         
Mr. Gary G. Miller (CA)          X                   Mr. Ross       X         
Ms. Hart                         X         Mrs. McCarthy (NY)       X         
Mrs. Capito                      X                   Mr. Baca       X         
Mr. Tiberi                       X               Mr. Matheson       X         
Mr. Kennedy (MN)                 X                  Mr. Lynch       X         
Mr. Feeney                       X            Mr. Miller (NC)       X         
Mr. Hensarling                   X                Mr. Emanuel       X         
Mr. Garrett (NJ)           X                   Mr. Scott (GA)       X         
Mr. Murphy                       X             Mr. Davis (AL)       X         
Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite (FL)       X                   Mr. Bell       X         
Mr. Barrett (SC)                 X                                            
Ms. Harris                       X                                            
Mr. Renzi                        X                                            
Mr. Gerlach                      X                                            
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Inslee, no. 1n, amending the Fair Credit Reporting Act to change the procedures under which officials of certain law enforcement and intelligence agencies may obtain credit reports, was not agreed to by a record vote of 33 yeas and 35 nays (Record vote no. FC-23).

RECORD VOTE NO. FC-23
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Representative             Aye Nay Present     Representative Aye Nay Present 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Oxley                        X             Mr. Frank (MA)   X             
Mr. Leach                                       Mr. Kanjorski   X             
Mr. Baker                        X                 Ms. Waters   X             
Mr. Bachus                       X                Mr. Sanders   X             
Mr. Castle                       X               Mrs. Maloney   X             
Mr. King                         X              Mr. Gutierrez   X             
Mr. Royce                        X              Ms. Velazquez   X             
Mr. Lucas (OK)                                       Mr. Watt   X             
Mr. Ney                          X               Mr. Ackerman   X             
Mrs. Kelly                       X            Ms. Hooley (OR)   X             
Mr. Paul                         X            Ms. Carson (IN)   X             
Mr. Gillmor                      X                Mr. Sherman   X             
Mr. Ryun (KS)                    X             Mr. Meeks (NY)   X             
Mr. LaTourette                   X                    Ms. Lee   X             
Mr. Manzullo                     X                 Mr. Inslee   X             
Mr. Jones (NC)                   X                  Mr. Moore   X             
Mr. Ose                          X                Mr. Capuano   X             
Mrs. Biggert                     X                   Mr. Ford   X             
Mr. Green (WI)                   X               Mr. Hinojosa   X             
Mr. Toomey                       X             Mr. Lucas (KY)   X             
Mr. Shays                        X                Mr. Crowley   X             
Mr. Shadegg                      X                   Mr. Clay   X             
Mr. Fossella                     X                 Mr. Israel   X             
Mr. Gary G. Miller (CA)          X                   Mr. Ross   X             
Ms. Hart                         X         Mrs. McCarthy (NY)   X             
Mrs. Capito                      X                   Mr. Baca   X             
Mr. Tiberi                       X               Mr. Matheson   X             
Mr. Kennedy (MN)                 X                  Mr. Lynch   X             
Mr. Feeney                       X            Mr. Miller (NC)   X             
Mr. Hensarling                   X                Mr. Emanuel   X             
Mr. Garrett (NJ)                 X             Mr. Scott (GA)   X             
Mr. Murphy                       X             Mr. Davis (AL)   X             
Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite (FL)       X                   Mr. Bell   X             
Mr. Barrett (SC)                 X                                            
Ms. Harris                       X                                            
Mr. Renzi                        X                                            
Mr. Gerlach                      X                                            
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Royce, no. 1o, limiting the forms of identification that may be accepted from non-United States persons by financial institutions, was not agreed to by a record vote of 22 yeas and 47 nays (Record vote no. FC-24).

RECORD VOTE NO. FC-24
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Representative             Aye Nay Present     Representative Aye Nay Present 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Oxley                        X             Mr. Frank (MA)       X         
Mr. Leach                        X              Mr. Kanjorski       X         
Mr. Baker                        X                 Ms. Waters       X         
Mr. Bachus                       X                Mr. Sanders       X         
Mr. Castle                       X               Mrs. Maloney       X         
Mr. King                         X              Mr. Gutierrez       X         
Mr. Royce                  X                    Ms. Velazquez       X         
Mr. Lucas (OK)                                       Mr. Watt       X         
Mr. Ney                    X                     Mr. Ackerman       X         
Mrs. Kelly                 X                  Ms. Hooley (OR)       X         
Mr. Paul                   X                  Ms. Carson (IN)       X         
Mr. Gillmor                X                      Mr. Sherman       X         
Mr. Ryun (KS)              X                   Mr. Meeks (NY)       X         
Mr. LaTourette             X                          Ms. Lee       X         
Mr. Manzullo               X                       Mr. Inslee       X         
Mr. Jones (NC)             X                        Mr. Moore       X         
Mr. Ose                          X                Mr. Capuano       X         
Mrs. Biggert                     X                   Mr. Ford       X         
Mr. Green (WI)             X                     Mr. Hinojosa       X         
Mr. Toomey                       X             Mr. Lucas (KY)       X         
Mr. Shays                  X                      Mr. Crowley       X         
Mr. Shadegg                X                         Mr. Clay       X         
Mr. Fossella                     X                 Mr. Israel       X         
Mr. Gary G. Miller (CA)    X                         Mr. Ross       X         
Ms. Hart                         X         Mrs. McCarthy (NY)       X         
Mrs. Capito                X                         Mr. Baca       X         
Mr. Tiberi                       X               Mr. Matheson       X         
Mr. Kennedy (MN)                 X                  Mr. Lynch       X         
Mr. Feeney                 X                  Mr. Miller (NC)       X         
Mr. Hensarling                   X                Mr. Emanuel       X         
Mr. Garrett (NJ)           X                   Mr. Scott (GA)       X         
Mr. Murphy                 X                   Mr. Davis (AL)       X         
Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite (FL) X                         Mr. Bell       X         
Mr. Barrett (SC)           X                                                  
Ms. Harris                 X                                                  
Mr. Renzi                  X                                                  
Mr. Gerlach                      X                                            
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following other amendments were also considered:

An amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Oxley, containing the legislative recommendations of the Committee on Financial Services in response to the findings of the 9/11 Commission, was agreed to by a voice vote.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Kanjorski, no. 1a, providing for a joint report on implementation of financial system resilience recommendations, was agreed to by a voice vote.

A substitute amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mrs. Maloney, no. 1c, substituting the text of the bill H.R. 5150, the National Intelligence Reform Act of 2004, was ruled out of order by the Chair.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mrs. Biggert, no. 1d, providing for coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury regarding international financial institutions, was agreed to by a voice vote.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Baca, no. 1e, expressing the sense of Congress with regard to private sector preparedness, was agreed to by a voice vote.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mrs. Biggert, no. 1f, expressing the sense of Congress with regard to support for financial services industry preparedness and response by the Department of the Treasury, was agreed to by a voice vote.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mrs. Maloney, no. 1g, establishing a critical infrastructure support program, was withdrawn.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Ms. Harris, no. 1h, providing for an exclusion from the Fair Credit Reporting Act for certain information exchange networks, was withdrawn.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Inslee, no. 1i, clarifying the definition of `lawful transaction', was agreed to by a voice vote.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Inslee, no. 1j, granting tribal authorities the same exception as State and local authorities, was withdrawn.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mrs. Kelly, no. 1k, requiring certain financial institutions to report certain cross-border electronic transmittals of funds, was agreed to by a voice vote.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Emanuel, no. 1l, requiring a report on public/private partnerships, was agreed to by a voice vote.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mrs. Kelly, no. 1m, establishing the office of terrorism and financial intelligence in the Department of the Treasury, was not agreed to by a voice vote.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mr. Gutierrez, no. 1p, providing for post-employment limitations on leading bank examiners, was agreed to by a voice vote.

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute by Mrs. Kelly, no. 1q, regarding certification procedures to deter financial support for domestic or international terrorism, was withdrawn.

COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS

Pursuant to clause 3(c)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee held a hearing and made findings that are reflected in this report.

PERFORMANCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Pursuant to clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee establishes the following performance related goals and objectives for this legislation:

The Secretary of the Treasury and the appropriate financial regulators will use the authority granted by this legislation to improve the Nation's ability to detect, seize, and freeze assets used in the financing of terrorist activities directed at the United States at home and abroad.

NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY, ENTITLEMENT AUTHORITY, AND TAX EXPENDITURES

In compliance with clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee finds that this legislation would result in no new budget authority, entitlement authority, or tax expenditures or revenues.

COMMITTEE AND CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATES

The cost estimate provided by the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 was not available for inclusion in this report. The Chairman will cause such estimate to be printed in either a supplemental report or the Congressional Record when it is available.

FEDERAL MANDATES STATEMENT

The estimate of Federal mandates prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 423 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act was not available for inclusion in this report. The Chairman will cause such estimate to be printed either in a supplemental report or the Congressional Record when it is available.

ADVISORY COMMITTEE STATEMENT

No advisory committees within the meaning of section 5(b) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act were created by this legislation.

CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT

Pursuant to clause 3(d)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee finds that the Constitutional Authority of Congress to enact this legislation is provided by Article 1, section 8, clause 1 (relating to the general welfare of the United States) clause 3 (relating to the power to regulate interstate commerce) and clause 5 (relating to the power to coin money).

APPLICABILITY TO LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to the terms and conditions of employment or access to public services or accommodations within the meaning of section 102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act.

SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATION

This section-by-section analysis contains only those provisions in H.R. 10, as introduced, which fall within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Financial Services, or added by the Committee's amendment.

TITLE II--TERRORISM PREVENTION AND PROSECUTION

SUBTITLE E--MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORIST FINANCING

CHAPTER 1--FUNDING TO COMBAT FINANCIAL CRIMES INCLUDING TERRORIST FINANCING

Section 2101. Additional authorization for FinCEN

This section authorizes funding for a series of technology enhancements to (1) improve the usefulness of data maintained by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, the Treasury's anti-terror finance unit, while reducing the compliance burden on financial institutions; and (2) initiate an office to improve compliance with the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), as enhanced by the USA PATRIOT Act. Among the programs authorized by this section, the `BSA Direct' program completely redesigns the way FinCEN accepts data from financial institutions in compliance with the BSA, the way law enforcement queries the database, and the way FinCEN, acting with law enforcement, shares data with financial institutions about particular individuals or entities of interest.

Section 2102. Money laundering and financial crimes strategy reauthorization

This section contains a short-term reauthorization of provisions first enacted in 1998 (Public Law 105-310) which require the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and a number of other Federal financial regulators and Federal and State law enforcement agencies, to submit to Congress a national strategy for combating money laundering and related financial crimes, to include efforts directed at the prevention, detection, and prosecution of the funding of acts of international terrorism.

The Committee believes that the potential exists for terror organizations to self-finance with counterfeit currency, and strongly encourages the Department of Treasury to consider that possibility as part of its implementation of a national money laundering strategy.

The section also authorizes the appropriation of $15 million in both fiscal years 2004 and 2005, to fund the designation of high risk money laundering areas that warrant enhanced scrutiny by Federal, State, and local law enforcement officials, as well as a grant program designed to support State and local law enforcement initiatives to detect and prevent money laundering and related financial crimes.

CHAPTER 2--ENFORCEMENT TOOLS TO COMBAT FINANCIAL CRIMES INCLUDING TERRORIST FINANCING

SUBCHAPTER A--MONEY LAUNDERING ABATEMENT AND FINANCIAL ANTITERRORISM TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS

Section 2111. Short title

This section establishes the short title of the subtitle, the `Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Antiterrorism Technical Corrections Act of 2004'.

Section 2112. Technical corrections to Public Law 107-56

This section makes a number of typographical and grammatical corrections to title III of the USA PATRIOT Act (relating to terrorist financing and money laundering) to ensure that those provisions work as intended and can be enforced by the relevant Federal agencies.

Section 2113. Technical corrections to other provisions of law

This section makes a number of typographical and grammatical corrections to title 31 of the U.S. Code and other provisions of Federal law, as amended by title III of the USA PATRIOT Act (relating to terrorist financing and money laundering), to ensure that those provisions work as intended and can be enforced by the relevant Federal agencies.

Among other changes, this section corrects a typographical error in 31 U.S.C. Sec. 5324. Subsection (b) of that statute makes it an offense to evade the currency reporting requirements set forth in `section 5333.' There is in fact no such section. The intended reference was to section 5331. That section requires any person who receives more than $10,000 in coins or currency, in one transaction or in two or more related transactions in the course of that person's trade or business, to file a report with respect to that transaction with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). Correcting the typographical error would make it possible for any person who violates this requirement to be subject to criminal and civil forfeitures under 31 U.S.C. 5317(c)(2), in addition to civil and criminal penalties.

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321 (1998) established legal precedents that protect against potentially unfair civil forfeitures. The Committee notes that these precedents now form the basis for more fair civil and criminal forfeitures and serve as guiding principles that Federal prosecutors should observe when enforcing failure-to-file violations under 31 U.S.C. Sec. 5331. The Committee also notes that all of the due process protections enacted as part of the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 apply to forfeitures under 31 U.S.C. 5317(c), including the protection against forfeitures that are grossly disproportional to the gravity of the offense. See 18 U.S.C. 983(g), which codified the Supreme Court's decision in Bajakajian.

In the Bajakajian case, the Court ruled it unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause for the government to seize $357,144 in currency that an individual attempted to transport out of the United States without filing a report required by law. As the majority opinion stated, `The forfeiture serves no remedial purpose, is designed to punish the offender, and cannot be imposed on innocent owners.' Bajakajian, 524 U.S. at 332.

The Court found that the failure to file a report required by Federal law was the only offense committed by the respondent. The forfeiture of the entire amount of the currency in question `would be grossly disproportional to the gravity of his offense.' Bajakajian, 524 U.S. at 339-40. It is permissible to move currency out of the country as long as it is reported. Moreover, the majority opinion also stated that the money came from legal activity and was to be used to repay a lawful debt. Lastly, the Court majority argued that the harm caused by the defendant's failure to file was minimal, in that there was no fraud on the Federal government, and no cost to the taxpayers of the failure to file. `Had his crime gone undetected,' wrote the Court, `the Government would have been deprived only of the information that $357,144 had left the country.' Bajakajian, 524 U.S. at 339.

The Committee therefore notes that the civil and criminal forfeitures provided for under 31 U.S.C. Sec. 5317(c) for violations of 31 U.S.C. 5331 are governed by the legal precedents established in United States v. Bajakajian.

Section 2114. Repeal of review

This section makes permanent the provisions of title III of the USA PATRIOT Act by repealing section 303 of the Act. Section 303 provides that the provisions of title III will terminate after September 30, 2004, if both Houses of Congress enact a joint resolution to that effect.

Section 2115. Effective date

This section provides that the amendments made by this subtitle to Public Law 107-56, the United States Code, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, and any other provision of law shall take effect as if such amendments had been included in Public Law 107-56, as of the date of the enactment of that public law, and no amendment made by that public law that is inconsistent with an amendment made by this subtitle will be deemed to have taken effect.

SUBCHAPTER B--ADDITIONAL ENFORCEMENT TOOLS

Section 2121. Bureau of Engraving and Printing security printing

This section authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to produce currency and other security documents at the request of foreign governments on a reimbursable basis, as a way of strengthening those currencies and the economies of developing countries that do not have the capacity to print secure notes themselves.

Section 2122. Conduct in aid of counterfeiting

This section amends the criminal code to equate the possession of anti-counterfeiting technology or components thereof, with the actual act of counterfeiting. It takes into account the fact that as currency anti-counterfeiting technology is improved, traditional counterfeiters may have to `subcontract' the manufacture of a necessary component.

Section 2123. Reporting of cross-border transmittal of funds

This section directs the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, to prescribe regulations requiring those financial institutions the Secretary deems appropriate to report certain crossborder transmittals of funds relevant to Treasury's anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing efforts to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). Before prescribing the regulations, the Secretary is required to delegate the task of producing a report to the Secretary and the Congress to the Bank Secrecy Act Advisory Group. The report, due within one year of the date of enactment, must identify the information in cross-border electronic transmittals of funds relevant to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing efforts, recommend the appropriate form, manner, content and frequency of filing of the required reports, and identify the technology necessary for FinCEN to receive, maintain, exploit and disseminate information from reports of cross-border electronic transmittals of funds.

The Secretary must prescribe final regulations pursuant to this section within 3 years of the date of enactment of this Act. The Secretary may not prescribe regulations before certifying to Congress that FinCEN has the technological systems in place to receive, maintain, exploit and disseminate information from reports of cross-border electronic transmittals of funds to law enforcement and other entities engaged in efforts against money laundering and terrorist financing.

Financial institutions required to submit reports on certain cross-border electronic transmittals of funds pursuant to this section are relieved of the recordkeeping requirements regarding such transmittals imposed by section 21(b)(3) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

Section 2124. Enhanced effectiveness of examinations, including anti-money laundering programs

This section amends section 10 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. Sec. 1820) by imposing post-employment restrictions on leading bank examiners. Specifically, this section prohibits an officer or employee of a Federal banking agency or Federal Reserve Bank, who has served as the examiner-in-charge, or a functionally equivalent position, for two or more months during the final eighteen months of his employment for a particular depository institution or depository institution holding company, from holding any office or position, or becoming a consultant or controlling shareholder, at this institution for a period of one year. Violators of this section are subject to suspension or an industry-wide prohibition, among other penalties which may apply to Federal employees.

The Federal banking regulators are charged with developing regulations that determine what constitutes a leading examiner. In prescribing the regulations, the agencies are directed to take into account the manner in which the examiners are distributed among institutions and holding companies; the number of institutions an examiner is involved with; the period of time an examiner is assigned to an institution or holding company; the size of the institutions or holding companies for which each examiner is responsible; and any other factors the agency determines to be appropriate.

A Federal banking agency may waive the restrictions of this section on a case-by-case basis if the agency head certifies in writing that such a waiver would not be inconsistent with the public interest and if the waiver is provided in advance of the examiner becoming affiliated with the institution or holding company.

This section also amends the Federal Credit Union Act to require similar post-employment limitations on examiners of Federally insured credit unions.

This section also requires the Federal banking and credit union regulators to study efforts and proposals for the retention of experienced and highly qualified examiners. The regulators must also study continuing efforts to attract examiners and supervisors. A report on the results of this study is required within one year of the enactment of this legislation.

SUBCHAPTER C--UNLAWFUL INTERNET GAMBLING FUNDING PROHIBITION

Section 2131. Short title

This section provides the short title of the subchapter, the `Unlawful Internet Gambling Funding Prohibition Act'.

Section 2132. Findings

This section provides certain Congressional findings. In particular, Congress finds that: (1) Internet gambling is primarily funded through the use of personal banking instruments and plays a large role in the creation of ultimately uncollectible personal debt; and (2) Internet gambling is susceptible to abuse by money launderers.

Section 2133. Policies and procedures required to prevent payments for unlawful internet gambling

Subsection (a) requires the Federal functional regulators to prescribe regulations within six months requiring any designated payment system to establish policies and procedures reasonably designed to identify and prevent restricted transactions.

Subsection (b) requires the Federal functional regulators, in prescribing regulations, to identify types of policies and procedures which would be reasonably designed to identify, block or prevent a restricted transaction; to the extent practical permit any participant in a payment system to choose among alternative means of compliance; and consider exempting restricted transactions where it is not reasonably practical to identify and block, or otherwise prevent, such transactions.

Subsection (c) provides that a creditor, credit card issuer, financial institution, operator of a terminal at which an electronic fund transfer may be initiated, money transmitting business, or international, national, regional, or local network utilized to effect a credit transaction, electronic fund transfer, or money transmitting service, or a participant in such network, is in compliance with subsection (a) if such person operates in reliance on procedures established by the payment system pursuant to subsection (a).

Subsection (d) requires that this section be enforced by the Federal functional regulators and the Federal Trade Commission, and sets out factors to be considered in any enforcement action against any payment system, or any participant in a payment system that is a creditor, credit card issuer, financial institution, operator of a terminal at which an electronic fund transfer may be initiated, money transmitting business, or international, national, regional, or local network utilized to effect a credit transaction, electronic fund transfer, or money transmitting service, or a participant in such network.

Section 2134. Definitions

This section defines the terms `restricted transaction', `designated payment system', `Federal functional regulator', `Internet', `unlawful Internet gambling', `credit', `creditor' and `credit card', `electronic fund transfer', `financial institution', and `money transmitting business' and `money transmitting service.' Paragraph (2) defines the term `bets or wagers' as the staking or risking by any person of something of value upon the outcome of a contest of others, a sporting event, or a game subject to chance with the agreement that the winner will receive something of greater value than the amount staked or risked. This subsection clarifies that `bets or wagers' does not include a bona fide business transaction governed by the securities laws; a transaction subject to the Commodity Exchange Act; an over-the-counter derivative instrument and any other transaction exempt from State gaming or bucket shop laws pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act or Securities Exchange Act; a contract of indemnity or guarantee; a contract for life, health, or accident insurance; a deposit with a depository institution; certain participation in a simulation sports game or education game; or a lawful transaction with a business licensed or authorized by a State, defined for these purposes as any transaction that is lawful under all applicable Federal laws and all applicable State laws of both the State in which the licensed or authorized business is located and the State where the bet is initiated.

Section 2135. Common sense rule of construction

This section provides that no provision of this legislation may be construed as altering, limiting, extending, changing the status of, or otherwise affecting any law relating to, affecting, or regulating gambling within the United States.

TITLE IV--INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND COORDINATION

SUBTITLE B--PREVENT THE CONTINUED GROWTH OF TERRORISM

CHAPTER 2--UNITED STATES MULTILATERAL DIPLOMACY

Section 4033. Leadership and membership of international organizations

This section requires that the President, acting through the Secretary of State, the relevant United States chiefs of mission, and, where appropriate, the Secretary of the Treasury, use the voice, vote, and influence of the United States to prevent countries subject to United Nations Security Council sanctions from becoming members or serving in leadership roles in all United Nation bodies and at other international organizations and multilateral institutions of which the United States is a member. The purpose of including the Secretary of the Treasury is to enable the Secretary to direct conforming action through instructions to U.S. Executive Directors to the International Monetary Fund, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the regional development banks, and other more informal multilateral financial policymaking bodies in which the Department of the Treasury is the lead representative and lead negotiator for the United States.

Section 4035. Implementation and establishment of office of multilateral negotiations

This section creates an office within the State Department and a Special Representative for Multilateral Negotiations, appointed by the President and carrying Ambassador-at-large status. The duties of the Special Representative include assisting in the organization of, and preparation for, United States participation in multilateral negotiations and, at the direction of the Secretary of State, serving as a member of a United States delegation to any multilateral negotiation. The section further requires the Special Representative to coordinate and consult with the Secretary of the Treasury regarding initiatives associated with international financial institutions and multilateral financial policymaking bodies, and clarifies that the Secretary of the Treasury is the lead representative and negotiator for those entities, including the International Monetary Fund, the development banks, the Financial Action Task Force, and the Group of Eight.

SUBTITLE D--AFGHANISTAN FREEDOM SUPPORT ACT AMENDMENTS OF 2004

Section 4061. Short title

This section establishes the short title of the subtitle, the `Afghanistan Freedom Support Act Amendments of 2004'.

Section 4062. Coordination of assistance for Afghanistan

This section creates a coordinator to unify and create assistance plans for Afghanistan. The coordinator is required to work with the international community, including multilateral organizations and international financial institutions, and the government of Afghanistan to ensure that assistance to Afghanistan is implemented in a coherent, consistent, and efficient manner to prevent duplication and waste. To effectuate these responsibilities within the international financial institutions, as defined in section 1701(c)(2) of the International Financial Institutions Act, the coordinator is required to work through the Secretary of the Treasury and the U.S. Executive Directors at the international financial institutions.

It is expected that the U.S. Executive Directors and the Department of the Treasury will provide all necessary assistance to the coordinator in order to ensure that bilateral U.S. aid packages are designed and delivered to Afghanistan in the most efficient and effective manner possible. There may be cases in which it the coordinator will need to meet with staff of relevant multilateral financial institutions. This provision is not intended to rule out the possibility of such meetings. However, the provision makes clear that any such meetings should be undertaken in consultation with the appropriate Treasury officials.

SUBTITLE H--IMPROVING INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND COOPERATION TO FIGHT TERRORIST FINANCING

Section 4111. Sense of the Congress regarding success in multilateral organizations

Subsection (a) sets forth findings that detail United States successes in creating a set of international standards for fighting terrorist financing through the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). They also describe the success of United States leadership in providing a mechanism in the International Monetary Fund and the development banks for identifying deficiencies in financial systems and for directing development funds to support changes in emerging market financial systems that want to comply with the international FATF standards.

Subsection (b) expresses the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Treasury should continue to promote the dissemination of international anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) standards, and to press for full implementation of the FATF 40 + 8 recommendations by all countries.

Section 4112. Expanded reporting and testimony requirements for the Secretary of the Treasury

This section amends the International Financial Institutions Act to require the Secretary of the Treasury to work with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to foster strong global AML/CTF regimes and ensure that country performance under the FATF AML/CTF standards is monitored effectively. The section also directs the Secretary to work with the IMF to ensure that AML/CTF issues are a part of regular reviews of country progress and these measures are to be considered indispensable elements of sound financial systems. Finally, the section requires the Treasury Department to emphasize the importance of sound AML/CTF regimes to global growth and development. The Committee notes that all of these actions currently are undertaken and, thus, the section seeks only to codify existing practice.

Section 1503(a) of the International Financial Institutions Act (22 U.S.C. 262o-2(a)) requires the Secretary of the Treasury to report to Congress during the first quarter of each year on the state of the international financial system. This section adds one more specific item to be included in the annual report: a progress report on the Secretary's efforts to fight terrorist financing through international financial institutions and multilateral policymaking bodies.

Since the events of September 11, 2001, the Secretary of the Treasury has provided these status reports, thus this section codifies existing practice. This section also defines the term `other multilateral policymaking bodies' in order to ensure that Group of Eight and FATF initiatives are included in the annual report in addition to international financial institution initiatives. In establishing this additional requirement, the Committee does not intend to diminish the importance of the development and financial stability work undertaken by the international institutions. Rather, the provision will ensure that the efforts to strengthen standards against money laundering and terrorist financing are properly understood within the overall context of strengthening financial system resilience and institutional strength.

Section 4113. Coordination of United States government efforts

This section codifies existing practice by authorizing the Secretary of the Treasury to continue convening the interagency U.S. Government FATF working group. The Committee notes that since the events of September 11, 2001, the Department of the Treasury has spearheaded efforts to cooperate with other agencies of the United States government to ensure that its negotiations within FATF, the Group of Eight, and other international fora are consistent and compatible with broader U.S. government objectives. The 9/11 Commission Report and the accompanying staff Monograph on terrorist financing acknowledge the unprecedented level of cooperation within the Federal government on anti-terrorist financing measures since September 11, 2001, but also express concern that such cooperation could wane `as memories fade' and as relevant personnel move on to other projects. In addition, the 9/11 Commission Report recommended that `information procedures should provide incentives for sharing, to restore a better balance between security and shared knowledge * * *. We propose that information be shared horizontally, across new networks that transcend individual agencies.'

By including this provision, the Committee intends to make the strong interagency cooperation and communication on international financial standard-setting matters related to anti-terrorist financing where the Treasury Department is in the lead permanent. Currently, the Secretary of the Treasury, or his designee, acts as the lead United States Government official to FATF. The section makes clear that the Secretary will continue to convene the interagency United States Government FATF working group.

This interagency working group has a flexible membership that permits the Secretary of the Treasury to draw on the resources of a range of U.S. government agencies for the purposes of preparing for international financial policy standard-setting negotiations at the multilateral level. For example, if FATF were considering establishing international standards concerning law enforcement-related issues, the Secretary would have formal authority under this section to incorporate into pre-negotiation meetings law enforcement agencies within the U.S. Federal government so that the Treasury Department position is consistent with U.S. government practice or priorities. If the issue for consideration relates instead to a specific financial sector, such as banking, securities, or insurance, the Secretary has the formal authority under this section to include financial regulators.

The Committee anticipates that in some years there will be no major standard-setting activities within the various international groups in which the Secretary of the Treasury has the lead. In those instances, the section requires that the interagency working group meet annually to advise the Secretary on policies to be pursued by the United States regarding the development of common international anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing standards.

Section 4114. Definitions

This section clarifies terms used throughout this title. It incorporates by reference the definition of the term `international financial institution' which already exists in section 1701(c)(2) of the International Financial Institutions Act. This section also defines the term `Financial Action Task Force.'

TITLE V--GOVERNMENT RESTRUCTURING

SUBTITLE G--EMERGENCY FINANCIAL PREPAREDNESS

CHAPTER 1--EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FOR FISCAL AUTHORITIES

Section 5081. Delegation authority of the Secretary of the Treasury

This section authorizes Treasury's Fiscal Assistant Secretary, which operates as the U.S. government's money manager, to delegate to subordinates the authority to authorize cash movements and approve and sign changes to debt security terms and conditions.

Section 5081A. Treasury support for financial services preparedness and response

Subsection (a) provides a finding that the Secretary of the Treasury has successfully communicated and coordinated with the private-sector financial services industry about counter-terrorist financing activities and preparedness; successfully reached out to State and local governments and regional public-private partnerships that protect employees and critical infrastructure by enhancing communication and coordinating plans for disaster preparedness and business continuity; and has set an example for the Department of Homeland Security and other Federal agency partners, whose active participation is vital on these issues.

Subsection (b) expresses the sense of the Congress that the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and other Federal agency partners, should furnish resources and submit annual reports to Congress on Federal efforts to educate consumers and employees of the financial services industry about domestic counter-terrorist financing activities, including how the public and private sector organizations involved in counter-terrorist financing activities can help to combat terrorism and simultaneously protect the lives and civil liberties of consumers and financial services employees, and how those consumers and employees can assist the public and private sector organizations involved in counter-terrorist financing activities.

CHAPTER 2--MARKET PREPAREDNESS

SUBCHAPTER A--NETTING OF FINANCIAL CONTRACTS

Section 5082. Short title

This section provides the short title of the subchapter, the `Financial Contracts Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2002.'

Section 5082A. Treatment of certain agreements by conservators or receivers of insured depository institutions

Subsections (a) through (f) of this section amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act's (FDIA) definitions of `qualified financial contract,' `securities contract,' `commodity contract,' `forward contract,' `repurchase agreement' and `swap agreement' to make them consistent with the definitions in the Bankruptcy Code and to reflect the enactment of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (CFMA). It is intended that the legislative history and case law surrounding those terms, to the date of this amendment, be incorporated into the legislative history of the FDIA.

Subsection (b) amends the definition of `securities contract' expressly to encompass margin loans, to clarify the coverage of securities options and to clarify the coverage of repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions. The inclusion of `margin loans' in the definition is intended to encompass only those loans commonly known in the securities industry as `margin loans,' such as arrangements where a securities broker or dealer extends credit to a customer in connection with the purchase, sale, or trading of securities, and does not include loans that are not commonly referred to as `margin loans.' The reference in subsection (b) to a `guarantee by or to any securities clearing agency' is intended to cover other arrangements, such as novation, that have an effect similar to a guarantee. The reference to a `loan' of a security in the definition is intended to apply to loans of securities, whether or not for a `permitted purpose' under margin regulations. The reference to `repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions' is intended to eliminate any inquiry under the qualified financial contract provisions of the FDIA as to whether a repurchase or reverse repurchase transaction is a purchase and sale transaction or a secured financing. Repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions meeting certain criteria are already covered under the definition of `repurchase agreement' in the FDIA (and a regulation of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)). Repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions on all securities (including, for example, equity securities, asset-backed securities, corporate bonds and commercial paper) are included under the definition of `securities contract.' Subsection (b) also specifies that purchase, sale and repurchase obligations under a participation in a commercial mortgage loan do not constitute `securities contracts.' While a contract for the purchase, sale or repurchase of a participation may constitute a `securities contract,' the purchase, sale or repurchase obligation embedded in a participation agreement does not make that agreement a `securities contract.'

A number of terms used in the qualified financial contract provisions, but not defined therein, are intended to have the meanings set forth in the analogous provisions of the Bankruptcy Code or Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA), such as, for example, `securities clearing agency'. The term `person,' however, is intended to have the meaning set forth in section 1 of title 1 of the United States Code.

Subsection (c) amends the definition of `commodity contract' in section 11(e)(8)(D)(iii) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. Subsection (d) amends section 11(e)(8)(D)(iv) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act with respect to its definition of a `forward contract.'

Subsection (e) amends the definition of `repurchase agreement' to codify the substance of the FDIC's 1995 regulation defining repurchase agreement to include those on qualified foreign government securities. The term `qualified foreign government securities' is defined to include those that are direct obligations of, or fully guaranteed by, central governments of members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), as determined by rule of the appropriate Federal banking agency. Subsection (e) reflects developments in the repurchase agreement markets, which increasingly use foreign government securities as the underlying asset. The securities are limited to those issued by or guaranteed by full members of the OECD, as well as countries that have concluded special lending arrangements with the International Monetary Fund associated with the Fund's General Arrangements to Borrow. (See 12 C.F.R. 360.5.) Subsection (e) also amends the definition of `repurchase agreement' to include those on mortgage-related securities, mortgage loans and interests therein, and to include principal and interest-only U.S. government and agency securities as securities that can be the subject of a `repurchase agreement.' The reference in the definition to United States government- and agency-issued or fully guaranteed securities is intended to include obligations issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) as well as all obligations eligible for purchase by Federal Reserve banks under the similar language of section 14(b) of the Federal Reserve Act. This amendment is not intended to affect the status of repos involving securities or commodities as securities contracts, commodity contracts, or forward contracts, and their consequent eligibility for similar treatment under the qualified financial contract provisions. In particular, an agreement for the sale and repurchase of a security would continue to be a securities contract as defined in the FDIA, even if not a `repurchase agreement' as defined in the FDIA. Similarly, an agreement for the sale and repurchase of a commodity, even though not a `repurchase agreement' as defined in the FDIA, would continue to be a forward contract for purposes of the FDIA.

Subsection (e), like subsection (b) for `securities contracts,' specifies that repurchase obligations under a participation in a commercial mortgage loan do not make the participation agreement a `repurchase agreement.' Such repurchase obligations embedded in participations in commercial loans (such as recourse obligations) do not constitute a `repurchase agreement.' A repurchase agreement involving the transfer of participations in commercial mortgage loans with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase the participation on demand or at a date certain 1 year or less after such transfer, however, would constitute a `repurchase agreement' as well as a `securities contract'.

Subsection (f) amends the definition of `swap agreement' to include an `interest rate swap, option, future, or forward agreement, including a rate floor, rate cap, rate collar, cross-currency rate swap, and basis swap; a spot, same day-tomorrow, tomorrow-next, forward, or other foreign exchange or precious metals agreement; a currency swap, option, future, or forward agreement; an equity index or equity swap, option, future, or forward agreement; a debt index or debt swap, option, future, or forward agreement; a total return, credit spread or credit swap, option, future, or forward agreement; a commodity index or commodity swap, option, future, or forward agreement; or a weather swap, weather derivative, or weather option.' As amended, the definition of `swap agreement' will update the statutory definition and achieve contractual netting across economically similar transactions that are the subject of recurring dealings in the swap agreements.

The definition of `swap agreement' was originally intended to provide sufficient flexibility to avoid the need to amend the definition as the nature and uses of swap transactions matured. To that end, the phrase `or any other similar agreement' was included in the definition. (The phrase `or any similar agreement' has been added to the definitions of `forward contract,' `commodity contract,' `repurchase agreement' and `securities contract' for the same reason.) To clarify this, subsection (f) expands the definition of `swap agreement' to include `any agreement or transaction that is similar to any other agreement or transaction referred to in [section 11(e)(8)(D)(vi) of the FDIA] and is of a type that has been, is presently, or in the future becomes, the subject of recurrent dealings in the swap markets * * * and that is a forward, swap, future, or option on one or more rates, currencies, commodities, equity securities or other equity instruments, debt securities or other debt instruments, quantitative measures associated with an occurrence, extent of an occurrence, or contingency associated with a financial, commercial, or economic consequence, or economic or financial indices or measures of economic or financial risk or value.'

The definition of `swap agreement,' however, should not be interpreted to permit parties to document non-swaps as swap transactions. Traditional commercial arrangements, such as supply agreements, or other non-financial market transactions, such as commercial, residential or consumer loans, cannot be treated as `swaps' under either the FDIA or the Bankruptcy Code simply because the parties purport to document or label the transactions as `swap agreements.' In addition, these definitions apply only for purposes of the FDIA and the Bankruptcy Code. These definitions, and the characterization of a certain transaction as a `swap agreement,' are not intended to affect the characterization, definition, or treatment of any instruments under any other statute, regulation, or rule including, but not limited to, the statutes, regulations or rules enumerated in subsection (f). Similarly, a new paragraph of section 11(e) of the FDIA provides that the definitions of `securities contract,' `repurchase agreement,' `forward contract,' and `commodity contract,' and the characterization of certain transactions as such a contract or agreement, are not intended to affect the characterization, definition, or treatment of any instruments under any other statute, regulation, or rule including, but not limited to, the statutes, regulations or rules enumerated in subsection (f).

The definition also includes any security agreement or arrangement, or other credit enhancement, related to a swap agreement, including any guarantee or reimbursement obligation related to a swap agreement. This ensures that any such agreement, arrangement or enhancement is itself deemed to be a swap agreement, and therefore eligible for treatment as such for purposes of termination, liquidation, acceleration, offset and netting under the FDIA and the Bankruptcy Code. Similar changes are made in the definitions of `forward contract,' `commodity contract,' `repurchase agreement' and `securities contract.'

The use of the term `forward' in the definition of `swap agreement' is not intended to refer only to transactions that fall within the definition of `forward contract.' Instead, a `forward' transaction could be a `swap agreement' even if not a `forward contract.'

Subsection (g) amends the FDIA by adding a definition for `transfer,' which is a key term used in the FDIA, to ensure that it is broadly construed to encompass dispositions of property or interests in property. The definition tracks that in section 101 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Subsection (h) makes clarifying technical changes to conform the receivership and conservatorship provisions of the FDIA. It also clarifies that the FDIA expressly protects rights under security agreements, arrangements or other credit enhancements related to one or more qualified financial contracts (QFCs). An example of a security arrangement is a right of setoff, and examples of other credit enhancements are letters of credit, guarantees, reimbursement obligations and other similar agreements.

Subsection (i) clarifies that no provision of Federal or state law relating to the avoidance of preferential or fraudulent transfers (including the anti-preference provision of the National Bank Act) can be invoked to avoid a transfer made in connection with any QFC of an insured depository institution in conservatorship or receivership, absent actual fraudulent intent on the part of the transferee.

Section 5082B. Authority of the FDIC and NCUAB with respect to failed and failing institutions

This section provides that no provision of law, including FDICIA, shall be construed to limit the power of the FDIC to transfer or to repudiate any QFC in accordance with its powers under the FDIA. As discussed below, there has been some uncertainty regarding whether or not FDICIA limits the authority of the FDIC to transfer or to repudiate QFCs of an insolvent financial institution. This section, as well as other provisions in the Act, clarify that FDICIA does not limit the transfer powers of the FDIC with respect to QFCs.

This section denies enforcement to `walkaway' clauses in QFCs. A walkaway clause is defined as a provision that, after calculation of a value of a party's position or an amount due to or from one of the parties upon termination, liquidation or acceleration of the QFC, either does not create a payment obligation of a party or extinguishes a payment obligation of a party in whole or in part solely because of such party's status as a non-defaulting party.

Section 5082C. Amendments relating to transfers of qualified financial contracts

This section amends the FDIA to expand the transfer authority of the FDIC to permit transfers of QFCs to `financial institutions' as defined in FDICIA or in regulations. This provision will allow the FDIC to transfer QFCs to a non-depository financial institution, provided the institution is not subject to bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings.

The new FDIA provision specifies that when the FDIC transfers QFCs that are cleared on or subject to the rules of a particular clearing organization, the transfer will not require the clearing organization

tion to accept the transferee as a member of the organization. This provision gives the FDIC flexibility in resolving QFCs cleared on or subject to the rules of a clearing organization, while preserving the ability of such organizations to enforce appropriate risk reducing membership requirements. The amendment does not require the clearing organization to accept for clearing any QFCs from the transferee, except on the terms and conditions applicable to other parties permitted to clear through that clearing organization. `Clearing organization' is defined to mean a `clearing organization' within the meaning of FDICIA (as amended both by the CFMA and by section 5082F of this Act).

The new FDIA provision also permits transfers to an eligible financial institution that is a non-U.S. person, or the branch or agency of a non-U.S. person or a U.S. financial institution that is not an FDIC-insured institution if, following the transfer, the contractual rights of the parties would be enforceable substantially to the same extent as under the FDIA. It is expected that the FDIC would not transfer QFCs to such a financial institution if there were an impending change of law that would impair the enforceability of the parties' contractual rights.

Subsection (b) amends the notification requirements following a transfer of the QFCs of a failed depository institution to require the FDIC to notify any party to a transferred QFC of such transfer by 5 p.m. (Eastern Time) on the business day following the date of the appointment of the FDIC acting as receiver or following the date of such transfer by the FDIC acting as a conservator. This amendment is consistent with the policy statement on QFCs issued by the FDIC on December 12, 1989.

Subsection (c) amends the FDIA to clarify the relationship between the FDIA and FDICIA. There has been some uncertainty whether FDICIA permits counterparties to terminate or liquidate a QFC before the expiration of the time period provided by the FDIA during which the FDIC may repudiate or transfer a QFC in a conservatorship or receivership. Subsection (c) provides that a party may not terminate a QFC based solely on the appointment of the FDIC as receiver until 5 p.m. (Eastern Time) on the business day following the appointment of the receiver or after the person has received notice of a transfer under FDIA section 11(d)(9), or based solely on the appointment of the FDIC as conservator, notwithstanding the provisions of FDICIA. This provides the FDIC with an opportunity to undertake an orderly resolution of the insured depository institution.

Subsection (c) also prohibits the enforcement of rights of termination or liquidation that arise solely because of the insolvency of the institution or are based on the `financial condition' of the depository institution in receivership or conservatorship. For example, termination based on a cross-default provision in a QFC that is triggered upon a default under another contract could be rendered ineffective if such other default was caused by an acceleration of amounts due under that other contract, and such acceleration was based solely on the appointment of a conservator or receiver for that depository institution. Similarly, a provision in a QFC permitting termination of the QFC based solely on a downgraded credit rating of a party will not be enforceable in an FDIC receivership or conservatorship because the provision is based solely on the financial condition of the depository institution in default. However, any payment, delivery or other performance-based default, or breach of a representation or covenant putting in question the enforceability of the agreement, will not be deemed to be based solely on financial condition for purposes of this provision. The amendment is not intended to prevent counterparties from taking all actions permitted and recovering all damages authorized upon repudiation of any QFC by a conservator or receiver, or from taking actions based upon a receivership or other financial condition-triggered default in the absence of a transfer (as contemplated in Section 11(e)(10) of the FDIA). The amendment allows the FDIC to meet its obligation to provide notice to parties to transferred QFCs by taking steps reasonably calculated to provide notice to such parties by the required time. This is consistent with the existing policy statement on QFCs issued by the FDIC on December 12, 1989.

Finally, the amendment permits the FDIC to transfer QFCs of a failed depository institution to a bridge bank or a depository institution organized by the FDIC for which a conservator is appointed either (i) immediately upon the organization of such institution or (ii) at the time of a purchase and assumption transaction between the FDIC and the institution. This provision clarifies that such institutions are not to be considered financial institutions that are ineligible to receive such transfers under FDIA section 11(e)(9). This is consistent with the existing policy statement on QFCs issued by the FDIC on December 12, 1989.

Section 5082D. Amendments relating to disaffirmance or repudiation of qualified financial contracts

This section limits the disaffirmance and repudiation authority of the FDIC with respect to QFCs so that such authority is consistent with the FDIC's transfer authority under FDIA section 11(e)(9). This ensures that no disaffirmance, repudiation or transfer authority of the FDIC may be exercised to `cherry-pick' or otherwise treat independently all the QFCs between a depository institution in default and a person or any affiliate of such person. The FDIC has announced that its policy is not to repudiate or disaffirm QFCs selectively. This unified treatment is fundamental to the reduction of systemic risk.

Section 5082E. Clarifying amendment relating to master agreements

This section specifies that a master agreement for one or more securities contracts, commodity contracts, forward contracts, repurchase agreements or swap agreements will be treated as a single QFC under the FDIA (but only with respect to underlying agreements that are themselves QFCs). This provision ensures that cross-product netting pursuant to a master agreement, or pursuant to an umbrella agreement for separate master agreements between the same parties, each of which is used to document one or more qualified financial contracts, will be enforceable under the FDIA. Cross-product netting permits a wide variety of financial transactions between two parties to be netted, thereby maximizing the present and potential future risk-reducing benefits of the netting arrangement between the parties. Express recognition of the enforceability of such cross-product master agreements furthers the policy of increasing legal certainty and reducing systemic risks in the case of an insolvency of a large financial participant.

Section 5082F. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991

Subsection (a)(1) amends the definition of `clearing organization' to include clearinghouses that are subject to exemptions pursuant to orders of the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and to include multilateral clearing organizations (the definition of which was added to FDICIA by the CFMA).

FDICIA provides that a netting arrangement will be enforced pursuant to its terms, notwithstanding the failure of a party to the agreement. The current netting provisions of FDICIA, however, limit this protection to `financial institutions,' which include depository institutions. Subsection (a)(2) amends the FDICIA definition of covered institutions to include (i) uninsured national and State member banks, irrespective of their eligibility for deposit insurance and (ii) foreign banks (including the foreign bank and its branches or agencies as a combined group, or only the foreign bank parent of a branch or agency). The latter change will extend the protections of FDICIA to ensure that U.S. financial organizations participating in netting agreements with foreign banks are covered by the bill, thereby enhancing the safety and soundness of these arrangements. It is intended that a non-defaulting foreign bank and its branches and agencies be considered to be a single financial institution for purposes of the bilateral netting provisions of FDICIA (except to the extent that the non-defaulting foreign bank and its branches and agencies on the one hand, and the defaulting financial institution, on the other, have entered into agreements that clearly evidence an intention that the non-defaulting foreign bank and its branches and agencies be treated as separate financial institutions for purposes of the bilateral netting provisions of FDICIA).

Subsection (a)(3) amends FDICIA to provide that, for purposes of FDICIA, two or more clearing organizations that enter into a netting contract are considered `members' of each other. This assures the enforceability of netting arrangements involving two or more clearing organizations and a member common to all such organizations, thus reducing systemic risk in the event of the failure of such a member. Under the current FDICIA provisions, the enforceability of such arrangements depends on a case-by-case determination that clearing organizations could be regarded as members of each other for purposes of FDICIA.

Subsection (a)(4) amends the FDICIA definition of netting contract and the general rules applicable to netting contracts. The current FDICIA provisions require that the netting agreement must be governed by the law of the United States or a State to receive the protections of FDICIA. Many of these agreements, however, particularly netting arrangements covering positions taken in foreign exchange dealings, are governed by the laws of a foreign country. This subsection broadens the definition of `netting contract' to include those agreements governed by foreign law, and preserves the FDICIA requirement that a netting contract not be invalid under, or precluded by, Federal law.

Subsections (b) and (c) establish two exceptions to FDICIA's protection of the enforceability of the provisions of netting contracts between financial institutions and among clearing organization members. First, the termination provisions of netting contracts will not be enforceable based solely on (i) the appointment of a conservator for an insolvent depository institution under the FDIA or (ii) the appointment of a receiver for such institution under the FDIA, if such receiver transfers or repudiates QFCs in accordance with the FDIA and gives notice of a transfer by 5 p.m. on the business day following the appointment of a receiver. This change is made to confirm the FDIC's flexibility to transfer or repudiate the QFCs of an insolvent depository institution in accordance with the terms of the FDIA. This modification also provides important legal certainty regarding the treatment of QFCs under the FDIA, because the current relationship between the FDIA and FDICIA is unclear.

The second exception provides that FDICIA does not override a stay order under SIPA with respect to foreclosure on securities (but not cash) collateral of a debtor (section 5082(k) makes a conforming change to the Securities Investor Protection Act (SIPA)). There is also an exception relating to insolvent commodity brokers. Subsections (b) and (c) also clarify that a security agreement or other credit enhancement related to a netting contract is enforceable to the same extent as the underlying netting contract.

Subsection (d) adds a new section 407 to FDICIA. This new section provides that, notwithstanding any other law, QFCs with uninsured national banks, an uninsured Federal branch or agency or Edge Act corporation, or an uninsured State member bank that operates, or operates as, a multilateral clearing organization will be treated in the same manner as if the contract were with an insured national bank or insured Federal branch for which a receiver or conservator was appointed. This provision will ensure that parties to QFCs with these institutions will have the same rights and obligations as parties entering into the same agreements with insured depository institutions. The new section also specifically limits the powers of a receiver or conservator for such an institution to those contained in 12 U.S.C. 1821(e)(8), (9), (10), and (11), which address QFCs.

While the amendment would apply the same rules as apply to insured institutions, the provision would not change the rules that apply to insured institutions. Nothing in this section would amend the International Banking Act, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the National Bank Act, or other statutory provisions with respect to receiverships of insured national banks or Federal branches.

Section 5082G. Bankruptcy code amendments

This section makes a series of amendments to the Bankruptcy Code. Subsection (a)(1) amends the Bankruptcy Code definitions of `repurchase agreement' and `swap agreement' to conform with the amendments to the FDIA contained in subsections 5082A (e) and (f).

In connection with the definition of `repurchase agreement,' the term `qualified foreign government securities' is defined to include securities that are direct obligations of, or fully guaranteed by, central governments of members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). This language reflects developments in the repurchase agreement markets, which increasingly use foreign government securities as the underlying asset. The securities are limited to those issued by or guaranteed by full members of the OECD, as well as countries that have concluded special lending arrangements with the International Monetary Fund associated with the Fund's General Arrangements to Borrow.

Subsection (a)(1) also amends the definition of `repurchase agreement' to include those on mortgage-related securities, mortgage loans and interests therein, and to include principal and interest-only U.S. Government and agency securities as securities that can be the subject of a `repurchase agreement.' The reference in the definition to United States government- and agency-issued or fully guaranteed securities is intended to include obligations issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) as well as all obligations eligible for purchase by Federal Reserve banks under the similar language of section 14(b) of the Federal Reserve Act.

This amendment is not intended to affect the status of repos involving securities or commodities as securities contracts, commodity contracts, or forward contracts, and their consequent eligibility for similar treatment under other provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. In particular, an agreement for the sale and repurchase of a security would continue to be a securities contract as defined in the Bankruptcy Code and thus also would be subject to the Bankruptcy Code provisions pertaining to securities contracts, even if not a `repurchase agreement' as defined in the Bankruptcy Code. Similarly, an agreement for the sale and repurchase of a commodity, even though not a `repurchase agreement' as defined in the Bankruptcy Code, would continue to be a forward contract for purposes of the Bankruptcy Code and would be subject to the Bankruptcy Code provisions pertaining to forward contracts.

Subsection (a)(1) specifies that repurchase obligations under a participation in a commercial mortgage loan do not make the participation agreement a `repurchase agreement.' These repurchase obligations embedded in participations in commercial loans (such as recourse obligations) do not constitute a `repurchase agreement.' However, a repurchase agreement involving the transfer of participations in commercial mortgage loans with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase the participation on demand or at a date certain 1 year or less after such transfer would constitute a `repurchase agreement' (as well as a `securities contract').

The definition of `swap agreement' is amended to include an `interest rate swap, option, future, or forward agreement, including a rate floor, rate cap, rate collar, cross-currency rate swap, and basis swap; a spot, same day-tomorrow, tomorrow-next, forward, or other

foreign exchange or precious metals agreement; a currency swap, option, future, or forward agreement; an equity index or equity swap, option, future, or forward agreement; a debt index or debt swap, option, future, or forward agreement; a total return, credit spread or credit swap, option, future, or forward agreement; a commodity index or commodity swap, option, future, or forward agreement; or a weather swap, weather derivative, or weather option.' As amended, the definition of `swap agreement' will update the statutory definition and achieve contractual netting across economically similar transactions.

The definition of `swap agreement' was originally intended to provide sufficient flexibility to avoid the need to amend the definition as the nature and uses of swap transactions matured. To that end, the phrase `or any other similar agreement' was included in the definition. (The phrase `or any similar agreement' has been added to the definitions of `forward contract,' `commodity contract,' `repurchase agreement,' and `securities contract' for the same reason.) To clarify this, subsection (a)(1) expands the definition of `swap agreement' to include `any agreement or transaction that is similar to any other agreement or transaction referred to in [section 101(53B) of the Bankruptcy Code] and that is of a type that has been, is presently, or in the future becomes, the subject of recurrent dealings in the swap markets' and that `is a forward, swap, future, or option on one or more rates, currencies, commodities, equity securities or other equity instruments, debt securities or other debt instruments, quantitative measures associated with an occurrence, extent of an occurrence, or contingency associated with a financial, commercial, or economic consequence, or economic or financial indices or measures of economic or financial risk or value.'

The definition of `swap agreement' in this subsection should not be interpreted to permit parties to document non-swaps as swap transactions. Traditional commercial arrangements, such as supply agreements, or other non-financial market transactions, such as commercial, residential or consumer loans, cannot be treated as `swaps' under either the FDIA or the Bankruptcy Code because the parties purport to document or label the transactions as `swap agreements.' These definitions, and the characterization of a certain transaction as a `swap agreement,' are not intended to affect the characterization, definition, or treatment of any instruments under any other statute, regulation, or rule including, but not limited to, the statutes, regulations or rules enumerated in subsection (a)(1)(C). Similarly, the definitions of `securities contract', `repurchase agreement', and `commodity contract' and the characterization of certain transactions as such a contract or agreement, are not intended to affect the characterization, definition, or treatment of any instrument under any other statute regulation, or rule including, but not limited to, the statutes, regulations, or rules enumerated in subsection (f).

The definition also includes any security agreement or arrangement, or other credit enhancement, related to a swap agreement, including any guarantee or reimbursement obligation related to a swap agreement. This ensures that any such agreement, arrangement or enhancement is itself deemed to be a swap agreement, and therefore eligible for treatment as such for purposes of termination, liquidation, acceleration, offset and netting under the Bankruptcy Code and the FDIA. Similar changes are made in the definitions of `forward contract,' `commodity contract,' `repurchase agreement,' and `securities contract.' An example of a security arrangement is a right of setoff; examples of other credit enhancements are letters of credit and other similar agreements. A security agreement or arrangement or guarantee or reimbursement obligation related to a `swap agreement,' `forward contract,' `commodity contract,' `repurchase agreement' or `securities contract' will be such an agreement or contract only to the extent of the damages in connection with such agreement measured in accordance with Section 562 of the Bankruptcy Code (added by the bill). This limitation does not affect, however, the other provisions of the Bankruptcy Code (including section 362(b)) relating to security arrangements in connection with agreements or contracts that otherwise qualify as `swap agreements,' `forward contracts,' `commodity contracts,' `repurchase agreements' or `securities contracts.'

The use of the term `forward' in the definition of `swap agreement' is not intended to refer only to transactions that fall within the definition of `forward contract.' Instead, a `forward' transaction could be a `swap agreement' even if not a `forward contract.'

Subsections (a)(2) and (a)(3) amend the Bankruptcy Code definitions of `securities contract' and `commodity contract,' respectively, to conform them to the definitions in the FDIA.

Subsection (a)(2), like the amendments to the FDIA, amends the definition of `securities contract' expressly to encompass margin loans, to clarify the coverage of securities options and to clarify the coverage of repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions. The inclusion of `margin loans' in the definition is intended to encompass only those loans commonly known in the securities industry as `margin loans', such as arrangements where a securities broker or dealer extends credit to a customer in connection with the purchase, sale, or trading of securities, and does not include loans that are not commonly referred to as `margin loans.' The reference in subsection (b) to a `guarantee' by or to a `securities clearing agency' is intended to cover other arrangements, such as novation, that have an effect similar to a guarantee. The reference to a `loan' of a security in the definition is intended to apply to loans of securities, whether or not for a `permitted purpose' under margin regulations. The reference to `repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions' is intended to eliminate any inquiry under section 555 of the Bankruptcy Code and related provisions as to whether a repurchase or reverse repurchase transaction is a purchase and sale transaction or a secured financing. Repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions meeting certain criteria are already covered under the definition of `repurchase agreement' in the Bankruptcy Code. Repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions on all securities (including, for example, equity securities, asset-backed securities, corporate bonds and commercial paper) are included under the definition of `securities contract'. A repurchase or reverse repurchase transaction which is a `securities contract' but not a `repurchase agreement' would thus be subject to the `counterparty limitations' contained in section 555 of the Bankruptcy Code (i.e., only stockbrokers, financial institutions, securities clearing agencies and financial participants can avail themselves of section 555 and related provisions).

Subsection (a)(2) also specifies that purchase, sale and repurchase obligations under a participation in a commercial mortgage loan do not constitute `securities contracts.' While a contract for the purchase, sale or repurchase of a participation may constitute a `securities contract,' the purchase, sale or repurchase obligation embedded in a participation agreement does not make that agreement a `securities contract.' Subsection (a) clarifies the reference to guarantee or reimbursement obligation.

Subsection (b) amends the Bankruptcy Code definitions of `financial institution' and `forward contract merchant.' The definition of `financial institution' adds Federally insured credit unions to the list of existing financial institutions.

Subsection (b) also adds a new definition of `financial participant' to limit the potential impact of insolvencies upon other major market participants. This definition will allow such market participants to close out and net agreements with insolvent entities under sections 362(b)(6), 555, and 556 of the Bankruptcy Code even if the creditor could not qualify as, for example, a commodity broker. Sections 362(b)(6), 555 and 556 preserve the limitations of the right to close-out and net such contracts, in most cases, to entities who qualify under the Bankruptcy Code's counterparty limitations. However, where the counterparty has transactions with a total gross dollar value of at least $1 billion in notional or actual principal amount outstanding on any day during the previous 15-month period, or has gross mark-to-market positions of at least $100 million (aggregated across counterparties) in one or more agreements or transactions on any day during the previous 15-month period, sections 362(b)(6), 555 and 556 and corresponding amendments would permit it to exercise netting and related rights irrespective of its inability otherwise to satisfy those counterparty limitations. This change will help prevent systemic impact upon the markets from a single failure, and is derived from threshold tests contained in Regulation EE promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board in implementing the netting provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act. It is intended that the 15-month period be measured with reference to the 15 months preceding the filing of a petition by or against the debtor.

`Financial participant' is also defined to include `clearing organizations' within the meaning of FDICIA (as amended by the CFMA and section 5082F). This amendment, together with the inclusion of `financial participants' as eligible counterparties in connection with `commodity contracts,' `forward contracts' and `securities contracts' and the amendments made in other sections of the bill to include `financial participants' as counterparties eligible for the protections in respect of `swap agreements' and `repurchase agreements', take into account the CFMA and will allow clearing organizations to benefit from the protections of all of the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code relating to these contracts and agreements. This will further the goal of promoting the clearing of derivatives and other transactions as a way to reduce systemic risk. The definition of `financial participant' (as with the other provisions of the Bankruptcy Code relating to `securities contracts,' `forward contracts,' `commodity contracts,' `repurchase agreements' and `swap agreements') is not mutually exclusive, i.e., an entity that qualifies as a `financial participant' could also be a `swap participant,' `repo participant,' `forward contract merchant,' `commodity broker,' `stockbroker,' `securities clearing agency' and/or `financial institution.'

Subsection (c) adds to the Bankruptcy Code new definitions for the terms `master netting agreement' and `master netting agreement participant.' The definition of `master netting agreement' is designed to protect the termination and close-out netting provisions of cross-product master agreements between parties. Such an agreement may be used (i) to document a wide variety of securities contracts, commodity contracts, forward contracts, repurchase agreements and swap agreements or (ii) as an umbrella agreement for separate master agreements between the same parties, each of which is used to document a discrete type of transaction. The definition includes security agreements or arrangements or other credit enhancements related to one or more such agreements and clarifies that a master netting agreement will be treated as such even if it documents transactions that are not within the enumerated categories of qualifying transactions (but the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code relating to master netting agreements and the other categories of transactions will not apply to such other transactions). A `master netting agreement participant' is any entity that is a party to an outstanding master netting agreement with a debtor before the filing of a bankruptcy petition.

Subsection (d) amends section 362(b) of the Bankruptcy Code to protect enforcement, free from the automatic stay, of setoff or netting provisions in swap agreements and in master netting agreements and security agreements or arrangements related to one or more swap agreements or master netting agreements. This provision parallels the other provisions of the Bankruptcy Code that protect netting provisions of securities contracts, commodity contracts, forward contracts, and repurchase agreements. Because the relevant definitions include related security agreements, the references to `setoff' in these provisions, as well as in section 362(b)(6) and (7) of the Bankruptcy Code, are intended to refer also to rights to foreclose on, and to set off against obligations to return, collateral securing swap agreements, master netting agreements, repurchase agreements, securities contracts, commodity contracts, or forward contracts. Collateral may be pledged to cover the cost of replacing the defaulted transactions in the relevant market, as well as other costs and expenses incurred or estimated to be incurred for the purpose of hedging or reducing the risks arising out of such termination. Enforcement of these agreements and arrangements free from the automatic stay is consistent with the policy goal of minimizing systemic risk.

Subsection (d) also clarifies that the provisions protecting setoff and foreclosure in relation to securities contracts, commodity contracts, forward contracts, repurchase agreements, swap agreements, and master netting agreements free from the automatic stay apply to collateral pledged by the debtor but that cannot technically be `held by' the creditor, such as receivables and book-entry securities, and to collateral that has been repledged by the creditor and securities resold pursuant to repurchase agreements.

Subsections (e) and (f) amend sections 546 and 548(d) of the Bankruptcy Code to provide that transfers made under or in connection with a master netting agreement may not be avoided by a trustee except where such transfer is made with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud and not taken in good faith. This amendment provides the same protections for a transfer made under, or in connection with, a master netting agreement as currently is provided for margin payments, settlement payments and other transfers received by commodity brokers, forward contract merchants, stockbrokers, financial institutions, securities clearing agencies, repo participants, and swap participants under sections 546 and 548(d), except to the extent the trustee could otherwise avoid such a transfer made under an individual contract covered by such master netting agreement.

Subsections (g), (h), (i), and (j) clarify that the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code that protect (i) rights of liquidation under securities contracts, commodity contracts, forward contracts and repurchase agreements also protect rights of termination or acceleration under such contracts, and (ii) rights to terminate under swap agreements also protect rights of liquidation and acceleration.

Subsection (k) adds a new section 561 to the Bankruptcy Code to protect the contractual right of a master netting agreement participant to enforce any rights of termination, liquidation, acceleration, offset or netting under a master netting agreement. These rights include rights arising (i) from the rules of a derivatives clearing organization, multilateral clearing organization, securities clearing agency, securities exchange, securities association, contract market, derivatives transaction execution facility or board of trade, (ii) under common law, law merchant or (iii) by reason of normal business practice. This reflects the enactment of the CFMA and the current treatment of rights under swap agreements under section 560 of the Bankruptcy Code. Similar changes to reflect the enactment of the CFMA have been made to the definition of `contractual right' for purposes of sections 555, 556, 559 and 560 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Subsections (b)(2)(A) and (b)(2)(B) of new section 561 limit the exercise of contractual rights to net or to offset obligations where the debtor is a commodity broker and one leg of the obligations sought to be netted relates to commodity contracts traded on or subject to the rules of a contract market designated under the Commodity Exchange Act or a derivatives transaction execution facility registered under the Commodity Exchange Act. Under subsection (b)(2)(A) netting or offsetting is not permitted in these circumstances if the party seeking to net or to offset has no positive net equity in the commodity accounts at the debtor. Subsection (b)(2)(B) applies only if the debtor is a commodity broker, acting on behalf of its own customer, and is in turn a customer of another commodity broker. In that case, the latter commodity broker may not net or offset obligations under such commodity contracts with other claims against its customer, the debtor. Subsections (b)(2)(A) and (b)(2)(B) limit the depletion of assets available for

distribution to customers of commodity brokers. Subsection (b)(2)(C) provides an exception to subsections (b)(2)(A) and (b)(2)(B) for cross-margining and other similar arrangements approved by, or submitted to and not rendered ineffective by, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, as well as certain other netting arrangements.

For the purposes of Bankruptcy Code sections 555, 556, 559, 560 and 561, it is intended that the normal business practice in the event of a default of a party based on bankruptcy or insolvency is to terminate, liquidate or accelerate securities contracts, commodity contracts, forward contracts, repurchase agreements, swap agreements and master netting agreements with the bankrupt or insolvent party. The protection of netting and offset rights in sections 560 and 561 is in addition to the protections afforded in sections 362(b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(17) and (b)(28) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Under this Act, the termination, liquidation or acceleration rights of a master netting agreement participant are subject to limitations contained in other provisions of the Bankruptcy Code relating to securities contracts and repurchase agreements. In particular, if a securities contract or repurchase agreement is documented under a master netting agreement, a party's termination, liquidation and acceleration rights would be subject to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code relating to orders authorized under the provisions of SIPA or any statute administered by the SEC. In addition, the netting rights of a party to a master netting agreement would be subject to any contractual terms between the parties limiting or waiving netting or setoff rights. Similarly, a waiver by a bank or a counterparty of netting or setoff rights in connection with QFCs would be enforceable under the FDIA.

New section 561 of the Bankruptcy Code clarifies that the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code related to securities contracts, commodity contracts, forward contracts, repurchase agreements, swap agreements and master netting agreements apply in a proceeding ancillary to a foreign insolvency proceeding under section 304 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Subsections (l) and (m) clarify that the exercise of termination and netting rights will not otherwise affect the priority of the creditor's claim after the exercise of netting, foreclosure and related rights.

Subsection (n) amends section 553 of the Bankruptcy Code to clarify that the acquisition by a creditor of setoff rights in connection with swap agreements, repurchase agreements, securities contracts, forward contracts, commodity contracts and master netting agreements cannot be avoided as a preference. This subsection also adds setoff of the kinds described in sections 555, 556, 559, 560, and 561 of the Bankruptcy Code to the types of setoff excepted from section 553(b).

Subsection (o), as well as other subsections of the Act, adds references to `financial participant' in all the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code relating to securities, forward and commodity contracts and repurchase and swap agreements.

Section 5082H. Recordkeeping requirements

This section amends section 11(e)(8) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to explicitly authorize the FDIC, in consultation with appropriate Federal banking agencies, to prescribe regulations on recordkeeping by any insured depository institution with respect to QFCs only if the insured financial institution is in a troubled condition (as such term is defined in the FDIA).

Section 5082I. Exemptions from contemporaneous execution requirement

This section amends FDIA section 13(e)(2) to provide that an agreement for the collateralization of governmental deposits, bankruptcy estate funds, Federal Reserve Bank or Federal Home Loan Bank extensions of credit or one or more QFCs shall not be deemed invalid solely because such agreement was not entered into contemporaneously with the acquisition of the collateral or because of pledges, delivery or substitution of the collateral made in accordance with such agreement.

This section codifies portions of policy statements issued by the FDIC regarding the application of section 13(e), which codifies the `D'Oench Duhme' doctrine. With respect to QFCs, this codification recognizes that QFCs often are subject to collateral and other security arrangements that may require posting and return of collateral on an ongoing basis based on the mark-to-market values of the collateralized transactions. The codification of only portions of the existing FDIC policy statements on these and related issues should not give rise to any negative implication regarding the continued validity of these policy statements.

Section 5082J. Damage measure

This section adds a new section 562 to the Bankruptcy Code providing that damages under any swap agreement, securities contract, forward contract, commodity contract, repurchase agreement or master netting agreement will be calculated as of the earlier of (i) the date of rejection of such agreement by a trustee or (ii) the date or dates of liquidation, termination or acceleration of such contract or agreement.

Section 562 provides an exception to the rules in (i) and (ii) if there are no commercially reasonable determinants of value as of such date or dates, in which case damages are to be measured as of the earliest subsequent date or dates on which there are commercially reasonable determinants of value. Although it is expected that in most circumstances damages would be measured as of the date or dates of either rejection or liquidation, termination or acceleration, in certain unusual circumstances, such as dysfunctional markets or liquidation of very large portfolios, there may be no commercially reasonable determinants of value for liquidating any such agreements or contracts or for liquidating all such agreements and contracts in a large portfolio on a single day. It is expected that measuring damages as of a date or dates before the date of liquidation, termination, or acceleration, will occur only in very unusual circumstances.

The party determining damages is given limited discretion to determine the dates as of which damages are to be measured. Its actions are circumscribed unless there are no `commercially reasonable' determinants of value for it to measure damages on the date or dates of either rejection or liquidation, termination or acceleration. The references to `commercially reasonable' are intended to reflect existing state law standards relating to a creditor's actions in determining damages. New section 562 provides that if damages are not measured as of either the date of rejection or the date or dates of liquidation, termination or acceleration and the trustee challenges the timing of the measurement of damages by the non-defaulting party determining the damages, the non-defaulting party, rather than the trustee, has the burden of proving the absence of any commercially reasonable determinants of value.

New section 562 is not intended to have any impact on the determination under the Bankruptcy Code of the timing of damages for contracts and agreements other than those specified in section 562. Also, section 562 does not apply to proceedings under the FDIA, and it is not intended that Section 562 have any impact on the interpretation of the provisions of the FDIA relating to timing of damages in respect of QFCs or other contracts.

Section 5082K. SIPC stay

This section amends SIPA to provide that an order or decree issued pursuant to SIPA shall not operate as a stay of any right of liquidation, termination, acceleration, offset or netting under one or more securities contracts, commodity contracts, forward contracts, repurchase agreements, swap agreements or master netting agreements (as defined in the Bankruptcy Code and including rights of foreclosure on collateral), except that such order or decree may stay any right to foreclose on or dispose of securities (but not cash) collateral pledged by the debtor or sold by the debtor under a repurchase agreement or lent by the debtor under a securities lending agreement. A corresponding amendment to FDICIA is made by section 5082F. A creditor that was stayed in exercising rights against such securities would be entitled to post-insolvency interest to the extent of the value of such securities.

Section 5082L. Applicability of other sections to chapter 9

This section clarifies that, with respect to municipal bankruptcies, all the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code relating to securities contracts, commodity contracts, forward contracts, repurchase agreements, swap agreements and master netting agreements (which by their terms are intended to apply in all proceedings under title 11) will apply in a Chapter 9 proceeding for a municipality. Although sections 555, 556, 559 and 560 of the Bankruptcy Code provide that they apply in any proceeding under the Bankruptcy Code, Section 502 makes a technical amendment in Chapter 9 to clarify the applicability of these provisions.

Section 5082M. Effective date; application of amendments

Subsection (a) provides that the amendments made by the bill take effect on the date of enactment. Subsection (b) provides that the amendments made by the bill shall not apply with respect to cases commenced, or to conservator/receiver appointments made, before the date of enactment. The amendments would, however, apply to contracts entered into prior to the date of enactment, so long as a Bankruptcy Code case were commenced or a conservator/receiver appointment were made on or after the date of enactment under any Federal or State law.

Section 5082N. Savings clause

This section provides that the meaning of terms used in the Act are applicable for purposes of the Act only, and shall not be construed or applied so as to challenge or affect the characterization, definition, or treatment of any similar terms under any other statute, regulation, or rule, including the Gramm-Leach Bliley Act, the Legal Certainty for Bank Products Act of 2000, the securities laws (as that term is defined in Section 3(a)(47) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), and the Commodity Exchange Act.

SUBCHAPTER B--EMERGENCY SECURITIES RESPONSE

Section 5086. Short title

This section states the short title of the subchapter, the `Emergency Securities Response Act of 2004.'

Section 5087. Extension of emergency order authority of the Securities Exchange Commission

This section modifies the authority of the Securities and Exchange Commission to issue emergency orders under section 12(k)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l(k)(2)). The section modifies section 12(k)(2) to grant the Commission authority to take emergency action with respect to any matter or action subject to regulation by the Commission or a self-regulatory organization under the securities laws, not just under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Committee recognizes that emergency conditions can necessitate emergency relief under securities laws other than the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is broadening the emergency measures the Commission can take under section 12(k)(2) accordingly.

The section also modifies the findings required for the Commission to enter an emergency order by adding a third finding that may support emergency action. Under new section 12(k)(2)(A)(iii), the Commission may take emergency action if it determines that action is necessary in the public interest and for the protection of investors `to reduce, eliminate, or prevent the substantial disruption by the emergency of (I) securities markets, investment companies, or any other significant portion or segment of such markets, or (II) the transmission or processing of securities transactions.'

The first of these two findings--section 12(k)(2)(A)(iii)(I)--covers situations in which emergency relief is warranted to reduce, eliminate or prevent the substantial disruption by the emergency of securities markets broadly defined, including investment companies or any other significant portion or segment of the securities markets (such as broker-dealers or investment advisers, or a class thereof). As illustrated by the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the effects of transportation and communication problems, no less than market disruptions, can require emergency relief. If transportation or communication problems or other circumstances substantially disrupt or threaten to substantially disrupt the operation of investment companies, broker-dealers, or any other significant portion or segment of the securities markets, and constitute an `emergency' under section 12(k)(6) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l(k)(6)), section 12(k)(2)(A)(iii)(I) allows the Commission to take emergency action under section 12(k)(2) even if the securities secondary-trading markets and the national system for clearance and settlement of securities transactions are not threatened or disrupted.

The second finding--section 12(k)(2)(A)(iii)(II)--covers situations in which emergency relief is warranted to reduce, eliminate or prevent the substantial disruption by the emergency of the transmission or processing of securities transactions. The Committee is aware that certain market participants experienced difficulties in transmitting and processing securities transactions, including government securities transactions, in the aftermath of the attacks of September 11, 2001. In the future, should these or other circumstances substantially disrupt or threaten to substantially disrupt the transmission or processing of securities transactions and constitute an `emergency' under section 12(k)(6), section 12(k)(2)(A)(iii)(II) allows the Commission to take emergency action under section 12(k)(2) even if the national system for clearance and settlement of securities transactions is not threatened or disrupted.

The section also modifies the statute's definition of `emergency' to reflect the broader scope of findings that may support an emergency order. Specifically, the definition of `emergency' in section 12(k)(6) of the Securities Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78l(k)(6)) is modified to include a major disturbance that substantially disrupts, or threatens to substantially disrupt, the functioning of securities markets, investment companies, or any other significant portion or segment of such markets, or the transmission or processing of securities transactions. This modification of section 12(k)(6) mirrors the changes to the findings under section 12(k)(2)(A) and, as discussed above, is designed to account for emergencies that substantially disrupt, or threaten to substantially disrupt, the securities markets broadly defined, including the functioning of investment companies or any other significant portion or segment of the securities markets or the transmission or processing of securities transactions, even in the absence of a major market disturbance under section 12(k)(6)(A).

The section also extends the duration of a Commission emergency order to 30 business days, from the current 10 business days. The section also allows the Commission to extend an emergency order for more than 30 business days, up to a total of 90 calendar days, based upon certain findings. Specifically, under new section 12(k)(2)(C) (15 U.S.C. 78l(k)(2)(C)), the Commission may extend the duration of an emergency order beyond 30 business days if the Commission finds, at the time of the extension, that the emergency still exists, and determines that the continuation is necessary in the public interest and for the protection of investors to attain one of the three objectives that may support the Commission's initial emergency action. The calendar day, as opposed to business day, limit on total extensions of an emergency order reflects the judgment that a total of approximately three months is a reasonable limit on Commission discretion, while providing sufficient latitude for the Commission to provide appropriate immediate relief.

Finally, the section provides that, as used in the subsection added by the legislation, the definition of `securities laws' excludes the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (15 U.S.C. 79a et seq.).

Section 5088. Parallel authority of the Secretary of the Treasury with respect to government securities

This section amends the Securities Exchange Act to provide emergency authority for the Secretary of the Treasury to take any action by order, involving a government security or a market therein (or significant portion or segment of that market), that the Commission may take under section 12(k)(2) of this title with respect to transactions in securities (other than exempted securities) or a market therein (or significant portion or segment of that market).

Section 5089. Joint report on implementation of financial system resilience recommendations

This section requires the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Securities and Exchange Commission to prepare and submit to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate a joint report on the efforts of the private sector to implement the Interagency Paper on Sound Practices to Strengthen the Resilience of the US Financial System. The report must be submitted no later than April 30, 2006.

The report is to examine (1) covered private sector financial services firms' efforts to implement enhanced business continuity plans; (2) the extent to which the implementation of business continuity plans has been done in a geographically dispersed manner; and (3) the need to cover more financial services entities than those covered by the Interagency Paper. The agencies are also directed to recommend legislative and regulatory changes that will maximize the effective implementation of business continuity planning by the financial services industry.

Section 5089A. Private sector preparedness

This section expresses the sense of the Congress that the insurance industry and credit-rating agencies, where relevant, should carefully consider a company's compliance with standards for private sector disaster and emergency preparedness in assessing insurability and creditworthiness, to ensure that private sector investment in disaster and emergency preparedness is appropriately encouraged.

Section 5089B. Report on public/private partnerships

This section requires the Secretary of the Treasury to submit a report to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate providing information on the efforts that the Treasury Department has made to encourage the formation of public/private partnerships to protect critical financial infrastructure. The report shall discuss the type of support that the Treasury has provided to these partnerships and provide recommendations for administrative or legislative action regarding these partnerships as the Secretary may determine to be appropriate.

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED

The comparative print required by clause 3(e)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House was not available in time for the filing of this report.

DISSENTING VIEWS

The Committee on Financial Services' 9/11 legislation is another attempt to address the threat of terrorism by giving more power and money to the federal bureaucracy. Should this legislation become law, Americans will not likely be significantly safer, but they will definitely be less free. Therefore, I urge my colleagues to vote against this bill. A particularly disturbing provision of this bill repeals the expedited procedure for Congress to debate repeal of the PATRIOT Act's money laundering provisions. Since the PATRIOT Act was rushed into law in the panicked atmosphere after the 9/11 attacks and the anthrax scare and before many members had a chance to even understand the PATRIOT Act, the ability to revisit this issue by debating a resolution of repeal is very important. This is especially so since many members, oftentimes under pressure from their constituents who are concerned that many provisions of the so-called PATRIOT Act threaten constitutional liberties, have expressed regret about hastily voting in favor of the act.

This legislation erodes one of the bulwarks of individual liberty--the presumption of innocence and the corresponding requirement that the government prove beyond a reasonable doubt that an individual committed a crime. It does this by criminalizing the mere possession of technology that may be used in counterfeiting. The committee claims this is necessary because of both improvements in counterfeiting technology and the increased practice of `contracting out' counterfeiting activities have made it more difficult to apprehend counterfeiters. However, this is no excuse for relieving the government of its obligation to prove that an individual was involved in a crime, rather than that he was merely in possession of technology that could be used in a crime, before depriving that individual of his liberty.

This bill further infringes on individual liberty by enacting an unconstitutional ban on internet gambling. Using the spurious pretext that terrorists may use internet gambling operations as a source of funds, supporters of banning internet gambling have snuck the ban into this bill. However, terrorists obtain funding from a wide variety of sources. During the committee's hearing on the 9/11 commission it was mentioned that some terrorists seek jobs in the mainstream economy to raise funds. Therefore, following the committee's logic to its natural conclusion, we should outlaw all private economic activity.

Furthermore, prohibiting internet gambling will make it more likely that criminal organizations, including groups dedicated to international terrorism, will control internet gambling. History, from the failed experiment of prohibition to today's futile `war on drugs,' shows that the government cannot eliminate demand for something like internet gambling simply by passing a law. Instead, this bill will force those who wish to gamble over the internet to patronize suppliers willing to flaunt the ban. In many cases, providers of services banned by the government will be members of criminal organizations. After all, since the owners and patrons of outlawed internet gambling could not rely on the police and courts to enforce contracts and resolve other disputes, they will be forced to rely on members of organized crime to perform those functions. Thus, the profits of internet gambling will flow into organized crime. Furthermore, outlawing an activity will raise the price vendors are able to charge consumers. Combined with the increased market share organized crime will gain over gambling granted organized crime by the ban. This could increase the profits flowing to organized crime. It is bitterly ironic that a bill masquerading as an attack on crime will actually increase organized crime's ability to control internet gambling!

Instead of trusting financial markets to make the necessary preparations and adjustments in the event of a terrorist attack, the committee gives the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) extended `emergency' powers to suspend trading and otherwise interfere in the securities market in the event of a terrorist attack. Granting the SEC this power assumes that SEC officials will know exactly when trading needs to be suspended and for how long. However, no individual or small group of individuals can have such knowledge. Instead, this knowledge is dispersed among all market actors and coordinated though the free market. In addition, shutting down trading after a terrorist attack, when markets need to adjust in response to new conditions, will induce distortions in the market and thus worsen the economic effects of a terrorist attack.

Perhaps the most disturbing feature of the committee's 9/11 bill is the failure to address a major intrusion into financial privacy, which also hinders an effective war on terrorism: the requirement that financial institutions file suspicious activity reports whenever a transaction's value exceeds $10,000. The suspicious activity report requirement buries law enforcement in a mountain of reports, making it difficult to identify the reports that indicate behavior truly threatening to our safety. There were over 300,000 suspicious activity reports filed in 2002 alone. Expecting law enforcement to shift through massive amounts of reports and identify the true threats to our safety is the equivalent of asking law enforcement to find a needle in a forest!

John Yoder, Director of the Department of Justice's Asset Forfeiture Office during the Reagan Administration, told investigative reporter John Berlau, for a story in Reason magazine, that, `It costs more to enforce and regulate them [financial institutions subject to the Bank Secrecy Act's reporting requirements] than the benefits that are received. You're getting so much data on people who are absolutely legitimate and who are doing nothing wrong. You have investigators running around chasing innocent people, trying to find something that they're doing wrong, rather than targeting real criminals.'

Director Yoder also expressed concerns that this information overload contributed to the failure to identify the September 11 highjackers: `We already had so much information that we weren't really focusing on the right stuff. What good does it do to gather more paperwork when you're already so awash in paperwork that you're not paying attention to your own currently existing intelligence gathering system?'

By expanding the reporting requirements to gold dealers, pawns shops, jewelers, and even convenience stores that process money orders, the PATRIOT Act increased the burden on law enforcment, while further diminishing the financial privacy of American citizens. The 9/11 commission expressed skepticism over whether making 7-11s and Stop-and-Gos subject to the Suspicious Activity Reports could help catch members of Al Queda, since terrorists do not use money orders!

The suspicious activity reports also violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Fourth Amendment guarantees the people the right to be secure in their persons and papers, unless the government has probable cause to believe the person is involved in criminal activities. Requiring the filing of a suspicious activity report every time a transaction's value exceeds $10,000 shreds the Fourth Amendment. Government has no right or need to spy on the financial transactions of every Americans whenever the value of the transaction exceeds an arbitrary amount.

Justice William Douglas's criticism of suspicious activity reports still rings true today: `Delivery of the records without the requisite hearing of probable cause breaches the Fourth Amendment . . . . I am not yet ready to agree that America is so possessed with evil that we must level all constitutional barriers to give our civil authorities the tools to catch criminals.'

The 9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act is yet another in a series of bills that expands government power and restrict individual liberty in the name of the war on terrorism. Outlawing internet gambling, increasing the SEC's power to suspend trading in the event of a terrorist attack, and continuing to violate the Fourth Amendment by burying law enforcement in suspicious activities reports will do little to keep Americana safe. Therefore, I urge my colleagues to reject this bill.

RON PAUL.