STATEMENT BY
MAJOR GENERAL KENNETH R. ISRAEL
DIRECTOR
DEFENSE AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE
AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE:
PROVIDING INFORMATION DOMINANCE TO THE WARFIGHTER
Mr. Chairman, Members of the Committee, it is a pleasure to have the
opportunity to appear before you to discuss the Departmentís airborne
reconnaissance acquisition and technology efforts. I have a brief statement
prepared which I would like to present to the Subcommittee.
The Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Office
I am the Director of the Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Office (DARO),
an arm of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition &
Technology). By the charter of the DARO, I am the principal advisor to
the USD(A&T) for airborne reconnaissance. On behalf of the USD(A&T)
and in coordination with the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command,
Control, Communications and Intelligence (ASD(C3I)), the DARO exercises
oversight of the Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Program (DARP), a $2.1
billion program in FY98 comprised of joint and defense-wide airborne reconnaissance
programs. The DARO develops the Departmentís airborne reconnaissance
architecture, strategy and vision, and has programmatic responsibility
for the DARP in order to connect our vision with viable implementation
plans. Major programmatic decisions, however, are made by the Defense Airborne
Reconnaissance Steering Committee (DARSC) which is chaired by the USD(A&T)
and the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (VCJCS), and has representation
from other OSD offices such as ASD (C3I), the Services, and Defense Agencies.
This ensures that all major decisions on airborne reconnaissance are corporate
decisions, agreed to by the Department of Defense as a whole, rather than
by any single entity or interest.
The DARO routinely interfaces with other organizations such as OASD(C3I),
the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the National Reconnaissance Office
(NRO), the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the National
Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA), the National Security Agency (NSA),
the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization
(BMDO), the Joint Staff and the Services. A number of mechanisms exist
to facilitate this interaction, namely the Joint Requirements Oversight
Council (JROC) and its UAV Special Studies Group, the Joint Warfighting
Capabilities Assessment (JWCA) study teams, and, of course, the DARSC.
In addition, the DARO leverages a Program Review Steering Council, a review
board made up of flag officers that provides recommendations to the Director
on programmatic matters. Joint efforts between DARO and these organizations
include modeling and simulation efforts, technology initiatives and requirements
analysis. In summary, these organizations have helped us by framing airborne
reconnaissance issues, evaluating operations, and proposing recommendations.
The Department created the DARO in November 1993, in part at the urging
of the Congress, to address the fragmentation of responsibilities for airborne
reconnaissance among the Services and Defense Agencies that produced conflicting
architectures, and hindered the acquisition of joint and interdependent
programs and precluded tradeoffs. The DARO provides the leadership in development
of a DoD-wide airborne reconnaissance architecture. In addition, the DARP
enables centralized technology development, which avoids costly Service
duplication. Of great importance is the fact that the DARP leads to interoperability
and commonality via a series of cross-Service programs including the Common
Imagery Ground/Surface System (CIGSS), the Common Data Link (CDL), the
Joint Airborne SIGINT Architecture (JASA), and common UAV control system
programs such as the Tactical Control System (TCS).
Maintaining Information Dominance
The Department has placed this focus on airborne reconnaissance because
it is an essential element of our efforts to provide warfighters with battlespace
information dominance. It is at the very core of the current Revolution
in Military Affairs, in which we are leveraging information as never before.
In Joint Vision 2010 the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS)
recognizes information dominance as the critical enabler for the
operational concepts of dominant maneuver, precision engagement, full dimensional
protection, and focused logistics.
The transformation in the use of information technology manifested itself
for the first time during Operation DESERT STORM. Our performance in that
operation shocked the world and gave us a glimpse at the military potential
of information dominance and precision weapons. That war changed the way
we envision the future of warfare, and there is no going back. Information
will not only revolutionize the way America fights, but the way our competitors
will fight as well. In addition, other nations will have an easier road
than we have had. They will be able to apply lessons we have learned. They
will be able to leverage commercial imagery and communications architectures
without needing to develop their own. Furthermore, other nations will leverage
systems developed by the US military, namely the Global Positioning System,
while incurring no development or maintenance costs. Fighting wars the
way we fought the last one will not be good enough in the future. Rather,
to maintain information dominance on the battlefield of the future, we
must continue both to maintain our current manned airborne reconnaissance
systems and leverage new technologies such as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
(UAVs), advanced sensors, telecommunications, stealth and precision guided
weapons.
An additional facet of this revolution is a change in the way we conduct
our wars. In Bosnia, the CINC is using information assets to provide a
much more accurate and timely picture of the situation not only to him,
but to the lower echelons. ìWe are learning a great deal about how
to put an umbrella over an operation,î GEN Joulwan, Commander in
Chief of US European Command, has said. ìWe have been able to use
the UAVs, Joint STARS and Airborne Reconnaissance Low in a comprehensive
way, in an integrated way.î The US military is learning about how
to best use the growing potential of information dominance in Bosnia today,
and their ability to leverage that dominance will grow in the future. Army
Chief of Staff GEN Reimer has stated that information systems which improve
situational awareness have increased the lethality of our armed forces.
ìSituational awareness is changing the way the Army fights,î
he said.
In addition to their use in the Bosnian theater, new concepts for application
of information assets are being assessed in a variety of exercises and
demonstrations. Seven of the twenty-five approved Advanced Concept Technology
Demonstrations (ACTDs) focus on information technology. Through these demonstrations,
we are putting new information capabilities in the hands of the warfighters
to let them determine how the assets are best used. Information dominance
concepts are also being explored in demonstrations such as Army After Next
and Task Force XXI, and at facilities such as the new Air Force UAV Battle
Lab at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida and the Joint UAV Training Center
at Fort Huachuca, Arizona.
Information dominance, as described in Joint Vision 2010, is
a concept that is very familiar to the DARO. It is similar to the concept
of extended reconnaissance which I have mentioned to this committee in
the past, and which is the underlying goal within our Integrated Airborne
Reconnaissance Strategy -- developed three years ago by the DARO. Extended
reconnaissance is the ability to supply responsive and sustained intelligence
data from anywhere within enemy territory, day or night, regardless of
weather, as the needs of the warfighter dictate. This remains the DAROís
primary goal. Airborne reconnaissance assets are critical to provide battlespace
information dominance to the warfighter, enabling a reconnaissance flexibility
which is essential to support a nation with global interests and responsibilities.
Employing airborne reconnaissance assets provides the capability to dwell,
focusing on the battlefield or other key areas to provide continuous situational
awareness to commanders. Our Objective Architecture is designed to realize
the potential of an interoperable, responsive airborne reconnaissance force,
and we are determined to achieve it to ensure continued information dominance
to the warfighter.
Achieving the Objective Architecture
During DESERT STORM, it became clear that information superiority minimizes
casualties while maximizing the effectiveness of our armed forces. However,
it also highlighted many shortfalls in our intelligence architecture. Many
of the systems used in the operation were not interoperable, and this hindered
the delivery of intelligence to the warfighters who needed it. Our limited
ability to retrieve previously collected intelligence made it easier to
retask the platform than to find the product in the theater database. The
need for a long endurance, broad area coverage reconnaissance capability
was highlighted by the significant number of U-2 aircraft we had to employ
to maintain relatively few orbits. It became clear that the Department
needed to develop a focused response to these needs to enable it to fully
leverage airborne reconnaissance assets in future conflicts. This led to
the creation of the DARO.
The DARO has established a vision for airborne reconnaissance based
on extended reconnaissance, as described earlier. The Objective Architecture
is an interoperable system of systems comprised of a balanced mix between
manned and unmanned platforms, between imagery, signals and other sensory
data, and between airborne and national assets, all supported by an efficient
global information infrastructure, with emphasis on timely delivery of
intelligence from sensor to shooter. The farther we move along this path,
the more we enable the warfighter.
At this point Iíd like to discuss a few key themes that I believe
are essential to achieving our Objective Architecture.
Interoperability and Open Systems
First, the DoD is committed to an Objective Architecture comprised of
interoperable and common systems. Over the past three years, the DARO has
been working to break down the stovepipes that existed in the past, to
create a true system of systems which allows each element of the airborne
reconnaissance force to leverage the others. This increases the flexibility
and effectiveness of each element of the force structure while achieving
real cost savings.
The ìopen systemsî approach encourages interoperability
through open standards, while not mandating specific hardware solutions.
The Department advocates commonality when possible, allowing it to leverage
economies of scale and to make equipment more supportable. Using this concept,
we are also leveraging improvements to existing airborne reconnaissance
systems to reduce risk for new ones. An example of this is the commonality
between the U-2 ASARS Improvement Program and the Global Hawk radar, which
are 80-90 percent common. The DARO has embraced the ASD(C3I)ís Joint
Technical Architecture (JTA) and has produced an Airborne Reconnaissance
Information Technical Architecture (ARITA) which outlines widely accepted
(primarily commercial) standards and will be included as an annex to the
JTA later this year. This guidebook addresses the range of capabilities
across the spectrum of disciplines which comprise our systems - from sensors
to communications to computer processing of data - from traditional imagery
to video to signals intelligence, and beyond. We are currently soliciting
feedback on the ARITA from both industry -- especially the commercial sector
-- and government.
The DARO continues to emphasize interoperability initiatives, as evidenced
by our continued commitment to programs such as CIGSS, JASA and CDL. With
CIGSS, we are updating existing imagery ground stations to ensure interoperability
and common standards. Furthermore, current developments are being designed
to work together. The Tactical Control System (TCS) is being developed
compliant with JTA and ARITA standards, assuring UAV and product interoperability
and utility among multiple operational users. Similarly, the Joint SIGINT
Avionics Family (JSAF), the initial implementation of JASA, is a modular,
scaleable family of sensors which will enable future SIGINT platforms to
work together to accomplish their missions.
The Future Manned / Unmanned Mix
The Department has focused a great deal of attention on the balance
between manned and unmanned platforms, and what the appropriate balance
will be in the future. The DARO is pursuing a balanced mix of manned and
unmanned platforms. Currently the airborne reconnaissance force is predominantly
manned, while potentially high payoff UAVs are under development. Manned
reconnaissance systems continue to account for the lionís share
of the DARP for FY 98. Before the Department will incorporate these developmental
UAVs into the force structure, these new systems will have to demonstrate
military utility in the hands of warfighters. The Predator UAV system is
an example of one that has. The Predator has demonstrated utility after
several successful deployments as part of its Advanced Concept Technology
Demonstration (ACTD), and is transitioning to operational status. In fact,
Predator has accumulated over 5,000 flight hours since contract award in
January 1994. Analyses such as the Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance
Joint Warfighter Capabilities Assessment (ISR JWCA) and the Quadrennial
Defense Review (QDR) will provide further assessments of the value of manned
versus unmanned airborne collection platforms for the 21st century.
We are examining developmental UAVs like Outrider (tactical), DarkStar
(low observable) and the Global Hawk (high altitude endurance) because
they have several appealing features. For example, our tactical UAVs are
smaller and more deployable than traditional manned aircraft, allowing
more control by the lower echelons of real time information sources. Endurance
UAVs will exploit the absence of onboard crews by taking advantage of their
ability to stay on station for more than a day. I believe this endurance
capability will prove valuable in a number of mission applications. As
with any new basic capability, we will find innovative ways to exploit
it to our advantage. Some of these ideas are already being investigated,
such as the use of the UAV to host an airborne communications node. This
concept enables the creation of a relatively low cost, modern communications
network enveloping the battlefield. This could also apply to any localized
geographical problem area where high demand, ready access communications
are required, such as a natural disaster.
Finally, the cost of these systems is also attractive, as they promise
significant life-cycle cost savings. Yet another advantage is that the
loss of a vehicle does not endanger a pilot. To see the importance of this,
compare the reaction to the loss of Scott OíGradyís F-16
and to the loss of a Predator UAV in Bosnia. It bears repeating, though,
that UAVs will need to continue to prove themselves before they are integrated
into the force structure. We will not trade off a proven system for an
unproven one.
SIGINT Modernization
In the Spring of 1996, a series of meetings were held by the Defense
Airborne Reconnaissance Steering Committee on the Joint Airborne SIGINT
Architecture (JASA) and the future of airborne SIGINT. The Services developed
a ìmoderate paceî plan presented at DARSC X, maintaining a
balance between sustainment and modernization of the airborne reconnaissance
SIGINT fleet. The DARSC selected the modular, scaleable Joint SIGINT Avionics
Family (JSAF) as the initial implementation of JASA. This modernization
strategy, which was adopted and endorsed by the DARSC and the JROC, is
based on an incremental approach that phases in affordable capability over
time. The approach prioritizes SIGINT capabilities based on NSA threat
projections. The Department will develop individual platform modernization
plans based on current capabilities and fiscal constraints (i.e., FY98-03
POM). The DARSC decision calls for no transfer of funds between Services,
but requires each Service to provide partial funding in the FY98-03 POM
for JSAF upgrades. We have adopted sequential funding for JSAF systems
to provide an achievable and affordable modernization approach within Service
resource constraints.
It is important for you to recognize why this effort is such a high
priority. The JSAF will provide a cost effective solution to eliminating
the lack of interoperability that is prevalent in current airborne SIGINT
systems due to the stovepiped architecture that we employed in the past.
JSAFís digital infrastructure and standards-based open systems approach
readily leverage advances in commercial technology and standards, provide
a disciplined environment for JSAF development that will foster lower life
cycle costs, mitigate technical risk, and ensure interoperability at all
system levels. In addition, JASA facilitates keeping pace with the ever-changing
threat and explosive communications technology environments through time-phased
additions and upgrades to system capabilities. JSAFís digital infrastructure
is designed to host JASA-compliant commercial and special purpose hardware,
and reusable COTS/GOTS software, in a ìplug and playî approach
that allows realization of required performance improvements through enhancement
rather than replacement of earlier system implementations. Moreover, software
changes made to keep abreast of rapidly changing threats will be readily
distributed throughout the SIGINT fleet. In addition, JSAFís hardware
and software modularity and reconfigurability, and standards driven architecture
will serve to simplify operations, maintenance, and logistics tasks that
have, up to this time, limited the operational flexibility of SIGINT systems
to the warfighter and consumed a high logistics support budget.
In summary, with the JASA/JSAF development, we are embarking on a new
way of doing business. We are implementing streamlined acquisition procedures
to get needed capabilities to the warfighter quickly, and we are leveraging
developments within the commercial sector to give the benefits of technology
to the warfighter sooner. The success of JASA/JSAF depends on the cooperative
efforts of all parties involved - the Services, Agencies, Industry, and
Congress.
Acquisition Reform
Acquisition reform is key to the continuing affordable modernization
of the force in this era of limited financial resources, and the DARO is
involved across a spectrum of these initiatives today. The most obvious
example is our Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrations (ACTDs), specifically
in the area of UAVs. The Predator UAV, in fact, is the first ACTD to be
successfully completed and is transitioning to operational status. The
key to ACTDs can be seen in this example: the warfighter has had the ability
to handle a prototype and identify its utility in operational scenarios.
As we proceed to further production, newer models will be augmented by
necessary P3I upgrades identified by the warfighters. In essence, the warfighters
are determining how to configure the system they operate. This was only
possible because they were able to use the system before it went to production.
Furthermore, we are attempting to lower the cost of ownership. Outsourcing
looks very attractive for certain activities (e.g. maintenance). We are
presently undertaking a study to determine if in fact outsourcing results
in a significant savings compared to organic support. In addition, we have
leveraged our open systems concepts to transition sensor technology from
one program to another, e.g. the U-2 ASARS Improvement Program (AIP) has
helped us reduce risk on the Global Hawk. DARO programs are also leveraging
Service acquisition reform -- the most notable example being that JSAFís
Low Band Subsystem is being procured as one of the Air Forceís ìLightning
Boltî initiatives.
The FY98 Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Program (DARP)
The DARP looks a little different this year than it has in the past.
It has the same systems, but this year, at the request of Congress, weíve
broken it down into six separate program elements to facilitate oversight.
The six program elements are Tactical UAVs, Endurance UAVs, Manned Reconnaissance
Systems, Airborne Reconnaissance Advanced Development, Distributed Common
Ground Systems, and DARP Integration and Support. In addition, weíve
transferred UAV procurement funds out of defense-wide into Service accounts,
though keeping the funds within the DARP. This creates a similar management
structure for mature UAVs as we have for manned reconnaissance platforms
such as the U-2 or RIVET JOINT.
Figure 1: Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Program
The breakout of the DARP is shown in Figure 1. Manned reconnaissance
systems comprise the largest share of the DARP, consisting of $967 million
of the $2.1 billion request. For DARP UAV efforts, in comparison, the Department
is requesting $502 million ($333 million for endurance UAVs and $169 million
for tactical UAV programs). We are continuing our investment in ground
stations with $396 million, and we are devoting $213 million to advanced
development technology efforts. This year, per Congressional request, we
have broken out our DARP Integration and Support funds into a separate
Program Element (they had been embedded in program budgets), and it is
funded at a level of $21 million. Our budget has been constructed to balance
readiness and modernization. Below, I highlight several key steps we will
be taking with our airborne reconnaissance systems.
Manned Reconnaissance
The highlights of our FY98 manned reconnaissance programs include:
- Begin procurement of improved ASARS for U-2
- Continue U-2 re-engining program (Complete in 1QFY99)
- Delivery of RIVET JOINT 15 & 16
- RIVET JOINT re-engining begins (occurs in FY98, uses FY96-7 funds)
- Install Sensor System Improvement Program (SSIP) in six EP-3 aircraft
The DARO exercises oversight over manned systems which address joint
or multi-Service missions. These are programmed within the DARP, though
Service specific systems are included within the airborne reconnaissance
architecture. We are continuing to put considerable effort into sustaining
these systems, as they will continue to provide the bulk of our airborne
reconnaissance force for many years to come.
The fleet of 35 U-2 aircraft is in excellent shape and continues to
be upgraded. The first 22 re-engined U-2s (designated the U-2S model) have
been delivered, and the program is on schedule to be complete 1QFY99. All
U-2 overseas operations now fly the re-engined aircraft. Ongoing sensor
upgrades will also allow the U-2 to continue to keep up with emerging threats
and increase the U-2ís direct support to the warfighter. These efforts
include the Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar System 2 (ASARS 2) Improvement
Program (AIP) and multispectral upgrades to the Senior Year Electro-optical
Reconnaissance System (SYERS). As I indicated earlier, many of these improvements
have a direct, positive impact on the rapid successful fielding of capable
UAV systems.
The purchase of RIVET JOINT aircraft 15 and 16 in FY 1997 with delivery
in FY 1998 will allow more flexible and responsive support. Additionally,
the added aircraft will provide air crews better training continuity and
help reduce our personnel tempo (PERSTEMPO). Last year, Congress provided
additional funds to continue the RIVET JOINT re-engining effort and purchase
four additional engine kits (for a total of six). Although there are no
specific procurement funds requested in this yearís budget request
for additional engines, the Air Force will continue work on non-recurring
engineering development efforts and installation of the engine kits already
purchased.
The Navyís EP-3E fleet is in the final phase of the Conversion-In-Lieu-Of-Procurement
(CILOP) program which converts low-hour P-3C aircraft to the EP-3E ARIES
II configuration. Eleven ARIES II aircraft have been delivered to the fleet
and the remaining one will be delivered in July. The EP-3E is receiving
communications upgrades as part of the Sensor System Improvement Program
(SSIP). SSIP is designed to exploit future threats by enhancing communications
connectivity and joint interoperability. The first SSIP kit has been installed
and is undergoing developmental testing at NAS Patuxent River, MD. The
entire fleet will be SSIP configured by 1999. The EP-3E is the prototype
platform for the JSAF high band testing with the first flight scheduled
for the fall of 1997.
The SR-71 reconnaissance program consists of two SR-71A operational
aircraft and an SR-71B trainer aircraft that is shared with NASA. The SR-71
was reactivated at Congressional direction in FY95 to provide a reconnaissance
capability in a high-threat contingency environment. A ìClip-In-Kitî
(CIK) has been developed to replace the older Operational Deployable Processing
System (ODPS) used to process SR-71 ASARS 1 data. The ODPS was housed in
three 8í x 22í vans. The CIK is approximately podium sized
and has been integrated into the Armyís ETRAC for exercise participation.
The SR-71 is not funded beyond FY97.
Unmanned Reconnaissance
The highlights of our FY98 unmanned reconnaissance programs include:
- Procure three additional Predator systems
- Begin P3I on Predator for integration of de-icing system, voice communications
capability between Predator pilot and air control, and an improved IFF
system.
- Conduct exercises and demonstrations for both the TUAV and HAE ACTDs
- Complete DarkStar dynamic observables testing
- Install UCARS on all nine Pioneer systems
Development of tactical UAVs to support joint warfighters continues
to be the Servicesí top UAV priority. To satisfy this critical need,
the Department approved initiation of a Tactical UAV (TUAV) ACTD to meet
the Joint Services requirements. The TUAV ACTD is progressing, but technical
and hardware problems in the development of the Outrider air vehicle delayed
the first flight originally scheduled for November 1996 to 7 March 1997.
The development of a Tactical Control System (TCS) is well underway.
The TCS is a Department initiative to provide warfighters with an interoperable
and scaleable command, control, communications, and data dissemination
system for the family of Tactical UAVs and a capability to receive and
disseminate data from the High Altitude Endurance UAVs. TCS will satisfy
the critical interoperability requirements of the Joint Services. Recent
TCS participation in the Force XXI exercise successfully demonstrated TCS
capability to receive information from multiple UAVs. The Joint Requirements
Oversight Council endorses a common modular and scaleable ground station
for all tactical UAVs.
The Pioneer UAV continues to provide Fleet support to the US Marine
Corps and the US Navy after ten years of proven success. The Navy Pioneer
systems completed deployments on the USS Shreveport and the USS Austin
in the Mediterranean Sea and the USS Denver in the Western Pacific. In
addition, the Marine Corps deployed to Bosnia to provide dedicated reconnaissance
support to the ground forces. Other activity included deployments to provide
drug interdiction and to support various exercises. The Department has
recently increased programmed Pioneer funding to ensure system readiness
at current levels through FY03.
The Hunter UAV has enjoyed considerable success since returning to flight
in December 1995. Although DoD decided to allow the Hunter contract to
expire after delivery of the Low-Rate Production Systems, Hunter UAVs have
continued to fly supporting Concept of Operations development, exercise
support and payload demonstrations. The Hunter system has accumulated over
2000 flight hours and has participated in several warfighter training events,
including Force XXI exercises at the National Training Center.
The Predator Medium Altitude Endurance UAV has continued to excel, especially
in support of our forces deployed in Bosnia. Based in Taszar, Hungary,
the Predator, now designated the RQ-1A, has been employed to image areas
of interest by warfighters throughout the chain of command. Predatorís
utility has obviated the need for constant patrolling by our forces in
areas of concern, thereby limiting danger to our troops in theater.
Predatorís ACTD ended on June 30, 1996. Because of its proven
record of performance throughout the demonstration period, Predator is
transitioning to a formal acquisition program while being operated by the
USAF 11th Reconnaissance Squadron. A marinization study completed this
year indicates a naval variant of the Predator air vehicle is technically
feasible, yet not fiscally possible at this time due to costs in modifying
both the air vehicle as well as the hosting ship. The capability of Predator
launched from the shore to support naval forces was demonstrated during
an SSN demonstration conducted off the coast of California last year in
support of a SEAL team exercise as well as with an aircraft carrier task
force as demonstrated in December 1995. Additionally, an Echelon Below
Corps exercise was conducted in Bosnia during November where the Predator
was tasked and directed by the US division commander, again providing support
to a tactical commander. Throughout its 5,200+ flight hours history, Predator
has demonstrated its utility at both the theater and tactical levels of
operations and continues to provide outstanding service in support of the
warfighter.
As Predator transitions to a formal acquisition program in FY97, improvements
in the form of in-flight de-icing equipment, an air vehicle-mounted voice
radio capability, and an improved Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) system
will be integrated. Our goal is to provide these increased mission essential
capabilities to our operating forces in 1998.
The High Altitude Endurance (HAE) ACTD consists of two complementary
types of air vehicles, the Global Hawk and the low-observable DarkStar,
and a ground segment that is common and interoperable with both air vehicles.
The goal of this ACTD is to demonstrate an effective solution to a theater
commanderís need for near-real-time reconnaissance of broad areas
(Global Hawk) and high-value, well defended targets (DarkStar), all with
firm cost objectives. We are recovering well from last yearís DarkStar
mishap. We know the causes and are implementing modifications in flight
software and landing gear systems. An independent review team of outside
experts has overseen each course of action. DarkStar flight testing will
resume in late summer. Global Hawk has passed the final design review.
The first air vehicle made its public debut in a roll out ceremony in February.
Global Hawk will begin taxi tests late this summer and flight tests in
the fall. This yearís budget request will provide sufficient funds
to continue air vehicle testing, award an operational user demonstration
agreement and continue fabrication of the ACTD air vehicles. The need for
HAE platforms to fulfill our deep reconnaissance, long endurance reconnaissance
requirement enjoys the continued support of the CINCs. Additionally these
platforms are envisioned by the ongoing C4ISR Mission Assessment and the
ongoing Quadrennial Defense Review to meet collection needs well into the
next century in a complimentary mix with manned aircraft.
Distributed Common Ground Systems
The highlights of our FY98 Distributed Common Ground System programs
include:
- Test Common Imagery Processor (CIP) within Common Imagery Ground/Surface
System (CIGSS) Testbed with U-2, ATARS and HAE
- Begin fielding the CIPs and Imagery Product Libraries within operational
CIGSS systems
- Complete Deployable Ground System (DGS) Mission Intelligence System
(MIS) upgrade and JSIPS Block 3 upgrades
- Field Multispectral Imagery (MSI) exploitation and reporting capability
within DGS 1/2
A major DARO success is the migration toward a common, interoperable,
open systems ground systems architecture known as the Distributed Common
Ground System (DCGS). The DCGS provides a scaleable, modular, and multi-intelligence
system capable of receiving, processing, exploiting, and disseminating
information from both airborne and national sensors. The DCGS architecture
assures our processing, exploitation, and dissemination systems capable
of supporting the information needs of the Joint Warfighter, is integrated
with all reconnaissance assets, and is seamlessly integrated into the Joint
C4I environment. Operation JOINT ENDEAVORís Combined Air Operations
Center (CAOC) is currently being supported by elements of DCGS employed
at Rimini and Vicenza, Italy, with the bulk of the reach back capability
provided from assets located at Beale AFB, CA.
The DARO manages 13 separate types of ground system programs, sustains
21 operational systems, and is in the process of fielding an additional
36 systems, the bulk of which will be integrated on aircraft carriers and
amphibious landing ships. The DARO recently initiated the Common Imagery
Processor (CIP) program, a major interoperability breakthrough which will
allow the receipt and processing of all airborne imagery transmitted via
the Common Data Link (CDL) and outputs imagery compatible with United States
Imagery and Geospatial Systems (USIGS) standards. The DARO fielded the
CIGSS Testbed to serve as a interoperability development tool for use by
Service reconnaissance development programs and it has provided critical
support to the Navy TAC RECCE program. Early next year the CIGSS Testbed
will support the High Altitude Endurance (HAE) UAV flight testing programs.
We are continuing to work in close partnership with the National Imagery
and Mapping Agency (NIMA) to transfer to NIMA responsibility for CIGSS
standards as the DARO continues to champion and support the Intelligence,
Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) needs of the Joint Warfighter.
Insofar as the DCGS is a multi-intelligence architecture, the DARO is
working with the Services and Agencies to migrate existing SIGINT capability
to common baseline consistent with Joint Airborne SIGINT Architecture (JASA)
derived standards for processing, exploitation and dissemination. Both
JASA and CIGSS provide an open systems foundation for interoperability
and information exchange consistent with the Joint Technical Architecture
and Defense Information Infrastructure (DII) Common Operating Environment
(COE). The JASA and CIGSS architectures form the foundation for integrating
ACTD developed technologies such as the Semi-Automated IMINT Processor
(SAIP), High Altitude Endurance (HAE) Common Ground Segment and the Tactical
Control System (TCS) into the DAROís objective ground systems architecture.
Advanced Development
The highlights of our FY98 advanced development programs include:
- Operational deployment of the JASA High Band Prototype
- Completion of Predator UAV video upgrades
- Completion and evaluation of high resolution framing cameras
- First flight of the U-2 SYERS P3I
- Tactical CDL contract award
The Joint SIGINT Avionics Family (JSAF) is an evolutionary acquisition
program which is building the elements necessary to implement the Joint
Airborne SIGINT Architecture (JASA). The JASA Standards Handbook (JSH),
Version 1.0, published in July 1996, defines JASA and the standards to
support JSAF implementation. The JSH lays a foundation for the migration
of current systems and development of DAROís Objective Architecture
of interoperable SIGINT systems. The High Band Prototype (HBP), predecessor
to the High Band Subsystem (HBSS) planned procurement in CY97, is completing
its factory integration phase with government-witnessed factory acceptance
tests scheduled for March 1997. An operational deployment on a Navy EP-3E
is scheduled for mid-1998. The JSAF Low Band Subsystem (LBSS) competitive
procurement was initiated in 1996, with a contract award on January 24,
1997.
The DARO continues to invest in low-to-medium risk technologies to enhance
our airborne reconnaissance capability. The programs initiated and executed
by the DARO provide: enhanced performance of existing reconnaissance platforms;
better target detection and exploitation; and improved geolocation accuracy
for targeting. When feasible, the DARO has leveraged the substantial commercial
and other government investment in advanced sensors, compression, and imagery
display and exploitation. These programs have been prioritized in coordination
with the JROC and multiple technology review groups, including DARPA, NIMA,
NRO, NSA, and NASA.
In a continuing effort to enhance the operational effectiveness of our
existing reconnaissance assets, the DARO has initiated programs to incorporate
new technologies into the platforms. Examples include:
- Predator Video Upgrade: This effort enhances image quality, minimizes
motion-induced artifacts, improves night and cold weather performance,
automatically tracks moving vehicles, and improves data archiving and storage
capabilities. Completion is expected in FY98.
- High Resolution Framing Cameras: the DARO will initiate an infrared
framing camera this year and evaluate its performance in late FY98. We
will also complete the 100 megapixel camera in FY98. This provides the
basis for a family of new airborne reconnaissance cameras for tactical
forces. We are working with NIMA to develop compression and format standards.
- Heavy Fuel Engines: the DARO has initiated a program to develop engines
that can operate with heavy fuels which will allow for greatly simplified
logistics and transportability.
- Intelligent Bandwidth Compression: A DARO/DARPA program seeks to reduce
synthetic aperture radar collection bandwidth requirements by identifying
regions of interest within a scene, downlinking just those portions with
high resolution, and transmitting the rest at lower resolution. Extension
of this work to visible and infrared sensors is being explored.
Target detection and characterization are critical missions for DARO.
With the adversaryís deployment of camouflage, concealment, and
deception (CC&D), these missions become increasingly difficult. Examples
of efforts to counter CC&D include:
- SYERS P3I: This program is designed to provide very high spatial resolution
in six different spectral bands from the U-2 in order to enhance the U-2ís
detection and discrimination of targets. The first flight of the SYERS
P3I will occur in FY98.
- Adaptive Spectral Reconnaissance Program (ASRP): The ASRP is designed
to provide day/night detection of CC&D targets as well as targets in
a highly cluttered background (e.g., an urban environment). The DARO (with
DARPA and CMO) will fly a manned testbed version in FY98 to prove the technique
and a Predator UAV version by FY00.
- Moving Target Exploitation: The DARO, in a joint program with DARPA,
is developing tools and processing techniques to better exploit Moving
Target Indication (MTI) radar which will be deployed on JSTARS, U-2 ASARS,
ARL and future HAE UAVs.
Determining accurate geolocation coordinates for a detected target is
critical for hand-off to precision guided munitions. DARO is investing
in several programs to enhance this capability. Example programs include:
- RF Tags: Under this DARO/DARPA program, two prototype miniature RF
tags were built and successfully tested in FY97. These tags are ìsmartî
transponders and respond with ID and geolocation when interrogated by an
external radar (e.g., JSTARS). In FY98 the program will emphasize lower
cost, lightweight tags that provide minimal impact to radar image fidelity.
- GPS Pseudolites: This concept, developed with DARPA, will provide protection
against GPS jamming by adding payloads to Global Hawk UAVs that enable
rapid acquisition of the broadcast signal outside of jamming range. UAVs
can then be networked to rebroadcast the signal at higher power to battlefield
receivers.
With the deployment of the Predator system to Bosnia, the DARO broke
new ground in warfighter support by helping to put into place a system
to disseminate the real-time video imagery to multiple locations in CONUS
and EUCOM using the Joint Broadcast Service (JBS). The system includes
a very small aperture terminal (VSAT) relay from the Predator ground station
location in Hungary to the JBS injection site at Molesworth, UK. Broadcast
data includes annotated video, as well as audio narration. JBS receive
equipment has been installed at 20 fixed sites and on 6 ships. The JBS
proves the military worth of broadcast systems to simultaneously disseminate
large volumes of data simultaneously to many different sites in many different
countries faster and at less cost to the DoD than multiple point-to-point
circuits.
The DARO is the joint interoperability manager of the Common Data Link
(CDL). CDL is an extremely successful program and has the distinction of
being one of the only truly high speed digital data links in use by the
DoD today, operating at up to speeds of 274 Megabits per second (Mbps)
of data transfer. The DARO has initiated a streamlined acquisition experiment
with DARPA to compete and develop a newer, open system, lower-cost, 10.7
Mbps version of the existing CDL equipment suitable for use by UAVs and
larger manned aircraft. This new equipment, called Tactical CDL or TCDL,
will increase the communications capabilities for Predator and Outrider
UAV fleets at reduced costs to the DoD (order of magnitude less cost than
full CDL capability). A TCDL RFP was released on March 4, 1997. Contract
award is expected this summer.
Summary
As Secretary Cohen testified before the HNSC on February 12, 1997, UAVs
are a critical part of our modernization requirement to expand and ensure
battlespace dominance. Within the Department we have likewise emphasized
broad support for our Integrated Airborne Reconnaissance Strategy.
In fact, several DoD & Service Scientific Advisory Boards, Joint Chiefs
of Staff assessments, Global Wargames (e.g., Army After Next) and special
four-star reviews have all recommended a growing emphasis on a mix of manned
and unmanned airborne reconnaissance systems to solve our emerging information
dominance challenges. In addition, in the Army After Next exercise, high-altitude
look/talk/shoot UAVs had an unexpectedly important role as stand-ins for
some lost space capabilities. In his posture statement, GEN Shalikashvili
said, ìDoD should move swiftly to evaluate the cost-saving tradeoffs
between manned and UAV reconnaissance systems. I remain committed to fielding
a UAV force that is interoperable among all Services as an important enhancement
to warfighting capability.î The distinguishing line between military
sensors and commercial technologies is becoming blurred, with many advanced
sensors and technologies available commercially to potential opponents
who will not have to incur significant development time and cost.
We have fashioned an airborne reconnaissance investment strategy for
FY98 that clearly balances modernization and readiness. The challenge we
face is to ensure our technological advantage is not diminished. We must
downsize without downgrading our airborne reconnaissance capability. This
focus on quality versus quantity will help us preserve the operational
edge that will be required of all our future sensor and dissemination capabilities.
Situational awareness is no longer a luxury, it is a right of passage.
I ask the Subcommittee to give its continued support to DARO and to our
Presidentís budget request.
|